Skip to main content
Log in

Infraspinatus shift for massive, posterosuperior tears yields good clinical outcome

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the functional outcome of partial reconstruction margin convergence in the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (RCT).

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included all patients that were operated by means of a partial repair and infraspinatus shift for a massive, posterosuperior cuff tear between 2009 and 2016, either in arthroscopic or mini-open technique. Outcome measures included sex- and age-adapted Constant Score (saCS), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores (DASH), and relative effect per patient (REPP).

Results

Fifty-six shoulders in 54 patients (mean age: 66 ± 7 years) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 40 ± 9 months. The mean tear size was Bateman 3.1 ± 0.7 and Patte 2.3 ± 0.4. All clinical scores showed improvement. The saCS improved from 64.1 ± 13.4 to 90.4 ± 13.7 (p < 0.0001), the DASH score from 51.8 ± 9.4 to 10.2 ± 13.4 (p < 0.0001) and the WORC index from 47.1% ± 8.6 to 87.9% ± 13.7 (p < 0.0001). The abduction strength of the affected side (1.7 ± 1.6 kg) was not restored to the same level as the contralateral side (5.4 ± 2.7 kg, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Partial cuff repair for posterosuperior, massive cuff tears yields good clinical outcome with a low rate of complications and high proportion of good and excellent responders.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oh JH, Park MS, Rhee SM (2018) Treatment strategy for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Surg 10(2):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhart SS (2001) Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 390:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Kohn HS, Pachelli A (1994) Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10(4):363–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhart SS (1994) Reconciling the paradox of rotator cuff repair versus debridement: a unified biomechanical rationale for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10(1):4–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berth A, Neumann W, Awiszus F, Pap G (2010) Massive rotator cuff tears: functional outcome after debridement or arthroscopic partial repair. J Orthop Traumatol 11:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Duralde XA, Bair B (2005) Massive rotator cuff tears: the result of partial rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(2):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SJ, Lee IS, Kim SH, Lee WY, Chun YM (2012) Arthroscopic partial repair of irreparrablre large to massive rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc 28(6):761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu JE, Reuther KE, Sarver JJ, Lee CS, Thomas SJ, Glaser DL et al (2011) Restoration of anterior-posterior rotator cuff force balance improves shoulder function in a rat model of chronic massive tears. J Orthop Res 29:1028–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iagulli ND, Field LD, Hobgood ER, Ramsey JR, Savoie FH (2012) Comparison of partial versus complete arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 40:1022–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Porcellini G, Castagna A, Cesari E, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Paladini P (2011) Partial repair of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears: clinical and radiographic evaluations at long-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:1170–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wellmann M, Lichtenberg S, Da Silva G, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2013) Results of arthroscopic partial repair of large retracted rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 29:1275–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox JA, Noerdlinger MA, Romeo AA (2002) Arthroscopic subscapularis repair. Oper Tech Orthop 12:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y (1990) Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears: a long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop 254:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goutailler D, Postel J, Bernageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures: pre and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop 304:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bayne O, Bateman J (1984) Long-term results of surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In: Bateman J, Welsh R (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. CV Mosby, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levy HJ, Gardner RD, Lemak LJ (1991) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 7:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nové-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I (2005) Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(3):238–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Ticker JB, Pawluk RJ, Hepler M, Ark J et al (1994) Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Patterns of subacromial contact. Am J Sports Med 22(6):779–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nove-Josserand L, Levigne C, Noel E, Walch G (1996) [The acromio-humeral interval. A study of the factors influencing its height]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(5):379–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I (1984) The subacromial space in normal shoulder radiographs. Acta Orthop Scand 55(1):57–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Constant C, Murley A (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17–2:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wessel RN, Lim TE, van Mameren H, de Bie RA (2011) Validation of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huber J, Hüsler J, Dieppe P, Günther KP, Dreinhöfer K, Judge A (2016) A new responder criterion (relative effect per patient (REPP) > 0.2) externally validated in a large total hip replacement multicenter cohort (EUROHIP). Osteoarthr Cartil 24(3):480–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH (2013) Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1674–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Jiwani AZ, Burkhart SS (2012) Functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears in individuals with pseudoparalysis. Arthroscopy 28(9):1214–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Dahiya N, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM (2013) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of failed repairs of large or massive rotator cuff tears: minimum ten year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(7):627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oh JH, McGarry MH, Jun BJ, Gupta A, Chung KC, Hwang J et al (2012) Restoration of shoulder biomechanics according to degree of repair completion in a cadaveric model of massive rotator cuff tear: importance of margin convergence and posterior cuff fixation. Am J Sports Med 40:2448–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cavalier M, Jullion S, Kany J, Grimberg J, Lefebvre Y, Oudet D et al (2018) Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(8S):S193–S197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Vasta S, Leonardi F, Maffuli N, Denaro V (2015) Surgical management of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(2):494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participating patients.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Surgery was performed by MJK, material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by LA and PA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LA and all authors (MJK, PA, SG, CGP) commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard Achenbach.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest for this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from the IRB (ID 17-656-101) prior to the initiation of this study.

Informed consent

Informed written consent was obtained from all study participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Achenbach, L., Ahlers, P., Pfeifer, C.G. et al. Infraspinatus shift for massive, posterosuperior tears yields good clinical outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 133–139 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04029-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04029-1

Keywords

Navigation