Skip to main content
Log in

Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to assess if women living in deprived areas have worse perinatal outcomes than those residing in high-income areas.

Methods

Datasets of PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and stillbirth) in deprived and non-deprive areas.

Results

A total of 46 studies were included. The systematic review of the literature revealed a higher risk for adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, small for gestational age, and stillbirth in deprived areas.

Conclusion

Deprived areas are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. More multifactorial studies are needed to assess the weight of each factor that composes the socioeconomic gradient of health in adverse perinatal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1

  2. Marmot M, Bell R (2012) Fair society, healthy lives. Public Health 126(Suppl 1):S4–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis LJ (2018) An economic perspective on the causal explanations for the socioeconomic inequalities in health. Rev Panam Salud Publica 42:e53. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marmot M (2004) Status syndrome. Significance 1:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barker DJ, Thornburg KL (2013) Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta 34(10):841–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Buklijas T (2010) A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease. J Dev Orig Health Dis 1(1):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174409990171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wadhwa P, Buss C, Entringer S, Swanson J (2009) Developmental origins of health and disease: brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod Med 27(5):358–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan CCH, Stirling PHC, Lam WL (2022) The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on congenital hand differences: a retrospective cohort study. Hand Surg Rehabil 41(2):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2021.12.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Graaf JP, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Inequalities in perinatal and maternal health. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25(2):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835ec9b0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kingdon C, Roberts D, Turner MA, Storey C, Crossland N, Finlayson KW, Downe S (2019) Inequalities and stillbirth in the UK: a meta-narrative review. BMJ Open 9(9):e029672. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029672

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vos AA, Posthumus AG, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA, Denktaş S (2014) Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(8):727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheikh J, Allotey J, Kew T, Fernández-Félix BM, Zamora J, Khalil A, Thangaratinam S, IPPIC Collaborative Network (2022) Effects of race and ethnicity on perinatal outcomes in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 2 198 655 pregnancies. Lancet 400(10368):2049–2062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01191-6. (Erratum in: Lancet. 2023;401(10371):104)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, Webster K, Muller P, Hawdon J, Khalil A, Harris T, van der Meulen J, National Maternity and Perinatal Audit Project Team (2021) Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study. Lancet 398(10314):1905–1912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01595-6. (Erratum in: Lancet. 2021;398(10314):1874)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R (2008) Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 371(9606):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilcox AJ, Cortese M, McConnaughey DR, Moster D, Basso O (2021) The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category. Eur J Epidemiol 36(10):985–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00810-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakano L, Adult-Onset Y (2020) Diseases in low birth weight infants: association with adipose tissue maldevelopment. J Atheroscler Thromb 27(5):397–405. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Management of Stillbirth (2020) Obstetric care consensus No, 10. Obstet Gynecol 135(3):e110–e132. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003719. (Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(5):1030)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyerlein A, Lack N, Maier W (2020) Associations of area-level deprivation with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Bavaria, Germany: results from a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 15(7):e0236020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. de Graaf JP, Ravelli AC, de Haan MA, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Living in deprived urban districts increases perinatal health inequalities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26(5):473–481. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.735722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu N, Wen SW, Katherine W, Bottomley J, Yang Q, Walker MC (2010) Neighbourhood family income and adverse birth outcomes among singleton deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(11):1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34711-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Timmermans S, Bonsel GJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Mackenbach JP, Steyerberg EW, Raat H, Verbrugh HA, Tiemeier HW, Hofman A, Birnie E, Looman CW, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA (2011) Individual accumulation of heterogeneous risks explains perinatal inequalities within deprived neighbourhoods. Eur J Epidemiol 26(2):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9542-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonthier C, Estellat C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Blondel B, Alfaiate T, Schmitz T, Oury JF, Mandelbrot L, Luton D, Ravaud P, Azria E (2017) Association between maternal social deprivation and prenatal care utilization: the PreCARE cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1310-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lelong A, Jiroff L, Blanquet M, Mourgues C, Leymarie MC, Gerbaud L, Lémery D, Vendittelli F (2015) Is individual social deprivation associated with adverse perinatal outcomes? Results of a French multicentre cross-sectional survey. J Prev Med Hyg 56(2):E95–E101

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hesselman S, Wikström AK, Skalkidou A, Sundström-Poromaa I, Wikman A (2019) Neighborhood deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes in Sweden: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(8):1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Field DJ (2009) Socioeconomic inequalities in survival and provision of neonatal care: population based study of very preterm infants. BMJ 339:b4702. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4702. (Erratum in: BMJ. 2009;339:b5196)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Janevic T, Stein CR, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Mason SM, Herring AH (2010) Neighborhood deprivation and adverse birth outcomes among diverse ethnic groups. Ann Epidemiol 20(6):445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Klumper J, Ravelli ACJ, Roos C, Abu-Hanna A, Oudijk MA (2022) Deprived neighborhoods and spontaneous preterm birth: a national cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 274:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dassios T, Refaey M, Kametas N, Bhat R, Greenough A (2018) Adverse neonatal outcomes and house prices in London. J Perinat Med 47(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertens LCM, Burgos Ochoa L, Van Ourti T, Steegers EAP, Been JV (2020) Persisting inequalities in birth outcomes related to neighbourhood deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health 74(3):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smeeton NC, Rona RJ, Dobson P, Cochrane R, Wolfe C (2004) Assessing the determinants of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths using routinely collected data in an inner city area. BMC Med 2:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-2-27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo ZC, Kierans WJ, Wilkins R, Liston RM, Mohamed J, Kramer MS, British Columbia Vital Statistics Agency (2004) Disparities in birth outcomes by neighborhood income: temporal trends in rural and urban areas, British Columbia. Epidemiology 15(6):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000142149.34095.88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Janghorbani M, Stenhouse E, Millward A, Jones RB (2006) Neighborhood deprivation and preterm birth in Plymouth. UK J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500363428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia-Subirats I, Pérez G, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Ruiz-Muñoz D, Salvador J (2012) Neighborhood inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes in an urban setting in Spain: a multilevel approach. J Urban Health 89(3):447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9648-4. (Erratum in: J Urban Health. 2012;89(5):872. Muñoz, Dolores Ruiz [corrected to Ruiz-Muñoz, Dolores])

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Agyemang C, Vrijkotte TG, Droomers M, van der Wal MF, Bonsel GJ, Stronks K (2009) The effect of neighbourhood income and deprivation on pregnancy outcomes in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 63(9):755–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.080408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spencer N, Bambang S, Logan S, Gill L (1999) Socioeconomic status and birth weight: comparison of an area-based measure with the Registrar General’s social class. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:495–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dibben C, Sigala M, Macfarlane A (2006) Area deprivation, individual factors and low birth weight in England: is there evidence of an “area effect”? J Epidemiol Community Health 60(12):1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.042853

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Collingwood Bakeo A, Clarke L (2006) Risk factors for low birthweight based on birth registration and census information, England and Wales, 1981–2000. Health Stat Q Summer(30):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Johansson SE, Li X, Winkleby M (2011) Mothers, places and small for gestational age births: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child 96(4):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.180042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rajmil L, Taylor-Robinson D, Gunnlaugsson G, Hjern A, Spencer N (2018) Trends in social determinants of child health and perinatal outcomes in European countries 2005–2015 by level of austerity imposed by governments: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of routinely available data. BMJ Open 8(10):e022932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Minion SC, Krans EE, Brooks MM, Mendez DD, Haggerty CL (2022) Association of driving distance to maternity hospitals and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 140(5):812–819. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dawson P, Auvray B, Jaye C, Gauld R, Hay-Smith J (2022) Social determinants and inequitable maternal and perinatal outcomes in Aotearoa New Zealand. Womens Health (Lond) 18:17455065221075912. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455065221075913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown H, Jesurasa A, Bambra C, Rankin J, McNaughton A, Heslehurst N (2021) Assessing the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and area-level deprivation in Wales 2014–2019: a national population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 11(11):e052330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Oxford Languages dictionary. https://languages.oup.com/

  45. Abel GA, Barclay ME, Payne RA (2016) Adjusted indices of multiple deprivation to enable comparisons within and between constituent countries of the UK including an illustration using mortality rates. BMJ Open 6(11):e012750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012750

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Labbe E, Blanquet M, Gerbaud L, Poirier G, Sass C, Vendittelli F, Moulin JJ (2015) A new reliable index to measure individual deprivation: the EPICES score. Eur J Public Health 25(4):604–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 30 Oct 2020

  48. Bonet M, Smith LK, Pilkington H, Draper ES, Zeitlin J (2013) Neighbourhood deprivation and very preterm birth in an English and French cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Gray R, Bonellie SR, Chalmers J, Greer I, Jarvis S, Williams C (2008) Social inequalities in preterm birth in Scotland 1980–2003: findings from an area-based measure of deprivation. BJOG 115(1):82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01582.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Taylor-Robinson D, Agarwal U, Diggle PJ, Platt MJ, Yoxall B, Alfirevic Z (2011) Quantifying the impact of deprivation on preterm births: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Beard JR, Lincoln D, Donoghue D, Taylor D, Summerhayes R, Dunn TM, Earnest A, Morgan G (2009) Socioeconomic and maternal determinants of small-for-gestational age births: patterns of increasing disparity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(5):575–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340902818170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Delpisheh A, Kelly Y, Rizwan S, Brabin BJ (2006) Socio-economic status, smoking during pregnancy and birth outcomes: an analysis of cross-sectional community studies in Liverpool (1993–2001). J Child Health Care 10(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493506062553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Henrotin JB, Vaissière M, Etaix M, Dziurla M, Radauceanu A, Malard S, Lafon D (2017) Deprivation, occupational hazards and perinatal outcomes in pregnant workers. Occup Med (Lond) 67(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Barry Y, Le Strat Y, Azria E, Gorza M, Pilkington H, Vandentorren S, Gallay A, Regnault N (2022) Ability of municipality-level deprivation indices to capture social inequalities in perinatal health in France: a nationwide study using preterm birth and small for gestational age to illustrate their relevance. BMC Public Health 22(1):919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13246-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Best KE, Seaton SE, Draper ES, Field DJ, Kurinczuk JJ, Manktelow BN, Smith LK (2019) Assessing the deprivation gap in stillbirths and neonatal deaths by cause of death: a national population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 104(6):F624–F630. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Luque-Fernández MÁ, Lone NI, Gutiérrez-Garitano I, Bueno-Cavanillas A (2012) Stillbirth risk by maternal socio-economic status and country of origin: a population-based observational study in Spain, 2007–08. Eur J Public Health 22(4):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bambang S, Spencer NJ, Logan S, Gill L (2000) Cause-specific perinatal death rates, birth weight and deprivation in the West Midlands, 1991–93. Child Care Health Dev 26(1):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00152.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. de Graaf JP, Ravelli AC, Wildschut HI, Denktaş S, Voorham AJ, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA (2008) Perinatale uitkomsten in de vier grote steden en de prachtwijken in Nederland [Perinatal outcomes in the four largest cities and in deprived neighbourhoods in The Netherlands]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 152(50):2734–2740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Manning D, Brewster B, Bundred P (2005) Social deprivation and admission for neonatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90(4):F337–F338. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.071530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Domínguez-Berjón MF, Pérez G, Gotsens M, Gènova R, Martín U, Ruiz-Ramos M, IMCRISES Project Working Group (2022) Socioeconomic inequalities in small-for-gestational-age births before and during the economic crisis: an ecologic study of trends in 13 Spanish cities. Int J Health Serv 52(1):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420923532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. de Andrade L, Kozhumam AS, Rocha TAH, de Almeida DG, da Silva NC, de Souza Queiroz RC, Massago M, Rent S, Facchini LA, da Silva AAM, Staton CA, Vissoci JRN, Thomaz EBAF (2022) Impact of socioeconomic factors and health determinants on preterm birth in Brazil: a register-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22(1):872. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05201-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bertin M, Viel JF, Monfort C, Cordier S, Chevrier C (2015) Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes in urban and rural contexts: a French mother–child cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 29(5):426–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Poeran J, Maas AF, Birnie E, Denktas S, Steegers EA, Bonsel GJ (2013) Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population. Soc Sci Med 83:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Urquia ML, Frank JW, Moineddin R, Glazier RH (2011) Does time since immigration modify neighborhood deprivation gradients in preterm birth? A multilevel analysis. J Urban Health 88(5):959–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9569-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Urquia ML, Frank JW, Glazier RH, Moineddin R (2007) Birth outcomes by neighbourhood income and recent immigration in Toronto. Health Rep 18(4):21–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Arechvo A, Nikolaidi DA, Gil MM, Rolle V, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH (2023) Incidence of stillbirth: effect of deprivation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 61(2):198–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Poeran J, Denktas S, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EA (2011) Urban perinatal health inequalities. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24(4):643–646. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.511341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Marmot M (2020) Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. BMJ 368:m693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Socedad Española de Fertilidad. Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020 y 2021—Informes estadísticos de Técnicas de Reproducción asistida 2020 y 2021. https://www.registrosef.com/public/docs/sef2020_IAFIV.pdf

  70. Instituto Nacional de Estadística Español. Estadística de nacimientos. Movimiento natural de la población. Resultados detallados nacimientos en 2020. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177007&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573002

  71. Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Committee Opinion No. 671. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e61–8

  72. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A (2012) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 18:485–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schieve LA, Cohen B, Nannini A, Ferre C, Reynolds MA, Zhang Z et al (2007) A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J 11:517–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Qin JB, Sheng XQ, Wu D, Gao SY, You YP, Yang TB et al (2017) Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:285–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 328:261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103:551–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A, Knowledge Synthesis Group (2009) Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146:138–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S (2016) Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 105(73–85):e1-6

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kawwass JF, Badell ML (2018) Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol 132(3):763–772. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sharma RS, Saxena R, Singh R (2018) Infertility & assisted reproduction: a historical & modern scientific perspective. Indian J Med Res 148(Suppl):S10–S14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_636_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Cubbin C, Marchi K, Lin M, Bell T, Marshall H, Miller C, Braveman P (2008) Is neighborhood deprivation independently associated with maternal and infant health? Evidence from Florida and Washington. Matern Child Health J 12(1):61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0225-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AMV performed the work’s conceptualization. AMV and BNA carried out the methodology and study design. AMV supervised the research work. AMV and BNA wrote the original draft. MNT and JMR performed valuable improvements in the original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia Martínez-Varea.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this review study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novillo-Del-Álamo, B., Martínez-Varea, A., Nieto-Tous, M. et al. Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309, 1205–1218 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07300-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07300-5

Keywords

Navigation