Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delayed interval delivery in multiple gestations: the Munich experience

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate delayed interval deliveries in multiple gestations in regard of delayed interval and neonatal survival and to provide a protocol.

Methods

Data of multiple pregnancies with delayed interval delivery at a tertiary maternity unit between 2002 and 2017 were collected. Contraindications for evaluation of a delay of the delivery of the remaining child were: severe maternal blood loss, poor maternal general condition, preeclampsia, placental abruption, fetal distress, serious congenital malformations of the remaining child, chorioamnionitis, and premature rupture of membranes of the second fetus. A total of 14 cases was included in this retrospective monocentric analysis.

Results

The cohort comprised nine twin and five triplet pregnancies. Mean gestational age at delivery of the first fetus was 21 + 6 and 26 + 0 of the retained fetus, respectively. The earliest delivery of the first fetus was at 15 + 2 weeks. The mean interval of the delay was 29.3 days (2–82 days). Mortality of the first fetuses was 53.3%, while it was 17.6% for the retained fetuses. Maternal outcome was good in general: two cases of major blood loss occurred with the necessity of a blood transfusion.

Conclusion

Delayed interval delivery is a reasonable approach in cases of an imminent preterm birth in multiple gestations which can be performed with a good fetal outcome and limited maternal risks. The situation when this procedure may be an option always comes unexpected. Therefore, the team of perinatologists should keep it in mind as one potential therapeutic approach. In addition, a standard protocol for the procedure should be established in the perinatal center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pison G, D’Addato AV (2006) Frequency of twin births in developed countries. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(2):250–259. https://doi.org/10.1375/183242706776382338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poeschmann PP, van Oppen CA, Bruinse HW (1992) Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancies: report of three cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 47(3):139–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakala EP, Branson BC (1987) Prolonged delivery-abortion interval in twin and triplet pregnancies. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 32(1):79–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziegler WF, Welgoss J (1996) Delayed delivery of a triplet pregnancy without surgical intervention: a case report. Am J Perinatol 13(3):191–193. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arabin B, van Eyck J (2009) Delayed-interval delivery in twin and triplet pregnancies: 17 years of experience in 1 perinatal center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2):154.e1–154.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farkouh LJ, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, Lindsay LG, Porreco RP (2000) Delayed-interval delivery: extended series from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(6):1499–1503. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.107319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Porreco RP, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, Lindsay LG (1998) Delayed-interval delivery in multifetal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(1 Pt 1):20–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roman AS, Fishman S, Fox N, Klauser C, Saltzman D, Rebarber A (2011) Maternal and neonatal outcomes after delayed-interval delivery of multifetal pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 28(2):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Doorn HC, van Wezel-Meijler G, van Geijn HP, Dekker GA (1999) Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancies. Is optimism justified? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(8):710–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feys S, Jacquemyn Y (2016) Delayed-interval delivery can save the second twin: evidence from a systematic review. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 8(4):223–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fayad S, Bongain A, Holhfeld P, Janky E, Durand-Reville M, Ejnes L, Schaaps JP, Gillet JY (2003) Delayed delivery of second twin: a multicentre study of 35 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 109(1):16–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Hamilton B, Martin J, Trumble A (2004) Delayed interval delivery and infant survival: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(2):470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berghella V, Davis GH, Macones GA, Wapner RJ (1996) Prolongation of pregnancy and survival of remaining fetuses after operative evacuation of one triplet at 18 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 88(4 Pt 2):665–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagy S, Ducz R (2002) Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. Orv Hetil 143(38):2193–2198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinhard J, Reichenbach L, Ernst T, Reitter A, Antwerpen I, Herrmann E, Schlosser R, Louwen F (2012) Delayed interval delivery in twin and triplet pregnancies: 6 years of experience in one perinatal center. J Perinat Med 40(5):551–555. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2011-0267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosbergen M, Vogt HP, Baerts W, van Eyck J, Arabin B, van Nimwegen-Hamberg JM, van Lingen RA (2005) Long-term and short-term outcome after delayed-interval delivery in multi-fetal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 122(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Omsjo IH, Alsos R (1984) Twin pregnancy: report of a case with 35 days between deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 17(6):413–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M Etheridge, M.A. Interpreting and Translating, for professional language editing (unsalaried). This manuscript is part of the dissertation of D. Fischer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TK: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing and editing, DF: data collection and data analysis, IR: manuscript editing, MF: manuscript editing, AH: manuscript writing and editing, TMK: data collection and manuscript writing/editing, CD: project development, data collection, and data analysis, MD: data collection and data analysis, KF: project development and manuscript editing, SM: manuscript editing, UH: project development and data collection, CH: data collection, manuscript writing and editing, and project development.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kolben.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S Mahner has received research support, advisory board fees, honoraria, and travel support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jenapharm, GSK, JanssenCilag, Medac, MSD, Pharmamar, Roche, Tesaro, and Teva. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolben, T., Fischer, D., Ruehl, I. et al. Delayed interval delivery in multiple gestations: the Munich experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299, 339–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4959-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4959-2

Keywords

Navigation