Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factor analysis on perioperative greater trochanteric fracture of total hip arthroplasty via anterolateral approach

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A greater trochanteric fracture is a perioperative complication of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) via an anterolateral approach. Although surgeons determine risk factors in the preoperative planning phase, no study explored the relationship between the planned femoral implant and greater trochanter. This study attempts to determine the risk factors for perioperative greater trochanteric fractures in primary THA via an anterolateral approach.

Materials and methods

This retrospective single-institution study enrolled 440 patients (66 males and 374 females) who underwent primary THA via an anterolateral approach with a minimum follow-up of six months. First, we selected patients with perioperative greater trochanteric fractures, regardless of the need for additional surgery. Second, we investigated the risk factors for perioperative greater trochanteric fractures using the patients’ demographic data, operative data, and femoral geometry data via univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Perioperative greater trochanteric fractures occurred in 30 joints (30/440, 6.8%), and all cases were reported in women. Multivariate analysis revealed that in cases where the top of the great trochanter was inside the longitudinal central axis of the planned femoral stem in three-dimensional templating (Type B) was the only independent risk factor for perioperative greater trochanteric fracture (odds ratio, 14.6; 95% confidence interval, 5.88–36.1; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study identified female sex and Type B femoral geometry as risk factors for perioperative greater trochanteric fracture via an anterolateral approach. Our results may reduce the incidence of perioperative greater trochanteric fractures associated with primary THA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

On reasonable request, derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author after approval from the Ethical Committee of Kanazawa University.

References

  1. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ (2010) Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(5):671-679.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, Dimmen S (2014) Worse patient reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A crosssectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1–3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 85:463–469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J et al (2019) Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101B(6):646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartford JM, Bellino MJ (2017) The learning curve for the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon’s first 500 cases. Hip Int 27(5):483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H et al (2016) Greater trochanter chip fractures in the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(6):605–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartford JM, Graw BP, Knowles SB, Frosch DL (2018) Isolated greater trochanteric fracture and the direct anterior approach using a fracture table. J Arthroplasty 33(7S):S253–S258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Foissey C, Kenney R, Luceri F, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C (2021) Greater trochanter fractures in the direct anterior approach: evolution during learning curve, risk factors and consequences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(4):675–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue D, Kabata T, Maeda T et al (2015) Value of computed tomography-based three-dimensional surgical preoperative planning software in total hip arthroplasty with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Sci 20(2):340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kabata T, Kajino Y, Inoue D et al (2019) Safety range for acute limb lengthening in primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 43(9):2047–2056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, Fink MJ, Alexander JW, Tullos HS (1995) The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 316:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Mal-luche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14(3):231–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pritchett JW (2001) Fracture of the greater trochanter after hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brun OC, Maansson L (2013) Fractures of the greater trochanter following total hip replacement. Hip Int 23(2):143–146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanda Y (2012) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013(48):452e8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barton C, Kim PR (2009) Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 40(3):371–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartford JM, Knowles SB (2016) Risk factors for perioperative femoral fractures: cementless femoral implants and the direct anterior approach using a fracture table. J Arthroplasty 31(9):2013–2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berend KR, Mirza AJ, Morris MJ, Lombardi AV (2016) Risk of periprosthetic fractures with direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(10):2295–2298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greco NJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Morris MJ, Hobbs GR, Berend KR (2019) Direct anterior approach and perioperative fracture with a single-taper wedge femoral component. J Arthroplasty 34(1):145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rueckl K, Springer B, Jungwirth-Weinberger A, Bechler U, Kasparek MF (2021) Boettner F (2021) A standardized soft tissue release technique to lower the risk of greater trochanteric fractures for the anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3067–3073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamon Kabata.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have none to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inoue, D., Kabata, T., Kajino, Y. et al. Risk factor analysis on perioperative greater trochanteric fracture of total hip arthroplasty via anterolateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 4519–4525 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04715-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04715-8

Keywords

Navigation