Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical evaluation of suture buttons versus cortical screws in the Latarjet–Bristow procedure: a fresh-frozen cadavers study

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A commonly used method of fixation of the transferred coracoid in the traditional Latarjet–Bristow procedure (open or arthroscopic) is by two bicortical screws. Although mechanically effective, screw fixation is also a major source of hardware and neurologic complications. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performances of traditional metal screws and endobuttons as fixators of the Latarjet–Bristow procedure.

Materials and methods

Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric human scapulae with the conjoined tendon attached to the coracoid process were used for the Latarjet–Bristow procedure. The specimens were randomly assigned one of two groups: fixation using two 4.5-mm cannulated partially threaded Latarjet–Bristow experience screws or fixation using a suture-button construct. Specimens were secured in a material testing machine and cyclically preconditioned from 2 to 10 N at 0.1 Hz for ten cycles. They were then pulled to failure at a normalized displacement rate of 400% of the measured gauge length per minute. The maximal load-to-failure, stiffness and stress were calculated using a custom script. The failure mechanism and site were recorded for each specimen.

Results

There were no significant differences in the maximal load-to-failure or other biomechanical properties of the two fixation techniques, but the failure mechanisms were unique to each one. Four specimens fixated with screws underwent graft failures (fracture) through the proximal or distal drill hole. Five specimens fixated with endobuttons underwent failure due to glenoid bone fractures.

Conclusions

A single endobutton fixation appears to be biomechanically comparable to screw fixation in the Latarjet–Bristow procedure and provides a lower risk for graft fracture. Further studies with more numerous specimens are warranted to conclusively validate these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shields DW, Jefferies JG, Brooksbank AJ, Millar N, Jenkins PJ (2018) Epidemiology of glenohumeral dislocation and subsequent instability in an urban population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(2):189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bessiere C, Trojani C, Pelegri C, Carles M, Boileau P (2013) Coracoid bone block versus arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparative paired study with 5-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(2):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Willemot L, De Boey S, Van Tongel A, Declercq G, De Wilde L, Verborgt O (2018) Analysis of failures after the Bristow–Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4105-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Provencher MT, Aman ZS, LaPrade CM, Bernhardson AS, Moatshe G, Storaci HW, Chahla J, Turnbull TL, LaPrade RF (2018) Biomechanical comparison of screw fixation versus a cortical button and self-tensioning suture for the Latarjet procedure. Orthop J Sports Med 6(6):2325967118777842. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118777842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shin JJ, Hamamoto JT, Leroux TS, Saccomanno MF, Jain A, Khair MM, Mellano CR, Shewman EF, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN (2017) Biomechanical analysis of Latarjet screw fixation: comparison of screw types and fixation methods. Arthroscopy 33(9):1646–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gendre P, Thelu CE, d'Ollonne T, Trojani C, Gonzalez JF, Boileau P (2016) Coracoid bone block fixation with cortical buttons: an alternative to screw fixation? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(8):983–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alvi HM, Monroe EJ, Muriuki M, Verma RN, Marra G, Saltzman MD (2016) Latarjet fixation: a cadaveric biomechanical study evaluating cortical and cannulated screw fixation. Orthop J Sports Med 4(4):2325967116643533. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116643533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmiddem U, Hawi N, Liodakis E, Dratzidis A, Kraemer M, Hurschler C, Page R, Meller R (2018) Monocortical fixation of the coracoid in the Latarjet procedure is significantly weaker than bicortical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4837-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole BJ, Sayegh ET, Yanke AB, Chalmers PN, Frank RM (2016) Fixation of soft tissue to bone: techniques and fundamentals. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(2):83–95. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Butt U, Charalambous CP (2012) Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(8):1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valenti P, Maroun C, Wagner E, Werthel JD (2018) Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure combined with bankart repair: a technique using 2 cortical buttons and specific glenoid and coracoid guides. Arthrosc Tech 7(4):e313–e320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.09.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 35(2):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506294854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN (2004) Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):635–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546503261714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spang JT, Weinhold PS, Karas SG (2006) A biomechanical comparison of EndoButton versus suture anchor repair of distal biceps tendon injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(4):509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milano G, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Piras S, Manunta A, Fabbriciani C (2006) Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy 22(6):660–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boileau P, Saliken D, Gendre P, Seeto BL, d'Ollonne T, Gonzalez JF, Bronsard N (2019) Arthroscopic Latarjet: suture-button fixation is a safe and reliable alternative to screw fixation. Arthroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Efi Kazum and Ofir Chechik have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Weizman Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Efi Kazum, Ofir Chechik, Tamir Pritsch, Gavriel Mozes, Guy Morag, Oleg Dolkart & Eran Maman

Authors
  1. Efi Kazum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ofir Chechik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamir Pritsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gavriel Mozes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guy Morag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Oleg Dolkart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eran Maman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleg Dolkart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

In-vitro biomechanical study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazum, E., Chechik, O., Pritsch, T. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of suture buttons versus cortical screws in the Latarjet–Bristow procedure: a fresh-frozen cadavers study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 1779–1783 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03269-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03269-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation