Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to compare the outcomes of primary anastomosis (PA) and enterostomy as treatments for intestinal atresia in neonates to identify the factors influencing the choice of modality.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective single-centre analysis of all neonates with intestinal atresia between 2000 and 2020 and measured the clinical outcomes. We performed logistic regression to identify factors that influenced the choice of surgical approach.
Results
Of 62 intestinal atresia neonates, 71% received PA. There were no significant differences in gestation, gender, age at operation, birth weight, or body weight at operation between the PA and enterostomy groups. PA reoperation was not required for 78% of patients, and the PA group had shorter hospital stays. Complications, operative time, duration on parenteral nutrition, time to full enteral feeding were comparable in both groups. Upon multivariate regression analysis, surgeons favoured PA in proximal atresia [Odds ratio (OR) 38.5, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.558–579] while enterostomy in smaller body size [OR 2.75, CI 0.538–14.02] and lower Apgar score [OR 1.1, CI 0.07–17.8]. Subgroup analysis in these patient groups demonstrated comparable outcomes with both surgical approaches.
Conclusion
Both surgical approaches achieved comparable outcomes, but PA was associated with short hospital stays and the avoidance of stoma-related complications, and reoperation was generally not required. This surgical approach was suitable for patients with proximal atresia, but enterostomy remained a sensible choice for patients with smaller body sizes and lower Apgar scores.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Best KE et al (2012) Epidemiology of small intestinal atresia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97(5):F353–F358
Lupo PJ et al (2017) Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2010–2014: a focus on gastrointestinal defects. Birth Defects Res 109(18):1504–1514
Martínez-Frías ML et al (2000) Isolated small intestinal atresias in Latin America and Spain: epidemiological analysis. Am J Med Genet 93(5):355–359
Dalla Vecchia LK et al (1998) Intestinal atresia and stenosis: a 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg 133(5):490–496 (discussion 496-7)
Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD et al. (2021) Treatment of jejunoileal atresia by primary anastomosis or enterostomy: double the operations, double the risk of complications. J Pediatr Surg
Kumaran N et al (2002) Trends in the management and outcome of jejuno-ileal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12(3):163–167
Peng YF et al (2019) Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 7(6):444–448
Wang J et al (2014) Prolonged feeding difficulties after surgical correction of intestinal atresia: a 13-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 49(11):1593–1597
Calisti A et al (2012) Jejunoileal atresia: factors affecting the outcome and long-term sequelae. J Clin Neonatol 1(1):38–41
Stollman TH et al (2009) Decreased mortality but increased morbidity in neonates with jejunoileal atresia; a study of 114 cases over a 34-year period. J Pediatr Surg 44(1):217–221
Hillyer MM et al (2019) Primary versus secondary anastomosis in intestinal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 54(3):417–422
Vandenbroucke JP et al (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18(6):805–835
Fung ACH et al (2021) Antenatal counselling of congenital surgical anomalies: a decade of experience in a local tertiary centre. J Paediatr Child Health 57(5):710–714
Evans CH (1951) Atresias of the gastrointestinal tract. Int Abstr Surg 92(1):1–8
Yeung F et al (2016) Early reoperations after primary repair of jejunoileal atresia in newborns. J Neonatal Surg 5(4):42
O’Connor A, Sawin RS (1998) High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg 133(8):875–880
Waldhausen JH, Sawin RS (1997) Improved long-term outcome for patients with jejunoileal apple peel atresia. J Pediatr Surg 32(9):1307–1309
Funding
The researchers received no specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fung and Lee contributed equally as the co-first author. Fung, Lee, Lui, and Lip prepared the data and wrote the main text. All the authors contributed the idea of the research and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fung, A.C.H., Lee, M.K., Lui, M.P.K. et al. Primary anastomosis is the preferred surgical approach for proximal intestinal atresia: a retrospective 20-year analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 99 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05383-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05383-4