Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand

  • Handsurgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Flexor tendon injuries are underestimated considering their anatomical function in the hand. According to the publications of Kleinert, Verdan and Kessler, primary suturing of the flexor tendon combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of “Early Passive Movement” became the standard form of therapy following acute flexor tendon injuries of the hand.

Materials and methods

In a study between 2007 and 2009, a total of 115 flexor tendon injuries were analysed retrospectively. All patients were treated using a two-strand repair technique according to Zechner. They received physiotherapy from the first postoperative day according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol. For statistical purposes, the factors: age, gender, range of motion (ROM), follow up interval, affected flexor tendon and zone were analysed. The time between injury and surgery was also determined, classified into groups and included in the study. On the basis of the range of motion AROM, the Buck-Gramcko and modified Strickland Score was calculated.

Results

The mean follow-up interval was 7 months. Using the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score an “excellent” overall result was achieved. Complications occurred in 3.5 %, one secondary rupture (0.9 %), two tendon adhaesions requiring tenolysis (1.7 %) and one case of infection (0.9 %). The time interval between injury and operation, gender, affected zone, flexor tendon and affected finger nerve had no influence on the Buck-Gramcko and Strickland Score.

Conclusions

Using Zechner’s core suture technique as the primary treatment, combined with immediate postoperative physiotherapy in terms of “Early Passive Movement” according to the Viennese flexor tendon rehabilitation programme, an excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate was acchieved.

Level of evidence

IV: case series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wittemann M, Jung A, Hornung R (1994) Die sog. „kleine Handverletzung“und ihre sozioökonomischen Folgen. Chirurg 65:1005–1007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verdan C (1972) Half a century of flexor tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(3):472–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinert HE, Schepel S, Gill T (1981) Flexor tendon injuries. Surg Clin North Am 61(2):267–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunnell S (1918) Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two new instruments. Surg Gynecol Obstet 26:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH (eds) (2010) Green’s operative hand surgery, 6th edn. Elsevier Churchill, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verdan C (1960) Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42:647–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E, Stormo A (1973) Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am 4:865–876

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessler I, Nissim F (1996) Primary repair without immobilization of flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Othop Scand 40:587–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinert HE, Spokevicius S, Papas NH (1995) History of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 20(3 Pt 2):S46–S52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Young RES, Harmon JM (1960) Repair of tendon injuries of the hand. Arm Surg 151:552–566

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leixnering M, Hintringer W (2003) Current treatments for primary injuries of the flexor and extensor tendons. Eur Surg 35(3):143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, AshbeU TS et al (1967) Primary repair of lacerated flexor tendon in no man’s land (abstract). J Bone Joint Surg 49A:577

    Google Scholar 

  13. Werdin F, Schaller HE (2008) Combined flexor tendon and nerve injury of the hand. Der Orthopäde 37(12):1202–1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strickland JW (2005) The scientific basis for advances in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Ther 18:94–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo S, Gelberman RH, Cobb NG, Amiel D et al (1981) The importance of controlled passive mobilization on flexor tendon healing: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop 52:615–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyer MI (2005) Flexor tendon biology. Hand Clin 21(2):159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W (2012) An overview of the management of flexor tendon injuries. Open Orthop J 6:28e35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Wolfe SW (2000) The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg Am 25(4):714e720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matheson G, Nicklin S, Gianoutsous MP, Walsh WR (2005) Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol. Clin Biomech 20(7):718e722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dy CJ, Hernandez-Soria A, Ma Y, Roberts TR, Daluiski A (2012) Complications after flexor tendon repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am 37(3):543–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ (1995) Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Br 20(3):310e313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hardwicke JT, Tan JJ, Foster MA, Titley OG (2014) A systematic review of 2-strand versus multistrand core suture techniques and functional outcome after digital flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 39(4):686–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brushart TM (1999) Nerve repair and grafting. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1381–1403

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller EM (1921) An experimental study to determine the strength of the suture line. Arch Surg 2:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malczewski MC, Zamboni WA, Haws MJ, Johnson RM, Smoot EC, Russell RC (1995) Effect of motion on digital nerve repair in a fresh cadaver model. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1672–1675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chao RP, Braün SA, Ta KT, Palesty JA, Mine R, Syed SA, Chang DJ, Thomson JG (2001) Early passive mobilization after digital nerve repair and grafting in a fresh cadaver. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(2):386–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Henry FP, Farkhad RI, Butt FS, O’Shaughnessy M, O’Sullivan ST (2012) A comparison between complete immobilisation and protected active mobilisation in sensory nerve recovery following isolated digital nerve injury. J Hand Surg Eur 37(5):422–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clare TD, de Haviland Mee S, Belcher HJ (2004) Rehabilitation of digital nerve repair: is splinting necessary? J Hand Surg Br 29(6):552–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu RS, Catalano LW 3rd, Barron OA, Johnson C, Glickel SZ (2004) Limited, protected postsurgical motion does not affect the results of digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg Am 29(2):302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jabir S, Iwuagwu FC (2014) Postoperative mobilization regimens following digital nerve repair: a systematic review. Eplasty 17:14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zechner W, Buck-Gramcko D, Lohmann H, Goth D, Stock W (1985) Improvement of suture technic in flexor tendon injuries. Clinical and experimental study. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 17(1):8–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buck-Gramcko D (1976) A new method for evaluation of results in flexor tendon repair. Handchirurgie 8(2):65–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Strickland JW (1985) Results of flexor tendon surgery in zone II. Hand Clin 1:167–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rust RA, Eckersley R (2008) Twenty questions on tendon injuries in the hand. Curr Orthop 22:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grobbelaar AO, Hudson DA (1994) Flexor tendon injuries in children. J Hand Surg Br 19(6):696–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Small JO, Brennen MD, Colville J (1989) Early active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Brit 14(4):383–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyer MI, Strickland JW, Engles DR, Sachar K, Leversedge FJ (2002) Flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation, state of the art in 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(9):1684–1706

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chesney A, Chauhan A, Kattan A, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A (2011) Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(4):1583–1592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Starr HM, Snoddy M, Hammond KE, Seiler JG 3rd (2013) Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 38(9):1712–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Frueh FS, Kunz VS, Gravestock IJ, Held L, Haefeli M, Giovanoli P, Calcagni M (2014) Primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2: early passive mobilization versus controlled active motion. J Hand Surg Am 39(7):1344–1350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Betz C, Schleicher P, Winkel R, Hoffmann R (2013) Biomechanical investigation of the tensile strength of tendon sutures—locking sutures increase stability. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 45(1):20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu YF, Tang JB (2014) Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur 39(1):6–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tanaka T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, An KN (2005) Flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension during finger manipulation. J Hand Ther 18(3):330–338

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee HI, Lee JS, Kim TH, Chang SH, Park MJ, Lee GJ (2015) Comparison of flexor tendon suture techniques including 1 using 10 strands. J Hand Surg Am 40(7):1369–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Moriya T, Zhao C, Yamashita T, An KN, Amadio PC (2010) Effect of core suture technique and type on the gliding resistance during cyclic motion following flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 28(11):1475–1481

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Traumatology, AUVA Trauma Hospital Lorenz Böhler, European Hand Trauma Center, Donaueschingenstraße 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria

    S. Quadlbauer, Ch. Pezzei, J. Jurkowitsch, P. Reb, T. Beer & M. Leixnering

  2. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, 1200, Vienna, Austria

    S. Quadlbauer

Authors
  1. S. Quadlbauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ch. Pezzei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Jurkowitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Reb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Beer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Leixnering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Quadlbauer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Martin Leixnering, M.D. was involved in the development and marketing of the HILEI® thermoplastic splint.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quadlbauer, S., Pezzei, C., Jurkowitsch, J. et al. Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 285–293 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2362-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2362-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation