Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distal hypospadias repair in infants without a postoperative stent

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review our experience with infants undergoing distal hypospadias repair without a postoperative stent to determine if an unacceptable complication rate might justify its use.

Methods

Children <1 year of age who underwent distal hypospadias repair by a single surgeon were identified through a prospectively maintained database. The use of a postoperative urethral stent was recorded for each case. Demographics, meatus position, operative technique and complications were also recorded. Patients older than 1 year or with hypospadias proximal to a subcoronal position were excluded.

Results

Eighty-nine patients without a stent were identified in addition to 21 patients who had a stent for a minimum of 3 days. At 3 months follow-up, 4/89 (4.49 %) patients in the stentless group required circumcision revision. 1 patient experienced urinary retention. 1/21 (4.76 %) patients with a postoperative stent required reoperation for meatal stenosis.

Conclusions

The complication rate for infants undergoing distal hypospadias repair is low, does not appear to be significantly increased by forgoing a postoperative urethral stent. Avoiding a stent likely reduces a variety of associated adverse events and needs for short-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ritch CR, Murphy AM, Woldu SL, Reiley EA, Hensle TW (2010) Overnight urethral stenting after tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 26:639–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. el-Kassaby AW, Al-Kandari AM, Elzayat T, Shokeir AA (2008) Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: long-term results of 764 patients. Urology 71(4):611–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baccala AA Jr, Ross J, Detore N, Kay R (2005) Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (Snodgrass) procedure for hypospadias repair. Urology 66(6):1305–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenz C, Schmedding A, Leutner A, Kolb H (2004) Prolonged stenting does not prevent obstruction after TIP repair when the glans was deeply incised. Eur J Pediatr Surg 14(5):322–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steckler RE, Zaontz MA (1997) Stent-free Thiersch–Duplay hypospadias repair with the Snodgrass modification. J Urol 158:1178–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hakim S, Merguerian PA, Rabinowitz R, Shortliff LD, McKenna PH (1996) Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: comparison of stented and unstented repairs. J Urol 156:836–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turial S, Enders J, Engel V, Schier F (2011) Stent-free tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair of distal and mid-shaft hypospadias irrespective of age. Eur J Pediatr Surg 21:168–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leclair MD, Camby C, Battisti S, Renaud G, Plattner V, Heloury Y (2004) Unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty combined with foreskin reconstruction for distal hypospadias. Eur Urol 46(4):526–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Snodgrass WT, Nguyen MT (2002) Current technique of tubularized, incised plate hypospadias repair. Urology 60:157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atala A (2002) Urethral mobilization and advancement for mid shaft to distal hypospadias. J Urol 168(4 Pt 2):1738–1741 (discussion 1741)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duckett JW (1981) MAGPI (meatoplasty and glanuloplasty): a procedure for subcoronal hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 8(3):513–519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mustafa NA, Lope RJ, Cheah FC (2006) Spontaneous knot formation impeding the removal of a silicone urethral catheter. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91(4):F287

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Snodgrass WT (1994) Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 151(2):464–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Sherbiny MT (2003) Tubularized incised plate repair of distal hypospadias in toilet-trained children: should a stent be left? BJU Int 92:1003–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hafez AT, Herz D, Bägli D, Smith CR, McLorie G, Khoury AE (2003) Healing of unstented tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: an experimental study in a rabbit model. BJU Int 91:84–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bleustein CB, Esposito MP, Soslow RA, Felsen D, Poppas DP (2001) Mechanism of healing following the Snodgrass repair. J Urol 165(1):277–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McLorie G, Joyner B, Herz D, McCallum J, Bagli D, Merguerian P, Khoury A (2001) A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate methods of postoperative care of hypospadias. J Urol 165(5):1669–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buson H, Smiley D, Reinberg Y, Gonzalez R (1994) Distal hypospadias repair without stents: is it better? J Urol 151(4):1059–1060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Chalmers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chalmers, D.J., Siparsky, G.L., Wiedel, C.A. et al. Distal hypospadias repair in infants without a postoperative stent. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 287–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3647-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3647-y

Keywords

Navigation