Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study on hybrid-based MoS2-GO hybrid nanofluid flow over a three-dimensional extending surface: A numerical investigation

  • Research
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research work, the authors have presented a water-ethylene glycol-based hybrid nanofluid flow which contains MoS2 and GO nanoparticles on a stretching surface. The fluid flow has been examined under the consequences of velocity and thermal slip conditions, magnetic field, and exponential heat source/sink. The hybrid-based fluid flow is composed of 50% water and 50% ethylene glycol. The purpose of this investigation is to propose a comparative analysis among the pure fluid, GO nanofluid, and hybrid nanofluid. A suitable set of variables has been used to convert the leading equation to dimensionless notation. The bvp4c Matlab built-in package is utilized to compute a numerical solution of the suggested model. A comparison of the resultant data with published results exhibits a significant agreement. The outcomes of the present work show that GO nanofluid flow has a greater velocity profile than the hybrid nanofluid and base fluid. Temperature panels, skin friction, and thermal flow rate are much greater in the case of hybrid nanoparticles in contrast to single GO nanofluid and base fluid. Further, it has been noticed that the impact of the porosity factor and magnetic and rotation factors drops the velocity distribution, while the opposite impacts of the porosity and magnetic factors have been found on the radial velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

A :

Constant

\(B_{0}\) :

Strength of magnetic field

\({\text{Ec}}\) :

Eckert number

\(C_{p}\) :

Specific heat

\(k\) :

Thermal conductivity

\(Q_{E}\) :

Exponential heat source factor

\(L_{1} ,L_{2} ,L_{3}\) :

Slip lengths

\(M\) :

Magnetic factor

\(\Pr\) :

Prandtl number

\(Q_{0}\) :

Heat source coefficient

\(T_{w}\) :

Surface temperature

\(T_{\infty }\) :

Free-stream temperature

\(u_{1} ,u_{2} ,u_{3}\) :

Velocity components

\(u_{1\left( w \right)}\) :

Stretching velocity

x, y, z :

Coordinates

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity

\(\rho\) :

Density

\(\beta_{T}\) :

Thermal expansion

\(\sigma\) :

Electrical conductivity

\(\chi_{1}\), \(\chi_{2}\) :

Volume fraction of first and second nanoparticles

\(\nu_{f}\) :

Kinematic viscosity

\(\alpha\) :

Rotation factor

\(\lambda\) :

Mixed convection parameter

\(\infty\) :

Free stream

f, nf, hnf:

Fluid, nanofluid, hybrid nanofluid

w :

Surface

References

  1. Bennett TD, Coudert F-X, James SL, Cooper AI (2021) The changing state of porous materials. Nat Mater 20:1179–1187

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng H, Gharasoo M, Zhang L, Dai Z, Hajizadeh A, Peters CA, Soulaine C, Thullner M, Van Cappellen P (2022) A perspective on applied geochemistry in porous media: reactive transport modeling of geochemical dynamics and the interplay with flow phenomena and physical alteration. Appl Geochem 146:105445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Habibishandiz M, Saghir MZ (2022) A critical review of heat transfer enhancement methods in the presence of porous media, nanofluids, and microorganisms. Therm Sci Eng Prog 30:101267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuqiang W, Xinping Z, Yan D, Hongliang Y, Shi X, Yang L, Ziming C (2022) Progress in radiative transfer in porous medium: a review from macro scale to pore scale with experimental test. Appl Therm Eng 210:118331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bejawada SG, Reddy YD, Jamshed W, Nisar KS, Alharbi AN, Chouikh R (2022) Radiation effect on MHD Casson fluid flow over an inclined non-linear surface with chemical reaction in a Forchheimer porous medium. Alexandria Eng J 61(10):8207–8220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEJ.2022.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wehinger D, Eppinger T, Bafakeeh OT, Raghunath K, Ali F, Khalid M, Sayed E, Tag-Eldin M, Oreijah M, Guedri K, Ben Khedher N, Khan MI (2022) Hall current and Soret effects on unsteady MHD rotating flow of second-grade fluid through porous media under the influences of thermal radiation and chemical. Mdpi Com. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Megahed AM, Abbas W (2022) Non-Newtonian cross fluid flow through a porous medium with regard to the effect of chemical reaction and thermal stratification phenomenon. Case Stud Therm Eng 29:101715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbas A, Jeelani MB, Alharthi NH (2022) Darcy-Forchheimer relation influence on MHD dissipative third-grade fluid flow and heat transfer in porous medium with Joule heating effects: a numerical approach. Processes 10:906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Int Mech Eng Congr Exhib San Fr CA (United States) 1(1):12–17. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc671104/. Accessed October 2,2021

  10. Said Z, Sundar LS, Tiwari AK, Ali HM, Sheikholeslami M, Bellos E, Babar H (2022) Recent advances on the fundamental physical phenomena behind stability, dynamic motion, thermophysical properties, heat transport, applications, and challenges of nanofluids. Phys Rep 946:1–94

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Acharya N, Mabood F, Shahzad SA, Badruddin IA (2022) Hydrothermal variations of radiative nanofluid flow by the influence of nanoparticles diameter and nanolayer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 130:105781. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2021.105781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatti MM, Arain MB, Zeeshan A, Ellahi R, Doranehgard MH (2022) Swimming of gyrotactic microorganism in MHD Williamson nanofluid flow between rotating circular plates embedded in porous medium: application of thermal energy storage. J Energy Storage 45:103511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raizah Z, Khan A, Gul T, Saeed A, Bonyah E, Galal AM (2023) Coupled Dufour and Soret effects on hybrid nanofluid flow through gyrating channel subject to chemically reactive arrhenius activation energy. J Nanomater 2023

  14. Rasool G, Shah NA, El-Zahar ER, Wakif A (2022) Numerical investigation of EMHD nanofluid flows over a convectively heated riga pattern positioned horizontally in a Darcy-Forchheimer porous medium: application of passive control strategy and generalized transfer laws. Waves Random Complex Media 1–20

  15. Hussain SM, Jamshed W, Safdar R, Shahzad F, Mohd Nasir NAA, Ullah I (2022) Chemical reaction and thermal characteristiecs of Maxwell nanofluid flow-through solar collector as a potential solar energy cooling application: a modified Buongiorno’s model. Energy Environ 0958305X221088113

  16. Kumar NN, Sastry D, Shaw S (2022) Irreversibility analysis of an unsteady micropolar CNT-blood nanofluid flow through a squeezing channel with activation energy-application in drug delivery. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 226:107156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu Y, Bashir S, Ramzan M, Malik MY (2023) Model-based comparative study of magnetohydrodynamics unsteady hybrid nanofluid flow between two infinite parallel plates with particle shape effects. Math Methods Appl Sci 46:11568–11582

  18. Song H, Wang B, Zhou Q, Xiao J, Jia X (2017) Preparation and tribological properties of MoS2/graphene oxide composites. Appl Surf Sci 419:24–34

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Bhatti MM, Michaelides EE, Marin M, Ellahi R (2022) Hybrid nanofluid flow towards an elastic surface with tantalum and nickel nanoparticles, under the influence of an induced magnetic field. Eur Phys J Spec Top 231:521–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gumber P, Yaseen M, Rawat SK, Kumar M (2022) Heat transfer in micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow past a vertical plate in the presence of thermal radiation and suction/injection effects. Partial Differ Equations Appl Math 5:100240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ojjela O (2022) Numerical investigation of heat transport in alumina–silica hybrid nanofluid flow with modeling and simulation. Math Comput Simul 193:100–122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Elattar S, Helmi MM, Elkotb MA, El-Shorbagy MA, Abdelrahman A, Bilal M, Ali A (2022) Computational assessment of hybrid nanofluid flow with the influence of hall current and chemical reaction over a slender stretching surface. Alexandria Eng J 61:10319–10331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guedri K, Khan A, Gul T, Mukhtar S, Alghamdi W, Yassen MF, Tag Eldin E (2022) Thermally dissipative flow and entropy analysis for electromagnetic trihybrid nanofluid flow past a stretching surface. ACS Omega 7:33432–33442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Haq I, Naveen Kumar R, Gill R, Madhukesh JK, Khan U, Raizah Z, Eldin SM, Boonsatit N, Jirawattanapanit A (2022) Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in the presence of hybrid nanofluid flow on various geometries. Front Chem. 10:1032805

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Acharya N (2023) Magnetically driven MWCNT-Fe3O4-water hybrid nanofluidic transport through a micro-wavy channel: A novel MEMS design for drug delivery application. Mater Today Commun 107844

  26. Acharya N (2023) Hydrothermal scenario of buoyancy-driven magnetized multi-walled carbon nanotube-Fe3O4-water hybrid nanofluid flow within a discretely heated circular chamber fitted with fins. J Magn Magn Mater 171612

  27. Das K, Giri SS, Kundu PK (2021) Influence of Hall current effect on hybrid nanofluid flow over a slender stretching sheet with zero nanoparticle flux. Heat Transf 50:7232–7250. https://doi.org/10.1002/HTJ.22226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Das K, Giri SS, Kundu PK (2019) Induced magnetic field and second order velocity slip effects on TiO2-water/ethylene glycol nanofluids. Phys Scr 95:15803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Acharya N, Öztop HF (2023) On the entropy analysis and hydrothermal behavior of buoyancy-driven magnetized hybrid nanofluid flow within a semi-circular chamber fitted with a triangular heater: application to thermal energy storage for energy management. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 1–31

  30. Acharya N, Mabood F (2021) On the hydrothermal features of radiative Fe3O4–graphene hybrid nanofluid flow over a slippery bended surface with heat source/sink. J Therm Anal Calorim 143:1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10973-020-09850-1/METRICS

  31. Giri SS, Das K, Kundu PK (2018) Framing the features of a Darcy-Forchheimer nanofluid flow past a Riga plate with chemical reaction by HPM. Eur Phys J Plus 133:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Acharya N (2022) Magnetized hybrid nanofluid flow within a cube fitted with circular cylinder and its different thermal boundary conditions. J Magn Magn Mater 564:170167

  33. Acharya N (2022) On the hydrothermal behavior and entropy analysis of buoyancy driven magnetohydrodynamic hybrid nanofluid flow within an octagonal enclosure fitted with fins: application to thermal energy storage. J Energy Storage 53:105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EST.2022.105198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ullah I, Alajlani Y, Pasha AA, Adil M, Weera W (2022) Theoretical investigation of hybrid nanomaterials transient flow through variable feature of Darcy-Forchheimer space with exponential heat source and slip condition. Sci Rep 12:15085

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Awan AU, Shah SAA, Ali B (2022) Bio-convection effects on Williamson nanofluid flow with exponential heat source and motile microorganism over a stretching sheet, Chinese. J Phys 77:2795–2810

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan SU, Irfan M, Khan MI, Abbasi A, Rahman SU, Niazi UM, Farooq S (2022) Bio-convective Darcy-Forchheimer oscillating thermal flow of Eyring-Powell nanofluid subject to exponential heat source/sink and modified Cattaneo-Christov model applications. J Indian Chem Soc 99:100399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hasibi A, Gholami A, Asadi Z, Ganji DD (2022) Importance of induced magnetic field and exponential heat source on convective flow of Casson fluid in a micro-channel via AGM. Theor Appl Mech Lett 12:100342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar A, Sharma BK, Gandhi R, Mishra NK, Bhatti MM (2023) Response surface optimization for the electromagnetohydrodynamic Cu-polyvinyl alcohol/water Jeffrey nanofluid flow with an exponential heat source. J Magn Magn Mater 576:170751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Giri SS, Das K, Kundu PK (2019) Inclined magnetic field effects on unsteady nanofluid flow and heat transfer in a finite thin film with non-uniform heat source/sink. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct

  40. Yaseen M, Garia R, Rawat SK, Kumar M (2023) Hybrid nanofluid flow over a vertical flat plate with Marangoni convection in the presence of quadratic thermal radiation and exponential heat source. Int J Ambient Energy 44:527–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dawar A, Islam S, Shah Z, Mahmuod SR (2023) A passive control of Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface with alumina and copper nanomaterials: A study on sodium alginate-based fluid. J Mol Liq 122018

  42. Thumma T, Pyari DR, Ontela S, Al-Mdallal QM, Jarad F (2023) Heat transfer analysis of magnetized Cu-Ag-H2O hybrid nanofluid radiative flow over a spinning disk when the exponential heat source and Hall current are substantial: optimization and sensitivity analysis. Case Stud Therm Eng 50:103448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rawat SK, Yaseen M, Shafiq A, Kumar M, Al-Mdallal QM (2023) Nanoparticle aggregation effect on nonlinear convective nanofluid flow over a stretched surface with linear and exponential heat source/sink. Int J Thermofluids 100355

  44. Asghar A, Chandio AF, Shah Z, Vrinceanu N, Deebani W, Shutaywi M, Lund LA (2023) Magnetized mixed convection hybrid nanofluid with effect of heat generation/absorption and velocity slip condition. Heliyon 9

  45. Zainodin S, Jamaludin A, Nazar R, Pop I (2023) Effects of higher order chemical reaction and slip conditions on mixed convection hybrid ferrofluid flow in a Darcy porous medium. Alexandria Eng J 68:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mahmood Z, Eldin SM, Rafique K, Khan U (2023) Numerical analysis of MHD tri-hybrid nanofluid over a nonlinear stretching/shrinking sheet with heat generation/absorption and slip conditions. Alexandria Eng J 76:799–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ramzan M, Shahmir N, Saleel CA, S54 Kadry, SM Eldin, AM Saeed, (2023) Model-based comparison of hybrid nanofluid Darcy-Forchheimer flow subject to quadratic convection and frictional heating with multiple slip conditions. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 1–21

  48. Farooq M, Walie MH, Ahmad S, Hassine SBH (2023) Assessment of squeezing phenomenon in non-linear stratified fluid flow with slip conditions through Darcy porous material. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 146:106945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rafique K, Mahmood Z, Khan U (2023) Mathematical analysis of MHD hybrid nanofluid flow with variable viscosity and slip conditions over a stretching surface. Mater Today Commun 36:106692

  50. Shahzadi I, Duraihem FZ, Ijaz S, Raju CSK, Saleem S (2023) Blood stream alternations by mean of electroosmotic forces of fractional ternary nanofluid through the oblique stenosed aneurysmal artery with slip conditions. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 143:106679

  51. Giri SS, Das K, Kundu PK (2022) Computational analysis of thermal and mass transmit in a hydromagnetic hybrid nanofluid flow over a slippery curved surface. Int J Ambient Energy 43:6062–6070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Giri SS, Das K, Kundu PK (2020) Heat conduction and mass transfer in a MHD nanofluid flow subject to generalized Fourier and Fick’s law. Mech Adv Mater Struct 27:1765–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dawar A, Thumma T, Islam S, Shah Z (2023) Optimization of response function on hydromagnetic buoyancy-driven rotating flow considering particle diameter and interfacial layer effects: homotopy and sensitivity analysis. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 144:106770. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2023.106770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Nazir U, Sohail M, Hafeez MB, Krawczuk M (2021) Significant production of thermal energy in partially ionized hyperbolic tangent material based on ternary hybrid nanomaterials. Energies 14:6911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dawar A, Islam S, Shah Z (2022) A comparative analysis of the performance of magnetised copper–copper oxide/water and copper–copper oxide/kerosene oil hybrid nanofluids flowing through an extending surface with velocity slips and thermal convective conditions. Int J Ambient Energy 1–19

  56. Shah NA, Animasaun IL, Chung JD, Wakif A, Alao FI, Raju CSK (2021) Significance of nanoparticle’s radius, heat flux due to concentration gradient, and mass flux due to temperature gradient: the case of water conveying copper nanoparticles. Sci Reports 111(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81417-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ghadikolaei SS, Gholinia M (2020) 3D mixed convection MHD flow of GO-MoS2 hybrid nanoparticles in H2O–(CH2OH) 2 hybrid base fluid under the effect of H2 bond. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 110:104371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang CY (1988) Stretching a surface in a rotating fluid, Zeitschrift Für Angew. Math Und Phys ZAMP 39:177–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, P.O. Box 741, 71491, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

    Ebrahem A. Algehyne & Fahad Maqbul Alamrani

  2. Nanotechnology Research Unit (NRU), University of Tabuk, 71491, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

    Ebrahem A. Algehyne

  3. Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Zehba Raizah

  4. Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Theoretical Studies, Saudi Electronic University, 11673, Jeddah-M, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Showkat Ahmad Lone

  5. Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, 23200, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Anwar Saeed

  6. Department of Basic Sciences, General Administration of Preparatory Year, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Hofuf, Saudi Arabia

    Humaira Yasmin

Authors
  1. Ebrahem A. Algehyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fahad Maqbul Alamrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zehba Raizah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Showkat Ahmad Lone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anwar Saeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Humaira Yasmin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and H.Y.; methodology, E.A.A. and F.M.A.; software, Z.R.; validation, A.S., E.A.A., and S.A.L.; formal analysis, Z.R.; investigation, F.M.A. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and E.A.A.; writing—review and editing, H.Y. and S.A.L.; visualization, H.Y. and F.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ebrahem A. Algehyne or Humaira Yasmin.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Algehyne, E.A., Alamrani, F.M., Raizah, Z. et al. Comparative study on hybrid-based MoS2-GO hybrid nanofluid flow over a three-dimensional extending surface: A numerical investigation. Colloid Polym Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-024-05233-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-024-05233-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation