Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative blood pressure changes during cemented versus uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a multi-center cohort study

The effect of bone cement for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with uncemented about the change of intraoperative blood pressure and the incidence of major complications in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

Materials and methods

This multiple center prospective cohort study included only patients with acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden stage III or IV). All patients were treated with cemented or uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using modified Hardinge or Watson-Jones approach in the lateral decubitus position. Baseline data, medical history, type of anesthesia, FiO2 value, the number of vasopressor using during operation, femoral component, intraoperative blood pressure, SaO2, and major complications were evaluated.

Results

Of 164 patients (45 males and 119 females), 86 underwent cemented and 78 underwent uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Baseline medical histories were similar in both groups. In both the cemented and uncemented groups, intraoperative systolic blood pressure significantly decreased during cementing or rasping (106.3 and 103.6 mmHg) and after femoral component insertion (103.3 and 99.1 mmHg) compared to before rasping (120.7 and 116.4 mmHg) (p < 0.0001, respectively). Donaldson’s grade seemed more favorable in uncemented group than in cemented group during cementing or rasping, during stem insertion; however, no patients experienced the lethal complication in both groups.

Conclusions

Intraoperative blood pressure did not change during cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthrplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. If the standard modern cement technique was performed during operation, bone cement is a safe and acceptable for elderly patients who have a lot of medical histories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2(6):285–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hagino H, Sakamoto K, Harada A, Nakamura T, Mutoh Y, Mori S, Endo N, Nakano T, Itoi E, Kita K, Yamamoto N, Aoyagi K, Yamazaki K (2010) Committee on osteoporosis of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Nationwide one-decade survey of hip fractures in Japan. J Orthop Sci 15:737–745. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1543-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsukutani Y, Hagino H, Ito Y, Nagashima H (2015) Epidemiology of fragility fractures in Sakaiminato, Japan: incidence, secular trends, and prognosis. Osteoporos Int 26(9):2249–2255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2122–2130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6. doi:10.1002/14651858

  6. Murphy P, Edelist G, Byrick RJ, Kay JC, Mullen JB (1997) Relationship of fat embolism to haemodynamic and echocardiographic changes during cemented arthroplasty. Can J Anaesth 44:1293–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagio K, Sugano N, Takashina M, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T (2003) Embolic events during total hip arthroplasty: an echocardiographic study. J Arthroplasty 18:186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N, Malchau H (2013) A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2052–2059. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis G (1997) Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 38:155–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitehouse MR, Evans SL (2010) Bone cement: An overview. Int J Nano Biomater 3:4–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen G (1998) Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):754–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA, Hubble MJ, Timperley AJ, Wilson MJ, Howell JR (2016) The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: A report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J 98(11):1441–1449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor F, Wright M, Zhu M. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: a randomized clinical trial (2012) J Bone Joint Surg Am 4;94(7):577–583. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Enocson A (2015) Cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty in patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 97(11):1475–1480. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.36248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Evaniew N, Madden K, Bhandari M (2014) Cochrane in CORR®: Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(5):1367–1372. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3328-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker MI, Pryor G, Gurusamy K (2010) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):116–122. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW (2009) Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 102(1):12–22. doi:10.1093/bja/aen328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark DI, Ahmed AB, Baxendale BR, Moran CG (2001) Cardiac output during hemiarthroplasty of the hip. A prospective, controlled trial of cemented and uncemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3):414–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Christie J, Burnett R, Potts HR, Pell AC (1994) Echocardiography of transatrial embolism during cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3):409–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. López-Durán L, García-López A, Durán L, Hurtado J, Ruiz C, Rodrigo JL (1997) Cardiopulmonary and haemodynamic changes during total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 21(4):253–258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nolan JP (1994) Arterial oxygenation and mean arterial blood pressure in patients undergoing total hip replacement: cemented versus uncemented components. Anaesthesia 49(4):293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fujita H, Okumura T, Hara H, Toda H, Harada H, Nishimura R, Tominaga T (2015) Monitoring of blood pressure during total hip arthroplasty using the interface bioactive bone cement (IBBC) technique. J Orthop Sci 20(2):347–356. doi:10.1007/s00776-014-0691-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soleimanha M, Sedighinejad A, Haghighi M, Nabi BN, Mirbolook AR, Mardani-Kivi M (2014) Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters during cemented hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2(3):163–167

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Breusch SJ, Kühn KD (2003) Bone cements based on polymethylmethacrylate. Orthopade 32(1):41–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eden OR, Lee AJ, Hooper RM (2002) Stress relaxation modelling of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 216(3):195–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Lodenkämper H (1979) The infected joint implant. In: McKibbin B (ed) Recent advances in orthopaedics 3, New York, pp 139–161

  27. Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, Lodenkämper H, Röttger J, Siegel A (1981) Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63(3):342–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rinecker H (1980) New clinico-pathophysiological studies on the bone cement implantation syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 97(4):263–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mudgalkar N, Ramesh KV (2011) Bone cement implantation syndrome: a rare catastrophe. Anesth Essays Res 5(2):240–242. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.94796

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Modig J, Busch C, Olerud S, Saldeen T, Waernbaum G (1975) Arterial hypotension and hypoxaemia during total hip replacement: the importance of thromboplastic products, fat embolism and acrylic monomers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 19(1):28–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Urban MK, Sheppard R, Gordon MA, Urquhart BL (1996) Right ventricular function during revision total hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 82(6):1225–1229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parvizi J, Holiday AD, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG (1999) The Frank Stinchfield Award. Sudden death during primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duncan JA (1989) Intra-operative collapse or death related to the use of acrylic cement in hip surgery. Anaesthesia 44(2):149–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pitto RP, Blunk J, Kössler M (2000) Transesophageal echocardiography and clinical features of fat embolism during cemented total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study in patients with a femoral neck fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(1–2):53–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Breusch SJ, Reitzel T, Schneider U, Volkmann M, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M (2000) Cemented hip prosthesis implantation-decreasing the rate of fat embolism with pulsed pressure lavage. Orthopade 29(6):578–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Qi X, Zhang Y, Pan J, Ma L, Wang L, Wang J (2015) Effect of bone cement implantation on haemodynamics in elderly patients and preventive measure in cemented hemiarthroplasty. Biomed Res Int 568019. doi:10.1155/2015/568019

  37. Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X, Zhou L, Bian Y (2013) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8(7):e68903. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Satoshi Iida, Dr. Tomonori Shigemura, Dr. Shunji Kishida, Dr. Isao Abe, Dr. Munenori Takeshita, and Dr. Yoshitada Harada, head of our department, for their valuable suggestions and support during this study. Dr. Junichi Nakamura, Dr. Sumihisa Orita, and Prof. Seiji Ohtori conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination. We do not receive any funding or financial support that may be perceived to have based the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichi Miyamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards approval of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyamoto, S., Nakamura, J., Iida, S. et al. Intraoperative blood pressure changes during cemented versus uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a multi-center cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 523–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2651-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2651-9

Keyword

Navigation