Skip to main content
Log in

Reverse polyaxial less invasive stabilization systems for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures of the distal femur

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The reverse less invasive stabilization system (LISS) for the distal femur remains generally regarded as a safe and satisfactory option for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. The polyaxial LISS provides a reverse plating technique that leverages the advantages of proximal screws by allowing the adjustable locking screw to be better positioned and providing more reliable fixation on the proximal femur compared with the standard axial LISS. To assess this fixation method, a detailed evaluation of institutional outcomes of femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated with reverse polyaxial LISS was performed.

Materials and methods

A total of 29 patients presenting with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated with the reverse polyaxial LISS system between January 2010 and March 2011. Patients were classified into stable and unstable fracture groups according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association’s (OTA) classification. Clinical data, including operative time, blood loss, radiological records and complications, Harris Hip scores and Parker scores, were collected and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences in age, sex, or American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Operative time and blood loss were significantly higher in the unstable fracture group compared with the stable fracture group. Four cases of fixation failure, consisting of one case of A2.3, one case of A3.2 and two cases of A3.3, occurred 4–7 m postoperatively.

Conclusions

Treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with unstable pattern using polyaxial reverse LISS results in high failure rates; therefore, it should not be recommended as a routine alternative method for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with unstable pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ (2005) Salvage of failed treatment of hip fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(2):101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haidukewych GJ (2010) Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. Instr Course Lect 59:503–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolaou VS, Papathanasopoulos A, Giannoudis PV (2008) What’s new in the management of proximal femoral fractures? Injury 39(12):1309–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozkan K, Türkmen İ, Sahin A, Yildiz Y, Erturk S, Soylemez MS (2015) A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: a study on synthetic bones. Indian J Orthop 49(3):347–351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guerra MT, Pasqualin S, Souza MP, Lenz R (2014) Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques. Injury 45(Suppl 5):S26–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozkaya U, Bilgili F, Kilic A, Parmaksizoglu AS, Kabukcuoglu Y (2009) Minimally invasive management of unstable proximal femoral extracapsular fractures using reverse LISS femoral locking plates. Hip Int 19(2):141–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang CQ, Sun Y, Jin DX, Yao C, Chen SB, Zeng BF (2010) Reverse LISS plating for intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou F, Zhang ZS, Yang H, Tian Y, Ji HQ, Guo Y et al (2012) Less invasive stabilization system (LISS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in treating proximal femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma 26(3):155–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Konstantinidis L, Papaioannou C, Mehlhorn A, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Helwig P (2011) Salvage procedures for trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure: biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylar screw. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 225(7):710–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han N, Sun GX, Li ZC, Li GF, Lu QY, Han QH et al (2011) Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation blade and reverse less invasive stabilization system-distal femur systems in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Orthop Surg 3(1):7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1–S133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49(4):239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(5):797–798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kostić IM, Mitković MM, Mitković MB (2015) Treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with selfdynamisable internal fixator (concept of double dynamisation). Vojnosanit Pregl 72(7):576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koval K, Zuckerman J (2001) Intertrochanteric fractures. In: Heckman J, Bucholz R (eds) Rockwood, green’s fractures in adults. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1635–1663

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chou DT, Taylor AM, Boulton C, Moran CG (2012) Reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the intramedullary hip screw (IMHS). Injury 43(6):817–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Otto RJ, Moed BR, Bledsoe JG (2009) Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23(9):645–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P (2015) Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(6):811–818

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao C, Zhang CQ, Jin DX, Chen YF (2011) Early results of reverse less invasive stabilization system plating in treating elderly intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective study compared to proximal femoral nail. Chin Med J (Engl) 124(14):2150–2157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Source of funding

Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201440).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, L., Li, X., Wang, T. et al. Reverse polyaxial less invasive stabilization systems for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures of the distal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 1531–1537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2542-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2542-5

Keywords

Navigation