Skip to main content
Log in

A watchful waiting approach for newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease patients with an inflammatory phenotype

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

An early treat-to-target approach in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients is recommended to avoid complications. However, CD may not always progress despite lack of treatment, thus exposing some patients to unnecessary side effects. We aimed to examine whether newly diagnosed CD patients with an inflammatory phenotype can benefit from a watchful waiting approach.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study followed CD patients with an inflammatory phenotype who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 and followed for at least 1 year. A watchful waiting approach was defined as maintenance therapy with 5-ASA medication only or no treatment during the first year of diagnosis or longer. Disease complications were defined as need for surgery or change in disease phenotype.

Results

Eighty-six patients were included and followed-up for 57.0 ± 29.0 months. Thirty-seven patients were managed with a watchful waiting approach and 49 with an early therapeutic intervention. The majority of patients (83.8%) in the watchful waiting group did not develop disease complications. In this group, there was no difference in clinical disease severity (stools per day, 2.7 ± 1.7 vs 3.3 ± 1.0, P = 0.39; abdominal pain, 74.2 vs 50.0%, P = 0.24) between those who did not develop complications and those who did. Smoking was associated with a complicated course (multivariate analysis: OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.06–3.71, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

A watchful waiting approach of newly diagnosed CD patients with an inflammatory phenotype may be a feasible option, with low long-term complication rate specifically in nonsmoking patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beaugerie L, Seksik P, Nion-Larmmurier I et al (2006) Predictors of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 130(3):650–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burisch J, Kiudelis G, Kupcinskas L for the Epi-IBD group et al (2019) Natural disease course of Crohn’s disease during the first 5 years after diagnosis in a European population-based inception cohort: an Epi-IBD study. Gut 68:423–433

  3. Kruis W, Klugmann T, Franke GR et al (2013) Predictive factors for an uncomplicated long-term course of Crohn’s disease: a retrospective analysis. J Crohns Colitis 7(7):e263–e270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T et al (2005) Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol 19(Suppl A):5A–36A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thia KT, Sandborn WJ, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Loftus EV Jr (2010) Risk factors associated with progression to intestinal complications of Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Gastroenterology 139(4):1147–1155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Solberg IC, Vatn MH, Høie O, Stray N, Sauar J, Jahnsen J, Moum B, Lygren I, IBSEN Study Group (2007) Clinical course in Crohn’s disease: results of a Norwegian population-based ten-year follow-up study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(12):1430–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarrant KM, Barclay ML, Frampton CMA, Gearry RB (2008) Perianal disease predicts changes in Crohn’s disease phenotype-results of a population-based study of inflammatory bowel disease phenotype. Am J Gastroenterol 103(12):3082–3093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolters FL, Russel MG, Sijbrandij J, Ambergen T, Odes S, Riis L, Langholz E, Politi P, Qasim A, Koutroubakis I, Tsianos E, Vermeire S, Freitas J, van Zeijl G, Hoie O, Bernklev T, Beltrami M, Rodriguez D, Stockbrügger RW, Moum B (2006) Phenotype at diagnosis predicts recurrence rates in Crohn’s disease. Gut 55(8):1124–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Feagan BG (2003) Maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98(12 Suppl):S6–S17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanauer SB (2003) Crohn's disease: step up or top down therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 17(1):131–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandborn WJ (2003) Evidence-based treatment algorithm for mild to moderate Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98(12 Suppl):S1–S5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombel JF, Narula N, Peyrin-Biroulet L (2017) Management strategies to improve outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 152(2):351–361 e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D'Haens G, Baert F, Assche GV et al (2008) Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease: an open randomised trial. Lancet 371(9613):660–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aldhous MC, Drummond HE, Anderson N, Smith LA, Arnott IDR, Satsangi J (2007) Does cigarette smoking influence the phenotype of Crohn’s disease? Analysis using the Montreal classification. Am J Gastroenterol 102(3):577–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith BR, Arnott IDR, Drummond HE et al (2004) Disease location, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody, and NOD2/CARD15 genotype influence the progression of disease behavior in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10(5):521–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cosnes J, Carbonnel F, Beaugerie L, le Quintrec Y, Gendre JP (1996) Effects of cigarette smoking on the long-term course of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 110(2):424–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouguen G, Levesque BG, Feagan BG, Kavanaugh A, Peyrin–Biroulet L, Colombel J–F, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ (2015) Treat to target: a proposed new paradigm for the management of Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(6):1042–1050 e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouguen G, Levesque BG, Pola S, Evans E, Sandborn WJ (2014) Endoscopic assessment and treating to target increase the likelihood of mucosal healing in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(6):978–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cosnes J, Nion-Larmurier I, Beaugerie L, Afchain P, Tiret E, Gendre JP (2005) Impact of the increasing use of immunosuppressants in Crohn’s disease on the need for intestinal surgery. Gut 54(2):237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeuring SF, Van Den Heuvel TRA, Tim RA et al (2017) Improvements in the long-term outcome of Crohn’s disease over the past two decades and the relation to changes in medical management: results from the population-based IBDSL cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 112(2):325–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vester-Andersen MK, Prosberg MV, Jess T, Andersson M, Bengtsson BG, Blixt T, Munkholm P, Bendtsen F, Vind I (2014) Disease course and surgery rates in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based, 7-year follow-up study in the era of immunomodulating therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 109(5):705–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronnblom A, Holmstrom T, Karlbom U et al (2017) Clinical course of Crohn’s disease during the first 5 years. Results from a population-based cohort in Sweden (ICURE) diagnosed 2005-2009. Scand J Gastroenterol 52(1):81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakatos PL, Golovics PA, David G, Pandur T, Erdelyi Z, Horvath A, Mester G, Balogh M, Szipocs I, Molnar C, Komaromi E, Veres G, Lovasz BD, Szathmari M, Kiss LS, Lakatos L (2012) Has there been a change in the natural history of Crohn’s disease? Surgical rates and medical management in a population-based inception cohort from Western Hungary between 1977-2009. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):579–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Colombel JF, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Egan LJ, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Sandborn WJ (2004) The safety profile of infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease: the Mayo clinic experience in 500 patients. Gastroenterology 126(1):19–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keane J, Gershon S, Wise RP, Mirabile-Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman WD, Siegel JN, Braun MM (2001) Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha-neutralizing agent. N Engl J Med 345(15):1098–1104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Warris A, Bjorneklett A, Gaustad P (2001) Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis associated with infliximab therapy. N Engl J Med 344(14):1099–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prelipcean CC, Mihai C, Gogalniceanu P, Mihai B (2013) What is the impact of age on adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease? Clujul Med 86(1):3–9

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. de Barros KSC, Flores C, Harlacher L, Francesconi CFM (2017) Evolution of clinical behavior in Crohn’s disease: factors associated with complicated disease and surgery. Dig Dis Sci 62(9):2481–2488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Panés J, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Danese S, Feagan BG, Colombel JF, Hanauer SB, Rycroft B (2016) Defining disease severity in inflammatory bowel disease: current and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Henriksen M, Jahnsen J, Lygern I et al (2007) Clinical course in Crohn’s disease: results of a five-year population-based follow-up study (the IBSEN study). Scand J Gastroenterol 42(5):602–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khanna R, Bressler B, Levesque BG, Zou G, Stitt LW, Greenberg GR, Panaccione R, Bitton A, Paré P, Vermeire S, D'Haens G, MacIntosh D, Sandborn WJ, Donner A, Vandervoort MK, Morris JC, Feagan BG (2015) Early combined immunosuppression for the management of Crohn’s disease (REACT): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10006):1825–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Colombel JF, Panaccione R, Bossuyt P et al (2018) Effect of tight control management on Crohn’s disease (CALM): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 390(10114):2779–2789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frei R, Fuornier N, Zeitz J et al (2019) Early initiation of anti-TNF is associated with Favourable long-term outcome in Crohn’s disease: 10-year-follow-up data from the Swiss IBD cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 13(10):1292–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Safroneeva E, Vavricka SR, Fournier N, Pittet V, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Straumann A, Rogler G, Schoepfer AM, the Swiss IBD Cohort Study Group (2015) Impact of the early use of immunomodulators or TNF antagonists on bowel damage and surgery in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 42(8):977–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Oussalah A, Williet N, Pillot C, Bresler L, Bigard MA (2011) Impact of azathioprine and tumour necrosis factor antagonists on the need for surgery in newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease. Gut 60(7):930–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Romberg-Camps MJ, Dagnelie PC, Kester A et al (2009) Influence of phenotype at diagnosis and of other potential prognostic factors on the course of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 104:371–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazor Y, Maza I, Kaufman E, Ben-Horin S, Karban A, Chowers Y, Eliakim R (2011) Prediction of disease complication occurrence in Crohn’s disease using phenotype and genotype parameters at diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 5:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Blumenstein I, Hermann E, Filmann N et al (2011) Female patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease are treated less frequently with immunosuppressive medication and have a higher disease activity: a subgroup analysis of a large multi-center, prospective, internet-based study. J Crohns Colitis 5:203–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parkes GC, Whelan K, Lindsay JO et al (2014) Smoking in inflammatory bowel disease: impact on disease course and insights into the aetiology of its effect. J Crohns Colitis 8(8):717–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Biedermann L, Fournier N, Misselwitz B, Frei P, Zeitz J, Manser CN, Pittet V, Juillerat P, von Känel R, Fried M, Vavricka SR, Rogler G, for the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study Group (2015) High rates of smoking especially in female Crohn’s disease patients and low use of supportive measures to achieve smoking cessation--data from the Swiss IBD cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 9(10):819–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cleynen I, Gonzalez JR, Figueroa C et al (2013) Genetic factors conferring an increased susceptibility to develop Crohn’s disease also influence disease phenotype: results from the IBDchip European project. Gut 62(11):1556–1565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Subramanian S, Ekbom A, Rhodes JM et al (2017) Recent advances in clinical practice: a systematic review of isolated colonic Crohn’s disease: the third IBD? Gut 66(2):362–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kaaria R, Desai D, Abraham P et al (2016) Temporal change in phenotypic behaviour in patients with Crohn’s disease: do Indian patients behave differently from Western and other Asian patients? J Crohns Colitis 10(3):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Scheinfeld N (2004) A comprehensive review and evaluation of the side effects of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab. J Dermatol Treat 15(5):280–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitsan Maharshak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IRB# 0643–17) and conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was waived for this retrospective analysis.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Summary

A retrospective cohort following eighty-six newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease patients with an inflammatory phenotype for an average of 4.5 years, concluding that a watchful waiting approach may be a feasible option, with low long-term complication rate specifically in nonsmoking patients.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yassin, S., Isakov, N.F., Ron, Y. et al. A watchful waiting approach for newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease patients with an inflammatory phenotype. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 735–743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03811-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03811-8

Keywords

Navigation