Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-specific uncertainties in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is unknown whether higher rates of delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in women might have contributed to the poorer outcome of women.

Methods

In a prospective diagnostic multicenter study, we recruited patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with any kind of chest discomfort/chest pain with onset or peak within the last 12 h. We quantified early diagnostic uncertainty for the presence of ACS among treating physicians at the ED after 90 min, possibly responsible for delayed diagnosis, using a visual analogue scale. Late diagnostic uncertainty, possibly responsible for misdiagnosis, was defined as disagreement among two independent cardiologists’ adjudication of the final diagnosis after complete work-up.

Results

Among 2795 patients (897 women and 1898 men), ACS was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24 % of women and 35 % of men. Early diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgment of the ED physician for ACS as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.89 (95 % CI 0.87–0.92) in women and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.85–0.88) in men (p = 0.046). Late diagnostic uncertainty regarding the diagnosis of ACS was 5 % in women and 7 % in men (p = 0.069).

Conclusion

Diagnostic uncertainty for the presence of ACS in women is not more common as compared to men and does, therefore, not explain the poorer outcome observed in women with ACS.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al (2000) Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 342:1163–1170. doi:10.1056/NEJM200004203421603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mockel M, Searle J, Muller R et al (2013) Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charité Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM). Eur J Emerg Med 20:103–108. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW (2008) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report 1–38

  4. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P et al (2015) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 37:267–315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Redberg RF (2012) Coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 367:375–376. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1206040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arslanian-Engoren C, Patel A, Fang J et al (2006) Symptoms of men and women presenting with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 98:1177–1181. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anand SS, Xie CC, Mehta S et al (2005) Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1845–1851. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubini Gimenez M, Reiter M, Twerenbold R et al (2014) Sex-specific chest pain characteristics in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med 174:241–249. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heer T, Hochadel M, Schmidt K et al (2015) Gender differences in therapeutic recommendation after diagnostic coronary angiography: insights from the coronary angiography and PCI registry of the German Society of Cardiology. Clin Res Cardiol 104:507–517. doi:10.1007/s00392-015-0815-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Albarqouni L, von Eisenhart Rothe A, Ronel J et al (2016) Frequency and covariates of fear of death during myocardial infarction and its impact on prehospital delay: findings from the multicentre MEDEA study. Clin Res Cardiol 105:135–144. doi:10.1007/s00392-015-0895-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Melberg T, Kindervaag B, Rosland J (2013) Gender-specific ambulance priority and delays to primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a consequence of the patients’ presentation or the management at the emergency medical communications center? Am Heart J 166:839–845. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawesson SS, Alfredsson J, Fredrikson M, Swahn E (2013) A gender perspective on short- and long term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction–a report from the SWEDEHEART register. Int J Cardiol 168:1041–1047. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Canto JG, Rogers WJ, Goldberg RJ et al (2013) Association of age and sex with myocardial infarction symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality. JAMA 307:813–822

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davis M, Diamond J, Montgomery D et al (2015) Acute coronary syndrome in young women under 55 years of age: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol 104:648–655. doi:10.1007/s00392-015-0827-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fengler K, Fuernau G, Desch S et al (2015) Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 104:71–78. doi:10.1007/s00392-014-0767-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Welch LC, Lutfey KE, Gerstenberger E, Grace M (2012) Gendered uncertainty and variation in physicians’ decisions for coronary heart disease: the double-edged sword of “atypical symptoms”. J Health Soc Behav 53:313–328. doi:10.1177/0022146512456026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin JY, Martin R, Suls J (2010) Meta-analytic evaluation of gender differences and symptom measurement strategies in acute coronary syndromes. Heart Lung 39:283–295. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Canto JG, Canto EA, Goldberg RJ (2013) Time to standardize and broaden the criteria of acute coronary syndrome symptom presentations in women. Can J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2013.10.015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al (2009) Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 361:858–867. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B et al (2012) One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Arch Intern Med 172:1211–1218. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reichlin T, Irfan A, Twerenbold R et al (2011) Utility of absolute and relative changes in cardiac troponin concentrations in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 124:136–145. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubini Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T et al (2014) Direct comparison of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin i versus t for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 35:2303–2311. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD (2007) Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 28:2525–2538. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thygesen K, Mair J, Katus H et al (2010) Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 31:2197–2204. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Apple FS, Jesse RL, Newby LK et al (2007) National academy of clinical biochemistry and IFCC committee for standardization of markers of cardiac damage laboratory medicine practice guidelines: analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 115:e352–e355. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mueller-Hennessen M, Lindahl B, Giannitsis E et al (2016) Diagnostic and prognostic implications using age- and gender-specific cut-offs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T—sub-analysis from the TRAPID-AMI study. Int J Cardiol 209:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Champney KP, Frederick PD, Bueno H et al (2009) The joint contribution of sex, age and type of myocardial infarction on hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Heart 95:895–899. doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.155804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in Renal Disease study group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Poon S, Goodman SG, Yan RT et al (2012) Bridging the gender gap: insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 163:66–73. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Peterson ED, Rogers WJ, Kiefe CI, John Canto M (2009) Sex differences in mortality after acute myocardial infarction changes from 1994 to 2006. Arch Intern Med 169:1767–1774

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Khan NA, Daskalopoulou SS, Karp I et al (2013) Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients. JAMA Intern Med 173:1863–1871. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naegeli B, Radovanovic D, Rickli H et al (2011) Impact of a nationwide public campaign on delays and outcome in Swiss patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 18:297–304. doi:10.1177/1741826710389386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG et al (2004) Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the global registry of acute coronary events. Chest 126:461–469. doi:10.1378/chest.126.2.461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Canto JG, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ et al (2000) Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA 283:3223–3229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dorsch MF, Lawrance RA, Sapsford RJ et al (2001) Poor prognosis of patients presenting with symptomatic myocardial infarction but without chest pain. Heart 86:494–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Arenja N, Mueller C, Ehl NF et al (2013) Prevalence, extent, and independent predictors of silent myocardial infarction. Am J Med 126:515–522. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients who participated in the study, the staff of the participating EDs, the research coordinators, and the laboratory technicians (particularly Michael Freese, Claudia Stelzig, Kathrin Meissner, Esther Garrido, Irina Klimmeck, Janine Voegele, and Fausta Chiaverio) for their most valuable efforts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Mueller.

Ethics declarations

Funding sources

This study was supported by research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University Basel, and the University Hospital Basel.

Conflict of interest

Professor Mueller has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, 8sense, Abbott, ALERE, Brahms, Critical Diagnostics, Nanosphere, Roche, Siemens, and the University Hospital Basel, as well as speaker honoraria from Abbott, ALERE, BG medicine, Biomerieux, Brahms, Cardiorentis, Novartis, Radiometer, Roche, and Siemens. We disclose that Dr. Reichlin has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PASMP3-136995), the Swiss Heart Foundation, the University of Basel, the Professor Max Cloetta Foundation and the Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel as well as speakers honoraria from Brahms and Roche. Dr. Rubini has received speakers honoraria from Abbott. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with this study. The sponsors had no role in the design of the study, the analysis of the data, the preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional information

P. Hillinger and R. Twerenbold have contributed equally and should be considered first author.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hillinger, P., Twerenbold, R., Wildi, K. et al. Gender-specific uncertainties in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Res Cardiol 106, 28–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1020-y

Keywords

Navigation