Abstract
Purpose
Holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Ho:YAG) laser and Pneumatic cystolithotripsy (CL) are the most widely practiced transurethral procedures for treatment of pediatric bladder stones. The aim of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Ho:YAG laser CL and pneumatic CL in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones.
Methods
In this prospective randomized study from January 2012 to April 2015, 25 male children with bladder stones <3 cm were consecutively randomized into two treatment groups: group A (pneumatic CL) consisted of 13 patients and group B (Ho:YAG CL) consisted of 12 patients. Operative time, duration of stay and complications were recorded. Patients were followed up prospectively.
Results
The mean operative time was significantly lower in group B (25.6 vs. 31.6 min) for stones <1.5 cm (p = 0.040). However, for stones between 1.5 and 3 cm in size, the mean operating times were similar in both the groups (49.4 min in Ho:YAG vs. 44.6 min in pneumatic, p = 0.40). There was no difference in complication rates and hospital stay in both the groups. No major complications were seen in both the groups.
Conclusions
We found that Ho:YAG CL was more effective than pneumatic CL for treating bladder stones smaller than 1.5 cm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Iman HE, Khan AM, Flasko T (2004) Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology 63:159–162
Hussain M (2001) Endemic Bladder calculi in children. What is current position? Editorial. J Nephrol Urol Transpl 2:1–2
Papatsoris AG, Varkarakis I, Dellis A (2006) Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy. Urol 34:163–167
Mahran MR, Dawaba MS (2000) Cystolithopaxy versus cystolithotomy in children. J Endourol 14:423
Shokier AA (1994) Transurethral cystolithopaxy in children. J Endourol 8:157
Ramakrishnan PA, Medhat M, Al-Bulushi YH (2005) Holmium laser cystolithotripsy in children: initial experience. Can J Urol 12:2880
Cheah WK, King PA, Tan HL (1994) A review of pediatric cases of urinary tract calculi. J Pediatr Surg 29:701–705
Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Bansal M (1999) Percutaneous cystolithotomy for vesical calculi: a better approach. Tech Urol 5:40
Salah MA, Holman E, Toth C (2001) Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy for pediatric bladder stones in a developing country. Eur Urol 39:466
Isen K, Em S, Kilic V (2008) Management of bladder stones with pneumatic lithotripsy using an ureteroscope in children. J Endourol 22:1037–1040
Kauer PC, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G (2005) Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 48:182
Shaikh AR, Zubari BF (2001) Intracorporeal cystolithotripsy in children. JCPSP 11:156–157
Teichman JMH, Vassar GJ, Bishoff JT (1998) Holmium YAG Lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol 159:17
Aboulela W, ElSheemy MS, Shoukry AI, Shouman AM, ElShenoufy A, Daw K, Morsi HA, Badawy H (2015) Transurethral holmium laser cystolithotripsy in children: single center experience. J Endourol 29(6):661–665
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gangkak, G., Yadav, S.S., Tomar, V. et al. Pneumatic cystolithotripsy versus holmium:yag laser cystolithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones: a prospective randomized study. Pediatr Surg Int 32, 609–614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3876-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3876-3