Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether the use of direct colposcopic vision during excision therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) has an impact on the risk of treatment failure.

Methods

Data from 285 patients who had had excision therapy with proven CIN at specimen histological analysis were reviewed. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of post-treatment failure defined by the histological diagnosis of CIN 2–3 during follow-up. Data were analysed according to the use of colposcopy at the time of initial therapy of CIN.

Results

The use of direct colposcopic vision (DCV) resulted in a significant reduction in the mean height (p = 0.008) and diameter (p < 0.001) of the excised specimen. Patients’ median follow-up was 28.4 (±1.3) months. A total of 43 (15.2 %) patients were diagnosed with treatment failure. Compared to excisions performed without any use of colposcopy, DCV was not found to have any significant impact on the risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.58; 95 % CI 0.16–2.13, p = 0.412), neither when compared to excisions performed immediately after colposcopy (HR: 0.91; 95 % CI 0.47–1.79; p = 0.794). The only factors found to have a significant impact on the risk of treatment failure was the identification of clear margins (HR: 0.36; 95 %CI 0.19–0.69; p = 0.002) and the diameter of the surgical specimen (HR: 0.94; 95 %CI 0.89–0.99; p = 0.040).

Conclusions

Although the use of DCV during excision therapy of CIN was associated with a significant reduction in the dimensions of the excised cervical specimen, it did not result in a significant change in the risk of treatment failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carcopino X, Mergui JL, Prendiville W, Taranger-Charpin C, Boubli L (2011) Traitement des néoplasies intra-épithéliales du col de l’utérus: laser, cryothérapie, conisation, résection à l’anse. Techniques chirurgicales-Gynécologie. doi:10.1016/S2211-0666(11)46163-6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367:489–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO (2013) Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carcopino X, Maycock JA, Mancini J, Jeffers M, Farrar K, Martin M, Khalid S, Prendiville W (2013) Image assessment of cervical dimensions after LLETZ: a prospective observational study. BJOG 120:472–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK (2009) Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114:1232–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM, Founta C, Athanasiou A, Bennett P, Paraskevadis E (2015) Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 128:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, Soutter WP (2007) Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:985–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaem-Maghami S, De-Silva D, Tipples M, Lam S, Perryman K, Soutter W (2011) Determinants of success in treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. BJOG 118:679–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobbs SP, Asmussen T, Hollingworth Nunns D, Brown LJ, Ireland LJ (2000) Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rate? A six-year cytological follow-up. Br J Obstet Gynecol 107:1298–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Woo YL, Badley C, Jackson E, Crawford R (2011) Long-term cytological and histological outcomes in women managed with loop excision treatment under local anaesthetic for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cytopathology 22:334–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan J, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Schenck U, Baldauf JJ, Da Silva D, Anttila A, Nieminen P, Prendiville W (2009) European guidelines for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 2. Cytopathology 20:5–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grisot C, Mancini J, Giusiano S, Houvenaeghel G, Agostini A, d’Ercole C, Boubli L, Prendiville W, Carcopino X (2012) How to optimize excision procedures for the treatment of CIN? The role of colposcopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1383–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carcopino X, Mancini J, Charpin C, Grisot C, Maycock JA, Houvenaeghel G, Agostini A, Boubli L, Prendiville W (2013) Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results of joint cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:1087–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, Perrotta M, Prendiville W, Russell P, Sideri M, Strander B, Tatti S, Torne A, Walker P (2012) 2011 colposcopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120:166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mergui JL, Carcopino X, Marchetta J, Gondry J, Boubli L (2010) Modern management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a proposal for a risk assessment method in colposcopic decision-making. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 39:520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, Wiener H, Herbert A, von Karsa L (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 21:448–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, Louwers JA, Nobbenhuis MA, Bais AG, Hogewoning CJ, Zaal A, Verheijen RH, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ (2011) Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol 12:441–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E (1998) A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 92:737–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Strander B, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Milsom I, Sparen P (2007) Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study. BMJ 335:1077–1082

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, Monaghan JM, Duncan ID, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC (1997) Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 349:978–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rebolj M, Helmerhorst T, Habbema D, Looman C, Boer R, van Rosmalen J, van Ballegooijen M (2012) Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6855

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snidjers PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N (1999) Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 189:12–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Carcopino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heineman, M., Mancini, J., Villeret, J. et al. Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 825–831 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3887-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3887-7

Keywords

Navigation