Skip to main content
Log in

Large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) in model colloidal suspensions and glasses: frequency dependence

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Rheologica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the effect of frequency on the non-linear large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) response of concentrated colloidal suspensions of model soft and hard spheres at various concentrations, both below and above the glass transition. We show that the anharmonic response in the stress increases with frequency for liquid-like samples but decreases with frequency for solid-like samples. We argue that for samples below the glass transition, higher frequencies involving higher maximum shear rates promote shear thinning and increase anharmonicity. On the other hand, solid-like samples deform plastically at low frequencies as they are subjected to low shear rates within the period. Higher frequencies (higher average shear rates) lead to viscous flow over a larger fraction of the period thereby decreasing anharmonic behavior. We also demonstrate that LAOS experiments in strain-controlled rheometry at moderately high frequencies (ω > 5 rad/s) have to be very carefully interpreted, due to the superharmonic instrumental resonance effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allgaier J, Poppe A, Willner L, Richter D (1997) Synthesis and characterization of poly 1,4-isoprene-b-(ethylene oxide) and poly ethylene-co-propylene-b-(ethylene oxide) block copolymers. Macromolecules 30:1582–1586. doi:10.1021/ma961311q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballauff M, Brader JM, Egelhaaf SU, Fuchs M, Horbach J, Koumakis N, Krüger M, Laurati M, Mutch KJ, Petekidis G, Siebenbürger M, Voigtmann T, Zausch J (2013) Residual stresses in glasses. Physical Review Letters 110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215701

  • Besseling R, Weeks ER, Schofield AB, Poon WCK (2007) Three-dimensional imaging of colloidal glasses under steady shear. Phys Rev Lett 99:028301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.028301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brader JM, Siebenbürger M, Ballauff M, Reinheimer K, Wilhelm M, Frey SJ, Weysser F, Fuchs M (2010) Nonlinear response of dense colloidal suspensions under oscillatory shear: Mode-coupling theory and Fourier transform rheology experiments. Phys Rev E 82. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.061401

  • Carrier V, Petekidis G (2009) Nonlinear rheology of colloidal glasses of soft thermosensitive microgel particles. J Rheol 53:245–273. doi:10.1122/1.3045803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho KS, Hyun K, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2005) A geometrical interpretation of large amplitude oscillatory shear response. J Rheol 49:747. doi:10.1122/1.1895801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel C, Hamley IW, Wilhelm M, Mingvanish W (2001) Non-linear rheology of a face-centred cubic phase in a diblock copolymer gel. Rheol Acta 40:39–48. doi:10.1007/s003970000124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF (1990) Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing. Springer

  • Dullaert K, Mewis J (2005) Stress jumps on weakly flocculated dispersions: steady state and transient results. J Colloid Interface Sci 287:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin BM, Cloitre M, Gauthier M, Vlassopoulos D (2010) Dynamics and rheology of colloidal star polymers. Soft Matter 6:2825. doi:10.1039/b926526k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewoldt RH, Hosoi AE, McKinley GH (2008) New measures for characterizing nonlinear viscoelasticity in large amplitude oscillatory shear. J Rheol 52:1427. doi:10.1122/1.2970095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs M, Cates ME (2002) Theory of nonlinear rheology and yielding of dense colloidal suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 89:248304. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.248304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomin AJ, Gilbert PH, Merger D, Wilhelm M (2015) Large-amplitude oscillatory shear: comparing parallel-disk with cone-plate flow. Rheol Acta 54:263–285. doi:10.1007/s00397-014-0819-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson ME, Wagner NJ, Vlassopoulos D (2007) Viscoelasticity and shear melting of colloidal star polymer glasses. J Rheol 51:297–316. doi:10.1122/1.2433935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann L, Peukert S, Aksel N (2002) Investigation of the solid–liquid transition of highly concentrated suspensions in oscillatory amplitude sweeps. J Rheol 46:93. doi:10.1122/1.1423314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun K, Nam JG, Wilhelm M, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2006) Large amplitude oscillatory shear behavior of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymer solutions. Rheol Acta 45:239–249. doi:10.1007/s00397-005-0014-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun K, Wilhelm M (2009) Establishing a new mechanical nonlinear coefficient Q from FT-rheology: first investigation of entangled linear and comb polymer model systems. Macromolecules 42:411–422. doi:10.1021/ma8017266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun K, Wilhelm M, Klein CO, Cho KS, Nam JG, Ahn KH, Lee SJ, Ewoldt RH, McKinley GH (2011) A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS). Prog Polym Sci 36:1697–1753. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein CO, Spiess HW, Calin A, Balan C, Wilhelm M (2007) Separation of the nonlinear oscillatory response into a superposition of linear, strain hardening, strain softening, and wall slip response. Macromolecules 40:4250–4259. doi:10.1021/ma062441u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koumakis N, Brady JF, Petekidis G (2013) Complex oscillatory yielding of model hard-sphere glasses. Physical Review Letters 110(5):178301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koumakis N, Pamvouxoglou A, Poulos A, Petekidis G (2012) Direct comparison of the rheology of model hard and soft particle glasses. Soft Matter 8:4271–4284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koumakis N, Schofield AB, Petekidis G (2008) Effects of shear induced crystallization on the rheology and ageing of hard sphere glasses. Soft Matter 4:2008. doi:10.1039/b805171b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson R (1999) The structure and rheology of complex fluids. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurati M, Stellbrink J, Lund R, Willner L, Richter D, Zaccarelli E (2005) Starlike micelles with starlike interactions: a quantitative evaluation of structure factors and phase diagram. Physical Review Letters 94. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.195504

  • Le Grand A, Petekidis G (2008) Effects of particle softness on the rheology and yielding of colloidal glasses. Rheol Acta 47:579–590. doi:10.1007/s00397-007-0254-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin NYC, Goyal S, Cheng X, Zia RN, Escobedo FA, Cohen I (2013) Far-from-equilibrium sheared colloidal liquids: disentangling relaxation, advection, and shear-induced diffusion. Phys Rev E 88:062309. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.88.062309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Barrón CR, Porcar L, Eberle APR, Wagner NJ (2012) Dynamics of melting and recrystallization in a polymeric micellar crystal subjected to large amplitude oscillatory shear flow. Phys Rev Lett 108:258301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.258301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund R, Willner L, Stellbrink J, Lindner P, Richter D (2006) Logarithmic chain-exchange kinetics of diblock copolymer micelles. Physical Review Letters 96. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.068302

  • Mason T, Bibette J, Weitz D (1996) Yielding and flow of monodisperse emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 179:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason TG, Weitz DA (1995) Linear viscoelasticity of colloidal hard sphere suspensions near the glass transition. Phys Rev Lett 75:2770–2773. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merger D, Wilhelm M (2014) Intrinsic nonlinearity from LAOStrain-experiments on various strain- and stress-controlled rheometers: a quantitative comparison. Rheol Acta 53:621–634. doi:10.1007/s00397-014-0781-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2011) Colloidal suspension rheology. Cambridge University Press

  • Nicolai T, Benyahia L (2005) Shear flow and large strain oscillation of dense polymeric micelle suspension. Macromolecules 38:9794–9802. doi:10.1021/ma0514267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petekidis G, Vlassopoulos D, Pusey PN (2003) Yielding and flow of colloidal glasses. Faraday Discuss 123:287–302. doi:10.1039/b207343a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham KN, Petekidis G, Vlassopoulos D, Egelhaaf SU, Pusey PN, Poon WCK (2006) Yielding of colloidal glasses. Europhys Lett 75:624–630. doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10156-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippoff W (1966) Vibrational measurements with large amplitudes. Transactions of The Society of Rheology (1957–1977) 10:317–334

  • Poulos AS, Stellbrink J, Petekidis G (2013) Flow of concentrated solutions of starlike micelles under large-amplitude oscillatory shear. Rheol Acta 52:785–800. doi:10.1007/s00397-013-0703-9

  • Pusey PN, van Megen W (1987) Observation of a glass transition in suspensions of spherical colloidal particles. Phys Rev Lett 59:2083–2086. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renou F, Stellbrink J, Petekidis G (2010a) Yielding processes in a colloidal glass of soft star-like micelles under large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS). J Rheol 54:1219. doi:10.1122/1.3483610

  • Rogers SA, Erwin BM, Vlassopoulos D, Cloitre M (2011) A sequence of physical processes determined and quantified in LAOS: application to a yield stress fluid. J Rheol 55:435. doi:10.1122/1.3544591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlatter G, Fleury G, Muller R (2005) Fourier transform rheology of branched polyethylene: experiments and models for assessing the macromolecular architecture. Macromolecules 38:6492–6503. doi:10.1021/ma0505530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senff H, Richtering W (1999) Temperature sensitive microgel suspensions: colloidal phase behavior and rheology of soft spheres. J Chem Phys 111:1705. doi:10.1063/1.479430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollich P (1998) Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. Phys Rev E 58:738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stellbrink J, Rother G, Laurati M, Lund R, Willner L, Richter D (2004) Poly(ethylene-alt-propylene)–poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer micelles: a colloidal model system with tunable softness. J Phys Condens Matter 16:S3821–S3834. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/38/004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiakakis E, Vlassopoulos D, Loppinet B, Roovers J, Meier G (2002) Kinetic arrest of crowded soft spheres in solvents of varying quality. Phys Rev E 66:051804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiakakis E, Wilk A, Kohlbrecher J, Vlassopoulos D, Petekidis G (2010) Slow dynamics, aging, and crystallization of multiarm star glasses. Phys Rev E 81. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.020402

  • van der Vaart K, Rahmani Y, Zargar R, Hu ZB, Bonn D, Schall P (2013) Rheology of concentrated soft and hard-sphere suspensions. J Rheol 57:1195–1209. doi:10.1122/1.4808054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm M, Maring D, Spiess HW (1998) Fourier-transform rheology. Rheol Acta 37:399–405. doi:10.1007/s003970050126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm M, Reinheimer P, Ortseifer M (1999) High sensitivity fourier-transform rheology. Rheol Acta 38:349–356. doi:10.1007/s003970050185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm M, Reinheimer P, Ortseifer M, Neidhofer T, Spiess HW (2000) The crossover between linear and non-linear mechanical behaviour in polymer solutions as detected by Fourier-transform rheology. Rheol Acta 39:241–246. doi:10.1007/s003970000084

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge J. Stellbrink and L. Willner for providing the PEP1–PEO20 diblock copolymer and A.B.. Schofield for providing the PMMA particles. We also thank J. Stellbrink for the helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We also acknowledge the financial support by the DFG within SFB TR6 (project A2) and the Greek project Thales “Covisco”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas S. Poulos.

Appendix

Appendix

Oscillatory rheometry at high frequencies

We have measured the LAOS response of all samples at a relatively limited range of frequencies (0.1–5 rad/s). Measuring at higher frequencies is essential to enter the domain of non-linear viscoelasticity and gain a more complete understanding of the processes involved. For these samples, the stress-controlled Anton-Paar MCR 501 rheometer does not produce perfect sinusoidal large-amplitude deformations through the direct strain control (DSO) feedback loop, introducing additional artificial higher harmonics in the stress signal. Hence, in order to perform high-frequency (ω > 5 rad/s) LAOS measurements, a strain-controlled ARES rheometer with a 100FRTN1 force rebalance transducer was also used. However, as we will show below, the interpretation of non-linear data was not possible due to the transducer resonance effect that introduced higher harmonics even at moderate frequencies, above about 10 rad/s.

Dynamic time sweeps were performed at different amplitudes and frequencies on the solid-like star-like micelle samples. The normalized third and fifth harmonics, I3/I1 and I5/I1, are plotted in a Pipkin-type diagram (In/I1 vs amplitude γ 0 and frequency ω). The resulting contour plots are shown in Fig. 7. Both I3/I1 and I5/I1 show a well-defined peak in the Pipkin space. The third harmonic peak is at γ 0 = 100 % and ω = 65 rad/s and the fifth harmonic peak at the same amplitude γ 0 = 100 %, but lower frequency ω = 40 rad/s. Furthermore, at the peak, the non-linearity is extremely large; it reaches values of 48 % for the third harmonic and 24 % for the fifth which are quite unusual. In comparison, the non-linearity in the low-frequency regime saturates at I 3/I 1 = 28 % (Fig. 2c). The Lissajous figures for selected data points can be seen in Fig. 8 in a Pipkin representation. It is clear that the shape drastically changes at around ω = 60 rad/s. The maximum stress that follows strain reversal is dominating the response, and it is followed by a stress minimum close to maximum shear rate.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Normalized amplitude of the third and fifth Fourier harmonics of the stress response of star-like micelles at ϕ eff = 3.1. A peak in In/I1 can be observed at an angular frequency of 60 rad/s in the case of the third harmonic and at 40 rad/s in the case of the fifth harmonic

Fig. 8
figure 8

Pipkin plot showing Lissajous figures (stress vs strain) for selected data. The star-like micelle sample is at ϕ eff = 3.1. Note the unconventional shapes at ω = 60 rad/s

In Fig. 9, we show the variation of the third, fifth, and seventh harmonic with frequency at an amplitude γ 0 = 100 %. All three normalized harmonics can be fitted with a damped, driven harmonic oscillator equation:

$$ \frac{I_n}{I_1}=\frac{\alpha }{\sqrt{{\left({\omega}^2-{\omega}_0^2\right)}^2+{\beta}^2{\omega}^2}} $$

where ω 0 is the resonance frequency, β is the damping parameter, and α is the normalized amplitude. The lines in Fig. 9 indicate least-squares fitting of the data with the resonance equation, which gives excellent agreement and a resonance frequency of 66, 40, and 28 rad/s for the third, fifth, and seventh harmonics, respectively. In the inset of Fig. 9, we show that the resonance frequencies are proportional to 1/n (where n is the number of the harmonic). This is typical of non-linear or superharmonic resonance effect which corresponds to resonance of the higher harmonics at integer fractions of the natural (or fundamental) frequency of a driven non-linear oscillator. Extrapolation of the line (inset, Fig. 9) to where 1/n is equal to one gives a fundamental resonance frequency of 200 rad/s.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Fit of the normalized amplitude of higher harmonics. Lines represent fit using the damped, driven harmonic oscillator equation. Inset: resonance frequency ω 0 vs 1/n, where n is the harmonic number

In order to verify this resonance effect, we also used PMMA hard spheres at ϕ = 0.6. A similar resonance peak is visible at a lower amplitude of 20 % but crucially at the same frequency of 65 rad/s. The fact that resonance appears at the same frequencies for samples as different as star-like micelles and PMMA hard spheres, as well as the unnaturally high values of non-linearity, points out to an instrumental origin of the non-linear resonance effect.

It is important to realize that the transducer of the rheometer has a feedback loop that keeps the measurement geometry in place, and the torque measured is just proportional to the reaction torque that drives the tool back to the original position. This feedback loop has a characteristic time constant in the tens of milliseconds range (Dullaert and Mewis 2005) and can thus be driven to resonance at frequencies around hundreds of rad/s. Thus, a fundamental frequency of 200 rad/s is consistent with the view that the superharmonic resonance effect is caused by the transducer and not by the sample.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poulos, A.S., Renou, F., Jacob, A.R. et al. Large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) in model colloidal suspensions and glasses: frequency dependence. Rheol Acta 54, 715–724 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-015-0865-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-015-0865-8

Keywords

Navigation