Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical and oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with conventional surgery: a retrospective, single-institution study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was whether complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) is associated with a survival benefit compared with traditional procedure in right-sided colon cancer.

Methods

Overall, 251 consecutive patients underwent surgery for right colon cancer between 2007 and 2012. After exclusion, 95 subjects received non-CME surgery before 2010, and 97 subjects received CME surgery after January 2010, when we started to perform CME systematically. The number of lymph nodes, morbidity, and mortality was analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were investigated.

Results

The median number of examined lymph nodes was 33.28 in the CME group and 26.92 in the non-CME group, p < 0.001. Postoperative complications were 21.6% in the CME group and 17.8% in the non-CME group, without significant difference. One out of 192 patients died. Three-year OS was 88% in the CME group and 71% in the non-CME group (p = 0.003). In stage II, 3-year DSS was 97% in the CME group and 86% in the non-CME group. In stage III, the 3-year DSSs in the CME and in the non-CME groups were 86 and 67%, respectively (p < 0.001). Cox’s regression showed that CME (p = 0.0012), the number of lymph nodes (p = 0.029), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of DSS at 3 years.

Conclusion

Surgical standardization of CME with CVL for right-sided colon cancer is associated with better staging and prognosis, particularly in UICC stage II and III. This study shows that CME is safe and reproducible with acceptable morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 07 December 2017

    The publisher regrets that some errors were introduced during the production process. The errors are now presented correctly in this article.

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 62:10–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hohenberger W, Reingruber B, Merkel S (2003) Surgery for colon cancer. Scand J Surg 92:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heald RJ (1988) The “Holy Plane” of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Påhlman L, Glimelius B (1990) Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 211:187–195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF et al (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan AM, Winter DC (2009) Complete mesocolic excision—a marker of surgical quality? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1889–1891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11:354–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S (1995) Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH (2012) The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Color Dis 14:421–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Treves SF (1885) Lectures on the anatomy of the intestinal canal and peritoneum in man. Br Med J 1:415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Toldt C (1919) Abdominal and pelvic portions of the digestive organs. In: Toldt C, Della Rossa A (eds) An Atlas of Human Anatomy for Students and Physicians, New York, Rebman Company, p 453

  14. Sehgal R, Coffey JC (2014) Historical development of mesenteric anatomy provides a universally applicable anatomic paradigm for complete/total mesocolic excision. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Enker WE, Laffer UT, Block GE (1979) Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection. Ann Surg 190:350–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. West NP, Morris EJA, Retime O, Cairns A, Finan P, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moynihan BG (1908) The surgical treatment of cancer of the sigmoid flexure and rectum with especial reference to the principles to be observed. Surg Gynecol Obstet 6:463

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jinnai D (1983) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi H, Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2006) Distribution of lymph node metastasis is a prognostic index in patients with stage III colon cancer. Surgery 139:516–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ et al (2000) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:979–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertelsen CA, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Jansen JE, Neuenschwander AU, Vilandt J (2011) Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Color Dis 13:1123–1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F et al (2014) Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study. Int J Color Dis 29:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Killeen S, Mannion M, Devaney A, Winter DC (2014) Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis 16:577–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W et al (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Merkel S, Weber K, Matzel KE, Agaimy A, Göhl J, Hohenberger W (2016) Prognosis of patients with colon carcinoma before, during and after implementation of complete mesocolic excision. Br J Surg 103(9):1220–1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kessler H, Hohenberger W (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37:1789–1798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Perrakis A, Weber K, Merkel S, Matzel K, Agaimy A, Gebbert C, Hohenberger W (2014) Lymph node metastasis of trasverse colon including flexures. Consideration of the extramesocolic lymph node stations. Int J Color Dis 29(10):1223–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertelsen CA, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Nielsen M, Leotta SM, Daisuke F, Gögenur I (2016) Pattern of colon cancer lymph node metastases in patients undergoing central mesocolic lymph node excision: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 59(12):1209–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al (2016) Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with “conventional” colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 103(5):581–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kontovoinisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P (2014) Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Color Dis 17:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weber K, Merkel S, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W (2013) Is there a disadvantage to radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer? Int J Color Dis 28:217–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Mander BJ, Bissett IP, Newland RC (2003) Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:860–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Storli KE, Sondenaa K, Furnes B, Nevsvik I, Gudlaugsson E, Bukholm I, Eide GE (2014) Short term results of complete (D3) vs. standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete excision in patients with TNM stages I-II. Tech Coloproctol 18(2):557–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1100-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR et al (2015) Disease free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Siani LM, Garulli GL (2016) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: a comprehensive review. W J Gastroint Surg 8(2):106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Han D-P, Lu A-G, Feng H, Wang P-X-Z, Cao Q-F, Zong Y-P, Feng B, Zheng M-H (2013) Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1605-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Siani LM, Pulica C (2015) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcome between mesocolic and non-mesocolic planes of surgery. Scand J Surg 4:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Hohenberger W, Quirke P (2010) Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1954–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedermark B (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basing-stoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank very much Professor Werner Hohenberger (Erlangen) for the special review and the precious support during the writing of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Busto Arsizio (Va), Piazzale Solaro 3, 21052, Busto Arsizio, Italy

    Tommaso Zurleni, Alberto Cassiano, Elson Gjoni, Andrea Ballabio & Francesco Zurleni

  2. Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy

    Giovanni Serio

  3. Department of Medical Physics, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy

    Luca Marzoli

Authors
  1. Tommaso Zurleni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Cassiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elson Gjoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Ballabio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giovanni Serio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luca Marzoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francesco Zurleni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study conception and design: T. Zurleni, F. Zurleni

Acquisition of data: T. Zurleni, A. Cassiano, E. Gjoni, A. Ballabio, G. Serio

Analysis and interpretation of data: T. Zurleni, F. Zurleni, A. Cassiano, E. Gjoni, A. Ballabio, G. Serio, L. Marzoli

Writing the manuscript: T. Zurleni, F. Zurleni

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Zurleni.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Modifications have been made to the Figure 3 images, Figures 3 and 4 captions and also to the entries of Tables 1 and 3. Full information regarding corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction article for this article.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2936-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zurleni, T., Cassiano, A., Gjoni, E. et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with conventional surgery: a retrospective, single-institution study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2917-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2917-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation