Abstract
Background
Corticosteroids and hyaluronidase are trialed for treating phimosis in children. We carried out the present network meta-analysis to compare the therapeutic effect of these drugs.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was used as the effect estimate. A random-effects model was used for generating the pooled estimates. Rankogram plot was used for ranking the drugs.
Main outcome measures
Proportions of patients with remission (partial/complete) and with complete remission.
Results
Mometasone (OR 6.53, 95% CI 2.85, 14.96), betamethasone/hyaluronidase (OR 12.1, 95% CI 4.27, 34.49), triamcinolone (OR 19.15, 95% CI 4.47, 81.96), dexamethasone (OR 21.38, 95% CI 5.71, 79.98), betamethasone (OR 23.02, 95% CI 6.92, 79.54), hydrocortisone (OR 23.2, 95% CI 5.91, 91.02) and methylprednisolone (OR 50.47, 95% CI 4.45, 572.72) were observed with significantly higher proportions of patients with remission (partial/complete) compared to placebo. Dexamethasone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, betamethasone/hyaluronidase, clobetasol, mometasone, and hydrocortisone were observed with significantly higher proportions of patients with complete remission compared to placebo. Beclomethasone was not observed to be superior to either placebo or other drugs. Rankogram plot revealed methylprednisolone followed by hydrocortisone had the maximum statistical probability of being ‘the best’ in the pool for remission and betamethasone followed by hydrocortisone for complete remission.
Conclusion
Topical methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, and betamethasone were observed with better clinical resolution of phimosis compared to other corticosteroids. Very high potent corticosteroids like beclomethasone and clobetasol were not observed with superior benefits compared to other corticosteroids. Considering low-potency, hydrocortisone shall be preferred until further evidence emerges.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data are available from the individual studies that are freely present in the public domain.
Abbreviations
- AMSTAR:
-
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred reporting items in systematic review and meta-analysis
- SUCRA:
-
Surface area under cumulative ranking curve
References
Shankar KR, Rickwood AM (1999) The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int. 84(1):101-2.
Informed Health.org. Cologne, Germany: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) 2006 What are the treatment options for phimosis? 2015. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326433/
Shahid SK (2012) Phimosis in children. Int Sch Res Notices. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/707329
Garcia de Freitas R, Nobre YD, Demarchi GT, Hachul M, Macedo A Jr, Srougi M, Ortiz V (2006) Topical treatment for phimosis: time span and other factors behind treatment effectiveness. J Pediatr Urol. 2(4):380–385
Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T (2014) Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
Vorilhon P, Martin C, Pereira B, Clément G, Gerbaud L (2011) Assessment of topical steroid treatment for childhood phimosis: review of the literature. Arch Pediatr 18(4):426–431
Gabros S, Nessel TA, Zito PM. (2020) Topical corticosteroids. Updated 2020 Jul 10. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL), StatPearls Publishing, 2020 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532940/
Rouse B, Chaimani A, Li T (2017) Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med 12(1):103–111
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162:777–784
Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). (2020) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.1.0 edn. Available from https://www.cochrane-handbook.org (last Accessed on 28 Aug 2020).
Sedgwick P, Marston L (2015) How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis. BMJ. 351:h4718.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558
Mbuagbaw L, Rochwerg B, Jaeschke R et al (2017) Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Syst Rev 6:79
Brown S, Hutton B, Clifford T et al (2014) A microsoft-excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL. Syst Rev 3:110
Barendregt JJ, Doi SA. (2017) MetaXL user guide. Available at: http://www.epigear.com/index_files/MetaXL%20User%20Guide.pdf (Accessed on 21 Jul 2017).
Balamtekin N, Uloucak N, Atay A, Aydin HI, Karabiyik I (2006) The effect of topical corticosteroid creams on phimosis treatment. Erciyes Tip Derg 28(3):120–124
Ceballos-González S, Torres-Cantero C, Trujillo-Hernández B, Muñiz J, Huerta M, Trujillo X, Vásquez C (2006) Comparative effectiveness of 0.1% metilprednisolone aceponate and 0.05% betamethasone dipropionate among children with nonretractable prepuce. Gac Med Mex 142(2):121–124
Chamberlin JD, Dorgalli C, Abdelhalim A, Davis-Dao CA, Chalmers CL, Kelly MS, Wang ZT, Chuang KW, McAleer IM, Stephany HA, Wehbi EJ, Khoury AE (2019) Randomized open-label trial comparing topical prescription triamcinolone to over-the-counter hydrocortisone for the treatment of phimosis. J Pediatr Urol 15(4):388.e1-388.e5
da Rocha AK, Meyer KF (2019) Effectiveness of dexamethasone and hyaluronidase + valerate of bethasone associated with prepucial massage in the treatment of child phimosis. J Clini Nephrol 3:111–115
Esposito C, Centonze A, Alicchio F, Savanelli A, Settimi A (2008) Topical steroid application versus circumcision in pediatric patients with phimosis: a prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. World J Urol 26(2):187–190
Golubovic Z, Milanovic D, Vukadinovic V, Rakic I, Perovic S (1996) The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 78(5):786–788
Lee JW, Cho SJ, Park EA, Lee SJ (2006) Topical hydrocortisone and physiotherapy for nonretractile physiologic phimosis in infants. Pediatr Nephrol 21(8):1127–1130
Letendre J, Barrieras D, Franc-Guimond J, Abdo A, Houle AM (2009) Topical triamcinolone for persistent phimosis. J Urol 182(4 Suppl):1759–1763
Lindhagen T (1996) Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin. Eur J Surg 162(12):969–972
Lund L, Wai KH, Mui LM, Yeung CK (2005) An 18 month follow-up study after randomized treatment of phimosis in boys with topical steroid versus placebo. Scand J Urol Nephrol 39(1):78–81
Nascimento FJ, Pereira RF, Silva JL 2nd, Tavares A, Pompeo AC (2011) Topical betamethasone and hyaluronidase in the treatment of phimosis in boys: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Int Braz J Urol 37(3):314–319
de Pileggi F, O, Vicente YA. (2007) Phimotic ring topical corticoid cream (0.1% mometasone furoate) treatment in children. J Pediatr Surg 42(10):1749–1752
Yang SS, Tsai YC, Wu CC, Liu SP, Wang CC (2005) Highly potent and moderately potent topical steroids are effective in treating phimosis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 173(4):1361–1363
Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar MM, Basar H (2003) Psychological trauma of circumcision in the phallic period could be avoided by using topical steroids. Int J Urol 10(12):651–656
Liu J, Yang J, Chen Y, Cheng S, Xia C, Deng T (2016) Is steroids therapy effective in treating phimosis? A meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 48(3):335–342
Coondoo A, Phiske M, Verma S, Lahiri K (2014) Side-effects of topical steroids: a long overdue revisit. Indian Dermatol Online J 5(4):416–425
Abraham A, Roga G (2014) Topical steroid-damaged skin. Indian J Dermatol 59(5):456–459
Hengge UR, Ruzicka T, Schwartz RA, Cork MJ (2006) Adverse effects of topical glucocorticosteroids. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(1):1–15
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KS-conceived the idea KS, GS–drafted the proposal, indulged in data collection KS-analysed the data and prepared the first draft of the manuscript KS, GS–involved in subsequent revisions of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This manuscript does not contain any direct interaction with either animals or human participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sridharan, K., Sivaramakrishnan, G. Topical corticosteroids for phimosis in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 1117–1125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04906-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04906-1