Abstract
Purpose
The impact of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the purpose of diminishing the effect of uterine fibroids on fertility is unclear. We have investigated the reported rates of pregnancy and miscarriage after treatment of uterine fibroids with UAE.
Materials and methods
We searched for relevant information in PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials, comparative before–after trials, cohort studies, case–control studies and case series where UAE treatment of premenopausal women was performed for uterine fibroids with and where a control intervention was included. The PRISMA guideline was used to do a systematic review using the main outcomes pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool or by ROBINS-I. The quality of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach.
Results
We included 17 studies (989 patients): 1 RCT, 2 cohort studies, and 14 case series. Pregnancy rates after UAE were 50% in the RCT and 51 and 69% in the cohort studies. Among the case series median pregnancy rate was 29%. Miscarriage rates were 64% in the RCT. Miscarriage rates at 56 and 34% were found in the cohort studies after UAE. The median miscarriage rate was 25% in the case series.
Conclusion
Pregnancy rate was found to be lower and miscarriage rate higher after UAE than after myomectomy. However, we found very low quality of evidence regarding the assessed outcomes and the reported proportions are uncertain. There is a need for improved prospective randomized studies to improve the evidence base.
Systematic review registration number: CRD42016036661.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird DD et al (2003) High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):100–107
Ravina JH et al (2000) Pregnancy after embolization of uterine myoma: report of 12 cases. Fertil Steril 73(6):1241–1243
Stewart EA (2001) Uterine fibroids. Lancet 357(9252):293–298
Gupta JK et al (2015) Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:Cd005073
Spies JB et al (2007) Long-term outcome from uterine fibroid embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: results of a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(2):203–207
Guidance IP (2010) Uterine artery embolisation for fibroids
RCOG (2013) Clinical recommendations on the use of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) in the management of fibroids
Andersen JEA (2014) DSOG guideline
Gupta JK et al (2014) Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:Cd005073
Meta-analyses, T.R.o.S.R.a., PRISMA-statement. http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Green JPHAS (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, New York
IR, The risk of bias in non-randomized studies- of interventions (ROBINS I) assessment tool. https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/home
Guyatt G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):395–400
Balshem H et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):401–406
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):407–415
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1277–1282
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1283–1293
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1294–1302
Guyatt GH et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64(12):1303–1310
Mara M et al (2008) Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(1):73–85
Holub Z et al (2008) Pregnancy outcomes after uterine artery occlusion: prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril 90(5):1886–1891
Mara M et al (2012) Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion: the outcomes of a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35(5):1041–1052
Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG 109(11):1262–1272
McLucas B et al (2001) Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 74(1):1–7
Pron G et al (2005) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: the ontario multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol 105(1):67–76
Pinto Pabon I et al (2008) Pregnancy after uterine fibroid embolization: follow-up of 100 patients embolized using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. Fertil Steril 90(6):2356–2360
Firouznia K et al (2009) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 15 pregnancies. Am J Roentgenol 192(6):1588–1592
Redecha M Jr et al (2013) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for the treatment of myomas: a case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(1):71–76
Torre A et al (2014) Uterine artery embolization for severe symptomatic fibroids: effects on fertility and symptoms. Hum Reprod 29(3):490–501
Carpenter TT, Walker WJ (2005) Pregnancy following uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: a series of 26 completed pregnancies. BJOG 112(3):321–325
Walker WJ, McDowell SJ (2006) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: a series of 56 completed pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(5):1266–1271
Dutton S et al (2007) A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study comparing hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (HOPEFUL study): main results on medium-term safety and efficacy. BJOG 114(11):1340–1351
Bonduki CE et al (2011) Pregnancy after uterine arterial embolization. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66(5):807–810
Pisco JM et al (2011) Pregnancy after uterine fibroid embolization. Fertil Steril 95(3):1121.e5–1121.e8
McLucas B, Voorhees IWD (2014) Results of UAE in women under 40 years of age. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23(3):179–183
Ravina JH et al (1995) Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 346(8976):671–672
Tropeano G et al (2003) Permanent amenorrhea associated with endometrial atrophy after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 79(1):132–135
Mara M et al (2007) Hysteroscopy after uterine fibroid embolization in women of fertile age. J Obst Gynaecol Res 33(3):316–324
Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL (2009) Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 91(4):1215–1223
Homer H, Saridogan E (2010) Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 94(1):324–330
Mohan PP, Hamblin MH, Vogelzang RL (2013) Uterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(7):925–930
Mara M, Kubinova K (2014) Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons. Int J Womens Health 6:623–629
McLucas B, Voorhees WD 3rd, Elliott S (2016) Fertility after uterine artery embolization: a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25(1):1–7
Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD (2002) Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 17(5):1399–1403
Opinion C (2014) Female age-related fertility decline. Fertil Steril 101(3):633–634
Nybo Andersen AM et al (2000) Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 320(7251):1708–1712
Acknowledgements
This review received an un-restricted Grant from The University of Southern Denmark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KK: Data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, and writing original draft. AH: Methodology, supervision, writing review, and editing. MK: Data curation, formal analysis, writing review, and editing. OM: Supervision, writing review, and editing. PH: Supervision, writing review, and editing. PR: Formal analysis, supervision, writing review, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karlsen, K., Hrobjartsson, A., Korsholm, M. et al. Fertility after uterine artery embolization of fibroids: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297, 13–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4566-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4566-7