Skip to main content
Log in

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with hemorrhoidopexy: source and prevention of postoperative pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization, although it showed reliability, has not completely removed the issue of postoperative pain.

Objective

We investigated the causes of postoperative pain and proposed some changes of the technique in order to eliminate it.

Patients

One hundred six out of 188 operated patients were considered. Postoperative pain was investigated using a Visual Analogue Score dividing patients into three groups: 0 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 10. On the basis of these results, we proposed some variations of the technique. A second group of 25 patients was therefore treated with the modified technique. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed.

Main outcome

Pain intensity, surgical approach, and changes in the technique were analyzed, and a new proposal for a modified technique has been developed.

Results

The group of 106 patients, 64 males and 42 females, were divided: 71 III grade and 35 IV grade. Pain was detected in 37 cases (35 %).Fifteen males (23.50 %) were divided as follows: 8 mild and 7 medium or intense. Twenty-two females (52.38 %) were divided as follows: 11 mild and 11 with medium or intense. For what concerns the variable grade, the pain was present in 15 III G and 22 IV G with statistic significant difference (p value 0.00333). Among the 18 patients (7 males and 11 females) who had severe pain, they all had a number of mucopexies >4, while among 19 patients (8 males and 11 females) with mild pain, only 5 had a number of mucopexies >4, resulting in a statistic significant difference (p value 0.031). In the second group, pain was drastically reduced.

Limitations

We believe it is necessary to extend the sample in order to definitively adopt the proposed amendments.

Conclusions

The review of the causes of postoperative pain and the changes adopted compared with those proposed in literature have allowed us to greatly reduce postoperative pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moriaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoidal artery with a newly divised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A et al (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-years outcome. Tech Coloproctol 15(1):67–73

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C et al (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 14(2):205–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P et al (2012) A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrohoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zampieri N, Castellani R, Andreoli R et al (2012) Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Am J Surg 204(5):684–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pol RA, van der Zwet WC, Hoornenborg D et al (2010) Results of 244 consecutive patients with hemorrhoids treated with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dig Surg 27(4):279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szmulowicz UM, Gurland B, Garofalo et al (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: the experience of a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):803–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Faucheron JL, Poncet G, Voirin D et al (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair(HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids : long-term results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tempel MB, Pearson EG, Page M et al (2013) Survey of patients satisfaction after Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization performed in ambulatory settings. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-1104-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta PJ, Kalaskar S, Taori S et al (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids. Tech Coloroctol 15(4):439–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ratto C, Dionisi L, Parello A et al (2012) Distal doppler-guided dearterialization is highly effective in treating hemorrhoids by transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03146.x

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A et al (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/codi.12574

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elmèr SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A et al (2014) A prospective trial comparing the short-and-long-term results of Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsunoda A, Kiyasu Y, Fuji W et al (2014) Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel. Surg Today. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0885-5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM (2012) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 255(5):840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Theodoropoulos GE, Sevrisarianos N, Papacostantinou J et al (2010) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation, rectoanal repair, sutured haemorrhoidopexy and minimal mucocutaneous excision for grades III-IV hemorrhoids: a multicentre prospective study of safety and efficacy. Colorectal Dis 12:125–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roka S, Gold D, Walega P et al (2013) DG-RAR for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and grade IV haemorrhoids: a 12-month -multi-centre prospective observational study. Eur Surg 45(1):26–30

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

Michele Rubbini is the principal author. Valerio Tartari contributed in collecting the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Rubbini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubbini, M., Tartari, V. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with hemorrhoidopexy: source and prevention of postoperative pain. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 625–630 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2148-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2148-3

Keywords

Navigation