Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Caesarean scar pregnancy: is there a light in the end of the tunnel?

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To summarize and present a single tertiary center’s 25 years of experience managing patients with caesarean scar pregnancies and their long-term reproductive and obstetric outcomes.

Methods

A 25-year retrospective study included women diagnosed with CSP from 1996 to 2020 in one tertiary center. Data were retrieved from the medical records and through a telephone interview. Diagnosis was made by sonography and color Doppler. Treatments included methotrexate, suction curettage, hysteroscopy, embolization and wedge resection by laparoscopy or laparotomy as a function of the clinical manifestations, the physicians’ decisions, patient counseling, and parental requests.

Results

Analysis of the records recovered 60 cases of CSP (two of whom were recurrent). All patients had complete resolution with no indication for hysterectomy. Thirty-five patients had a long-term follow-up, of whom 24 (68.6%) attempted to conceive again and 22 (91.6%) succeeded. There were 17/22 (77.3%) patients with at least one live birth, 3/22 (13.6%) spontaneous miscarriages and 2/22 (9%) recurrent CSP. The obstetric complications included abnormal placentation 5/19 (26.3%), premature rupture of membranes 2/19 (10.5%), preterm delivery 4/19 (21%) and abnormality of the uterine scar 2/19 (10.5%). There was one case of neonatal death due to complications of prematurity 1/19 (5.2%).

Conclusion

CSP treatment focusing on reducing morbidity and preserving fertility has encouraging long-term reproductive and obstetric outcomes. In subsequent pregnancies, we recommend performing an early first trimester vaginal scan to map the location of the new pregnancy, followed by close monitoring given the obstetric complications mentioned above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Additional data are available by the corresponding author upon a reasonable request and subjected to the ethical standards and patients confidentiality.

References

  1. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendelovic S, Schnider D, Herman A (2004) Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update 10:515–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maymon R, Svirsky R, Smorgick N et al (2011) Fertility performance and obstetric outcomes among women with previous caesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 30:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ (2003) First trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:220–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M (2006) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol 107:1373–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seow KM, Huang KW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL (2004) Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harb HM, Knight M, Bottomley C et al (2018) Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. BJOG 125:1663–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequence of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:14–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, Ramos J, Berg R, Kovacs S (2015) Cesarean scar pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 34:601–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G et al (2014) Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:383–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herman A, Weinraub Z, Avrech O, Maymon R, Ron-El R, Bukovsky Y (1995) Follow-up and outcome isthmic pregnancy located in previous caesarean section scar. Br J Obstet Gynecol 102:839–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Timor-Tritsch IE (2021) Cesarean scar pregnancy: a therapeutic dilemma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57:32–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petersen KB, Hoffman E, Larsen CR, Nielsen HS (2016) Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril 105:958–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glenn TL, Bembry J, Findley AD et al (2018) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: current management strategies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 73:293–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin M, Huifang W, Xiaoyun W (2022) Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306:769–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiaofeng X, Dongdong L, Lan Y, Xiujuan J, Xiangyi K, Dezhu C, Tong R, Huaijun Z (2021) Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8-year experience at a single institution. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303:1223–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cali G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM et al (2018) Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:169–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadeghi H, Rutherford T, Rackow BW et al (2010) cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: case series and review of the literature. AM J Perinatol 27:111–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J (2017) Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:915–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao L, Huang Z, Zhang X, Zhou N, Huang X, Wang X (2016) Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy—a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 200:102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagi BJ, Helmy S, Ofili-Yebovi D, Yazbek J, Sawyer E, Jurkovic D (2007) Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Hum Reprod 22:2012–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang L, Lingjia L, Wenxian W, Jin S, Xinmei Z, Xiufeng H (2018) Reproductive study of patients with cesarean scar pregnancies treated by uterine artery chemoembolization and curettage. Int J Gynecol Obstet 143:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morlando M, Buca D, Timor-Tritsch I, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Monteagudo A, Khalil A, Cennamo C, La Manna V, Liberati M, D’Amico A, Nappi L, Colacurci N, D’Antonio F (2020) Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 99(10):1278–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu J, Ye J, OuYang Z, Wan Z, Zhang Q, Zhong B, Wei S (2021) Outcomes of reproduction following cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 262:80–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen L, Xiao S, Zhu X, He S, Xue M (2018) Analysis of the reproductive outcome of patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(5):883–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S et al (2004) Ectopic pregnancies in cesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical center. Hum Reprod 19:278–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fylstra DL, Pound-Chang T, Miller MG, Cooper A, Miller KM (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean delivery scar: a case report. AM J Obstet Gynecol 187:302–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J (1997) An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarean section scar. Fertil Steril 67:398–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai L, Hawang JL (2004) A cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfield P (2000) Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:592–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Q, Ma H, He L, Bian C, Zhao X (2015) Risk factors for intra-operative hemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 195:141–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS: manuscript writing; RM: manuscript editing; MG–K: data collection; NK: data collection; MP-Z: data collection; NS: manuscript editing; ZV: manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zvi Vaknin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (0281-16-ASF).

Informed consent

Since this is a retrospective study, no informed consent was needed. Patients who were interviewed by the phone gave their informed consent verbally at the beginning of the survey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiber, Y., Maymon, R., Gal-Kochav, M. et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: is there a light in the end of the tunnel?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 1057–1064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06888-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06888-4

Keywords

Navigation