Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this work was to detect subclinical sacroiliac joint involvement in patients with brucellosis and study their clinical and laboratory features.
Patients and methods
The study included 100 brucellosis patients being followed-up in the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute and Cairo University outpatient clinics. A thorough history, physical examination, routine laboratory tests, and abdominal ultrasound were obtained for all patients. Extended rheumatological examination was performed including clinical testing for sacroiliitis and enthesitis. None of the patients reported a history of back pain or any symptoms suggestive of sacroiliitis during the course of the infection. Plain x-ray and MRI scan of the sacroiliac joints were performed for all patients.
Results
Asymptomatic sacroiliitis was present in 24 % of the brucellosis patients; none of the patients had tenderness over their spine with preserved lumbar spine mobility. Sacroiliitis was mainly unilateral being bilateral in 20.83 %. There was an obvious relationship with animal contact and occupation of the patients. Osteoarticular involvement was common (67 %) including arthralgias, arthritis, myalgias, spondylitis, enthesitis and bursitis, being clearly higher in those with sacroiliitis. The MRI scan showed blurring of the margins in 66.67 %, widening in 25 %, narrowing in 54.17 %, erosions in 20.83 %, and sclerosis in 12.5 %.
Conclusion
Osteoarticular manifestations of brucellosis are prevalent and subclinical sacroiliitis is evident, a finding that may classify these patients as having brucellar spondyloarthropathy (BSA). Referring brucellosis patients for rheumatological assessment has the advantage of early assessment of asymptomatic cases with sacroiliitis which is commonly overlooked.
Zusammenfassung
Ziel
Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Aufdeckung einer subklinischen Beteiligung des Sakroiliakalgelenks bei Brucellosepatienten und die Untersuchung klinischer wie laborchemischer Charakteristika.
Patienten und Methoden
In die Studie eingeschlossen wurden 100 Brucellosepatienten, das Follow-up lag bei der Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit am Theodor Bilharz Research Institute und Ambulanzen der Universität Kairo. Eine gründliche Anamnese, körperliche Untersuchung, Routinelabordiagnostik und eine abdominale Sonographie wurden für alle Patienten durchgeführt, außerdem eine ausführliche rheumatologische Untersuchung einschließlich klinischer Tests hinsichtlich Sakroiliitis und Enthesitis. Keiner der Patienten gab Rückenschmerzen an oder andere Symptome, die auf eine Sakroiliitis im Verlauf der Infektion hingewiesen hätten. Native Röntgenaufnahmen und Magnetresonanztomographien wurden für alle Patienten angefertigt.
Ergebnisse
Eine asymptomatische Sakroiliitis bestand bei 24% der Brucellosepatienten; keiner hatte eine Schmerzempfindlichkeit im Bereich der Wirbelsäule und bei allen war die LWS(Lendenwirbelsäule)-Mobilität erhalten. Die Sakroiliitis war im Wesentlichen unilateral, in 20,83 % bilateral. Ein offensichtlicher Zusammenhang bestand zu Tierkontakt und Beruf der Patienten. Eine osteoartikuläre Beteiligung war verbreitet (67 %), einschließlich Arthralgien, Arthritis, Myalgien, Spondylitis, Enthesitis und Bursitis, deutlich häufiger bei den Patienten mit Sakroiliitis. Die MRT zeigte verwaschene Grenzen in 66,67 %, Erweiterungen in 25 %, Verschmälerungen in 54,17 %, Erosionen in 20,83 % und Sklerosierungen in 12,5 %.
Fazit
Osteoartikuläre Manifestationen einer Brucellose sind prävalent, eine subklinische Sakroiliitis evident; diesem Befund zufolge lassen sich diese Patienten als Patienten mit Brucellose-assoziierter Spondylarthropathie (BSA) klassifizieren. Patienten mit Brucellose zu einem rheumatologischen Assessment zu überweisen hat den Vorteil einer frühen Evaluierung von asymptomatischen Sakroiliitiden, die in der Regel übersehen wird.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayaşlioğlu E, Ozlük O, Kiliç D et al (2005) A case of brucellar septic arthritis of the knee with a prolonged clinical course. Rheumatol Int 25:69–71
Mantur BG, Amarnath SK, Shinde RS (2007) Review of clinical and laboratory features of human brucellosis. Indian J Med Microbiol 25:188–202
Adebajo AO (1996) Rheumatic manifestations of tropical diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 8:85–89
Pourbagher A, Pourbagher MA, Savas L et al (2006) Epidemiologic, clinical, and imaging findings in brucellosis patients with osteoarticular involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:873–880
Priest JR, Low D, Wang C, Bush T (2008) Brucellosis and sacroiliitis: a common presentation of an uncommon pathogen. J Am Board Fam Med 21:158–161
Alarcón GS, Gotuzzo E, Hinostroza SA et al (1985) HLA studies in brucellar spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 4:312–314
Girschick HJ, Guilherme L, Inman RD et al (2008) Bacterial triggers and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26(1 Suppl 48):S12–S17
Turan H, Serefhanoglu K, Karadeli E et al (2009) A case of brucellosis with abscess of the iliacus muscle, olecranon bursitis, and sacroiliitis. Int J Infect Dis 13e:485–487
Thakur SD, Kumar R, Thapliyal DC (2002) Human brucellosis: review of an under-diagnosed animal transmitted disease. J Commun Dis 34:287–301
Jubier-Maurin V, Boigegrain RA, Cloeckaert A et al (2001) Major outer membrane protein Omp25 of Brucella suis is involved in inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha production during infection of human macrophages. Infect Immun 69:4823–4830
Cloeckaert A, Vizcaino N, Paquet JY et al (2002) Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp. Past, present and future. Vet Microbiol 90:229–247
Gheita TA, El Gazzar II, El-Fishawy HS et al (2014) Involvement of IL-23 in enteropathic arthritis patients with inflammatory bowel disease: preliminary results. Clin Rheumatol 33(5):713–717
Dougados M, Linden S van der, Juhlin R et al (1991) The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218–1227
Wright AE, Smith F (1897) On the application of the serum test to the differential diagnosis of typhoid fever and Malta fever. Lancet 1:656–659
Taşova Y, Saltoğlu N, Sahin G, Aksu HS (1999) Osteoartricular involvement of brucellosis in Turkey. Clin Rheumatol 18:214–219
Chou CT, Tsai YF, Liu J et al (2001) The detection of the HLA-B27 antigen by immunomagnetic separation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-comparison with a flow cytometric procedure. J Immunol Methods 255(1–2):15–22
Baraliakos X, Heijde D van der, Braun J, Landewé RB (2011) OMERACT magnetic resonance imaging initiative on structural and inflammatory lesions in ankylosing spondylitis – report of a special interest group at OMERACT 10 on sacroiliac joint and spine lesions. J Rheumatol 38(9):2051–2054
Gerloni V, Fantini F (1990) Reactive arthritis. Pediatr Med Chir 12:447–451
Mantur BG, Biradar MS, Bidri RC (2006) Protean clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges of human brucellosis in adults: 16 years’ experience in an endemic area. J Med Microbiol 55:897–903
Hizel K, Guzel O, Dizbay M et al (2007) Age and duration of disease as factors affecting clinical findings and sacroiliitis in brucellosis. Infection 35:434–437
Buzgan T, Karahocagil MK, Irmak H et al (2010) Clinical manifestations and complications in 1028 cases of brucellosis: a retrospective evaluation and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis 14:e469–e478
Hashemi SH, Keramat F, Ranjbar M et al (2007) Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis in Hamedan, an endemic area in the west of Iran. Int J Infect Dis 11:496–500
Geyik MF, Gür A, Nas K et al (2002) Musculoskeletal involvement of brucellosis in different age groups: a study of 195 cases. Swiss Med Wkly 132:98–105
Heidari B, Heidari P (2011) Rheumatologic manifestations of brucellosis. Rheumatol Int 31:721–724
Janmohammadi N, Roushan MR (2009) False negative serological tests may lead to misdiagnosis and mismanagement in osteoarticular brucellosis. Trop Doct 39:88–90
Papagoras CE, Argyropoulou MI, Voulgari PV et al (2009) A case of Brucella spondylitis in a patient with psoriatic arthritis receiving infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27:124–127
Wallach JC, Delpino MV, Scian R et al (2010) Prepatellar bursitis due to Brucella abortus: case report and analysis of the local immune response. J Med Microbiol 59:1514–1518
Alvarez de Buergo M, Gomez Reino FJ, Gomez Reino JJ (1990) A long term study of 22 children with brucellar arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 8:609–612
Zaks N, Sukenik S, Alkan M et al (1995) Musculoskeletal manifestations of brucellosis: a study of 90 cases in Israel. Semin Arthritis Rheum 25:97–102
Khateeb MI, Araj GF, Majeed SA, Lulu AR (1990) Brucella arthritis: a study of 96 cases in Kuwait. Ann Rheum Dis 49:994–998
Bosilkovski M, Krteva L, Caparoska S, Dimzova M (2004) Osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis: study of 196 cases in the Republic of Macedonia. Croat Med J 45:727–733
Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Fernández-Nebro A, Cabrera-Franquelo F (1991) Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis. Ann Rheum Dis 50:23–26
Zribi M, Ammari L, Masmoudi A et al (2009) Clinical manifestations, complications and treatment of brucellosis: 45-patient study. Pathol Biol (Paris) 57:349–352
Díaz R, Ariza J, Alberola I et al (2006) Secondary serological response of patients with chronic hepatosplenic suppurative brucellosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13:1190–1196
Dayan L, Deyev S, Palma L, Rozen N (2009) Long-standing, neglected sacroiliitis with remarked sacro-iliac degenerative changes as a result of Brucella spp. infection. Spine J 9:e1–e4
Hermann KG, Landewé RB, Braun J, Heijde DM van der (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory lesions in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: is paramagnetic contrast medium necessary? J Rheumatol 32(10):2056–2060
Agnew S, Spink WW (1949) The erythrocyte sedimentation rate in brucellosis. Am J Med Sci 217:211–215
Romero-Sánchez C, Londoño J, DE Avila J, Valle-Oñate R (2010) Biomarkers for spondyloarthropathies. State of the art. Rev Med Chil 138(9):1179–1185
Shaalan MA, Memish ZA, Mahmoud SA et al (2002) Brucellosis in children: clinical observations in 115 cases. Int J Infect Dis 6:182–186
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Conflict of interest. TA Gheita, S Sayed, GS Azkalany, HS El Fishawy, MA Aboul-Ezz, MH Shaaban, and RH Bassyouni state that there are no conflicts of interest. All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gheita, T., Sayed, S., Azkalany, G. et al. Subclinical sacroiliitis in brucellosis. Z. Rheumatol. 74, 240–245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-014-1465-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-014-1465-1