Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer with the only high-risk histology of submucosal invasion depth ≥ 1000 μm

  • Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The number of patients undergoing additional surgery after endoscopic resection (ER) for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. Regarding high-risk histology of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1 CRC, a submucosal invasion depth ≥ 1000 μm (T1b) alone may be related to a low incidence of LNM. This study was conducted to clarify the incidence of LNM and to identify factors associated with LNM in T1 CRC with high-risk histology characterized only by T1b.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated patients with pathological T1b CRC who underwent colorectal resection between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups with high-risk histology: those in whom the only high-risk feature was T1b (low-risk T1b group, n = 263), and those with T1b as well as lymphovascular invasion, tumor budding, or poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinoma (high-risk T1b group, n = 289). The incidences of LNM and recurrence were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LNM in the low-risk T1b group.

Results

The incidences of LNM were 3.8% and 21.6% in the Low- and High-risk T1b groups, respectively (p < 0.01), while the 5-year recurrence rates in the two groups were 0.6% and 3.4%, respectively (p = 0.10). Multivariate analysis revealed that only a predominant histological type of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (p = 0.04) was independently associated with LNM in the low-risk T1b group.

Conclusion

When considering the omission of additional surgery after ER in cases of T1 CRC whose only high-risk histological feature is T1b, attention should be paid to the predominant histological type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saitoh Y, Inaba Y, Sasaki T, Sugiyama R, Sukegawa R, Fujiya M (2016) Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection. Dig Endosc 28:324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh JR, Park B, Lee S, Han KS, Youk EG, Lee DH, Kim DS, Lee DS, Hong CW, Kim BC, Kim B, Kim MJ, Park SC, Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Oh JH (2019) Nomogram development and external validation for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 51:1275–1284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, Hasegawa K, Hotta K, Ishida H, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, Kanemitsu Y, Kinugasa Y, Murofushi K, Nakajima TE, Oka S, Tanaka T, Taniguchi H, Tsuji A, Uehara K, Ueno H, Yamanaka T, Yamazaki K, Yoshida M, Yoshino T, Itabashi M, Sakamaki K, Sano K, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Uetake H, Yamaguchi S, Yamaguchi N, Kobayashi H, Matsuda K, Kotake K, Sugihara K; Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2020) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 25:1–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Kobayashi N, Fujii T, Oono Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Takao M, Shinohara T, Murakami Y, Fujimori T, Kaneko K, Saito Y (2013) Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 144:551–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Kobayashi N, Fujii T, Oono Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Takao M, Shinohara T, Fujimori T, Kaneko K, Saito Y (2013) A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 45:718–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Overwater A, Kessels K, Elias SG, Backes Y, Spanier BWM, Seerden TCJ, Pullens HJM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van den Blink A, Offerhaus GJA, van Bergeijk J, Kerkhof M, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, van Lelyveld N, Ter Borg F, Wolfhagen F, Siersema PD, Lacle MM, Moons LMG; Dutch T1 CRC Working Group (2018) Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut 67:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakadoi K, Tanaka S, Kanao H, Terasaki M, Takata S, Oka S, Yoshida S, Arihiro K, Chayama K (2012) Management of T1 colorectal carcinoma with special reference to criteria for curative endoscopic resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:1057–1062

  8. Yoshii S, Nojima M, Nosho K, Omori S, Kusumi T, Okuda H, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M, Yamamoto H, Hosokawa M (2014) Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:292–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasue C, Chino A, Takamatsu M, Namikawa K, Ide D, Saito S, Igarashi M, Fujisaki J (2019) Pathological risk factors and predictive endoscopic factors for lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer: a single-center study of 846 lesions. J Gastroenterol 54:708–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka S, Asayama N, Shigita K, Hayashi N, Oka S, Chayama K (2015) Towards safer and appropriate application of endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma as total excisional biopsy: future perspectives. Dig Endosc 27:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Shimazaki H, Aida S, Hase K, Matsukuma S, Kanai T, Kurihara H, Ozawa K, Yoshimura K, Bekku S (2004) Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:385–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bosch SL, Teerenstra S, de Wilt JH, Cunningham C, Nagtegaal ID (2013) Predicting lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review of risk factors providing rationale for therapy decisions. Endoscopy 45:827–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wada H, Shiozawa M, Katayama K, Okamoto N, Miyagi Y, Rino Y, Masuda M, Akaike M (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol 50(7):727–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2019) Japanese classification of colorectal, appendiceal, and anal carcinoma, third, English edn. Kanehara & CO., Ltd., Tokyo

  15. Yamaoka Y, Imai K, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Hino H, Yamakawa Y, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Kishida Y, Ito S, Hotta K, Imai T (2020) Endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer prior to surgery does not affect surgical adverse events and recurrence. Surg Endosc 34:5006–5016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E (2001) Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 33:367–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y, Nakajima T, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Ikehara H, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Emura F, Ono A, Sano Y, Shimoda T, Fujimori T (2008) Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2700–2706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Ikehara H, Gotoda T, Saito D, Fujii T (2006) Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum. Gut 55:1592–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, IARC, Lyon

  21. Nakadoi K, Oka S, Tanaka S, Hayashi N, Terasaki M, Arihiro K, Shimamoto F, Chayama K (2014) Condition of muscularis mucosae is a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 28:1269–1276

  22. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobayashi H, Higuchi T, Uetake H, Iida S, Ishikawa T, Ishiguro M, Sugihara K (2012) Resection with en bloc removal of regional lymph node after endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:4161–4167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tateishi Y, Nakanishi Y, Taniguchi H, Shimoda T, Umemura, (2010) Pathological prognostic factors predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal carcinoma. Mod Pathol 23:1068–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yokoyama S, Takifuji K, Hotta T, Matsuda K, Tominaga T, Oku Y, Nasu T, Tamura K, Ieda J, Yamaue H (2010) Moderately differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma as a lymph node metastatic phenotype: comparison with well differentiated counterparts. BMC Surg 10:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guarino M, Rubino B, Ballabio G (2007) The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer pathology. Pathology 39:305–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spaderna S, Schmalhofer O, Hlubek F, Berx G, Eger A, Merkel S, Jung A, Kirchner T, Brabletz T (2006) A transient, EMT-linked loss of basement membranes indicates metastasis and poor survival in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 131:830–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sako T, Kudo SE, Miyachi H, Wakamura K, Igarashi K, Misawa M, Mori Y, Kudo T, Hayashi T, Katagiri A, Ishida F, Azuma T, Inoue H, Hamatani S (2018) A novel ability of endocytoscopy to diagnose histological grade of differentiation in T1 colorectal carcinomas. Endoscopy 50:69–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218

  30. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30

  31. Kethman WC, Harris AHS, Morris AM, Shelton A, Kirilcuk N, Kin C (2020) Oncologic and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic, open, and robotic approaches for rectal cancer resection: a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 63:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rickert A, Aliyev R, Belle S, Post S, Kienle P, Kähler G (2014) Oncologic colorectal resection after endoscopic treatment of malignant polyps: does endoscopy have an adverse effect on oncologic and surgical outcomes? Gastrointest Endosc 79:951–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Compton CC (2007) Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease. Clin Cancer Res 13:6862s–6870s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi DH, Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Lim SB, Choi HS, Jeong SY (2009) Indications for subsequent surgery after endoscopic resection of submucosally invasive colorectal carcinomas: a prospective cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:438–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Iida S, Hasegawa H, Okabayashi K, Moritani K, Mukai M, Kitagawa Y (2012) Risk factors for postoperative recurrence in patients with pathologically T1 colorectal cancer. World J Surg 36:424–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nishimura T, Oka S, Tanaka S, Asayama N, Nagata S, Tamaru Y, Kuwai T, Yamashita K, Ninomiya Y, Kitadai Y, Arihiro K, Kuraoka K, Kaneko M, Shimamoto F, Chayama K (2021) Clinical significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation to determine additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal T1 carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:949–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yusuke Yamaoka designed this study and drafted the paper. Yusuke Yamaoka, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Hitoshi Hino, Shoichi Manabe, Kai Chen, and Kenji Naishi obtained and analyzed the data. Akifumi Notsu supervised statistical analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Yamaoka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital (Institutional code: J2020-9–2020-1–3).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaoka, Y., Shiomi, A., Kagawa, H. et al. Lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer with the only high-risk histology of submucosal invasion depth ≥ 1000 μm. Int J Colorectal Dis 37, 2387–2395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04269-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04269-6

Keywords

Navigation