Abstract
Individuals can reduce the risk of developing skin cancer by minimizing ultraviolet sunlight exposure, though recent trends in sun-protective behaviors remain to be investigated. To evaluate sun-protective behaviors and sunburn among US adults. We analyzed data from the 2010, 2015, and 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, cross-sectional survey conducted by the US Census Bureau. Multivariable regression models were stratified by demographic variables and constructed to evaluate sun-protective behaviors and sunburn avoidance across time. From 2010 through 2020, US adults had significantly increased prevalence of seeking shade (p value, 0.003), wearing wide-brimmed hats (< 0.001), wearing long-sleeved shirts (< 0.001), using sunscreen (< 0.001), and avoiding sunburns (< 0.001) and significantly decreased prevalence of sun avoidance (< 0.001). Disparities in sun-protective behaviors also exist among different sexes, ages, education levels, and those reporting higher sun sensitivity. This cross-sectional study found that by 2020, US adults had an increased prevalence of wearing sun-protective clothing and sunscreen use, though decreased prevalence of sun avoidance. Although certain sun-protective behaviors have become more prevalent, the incidence of skin cancer continues to rise. Efforts to understand drivers of sun-protective behaviors and targeted intervention efforts are needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Both keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) and melanomas may be ascribed to ultraviolet (UV) sunlight exposure [1, 2]. The overall incidence of skin cancer in the USA is rising, with the estimated number of new cases nearly doubling between 2000 and 2019 [3].
The pervasiveness of skin cancer represents an important public health concern, given the potential benefits of early skin cancer detection and prevention. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) does not currently recommend whole body cutaneous exams by primary care physicians or patient self-examination in asymptomatic patients as there is currently insufficient data for these recommendations [4, 5]. Nevertheless, the USPSTF does recommend interventions aimed at education and prevention. Messaging and preventative efforts for skin cancer have been devised and implemented on a local, national, and international level with direct patient intervention and policy changes to decrease the skin cancer burden [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Patient-directed efforts have included education about minimizing UV exposure and using sun protection [2]. Policies and environmental interventions, including provisions for shades at schools and free sunscreen dispensers, have been implemented on a local level [6, 7]. Globally, regulations to restrict indoor tanning have been adopted, and several studies have shown that technological messaging (i.e., via SMS texts, social media, YouTube) has been successful in improving sun-protective behaviors [2, 16,17,18,19].
These educational efforts represent a concerted effort to decrease the burden of skin cancers on patients and the healthcare system. Understanding changes in behavior as it pertains to sun exposure and protection may provide insight into the impact of these interventions over time. Herein, we use the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) database to evaluate sun-protective behaviors and sunburn exposure in the US adult population.
Patients and methods
Study sample
We used data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual, cross-sectional survey conducted by the US Census Bureau. Sample weights provided by the NHIS are used to yield estimates representative of the non-military, non-institutionalized US population. The NHIS is conducted using face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes, though follow-ups may be conducted via telephone. Of note, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the NHIS shifted from in-person interviewing to all-telephone interviewing starting in late March 2020 and continuing through June 2020. Data regarding sun-protective behaviors and sunburn are collected by the NHIS in 5-year interval. We collected data from 2010, 2015, and 2020, the most recent databases which contain our data of interest. This study was exempt from New York University Institutional Review Board.
Measures
We evaluated engagement in five unique sun-protective behaviors (staying in the shade, wearing a sun hat, wearing long-sleeved shirts, sunscreen use, and sun avoidance). A positive response to sun-protective behaviors was defined as most of the time or always engaging in a behavior when outside on a sunny day for more than one hour. Some respondents reported they “don’t go outside on a sunny day for more than one hour,” which was defined as a positive response to sun avoidance. Sunburn frequency was recoded as a dichotomous variable (0 vs. ≥ 1) and was determined by the response to “During the past 12 months, how many times have you had a sunburn?”. Indoor tanning was not assessed in the 2020 NHIS survey and, therefore, was not included in our analysis.
Statistical analysis
Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with sun-protective behaviors and sunburn avoidance as the dependent variables. All multivariable models included the adult’s sex (male/ female), age (18–39/40–65/ ≥ 66), race (White/Black or African American/Other), education level (high school or less/some college or undergraduate degree/graduate degree), region (west, south, midwest, northeast), and report of sun sensitivity (after 1 h of sun exposure does, one gets severe, moderate, or mild sunburn/ no sunburn). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analysis was performed in SAS (SAS Institute Inc. 2012. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.4. Cary, NC).
Results
Demographic data regarding sex, age, race, education level, region, and sun sensitivity is shown in Table 1. We observed positive trends in the prevalence of shade seeking, wide-brimmed hat-wearing, long-sleeved shirt wearing, sunscreen use, and sunburn avoidance. Adults in 2020 had increased odds of seeking shade (aOR [95% CI], 1.07 [1.02–1.11]), wearing wide-brimmed hats (3.12 [2.95–3.30]), wearing long-sleeved shirt (1.32 [1.24–1.41]), using sunscreen (1.31 [1.25–1.37]), and sunburn avoidance (1.44 [1.37–1.52]) when compared to adults in 2010 (Table 2). We noticed fewer overall changes in these trends from 2010 to 2015 than from 2015 to 2020. Despite these positive trends, there was an initial increase in sun avoidance from 2010 to 2015, with a subsequent decrease from 2015 to 2020 (Table 2).
When stratified by sex, males and females in 2020 exhibited significantly increased odds of wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, using sunscreen, and avoiding sunburn as compared to 2010 (Table 3). Notably, in 2020, adult women have increased odds of seeking shade, using sunscreen, avoiding sun, and avoiding sunburn than men, though decreased odds of wearing wide-brimmed and long-sleeved shirts (Table 4).
Adults of all ages in 2020 had significantly increased odds of wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, using sunscreen, and avoiding sunburn compared to 2010. Furthermore, adults aged 18–30 had significantly increased odds of seeking shade (1.08 [1.01–1.16]), whereas adults aged 40–65 had significantly decreased odds of sun avoidance (0.76 [0.61–0.95]) (Table 3). Notably, adults aged 18-–65 had decreased odds of seeking shade, wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, sun avoidance, and sunburn avoidance compared to adults aged 66 and greater (Table 4).
Adults of all education levels in 2020 significantly increased the odds of wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, and avoiding sunburn. Adults with less than high school/high school education also had increased odds of sunscreen use (1.39 [1.26–1.52). College graduates had increased odds of sunscreen use (1.34 [1.25–1.43) and shade seeking (1.12 [1.05–1.19]) (Table 3). Adults with less than high school, high school, or a college education were less likely to wear wide-brimmed hats and use sunscreen than adults with graduate education, though more likely to practice sun avoidance (Table 4).
Adults who reported having greater sun sensitivity in 2020 had significantly increased odds of wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, using sunscreen, and sunburn avoidance. Adults who reported greater sun sensitivity in 2020 also had a significant increase in seeking shade (1.15 [1.06–1.19]) (Table 3). Notably adults who reported greater sun sensitivity had increased odds of seeking shade, wearing wide-brimmed hats, using sunscreen, and avoiding sun compared to adults who did not report having greater sun sensitivity, though they did have decreased odds of avoiding sunburn (Table 4).
Discussion
Positive trends in sun-protective behaviors and lack of sunburns were seen in the US adult population. We saw the largest increases and consistently positive trends in the prevalence of wide-brimmed hat and long-sleeved shirt-wearing in all cohorts. Despite growing in prevalence since 2010, the overall prevalence of long-sleeve shirt-wearing remains low compared to shade seeking, wide-brimmed hat wearing, and sunscreen use in 2020. Cultural and social norms influence the acceptance of wearing long-sleeve shirts and other sun-protective behaviors [20].
Interestingly, in 2020, adult females had increased odds of seeking shade, using sunscreen, avoiding sun, and avoiding sunburn than males, but had decreased odds of wearing long-sleeved shirts and wide-brimmed hats as compared to males. This contrast may be explained by sun-protective studies demonstrating that image norms differ across genders [21, 22]. In melanoma patients queried on their sun-protective behaviors, the rate of long-sleeve shirt-wearing was the least employed sun-protective behavior [23]. Amongst first-degree relatives of melanoma survivors, inconsistent use of protective clothing such as long-sleeve shirts could be explained by weather, physical activity, being outdoors, going to the beach or water setting, already using sunscreen, and fashion [24]. Visual communication, such as images of long-sleeve shirts worn in an attractive manner, could be an effective tool to increase the use of long-sleeve shirts [25]. Further investigation regarding effective interventions to improve long-sleeve shirt wearing will need to overcome the factors that compete with sun protection when adults choose clothing for outdoor activities.
Despite positive changes in some sun-protective behaviors, there is an overall negative trend in sun avoidance between 2010 and 2020 (Table 2). This is a startling trend as a recent study suggests that only sun avoidance and long sleeves reliably prevent sunburn [26]. This dichotomy may reflect a lack of awareness of the differences in effectiveness between sun-protective behaviors [27]. Increasing use of other sun-protective behaviors, such as sunscreen, may lead to an increased time spent outdoors [28]. Further, outdoor occupations and outdoor leisure activities may negatively impact both the capability and motivation to use sun avoidance relative to other sun-protective behaviors [29,30,31,32]. Alternatively, an emphasis on the negative consequences of low serum 25(OH)‐vitamin D concentrations has been on the rise [33] and may lead to uncertainty regarding the importance of sun protection [34, 35].
Our analysis is consistent with prior reports that males are less likely to engage in sun-protective behaviors [36]. Across all periods analyzed, males exhibited a lower prevalence of seeking shade, wearing sunscreen, and avoiding the sun than females (Table 3). Variance in sun-protective behaviors between males and females may reflect gendered differences in messaging. Sun protection messaging often targets females and emphasizes beauty standards regarding aging and sun damage [21, 36, 37]. For example, magazines with majority female audiences contain advertisements for products related to sun protection, whereas magazines with majority male audiences were found to have almost no such advertisements [38]. Further, many males exhibit positive perceptions of tanning and the belief that peers view tanning favorably [39]. Sunscreen formulation may also negatively impact use among males. In a recent survey study, males identified oily sunscreen consistency and skin irritation as primary deterrents to sunscreen usage [40]. While there remains a disparity in sun-protective behaviors between males and females, there was a trending statistical improvement among males over the last decade. This may be attributed to increased health promoting messages, which have been suggested to increase adherence to sunscreen use, though additional research is warranted [41].
Cross-sectional studies also estimate that the most incident cancer in the USA in males in 2040 will be melanoma [42], which is consistent with steadily increasing incidence of melanoma over several decades in the general population [43, 44]. This increase may be related to early exposure to UV light with spikes in incidence related to early detection [45]. Increases across all melanoma tumor stages however, suggest that early detection is not a major factor for these changes [46]. The progressing shift in increasing incidence of melanoma in males implies that behavioral changes in sun protection in males must be made a priority.
When stratified by age group, younger age was generally associated with lower odds of wearing a wide-brimmed hat and long sleeves compared to older adults. Protective clothing choices made by younger adults may be subject to different considerations and needs than those made by older adults, such as style and comfort while engaging in outdoor activities. Further investigation into attitudes regarding sun-protective clothing among different age groups could help identify targets for intervention. Despite recent trends in sun-protective behaviors and sunburn avoidance, younger adults remain an important demographic to target with public health initiatives regarding sun safety, as cumulative sun exposure and sunburns at an early age are associated with increased risks of KCs and melanomas [47,48,49]. As such, early messaging interventions may have the greatest long-term benefit in preventing skin cancers. While our data show that the prevalence of sun-protective behaviors and lack of sunburn increased with age, sunscreen usage is a notable exception with prevalence declining after the age group 40–65. Older adults are at greater risk for skin cancer but are more likely to believe their risk is low [50,51,52,53]. This may reflect historical beliefs about sun exposure, with older adults also tending to believe there is not much one can do about the prevention of skin cancer at their age [54, 55].
On the other hand, adults 66 and older had increased odds of seeking shade, wearing wide-brimmed hats, wearing long-sleeved shirts, sun avoidance, and sunburn avoidance compared to adults aged 18–65 (Table 4). It has been shown that adults greater than 65 are less likely to get sunburns than younger cohorts [53]. Moreover, skin cancer incidences and risk are the greatest after age 65 [51, 56, 57], and older age groups demonstrate considerably more photodamage [58]. In individuals with a previous history of skin cancers, studies dependably reveal that attitudes about sun protection do appreciably change after a skin cancer diagnosis, especially with a melanoma diagnosis [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. The presence of marked photoaging seen by older individuals themselves can be a motivation for behavioral change. It has been shown that appearance-based interventions, like demonstrating wrinkles and UV photographs, have a positive effect on sun protection behaviors [70,71,72,73].
We also found that lower levels of education were associated with decreased odds of sun-protective clothing and sunscreen use, though increased odds of sun avoidance and sunburn avoidance when compared to adults with graduate education. While educational attainment is one of many indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), prior studies have suggested that SES is related to physical leisure activity, a known risk factor for frequent sunburn [74]. Disparities in leisure activity and frequent sun exposure related to SES may have been exacerbated during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the decreased odds of sunscreen use among individuals with lower levels of education, which may indicate lower SES, could stem from the cost required to achieve the amount of product and frequency of application required for proper use [75]. Discrepancies in price and availability of sunscreen products may exist between high- and low-income zip codes [76].
Our findings continue to highlight the role of reporting greater sun sensitivity in driving sun-protective behaviors and sunburn. Despite increased odds of seeking shade, wearing wide-brimmed hats, using sunscreen, and practicing sun avoidance, US adults who report having greater sun sensitivity are significantly less likely to avoid sunburn. These adults remain an important target population for future targeted sun protection interventions.
The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 an official pandemic during NHIS 2020 data collection [77]. We suspect that the data trends derived from the latest NHIS may contrast with future surveys. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was dramatically less public sunscreen distribution [78], an increase in active in outdoor activities [79,80,81], and an increase in direct and indirect sunlight exposure for the populace [82]. Reports that open spaces would decreased viral transmission may have also changed attitudes about obtaining sun exposure [83, 84]. Studies suggesting sunlight exposure may aid in the recovery of SARS-CoV2 patients and [85, 86] could also contribute to changes in sun-protective behaviors.
The limitations of this study include using cross-sectional, self-reported data, though prior studies have found validity of self-reported measures to assess sun-protective behaviors [87]. Aberrant changes between survey years may have gone unnoticed in our analyses. Other confounding factors could affect survey outcomes, like lack of data for indoor tanning across all time points and concerns about adverse issues or cancers associated with sunscreens [88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. In the future, survey data may be affected by the concerns with sunscreen recalls due to benzene contamination [98, 99]. In addition, in March 2020, the NHIS transitioned from in-person to total telephone interviewing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The NHIS was able to resume in-person interviews in July 2020 but continued to mostly perform surveys by telephone [100]. These changes in survey mode may impact results and increase the risk of mode effect [101, 102]. Previous studies suggest that telephone and in-person studies provide comparable results [103,104,105,106], but rates of non-responsiveness were found to be considerably higher in surveys using the telephone [105].
Although educational programs and interventions for sun protection are currently in place and there are positively trending changes in attitudes toward sun protection, decreases in skin cancer, in particular KCs, have not been seen. The incidence of skin cancer in the USA continues to rise, with the number of new cases almost doubling between 2000 and 2019 [107]. While seemingly at odds with the reported improvements in sun-protective behaviors, it is established that the incidence of skin cancers is primarily driven by older adults [108], who had accumulated years of sun exposure during a time when sunscreen was unavailable or not widely utilized [109,110,111]. As such, we may have yet to observe the improvements in skin cancer rates. Alternatively, the increasing incidence of skin cancer may be a reflection of other factors such as human papillomavirus infection (HPV), which is on the rise and has been linked to squamous cell carcinoma [112,113,114].
Despite increased awareness of the unhealthy nature of UV radiation, there remains a disconnect between knowledge, attitudes, and functional behaviors regarding sun protection [115, 116]. Continued efforts to understand drivers of sun-protective behaviors may enable targeted approaches to reducing sunburn incidence and overall skin cancer risk. The true manifestations of these behavioral changes, such as reduced skin cancer incidence and associated direct/indirect costs, may not be apparent for many years. However, current positive trends in sun protection and a negative trend in sunburn prevalence imply that future significant reductions in the incidence of skin cancers and their associated economic and health costs may be on the horizon for the USA.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the National Health Interview survey repository, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2020nhis.htm, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2015_data_release.htm, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2010_data_release.htm.
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CPSTF:
-
Community preventive services task force
- HS:
-
High school
- KC:
-
Keratinocyte carcinoma
- NHIS:
-
National health interview survey
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- UPF:
-
Ultraviolet protection factor
- USPSTF:
-
United States preventive services task force
- US:
-
United States
References
Parkin D, Mesher D, Sasieni P (2011) 13. Cancers attributable to solar (ultraviolet) radiation exposure in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer 105(2):S66–S69
Linos E, Katz KA, Colditz GA (2016) Skin cancer—the importance of prevention. JAMA Intern Med 176(10):1435–1436
Leiter U, Keim U, Garbe C (2020) Epidemiology of skin cancer: update 2019. Adv Exp Med Biol 1268:123–139
Recommendation: Skin Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce (2022). JAMA. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/skin-cancer-screening. Accessed 5 Apr 2022
Wernli KJ, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Pocobelli G, Blasi PR (2016) Screening for skin cancer in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 316(4):436–447
Skin Cancer: Child Care Center-Based Interventions. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/skin-cancer-child-care-center-based-interventions. Published 2021. Accessed 15 Oct 2021
Skin Cancer: Primary and Middle School-Based Interventions. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/skin-cancer-primary-and-middle-school-based-interventions. Published 2021. Accessed 15 Oct 2021
Sun Protective Clothing. Skin Cancer Foundation. https://www.skincancer.org/skin-cancer-prevention/sun-protection/sun-protective-clothing/. Published 2022. Accessed 3 Oct 2022
Aulbert W, Parpart C, Schulz-Hornbostel R, Hinrichs B, Krüger-Corcoran D, Stockfleth E (2009) Certification of sun protection practices in a German child day-care centre improves children’s sun protection–the ‘SunPass’ pilot study. Br J Dermatol 161:5–12
Durand C, Lamy A, Richard JB et al (2022) Influence of social and psychosocial factors on summer vacationers’ sun protection behaviors, the PRISME study, France. Int J Public Health 67:1604716
Modenese A, Loney T, Rocholl M et al (2021) Protocol for a systematic review on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure to occupational solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) among outdoor workers. Front Public Health 9:756566
Paulo MS, Adam B, Akagwu C et al (2019) WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and of the effect of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. Environ Int 126:804–815
Grifoni D, Betti G, Bogi A et al (2022) Protective measures from solar ultraviolet radiation for beach lifeguards in Tuscany (Italy): shade and clothing strategies. Saf Health Work 13(4):421–428
Weber M, Uller A, Schulmeister K, Brusl H, Hann H, Kindl P (2007) Outdoor workers’ acceptance of personal protective measures against solar ultraviolet radiation. Photochem Photobiol 83(6):1471–1480
Maguire E, Spurr A (2017) Implementation of ultraviolet radiation safety measures for outdoor workers: a Canadian perspective. J Cutan Med Surg 21(2):117–124
Horsham C, Baade P, Kou K et al (2021) Optimizing texting interventions for melanoma prevention and early detection: a Latin square crossover RCT. Am J Prev Med 61(3):348–356
Chambergo-Michilot D, Tellez WA, Becerra-Chauca N, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Taype-Rondan A (2020) Text message reminders for improving sun protection habits: a systematic review. PLoS One 15(5):e0233220
Janda M, Soyer HP (2020) Using mobile health technology and social media for the prevention and early detection of skin cancer. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) 236(2):72–74
De La Garza H, Maymone MB, Vashi NA (2021) Impact of social media on skin cancer prevention. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(9):5002
Martin A, Liu J, Thatiparthi A, Ge S, Wu JJ (2021) An evaluation of shade-seeking and long-sleeved shirt use in Asian Americans. J Am Acad Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.057
Jackson KM, Aiken LS (2006) Evaluation of a multicomponent appearance-based sun-protective intervention for young women: uncovering the mechanisms of program efficacy. Health Psychol 25(1):34
Jackson KM, Aiken LS (2000) A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol 19(5):469
Rodríguez VM, Berwick M, Hay JL (2017) Communication about melanoma and risk reduction after melanoma diagnosis. Psychooncology 26(12):2142–2148
Shuk E, Burkhalter JE, Baguer CF et al (2012) Factors associated with inconsistent sun protection in first-degree relatives of melanoma survivors. Qual Health Res 22(7):934–945
McWhirter JE, Hoffman-Goetz L (2013) Systematic review of population-based studies on the impact of images on UV attitudes and behaviours. Health Promot Int 30(2):397–410
Patel SP, Chien AL (2021) Sun protective clothing and sun avoidance: the most critical components of photoprotection in patients with melanoma. Dermatol Surg 47(3):333–337
Koch S, Pettigrew S, Strickland M, Slevin T, Minto C (2017) Sunscreen increasingly overshadows alternative sun-protection strategies. J Cancer Educ 32(3):528–531
Autier P, Boniol M, Doré JF (2007) Sunscreen use and increased duration of intentional sun exposure: still a burning issue. Int J Cancer 121(1):1–5
Peters CE, Koehoorn MW, Demers PA, Nicol A-M, Kalia S (2016) Outdoor workers’ use of sun protection at work and leisure. Saf Health Work 7(3):208–212
Snyder A, Valdebran M, Terrero D, Amber KT, Kelly KM (2020) Solar ultraviolet exposure in individuals who perform outdoor sport activities. Sports Med-Open 6(1):1–12
Tribby CP, Perna FM, Berrigan D (2019) Walking and sun protective behaviors: cross-sectional associations of beneficial health factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(13):2361
Jardine A, Bright M, Knight L, Perina H, Vardon P, Harper C (2012) Does physical activity increase the risk of unsafe sun exposure? Health Promot J Austr 23(1):52–57
Holick MF (2016) Biological effects of sunlight, ultraviolet radiation, visible light, infrared radiation and vitamin D for health. Anticancer Res 36(3):1345–1356
Hiom S (2006) Public awareness regarding UV risks and vitamin D—the challenges for UK skin cancer prevention campaigns. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92(1):161–166
Langbecker D, Youl P, Kimlin M, Remm K, Janda M (2011) Factors associated with recall of media reports about vitamin D and sun protection. Aust N Z J Public Health 35(2):159–162
Abroms L, Jorgensen CM, Southwell BG, Geller AC, Emmons KM (2003) Gender differences in young adults’ beliefs about sunscreen use. Health Educ Behav 30(1):29–43
Matts PJ, Fink B (2010) Chronic sun damage and the perception of age, health and attractiveness. Photochem Photobiol Sci 9(4):421–431
Wiznia LE, Wang J, Steuer AB, Elbuluk N (2019) Deficiency of sun protection advertising exists in consumer magazines across demographic groups and varies by target demographic. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(4):1139–1141
Adams GJ, Goldstein EK, Goldstein BG, Jarman KL, Goldstein AO (2021) Attitudes and behaviors that impact skin cancer risk among men. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(19):9989
Roberts C, Goldstein E, Goldstein B, Jarman K, Paci K, Goldstein A (2020) Men’s attitudes and behaviors about skincare and sunscreen use behaviors. J Drugs Dermatol 20:88–93
Gavin A, Boyle R, Donnelly D et al (2012) Trends in skin cancer knowledge, sun protection practices and behaviours in the Northern Ireland population. Eur J Public Health 22(3):408–412
Rahib L, Wehner MR, Matrisian LM, Nead KT (2021) Estimated projection of US cancer incidence and death to 2040. JAMA Netw Open 4(4):e214708–e214708
Arnold M, Singh D, Laversanne M et al (2022) Global burden of cutaneous melanoma in 2020 and projections to 2040. JAMA Dermatol 158(5):495–503
Erdmann F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Schüz J et al (2013) International trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma 1953–2008—are recent generations at higher or lower risk? Int J Cancer 132(2):385–400
Wehner MR, Shive ML, Chren M-M, Han J, Qureshi AA, Linos E (2012) Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 345:e5909
Shaikh WR, Dusza SW, Weinstock MA, Oliveria SA, Geller AC, Halpern AC (2016) Melanoma thickness and survival trends in the United States, 1989–2009. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv294
Armstrong BK, Kricker A (2001) The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 63(1–3):8–18
Kennedy C, Willemze R, de Gruijl FR, Bavinck JNB, Bajdik CD (2003) The influence of painful sunburns and lifetime sun exposure on the risk of actinic keratoses, seborrheic warts, melanocytic nevi, atypical nevi, and skin cancer. J Investig Dermatol 120(6):1087–1093
de Vries E, Arnold M, Altsitsiadis E et al (2012) Potential impact of interventions resulting in reduced exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (UVA and UVB) on skin cancer incidence in four European countries, 2010–2050. Br J Dermatol 167:53–62
Buster KJ, You Z, Fouad M, Elmets C (2012) Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol 66(5):771–779
Holman DM, Freeman MB, Shoemaker ML (2018) Trends in melanoma incidence among non-hispanic whites in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA Dermatol 154(3):361–362
Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA et al (2018) Merkel cell carcinoma: current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol 78(3):457-463.e452
Holman DM, Ding H, Freeman M, Shoemaker ML (2019) Association between sun protection behaviors and sunburn among U.S. older adults. Gerontologist 59(Suppl 1):S17–S27
Buster KJ, You Z, Fouad M, Elmets C (2012) Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income. J Am Acad Dermatol 66(5):771–779
Holman DM, Ding H, Freeman M, Shoemaker ML (2019) Association between sun protection behaviors and sunburn among US older adults. Gerontologist 59(Supplement_1):S17–S27
Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, Coldiron BM (2015) Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the U.S. population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol 151(10):1081–1086
Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA et al (2018) Merkel cell carcinoma: current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 78(3):457-463e452
Durai PC, Thappa DM, Kumari R, Malathi M (2012) Aging in elderly: chronological versus photoaging. Indian J Dermatol 57(5):343–352
Diao DY, Lee TK (2013) Sun-protective behaviors in populations at high risk for skin cancer. Psychol Res Behav Manag 7:9–18
Robinson JK (1990) Behavior modification obtained by sun protection education coupled with removal of a skin cancer. Arch Dermatol 126(4):477–481
Rhodes AR, Weinstock MA, Fitzpatrick TB, Mihm MC, Sober AJ (1987) Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: a practical method of recognizing predisposed individuals. JAMA 258(21):3146–3154
Soto E, Lee H, Saladi RN et al (2010) Behavioral factors of patients before and after diagnosis with melanoma: a cohort study - are sun-protection measures being implemented? Melanoma Res 20(2):147–152
Rhee JS, Matthews BA, Neuburg M, Smith TL, Burzynski M, Nattinger AB (2004) Quality of life and sun-protective behavior in patients with skin cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):141–146
Meyer N, Pruvost-Balland C, Bourdon-Lanoy E, Maubec E, Avri MF (2007) Awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards sun protection among skin cancer-treated patients in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21(4):520–525
Lee TK, Brazier AS, Shoveller JA, Gallagher RP (2007) Sun-related behavior after a diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res 17(1):51–55
Volkov A, Dobbinson S, Wakefield M, Slevin T (2013) Seven-year trends in sun protection and sunburn among Australian adolescents and adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 37(1):63–69
McMeniman E, De’Ambrosis K, De’Ambrosis B (2010) Risk factors in a cohort of patients with multiple primary melanoma. Australas J Dermatol 51(4):254–257
Freiman A, Yu J, Loutfi A, Wang B (2004) Impact of melanoma diagnosis on sun-awareness and protection: efficacy of education campaigns in a high-risk population. J Cutan Med Surg 8(5):303–309
Bowen D, Jabson J, Haddock N, Hay J, Edwards K (2012) Skin care behaviors among melanoma survivors. Psychooncology 21(12):1285–1291
Williams AL, Grogan S, Clark-Carter D, Buckley E (2013) Appearance-based interventions to reduce ultraviolet exposure and/or increase sun protection intentions and behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Br J Health Psychol 18(1):182–217
Mahler HI, Kulik JA, Harrell J, Correa A, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M (2005) Effects of UV photographs, photoaging information, and use of sunless tanning lotion on sun protection behaviors. Arch Dermatol 141(3):373–380
Pokharel M, Christy KR, Jensen JD, Giorgi EA, John KK, Wu YP (2019) Do ultraviolet photos increase sun safe behavior expectations via fear? A randomized controlled trial in a sample of US adults. J Behav Med 42(3):401–422
Mahler H (2018) Effects of multiple viewings of an ultraviolet photo on sun protection behaviors. Public Health 160:33–40
Braun HA, Adler CH, Goodman M, Yeung H (2021) Sunburn frequency and risk and protective factors: a cross-sectional survey. Dermatol Online J. https://doi.org/10.5070/D3274053150
Mahé E, Beauchet A, de Maleissye M-F, Saiag P (2011) Are sunscreens luxury products? J Am Acad Dermatol 65(3):e73–e79
Amber KT, Bloom R, Staropoli P, Dhiman S, Hu S (2014) Assessing the current market of sunscreen: a cross-sectional study of sunscreen availability in three metropolitan counties in the United States. J Skin Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/285357
WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. WHO; 2020.
Szeto MD, Kokoska RE, Maghfour J et al (2022) An analysis of public sunscreen distribution in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol 86(5):e241–e243
Schweizer A-M, Leiderer A, Mitterwallner V, Walentowitz A, Mathes GH, Steinbauer MJ (2021) Outdoor cycling activity affected by COVID-19 related epidemic-control-decisions. PLoS One 16(5):e0249268
Park S, Kim B, Lee J (2020) Social distancing and outdoor physical activity during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea: implications for physical distancing strategies. Asia Pac J Public Health 32(6–7):360–362
Khamung R, Hsu PS (2022) Social distancing and beach open spaces: recreational experiences of tourists at Bangsaen beach after the pandemic. Cogent Soc Sci 8(1):2143056
Bhatia N, Mesinkovska NA, Samolitis N, Soon S, Steele T, Enright KM (2022) Knowledge, perceptions and photoprotective behaviors against the damaging effects of direct, indirect, and blue light: there are no “cheat days.” J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 15(8):E61-e66
Zielinski S, Botero CM (2020) Beach tourism in times of COVID-19 pandemic: critical issues, knowledge gaps and research opportunities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(19):7288
Gerhold L (2020) COVID-19: risk perception and coping strategies. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xmpk4
Asyary A, Veruswati M (2020) Sunlight exposure increased covid-19 recovery rates: a study in the central pandemic area of Indonesia. Sci Total Environ 729:139016
Sharun K, Tiwari R, Dhama K (2021) COVID-19 and sunlight: impact on SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 66:102419
O’Riordan DL, Nehl E, Gies P et al (2009) Validity of covering-up sun-protection habits: association of observations and self-report. J Am Acad Dermatol 60(5):739–744
Jalalat S (2015) Sunscreens causing cancer? The facts. Cutis 95(1):E30–E33
Krause M, Klit A, Blomberg Jensen M et al (2012) Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int J Androl 35(3):424–436
Schlumpf M, Cotton B, Conscience M, Haller V, Steinmann B, Lichtensteiger W (2001) In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens. Environ Health Perspect 109(3):239–244
Schlumpf M, Schmid P, Durrer S et al (2004) Endocrine activity and developmental toxicity of cosmetic UV filters—an update. Toxicology 205(1–2):113–122
Gulson B, McCall M, Korsch M et al (2010) Small amounts of zinc from zinc oxide particles in sunscreens applied outdoors are absorbed through human skin. Toxicol Sci 118(1):140–149
Gulson B, Wong H, Korsch M et al (2012) Comparison of dermal absorption of zinc from different sunscreen formulations and differing UV exposure based on stable isotope tracing. Sci Total Environ 420:313–318
Wamer WG, Yin J-J, Wei RR (1997) Oxidative damage to nucleic acids photosensitized by titanium dioxide. Free Radic Biol Med 23(6):851–858
Nakagawa Y, Wakuri S, Sakamoto K, Tanaka N (1997) The photogenotoxicity of titanium dioxide particles. Mutat Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 394(1–3):125–132
Liao C-M, Chiang Y-H, Chio C-P (2008) Model-based assessment for human inhalation exposure risk to airborne nano/fine titanium dioxide particles. Sci Total Environ 407(1):165–177
Tavares R, da silva Paulitsch F, Zhang L (2018) Use of sunscreen and risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Dermatol 28(2):186–201
Jafari A, Christos P, Lipner S (2022) Dermatologists’ responses to benzene being reported as a contaminant in sunscreen: a cross-sectional analysis. J Drugs Dermatol: JDD 21(5):548–550
Conte S, Lagacé F, Netchiporouk E, Sasseville D, Litvinov IV (2021) Benzene, a known human carcinogen, detected in suncare products. J Cutan Med Surg 25(6):650–651
NHIS - 2020 NHIS (2021). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/2020nhisdata.htm. Accessed 5 Apr 2022
Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Glümer C, Juel K (2014) Effect of survey mode on response patterns: comparison of face-to-face and self-administered modes in health surveys. Eur J Public Health 24(2):327–332
Braekman E, Charafeddine R, Demarest S et al (2020) Comparing web-based versus face-to-face and paper-and-pencil questionnaire data collected through two Belgian health surveys. Int J Public Health 65(1):5–16
Herzog AR, Rodgers WL, Kulka RA (1983) Interviewing older adults: a comparison of telephone and face-to-face modalities. Public Opin Q 47(3):405–418
Herzog AR, Rodgers WL (1988) Interviewing older adults: mode comparison using data from a face-to-face survey and a telephone resurvey. Public Opin Q 52(1):84–99
Nelson DE, Powell-Griner E, Town M, Kovar MG (2003) A comparison of national estimates from the national health interview survey and the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Am J Public Health 93(8):1335–1341
Massey JT, O’Connor D, Krotki K (1997) Response rates in random digit dialing (RDD) telephone surveys. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods.
Leiter U, Keim U, Garbe C (2019) Epidemiology of skin cancer: update. Sunlight, Vitam D Skin Cancer 2020:123–139
Balducci L, Aapro M (2005) Epidemiology of cancer and aging. Biol Basis Geriatr Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23962-6_1
Hall HI, May DS, Lew RA, Koh HK, Nadel M (1997) Sun protection behaviors of the US white population. Prev Med 26(4):401–407
Levee GJ, Sayre RM, Marlowe E (1981) P-aminobenzoic acid as a sunscreen and its behaviour on the skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 3(1):49–55
Stender IM, Lock-Andersen J, Wulf H (1996) Sun-protection behaviour and self-assessed burning tendency among sunbathers. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 12(4):162–165
Nichols AJ, Allen AH, Shareef S, Badiavas EV, Kirsner RS, Ioannides T (2017) Association of human papillomavirus vaccine with the development of keratinocyte carcinomas. JAMA Dermatol 153(6):571–574
Nichols A, Nahm W, Rabinovitz H, Ioannides T (2022) Keratinocyte carcinomas in immunocompromised patients are reduced after administration of the nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccine. J Drugs Dermatol 21(5):526
Gupta R, Rady PL, Doan HQ, Tyring SK (2020) Development of a beta-HPV vaccine: updates on an emerging frontier of skin cancer prevention. J Clin Virol 126:104348
Berrigan D, Dodd K, Troiano RP, Krebs-Smith SM, Barbash RB (2003) Patterns of health behavior in US adults. Prev Med 36(5):615–623
Sandman D, Simantov E, An C, Fund C, Harris L (2000) Out of touch: American men and the health care system. The Commonwealth Fund, New York
Funding
The article has no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: CM, JGZ. Acquisition of Data: CM. Analysis and interpretation of data: CM, JGZ. Drafting of the manuscript: WJN, CAK, CM, JGZ. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: JGZ. Statistical analysis: CM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Consent for publication
These data have not been presented prior to publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
McKenzie, C., Nahm, W.J., Kearney, C.A. et al. Sun-protective behaviors and sunburn among US adults. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 1665–1674 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02547-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02547-z