Skip to main content
Log in

The fate of fibular osteotomies performed during high tibial osteotomy

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an important treatment alternative in isolated single compartment knee osteoarthritis. To achieve adequate mechanical axis corrections in the lower extremity fibula is also osteotomized concomitantly. The aim of this study was to compare the union rates of proximal and diaphyseal fibular osteotomies accompanying high tibial osteotomies.

Method

Sixty-seven knees of sixty-three patients who had undergone HTO were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were grouped according to the level of the fibular osteotomy (FO). In group I, the level of FO was proximal, and in group II, it was at the level of junction of middle and distal third of diaphysis. The union rates of FOs at two different levels were compared. The influence of the presence of displacement at the osteotomy site and apposition between bone ends on union was also evaluated.

Results

Fifty-nine of sixty-seven FOs (88.06 %) were united. The union rate of proximal FOs was significantly greater than diaphyseal osteotomies (p < 0.0001); 97.9 % of proximal FOs were united, whereas this ratio was 65 % for the diaphyseal FOs. The presence of displacement at the FO and apposition between bone ends significantly influenced the bony union rate (p values 0.035 and <0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Union rates and nonunion characteristics of FO might differ according to its level, apposition of bone ends, and contact area. The fate of FO might also affect the union of HTO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackson JP, Waugh W (1960) Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Proc R Soc Med 53(10):888

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson JP, Waugh W (1961) Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Br 43-B:746–751

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen W, Wall A, Paulin T, Park HU, Heymann L (2014) Stability of two angular stable locking plates for open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO): TomoFix™ versus LOQTEQ® HTO plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(10):1437–1442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arun GR, Kumaraswamy V, Rajan D, Vinodh K, Singh AK, Kumar P et al (2016) Long-term follow up of single-stage anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and high tibial osteotomy and its relation with posterior tibial slope. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(4):505–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydogdu S, Yercan H, Saylam C, Sur H (1996) Peroneal nerve dysfunction after high tibial osteotomy. An anatomical cadaver study. Acta Orthop Belg 62:156–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cobanoglu M, Cullu E (2014) Cerrahi uygulamada önemli etmenler. In: Sur H (ed) Yüksek tibial osteotomi, 1st edn, Turkish Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Miki Press, Ankara, pp 65–68 (Article in Turkish)

  7. Jokio PJ, Ragni P, Lindholm TS (1986) Management of the fibula in high tibial osteotomy for arthritis of the knee. Union times and complications. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 12(1):41–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurosaka M, Tsumura N, Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Mizuno K (2000) A new fibular osteotomy in association with high tibial osteotomy (a comparative study with conventional mid-third fibular osteotomy). Int Orthop 24(4):227–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wootton JR, Ashworth MJ, Macla CA (1995) Neurological complications of high tibial osteotomy—the fibular osteotomy as a causative factor: a clinical and anatomical study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:31–34

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Billings A, Scott DF, Camargo MP, Hofmann AA (2000) High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation, and early motion. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82(1):70–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curley P, Eyres K, Brezinova V, Allen M, Chan R, Barnes M (1990) Common peroneal nerve dysfunction after high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 72(3):405–408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogbemudia AO, Umebese PF, Bafor A, Igbinovia E, Ogbemudia PE (2010) The level of fibula osteotomy and incidence of peroneal nerve palsy in proximal tibial osteotomy. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2:17–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Soejima O, Ogata K, Ishinishi T, Fukahori Y, Miyauchi R (1994) Anatomic considerations of the peroneal nerve for division of the fibula during high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Rev 23:244–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramanoudjame M, Vandenbussche E, Baring T, Solignac N, Augereau B, Gregory T (2012) Fibular nonunion after closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(8):863–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elcil Kaya Bicer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bicer, E.K., Basa, C.D., Gunay, H. et al. The fate of fibular osteotomies performed during high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 1085–1090 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2493-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2493-x

Keywords

Navigation