Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does microscopic involvement of the surgical margins after ileocecectomy in Crohn’s patients predict early recurrence?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the microscopic presence of Crohn’s disease (CD) in the resected specimen margins in patients undergoing ileocecectomy predicts disease recurrence. The secondary aim was to identify other risk factors which can predict recurrence.

Methods

All CD patients who underwent ileocecectomy in a single colorectal unit between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnosis of CD and margin involvement status were retrieved from pathology reports. Recurrence was determined according to medical records or via a telephone questionnaire. Demographic, clinical, and surgical parameters were compared between patients with and without histopathologic evidence of CD in the resected margins.

Results

A total of 202 CD patients were included, 49 with and 153 without evidence of microscopic involvement in the resected margins. The main demographic characteristics, surgical approach and procedure, and postoperative course, including medical treatment, clinical or endoscopic recurrence, and reoperation rates, were similar for both groups. Patients who were operated laparoscopically (n=58, p 0.016), conversion from laparoscopic to open (n=25, p 0.016), stapled anastomosis (n=150, p 0.004), when stricturoplasty was required (n=12, p 0.046), and those with perianal disease (n=32, p 0.045) had shorter time to recurrence. Male gender had increased hazard ratio (n=106, HR 1.38) for reoperation, but not significantly (p=0.058).

Conclusions

The presence of microscopic CD at the resected specimen margins was not associated with the risk of disease recurrence. Other demographic, clinical, and technical features that did correlate with early recurrence were identified. These results support a conservative approach to the extent of resection in CD patients undergoing ileocecectomy.

Trial registration

Not relevant

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

References

  1. Abraham C, Cho JH (2009) Inflammatory bowel disease. NEJM 361:2066–2078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kristo I, Stift A, Bergmann M, Riss S (2015) Surgical recurrence in Crohn’s disease: are we getting better ? World J Gastroentrol 21:6097–6100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shental O, Tulchinsky H, Greenberg R (2012) Positive histological inflammatory margins are associated with increased risk for intra-abdominal septic complications in patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1125–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avidan B, Sakhnini E, Lahat A, Lang A, Koler M, Zmora O (2005) Risk factors regarding the need for a second operation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Digestion 72:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fazio V, Marchetti F, Church M (1996) Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: a randomized control trial. Ann Surg 224:563–571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone W, Veidenheimer M, Corman M, Coller J (1977) The dilemma of Crohn’s disease: long-term follow-up of Crohn’s disease of the small intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 20:372–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutgeerts P (2002) Crohn’s disease recurrence can be prevented after ileal resection. Gut. 51:152–154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeDombal F, Burton I, Goligher J (1971) Recurrence of Crohn’s disease after primary excisional surgery. Gut 12:519–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenstein A, Sachar D, Paternack B (1975) Reoperation and recurrence in Crohn’s colitis and ileocolitis. NEJM 293:685–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Je LJ, Stadler G (1967) Prognosis after resection of chronic regional ileitis. Gut 8:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G, Belyls J, Kerremans R (1990) Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroentrology 99:956–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lautenbach E, Berlin JA, Lichtenstein GR (1998) Risk factors for early postoperative recurrence. Gastroenterology 115:259–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sachar D, Wolfson D, Greenstein A, Goldberg J, Styczynski R, Janowitz H (1983) Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Gastroentrology 85:917–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whelan G, Farmer R, Fazio V, Goormastic M (1985) Recurrence after surgery in Crohn’s disease. Relationship to location of disease (clinical pattern) and surgical indications. Gastroentrology 88:1826–1833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Unkart JT, Anderson L, Li E, Miller C, Yan Y, Charles Gu C, Chen J, Stone CD, Hunt S, Dietz DW (2008) Risk factors for surgical recurrence after ileocolic resection of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stahlgren L, Ferguson L (1961) The results of surgical treatment of chronic regional enteritis. JAMA 175:986–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anseline P, Wlodarczyc J, Murugasu R (1997) Presence of granulomas is associated with recurrence after surgery for Crohn’s disease: experience of a surgical unit. Br J Surg 84:78–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vester-Andersen M, Vind I, Prosberg M, Bengtsson B (2014) Hospitalisation, surgical and medical reccurence rates in inflammatory bowl disease 2003-2011- a Danish population-based cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 8:1675–1683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Bertin E, Polese L, Filosa T (2007) Surgical predictors of recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolonic resection. Int J Color Dis 22:1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McLeod R, Wolff B, Steinhart A, Carryer P, O’Rourke K, Andrews D (1995) Prophylactic mesalamine treatment decreases postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Gastroentrology 109:404–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Geboes K, Peeters M, Penninckx F, Aerts R, Kerremans R (1995) Controlled trial of metronidazole treatment for prevention of Crohn’s recurrence after ileal resection. Gastroentrology 108:1617–1621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergman L, Krause U (1977) Crohn’s disease. A long-term study of the clinical course in 186 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 12:937–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolff B, Beart R, Frydenberg H, Weiland L, Agrez M (1983) The importance of disease-free margins in resections for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 26:239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krause U (1978) Post-operative complications and early course of surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. Acta Chir Scand 144:163–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Colcock B (1973) Operative technique in surgery for Crohn’s disease, and its relationship to recurrence. Surg Clin North Am 53:375–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karesen R, Serch-Hanssen A, Thoresen B (1981) Crohn’s disease: long-term results of surgical treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 16:57–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kyle J (1972) Surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease of the small intestine. Br J Surg 59:821–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pennington L, Hamilton S, Bayless T, Cameron J (1980) Surgical management of Crohn’s disease, influence of disease at margin of resection. Ann Surg 192:311–318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heuman R, Boeryd B, Bolin T, Sjodahl R (1983) The influence of disease at the margin of resection on the outcome of Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 70:519–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. De Buck van Oversstraeten A, Eshuis E, Vermeire S, Van Assche G (2017) Short- and medium-term outcomes following primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease in two specialist centers. Br J Surg 104:1713–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Poredska K, Kunovsky L, Marek F, Kala Z, Prochazka V, Dolina J, Zboril V, Kovalcikova P, Pavlik T, Jabandziev P, Pavlovsky Z, Vlazny J, Mitas L (2020) The influence of microscopic inflamation at resection margins on early postoperative recurrence after ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 14:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ryan JM, Rogers AC, O’Toole A, Burke JP (2019) Meta-analysis of histological margins positivity in he prediction of recurrence after Crohn’s resection. Dis Colon Rectum 62:882–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim SB, Cheon JH et al (2019) Risk factors for postoperative recurrence in Korean patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut and Liver 15;14(3):331–337

  34. Cohen-Mekelburg S, Schneider Y, Gold S, Scherl E, Steinlauf A (2017) Risk stratification for prevention of recurrence of postoperative Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:651–658

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao M, Lo BZS, Vester-Andersen MK, Vind I, Bendtsen F, Burisch J (2019) A 10-year follow-up study of the natural history of perianal Crohn’s disease in a Danish population-based inception cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis 25:1227–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gajendran M, Bauer A, Buchholz B, Watson A, Koutroubakis I (2018) Ileocecal anastomosis type significantly influences long term functional status, quality of life, and healthcare utilization in postoperative Crohn’s disease patients independent of inflammation recurrence. Am J Gastroenterol 113:576–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Toru K et al (2011) A new antimesenteric functional end-to-end handsewn anastomosis: surgical prevention of anastomotic recurence in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54:586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luglio G, Rispo A, Imperatore N, Giglio MC, Amendola A, Tropeano FP, Peltrini R, Castiglione F, de Palma GD, Bucci L (2020) Surgical prevention of anantomotic recurrence by exluding mesentry in Crohn’s disease: the SuPREMe-CD Study – a randomized cinical trail. Ann Surg 272:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Feng J, Li J, Yang Z, Chen X, Mo J (2018) Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be benefit in intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 97:e0315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Yamamura T (2000) Long-term results of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in patients with Crohn’s disease. Dig Surg 17:493–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mcleod RS, Wolff BG, Ross S et al (2009) Recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection is not affected by anastomotic type: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:919–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cameron JL, Coleman J, Sitzmann JV et al (1992) Patterns of ileal recurrence in Crohn’s disease. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 215:546–551

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Antoniou S, Antoniou G, Koch O, Poitner R, Granderath F (2014) Is laparoscopic ileocecal resection a safe option for Crohn’s disease? Best evidence topic. Int J Surg 12:22–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Colorectal Unit, Surgical Division, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Meir Zemel, Elian Solo & Hagit Tulchinsky

Authors
  1. Meir Zemel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elian Solo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hagit Tulchinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hagit Tulchinsky.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

Waived

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this manuscript

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zemel, M., Solo, E. & Tulchinsky, H. Does microscopic involvement of the surgical margins after ileocecectomy in Crohn’s patients predict early recurrence?. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 2427–2435 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03941-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03941-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation