Abstract
Purpose
To assess whether the use of direct colposcopic vision during excision therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) has an impact on the risk of treatment failure.
Methods
Data from 285 patients who had had excision therapy with proven CIN at specimen histological analysis were reviewed. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of post-treatment failure defined by the histological diagnosis of CIN 2–3 during follow-up. Data were analysed according to the use of colposcopy at the time of initial therapy of CIN.
Results
The use of direct colposcopic vision (DCV) resulted in a significant reduction in the mean height (p = 0.008) and diameter (p < 0.001) of the excised specimen. Patients’ median follow-up was 28.4 (±1.3) months. A total of 43 (15.2 %) patients were diagnosed with treatment failure. Compared to excisions performed without any use of colposcopy, DCV was not found to have any significant impact on the risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.58; 95 % CI 0.16–2.13, p = 0.412), neither when compared to excisions performed immediately after colposcopy (HR: 0.91; 95 % CI 0.47–1.79; p = 0.794). The only factors found to have a significant impact on the risk of treatment failure was the identification of clear margins (HR: 0.36; 95 %CI 0.19–0.69; p = 0.002) and the diameter of the surgical specimen (HR: 0.94; 95 %CI 0.89–0.99; p = 0.040).
Conclusions
Although the use of DCV during excision therapy of CIN was associated with a significant reduction in the dimensions of the excised cervical specimen, it did not result in a significant change in the risk of treatment failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carcopino X, Mergui JL, Prendiville W, Taranger-Charpin C, Boubli L (2011) Traitement des néoplasies intra-épithéliales du col de l’utérus: laser, cryothérapie, conisation, résection à l’anse. Techniques chirurgicales-Gynécologie. doi:10.1016/S2211-0666(11)46163-6
Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489–498
Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO (2013) Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub3
Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284
Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284
Carcopino X, Maycock JA, Mancini J, Jeffers M, Farrar K, Martin M, Khalid S, Prendiville W (2013) Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study. BJOG 120:472–473
Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK (2009) Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114:1232–1238
Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM, Founta C, Athanasiou A, Bennett P, Paraskevadis E (2015) Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 128:141–147
Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, Soutter WP (2007) Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:985–993
Ghaem-Maghami S, De-Silva D, Tipples M, Lam S, Perryman K, Soutter W (2011) Determinants of success in treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 118:679–684
Dobbs SP, Asmussen T, Hollingworth Nunns D, Brown LJ, Ireland LJ (2000) Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rate? A six-year cytological follow-up. Br J Obstet Gynecol 107:1298–1301
Woo YL, Badley C, Jackson E, Crawford R (2011) Long-term cytological and histological outcomes in women managed with loop excision treatment under local anaesthetic for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cytopathology 22:334–339
Jordan J, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Schenck U, Baldauf JJ, Da Silva D, Anttila A, Nieminen P, Prendiville W (2009) European guidelines for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 2. Cytopathology 20:5–16
Grisot C, Mancini J, Giusiano S, Houvenaeghel G, Agostini A, d’Ercole C, Boubli L, Prendiville W, Carcopino X (2012) How to optimize excision procedures for the treatment of CIN? The role of colposcopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1383–1390
Carcopino X, Mancini J, Charpin C, Grisot C, Maycock JA, Houvenaeghel G, Agostini A, Boubli L, Prendiville W (2013) Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results of joint cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:1087–1094
Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, Perrotta M, Prendiville W, Russell P, Sideri M, Strander B, Tatti S, Torne A, Walker P (2012) 2011 colposcopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120:166–172
Mergui JL, Carcopino X, Marchetta J, Gondry J, Boubli L (2010) Modern management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a proposal for a risk assessment method in colposcopic decision-making. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 39:520–528
Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, Wiener H, Herbert A, von Karsa L (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 21:448–458
Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, Louwers JA, Nobbenhuis MA, Bais AG, Hogewoning CJ, Zaal A, Verheijen RH, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ (2011) Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol 12:441–450
Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E (1998) A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 92:737–744
Strander B, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Milsom I, Sparen P (2007) Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study. BMJ 335:1077–1082
Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, Monaghan JM, Duncan ID, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC (1997) Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 349:978–980
Rebolj M, Helmerhorst T, Habbema D, Looman C, Boer R, van Rosmalen J, van Ballegooijen M (2012) Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6855
Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snidjers PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N (1999) Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 189:12–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heineman, M., Mancini, J., Villeret, J. et al. Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 825–831 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3887-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3887-7