Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with uncontrolled asthma vs. mild asthma: a retrospective comparative analysis

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate perinatal outcomes between the uncontrolled asthma group and the mild asthma group and to reveal the relationship between disease severity and adverse maternal–fetal outcomes in this study.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 180 pregnant women diagnosed with asthma, hospitalized, and delivered at our center between September 1, 2019, and December 1, 2021. We compared two groups: 160 with mild asthma and 20 with uncontrolled asthma. Data encompassed maternal characteristics, obstetrical complications, medication use, emergency department admissions for exacerbations, smoking status, and neonatal outcomes.

Results

In the uncontrolled asthma group, hospitalization rates, use of inhaled short-acting β-agonist (SABA), and systemic corticosteroids were significantly higher compared to the mild asthma group (p < 0.01). Maternal and fetal complications were more prevalent in the uncontrolled group, including asthma exacerbations (45% vs. 1.2%), anemia (10% vs. 4.4%), prematurity (25% vs. 9.6%), and intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) (10% vs. 0.6%). Neonatal outcomes in the uncontrolled group showed higher rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (50% vs. 25%), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (30% vs. 14%), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (5% vs. 0%) compared to the mild asthma group.

Conclusion

Uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy is associated with higher adverse maternal–fetal and neonatal outcomes compared to mild asthma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Murphy VE, Jensen ME, Gibson PG (2022) Exacerbations of asthma following step-up and step-down inhaled corticosteroid and long acting beta agonist therapy in the managing asthma in pregnancy study. J Asthma 59(2):362–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2020.1847934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vieira AC, Pité H, Morais-Almeida M (2022) Asthma and pregnancy in the 2020 decade: still a matter of concern. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 35(25):6498–6504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1916462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu Z, Doust JA, Wilson LF, Dobson AJ, Dharmage SC, Mishra GD (2022) Asthma severity and impact on perinatal outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 129(3):367–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLaughlin K, Jensen M, Foureur M, Murphy VE (2023) Are pregnant women with asthma receiving guideline-recommended antenatal asthma management? A survey of pregnant women receiving usual care in Australia. Women Birth 36(1):108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beau AB, Didier A, Hurault-Delarue C, Montastruc JL, Lacroix I, Damase-Michel C (2017) Prescription of asthma medications before and during pregnancy in France: an observational drug study using the EFEMERIS database. J Asthma 54(3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2016.1214731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCallister JW, Benninger CG, Frey HA, Phillips GS, Mastronarde JG (2011) Pregnancy related treatment disparities of acute asthma exacerbations in the emergency department. Respir Med 105(10):1434–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rejnö G, Lundholm C, Gong T, Larsson K, Saltvedt S, Almqvist C (2014) Asthma during pregnancy in a population-based study–pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes. PLoS ONE 9(8):e104755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddel HK, Bacharier LB, Bateman ED, Brightling CE, Brusselle GG, Buhl R et al (2022) Global initiative for asthma strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes. Eur Respir J 59(1):2102730. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02730-2021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Özyılmaz E, Nas T (2008) Major pulmonary disorders leading intensive care unit admission in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 14(2):139–143

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia (2020) ACOG practice bulletin summary, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 135(6):1492–1495. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204 (2019) Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 133(2):e97–e109. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth (2021) ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol 138(2):e65–e90. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Practice Bulletin No. 175 (2016) Ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 128(6):e241–e256. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grünebaum A, Chervenak J, Pollet SL, Katz A, Chervenak FA (2023) The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 228(6):696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dombrowski MP, Schatz M (2008) ACOG practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 90, February 2008: asthma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 111(2 Pt 1):457–464. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181665ff4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Namazy JA, Schatz M (2018) Management of asthma during pregnancy: optimizing outcomes and minimizing risk. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 39(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schatz M, Dombrowski MP (2009) Clinical practice. Asthma in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 360(18):1862–1869. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0809942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfaller B, Bendien S, Ditisheim A, Eiwegger T (2022) Management of allergic diseases in pregnancy. Allergy 77(3):798–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman AM, DiMango EA, Guglielminotti JR, Huang Y, Wright JD, D’Alton ME et al (2022) Trends in and maternal outcomes of delivery hospitalizations of patients with an asthma diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 139(1):52–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens DR, Rohn MCH, Hinkle SN, Williams AD, Kumar R, Lipsky LM et al (2022) Maternal body composition and gestational weight gain in relation to asthma control during pregnancy. PLoS ONE 17(4):e0267122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy VE, Jensen ME, Gibson PG (2017) Asthma during pregnancy: exacerbations, management, and health outcomes for mother and infant. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 38(2):160–173. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1600906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baribeau V, Beauchesne MF, Rey É, Forget A, Blais L (2016) The use of asthma controller medications during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 138(6):1732–3.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R (2010) Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 376(9741):631–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60279-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris M, Henke C, Hearst M, Campbell K (2020) Future directions: analyzing health disparities related to maternal hypertensive disorders. J Pregnancy 2020:7864816. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7864816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy VE, Namazy JA, Powell H, Schatz M, Chambers C, Attia J et al (2011) A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma. BJOG 118(11):1314–1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Firoozi F, Lemière C, Beauchesne MF, Perreault S, Forget A, Blais L (2012) Impact of maternal asthma on perinatal outcomes: a two-stage sampling cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 27(3):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9654-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cossette B, Forget A, Beauchesne MF, Rey É, Lemière C, Larivée P et al (2013) Impact of maternal use of asthma-controller therapy on perinatal outcomes. Thorax 68(8):724–730. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanacan A, Fadiloglu E, Celebioglu ED, Orhan N, Unal C, Celik T et al (2021) The effect of asthma severity on perinatal outcomes: a tertiary hospital experience. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 225(4):333–340. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1264-8207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to all healthcare staff who work with devotion for improving the health standards to the patients.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ATA: original draft preparation, writing, data collection. AT: analysis, interpretation, reviewing and editing. ÖK: reviewing and editing. DS: conceptualization, methodology, visualization, reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Taner Anuk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anuk, A.T., Tanacan, A., Kara, Ö. et al. Assessing adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with uncontrolled asthma vs. mild asthma: a retrospective comparative analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07347-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07347-4

Keywords

Navigation