Skip to main content
Log in

Single-stage salvage urethroplasty for failed distal hypospadias: comparison of Mathieu and grafted tubularised incised plate repairs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Distal hypospadias repair is a common operation but some children require a complete salvage operation due to major complications of initial repair. The aim of this paper is to analyze the results of single-stage salvage distal hypospadias operations with salvage Mathieu (SM) and salvage grafted tubularised incised plate (SGTIP) techniques.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of 115 children from 2 centers who underwent SM or SGTIP operations for failed distal hypospadias from January 2012 to July 2021 was conducted for demographic data, success of salvage operation and complications. Children with scarred urethral plate but with healthy, mobile ventral skin underwent SM operation, while children with a supple urethral plate of width 6 mm or greater underwent SGTIP operation. Twenty-four (21%) children with pre-operative glans width < 12 mm received pre-operative intramuscular testosterone injections (2 doses, 2 mg/kg/dose). In the SM group, 22 cases with shallow, scarred glans underwent distal glans augmentation using the terminal portion of the Mathieu skin flap. Pre-operative and intra-operative parameters and post-operative results were compared between SM and SGTIP techniques. Statistical analysis was done using software; student t test and Fishers exact test were used, and p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

During the study period, SM and SGTIP operations were performed in 84 and 31 children, respectively. Overall, at a median follow-up of 24 (3–72) months, the salvage operation was successful in 101/115 (87.8%) patients; complications were observed in 14/115 (12.2%). The SM and SGTIP groups were comparable with respect to the number of prior failed operations, mean age, mean length of the distal urethral defect, pre-operative testosterone use and use of dorsal plication for chordee correction. SM had significantly better success (77/84, 91.6%) than SGTIP (24/31, 77.4%, p = 0.044). In the SM group, urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) was noted in 2/84 (2.3%) while this was significantly higher (p = 0.01) at 5/31 (16.1%) in SGTIP. No patient in SM group developed meatal/urethral stenosis while this was significantly higher (p = 0.0003) at 6/31 (19.3%) in SGTIP; of these, 4 children had both UCF and meatal/urethral stenosis. A higher incidence of repair breakdown/dehiscence was seen in SM group, but the difference was not statistically significant (SM 5/84, 5.9% versus SGTIP 1/31, 3.2%, p = 0.484). In the SM group, two fistulae were successfully repaired after 6 months, while the three cases of complete dehiscence underwent two-stage oral mucosal graft (OMG) repair. In the SGTIP group, two children underwent successful repair of UCF (one along with meatoplasty), one child with stenosis improved with urethral dilatations, while four children (three with UCF and stenosis and one with complete dehiscence) were managed with two-stage OMG repair.

Conclusions

Single-stage salvage distal hypospadias repair was successful in 87.8% of patients. Both SM and SGTIP demonstrated acceptable results for salvage distal hypospadias repair. SM had better success and lower complications than SGTIP. SGTIP was associated with significantly higher post-operative UCF and meatal/neourethral stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbagli G, Perovic S, Djinovic R et al (2010) Retrospective descriptive analysis of 1176 patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol 183:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zubi F, Chua M, Ghazzaoui AM et al (2020) Competency in tubularised incised plate repair for distal hypospadias: cumulative sum learning curve analysis of a single surgeon experience. J Urol 204:1326–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen S, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EW (2021) Reoperation after hypospadias repair: a long-term analysis. J Urol 205:1778–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro F, Vallasciani S, Borsellino A et al (2009) Snodgrass urethroplasty: grafting the incised plate—10 years later. J Urol 182:1730–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boddy SA, Samuel M (2000) Mathieu and ‘V’ incision sutured (MAVIS) results in a natural glanular meatus. J Pediatr Surg 35:494–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bar-Yosef Y, Binyamini J, Matzkin H et al (2005) Salvage Mathieu urethroplasty: reuse of local tissue in failed hypospadias repair. Urology 65:1212–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karabulut A, Sunay M, Erdem K, Emir L, Erol D (2008) Retrospective analysis of the results obtained by using Mathieu and TIP urethroplasty techniques in recurrent hypospadias repairs. J Pediatr Urol 4:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayashi Y, Sasaki S, Kojima Y et al (2001) Primary and salvage urethroplasty using Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap technique for distal hypospadias. Int J Urol 8:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwentner C, Gozzi C, Lunacek A et al (2006) Interim outcome of single stage dorsal inlay skin graft for hypospadias reoperations. J Urol 175:1872–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye WJ, Ping P, Liu YD et al (2008) Single stage dorsal inlay buccal mucosal graft with tubularised incised plate technique for hypospadias reoperations. Asian J Androl 10:682–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfistermuller KLM, McArdle AJ, Cuckow PM (2015) Meta-analysis of complication rates of the tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair. J Pediatr Urol 11:54–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nezami BG, Mahboubi AH, Tanhaeivash R et al (2010) Hypospadias repair and glans augmentation using a modified Mathieu technique. Pediatr Surg Int 26:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emir L, Erol D, Kuyumcuoglu U et al (2004) Which procedure should be chosen as a salvage operation in anterior hypospadias cases, meatal-based or onlay island flap? A comparative analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 20:460–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Emir L, Erol D (2003) Mathieu urethroplasty as salvage procedure: 20 year experience. J Urol 169:2325–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mousavi SA, Aarabi M (2014) Tubularised incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation: a review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 40:588–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang SSD, Chen SC, Hsieh CH et al (2001) Reoperative Snodgrass procedure. J Urol 166:2342–2345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Winberg H, Arnbjornsson E, Anderberg M et al (2019) Postoperative outcomes in distal hypospadias: a meta-analysis of Mathieu and tubularised incised plate repair methods for the development of urethrocutaneous fistula and urethral stricture. Pediatr Surg Int 35:1301–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. S. Chandrasekharam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the patients gave informed consent for the operation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandrasekharam, V.V.S., Babu, R. Single-stage salvage urethroplasty for failed distal hypospadias: comparison of Mathieu and grafted tubularised incised plate repairs. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 643–650 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05070-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05070-w

Keywords

Navigation