Skip to main content
Log in

Primary anastomosis is the preferred surgical approach for proximal intestinal atresia: a retrospective 20-year analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare the outcomes of primary anastomosis (PA) and enterostomy as treatments for intestinal atresia in neonates to identify the factors influencing the choice of modality.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre analysis of all neonates with intestinal atresia between 2000 and 2020 and measured the clinical outcomes. We performed logistic regression to identify factors that influenced the choice of surgical approach.

Results

Of 62 intestinal atresia neonates, 71% received PA. There were no significant differences in gestation, gender, age at operation, birth weight, or body weight at operation between the PA and enterostomy groups. PA reoperation was not required for 78% of patients, and the PA group had shorter hospital stays. Complications, operative time, duration on parenteral nutrition, time to full enteral feeding were comparable in both groups. Upon multivariate regression analysis, surgeons favoured PA in proximal atresia [Odds ratio (OR) 38.5, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.558–579] while enterostomy in smaller body size [OR 2.75, CI 0.538–14.02] and lower Apgar score [OR 1.1, CI 0.07–17.8]. Subgroup analysis in these patient groups demonstrated comparable outcomes with both surgical approaches.

Conclusion

Both surgical approaches achieved comparable outcomes, but PA was associated with short hospital stays and the avoidance of stoma-related complications, and reoperation was generally not required. This surgical approach was suitable for patients with proximal atresia, but enterostomy remained a sensible choice for patients with smaller body sizes and lower Apgar scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Best KE et al (2012) Epidemiology of small intestinal atresia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97(5):F353–F358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lupo PJ et al (2017) Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2010–2014: a focus on gastrointestinal defects. Birth Defects Res 109(18):1504–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Martínez-Frías ML et al (2000) Isolated small intestinal atresias in Latin America and Spain: epidemiological analysis. Am J Med Genet 93(5):355–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalla Vecchia LK et al (1998) Intestinal atresia and stenosis: a 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg 133(5):490–496 (discussion 496-7)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD et al. (2021) Treatment of jejunoileal atresia by primary anastomosis or enterostomy: double the operations, double the risk of complications. J Pediatr Surg

  6. Kumaran N et al (2002) Trends in the management and outcome of jejuno-ileal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12(3):163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng YF et al (2019) Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 7(6):444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J et al (2014) Prolonged feeding difficulties after surgical correction of intestinal atresia: a 13-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 49(11):1593–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calisti A et al (2012) Jejunoileal atresia: factors affecting the outcome and long-term sequelae. J Clin Neonatol 1(1):38–41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stollman TH et al (2009) Decreased mortality but increased morbidity in neonates with jejunoileal atresia; a study of 114 cases over a 34-year period. J Pediatr Surg 44(1):217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillyer MM et al (2019) Primary versus secondary anastomosis in intestinal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 54(3):417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandenbroucke JP et al (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18(6):805–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fung ACH et al (2021) Antenatal counselling of congenital surgical anomalies: a decade of experience in a local tertiary centre. J Paediatr Child Health 57(5):710–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans CH (1951) Atresias of the gastrointestinal tract. Int Abstr Surg 92(1):1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeung F et al (2016) Early reoperations after primary repair of jejunoileal atresia in newborns. J Neonatal Surg 5(4):42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor A, Sawin RS (1998) High morbidity of enterostomy and its closure in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Arch Surg 133(8):875–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Waldhausen JH, Sawin RS (1997) Improved long-term outcome for patients with jejunoileal apple peel atresia. J Pediatr Surg 32(9):1307–1309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The researchers received no specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Fung and Lee contributed equally as the co-first author. Fung, Lee, Lui, and Lip prepared the data and wrote the main text. All the authors contributed the idea of the research and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Ho Yu Chung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fung, A.C.H., Lee, M.K., Lui, M.P.K. et al. Primary anastomosis is the preferred surgical approach for proximal intestinal atresia: a retrospective 20-year analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 99 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05383-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05383-4

Keywords

Navigation