Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform using a non-invasive method in individuals with craniosynostosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Craniosynostosis can lead to symptoms resulting from cranial compliance (CC) changes and intracranial hypertension (ICH), which may cause cognitive and visual impairment. Non-invasive methods have emerged, including a new device that captures and processes the intracranial pressure waveform (ICPw) by the skull’s oscillation. The present study evaluates ICPw obtained non-invasively (NIICPw) in patients with craniosynostosis.

Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study was conducted at a single center. Patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis and who provided informed consent were included. A US Food and Drug Administration–approved mechanical extensometer device (Brain4Care Corp.) was used to obtain a NIICPw. An ophthalmologist did a point-of-care retinography to check the optic nerve papilla. The P2/P1 ratio and the morphology of the NIICPw were analyzed, as well as the retinography.

Results

Thirty-five patients were evaluated, and 42 registers were obtained because seven were assessed before and after the surgery. The two patients who presented papilledema had low CC (NIICPw shape Class 3 or 4). There was a significant association between NIICPw and papilledema.

Conclusion

The ratio P2/P1 and the NIICPw morphology provided by a non-invasive monitor are related to CC changes before papilledema occurs. This is especially useful in patients with craniosynostosis because invasive ICP monitoring is not always feasible. Further studies are warranted to establish the clinical utility of NIICPw in patients with craniosynostosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fok H, Jones BM, Gault DG et al (1992) Relationship between intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in craniosynostosis. Br J Plast Surg 45:394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90013-n

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill CA, Vaddi S, Moffitt A et al (2011) Intracranial volume and whole brain volume in infants with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:394–398. https://doi.org/10.1597/10-051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D, Jones BM (1992) Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:377–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199209000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchac D, Renier D (1989) Craniosynostosis. World J Surg 13:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01660748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eide PK (2005) Assessment of childhood intracranial pressure recordings using a new method of processing intracranial pressure signals. Pediatr Neurosurg 41:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swanson J, Bender L, Mitchell B et al (2015) Optical coherence tomography: an objective modality for detecting papilledema in craniosynostosis patients with suspected intracranial hypertension. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 52:e139

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eide PK, Helseth E, Due-Tønnessen B, Lundar T (2002) Assessment of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in childhood craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 37:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang S-S, Kalmar C, Heuer G et al (2020) Optical coherence tomography can detect elevated intracranial pressure in craniosynostosis. J Neursurg Pediatr 25:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rufai SR, Jeelani NUO, McLean RJ (2021) Early recognition of raised intracranial pressure in craniosynostosis using optical coherence tomography. J Craniofac Surg 32:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rufai SR, Hisaund M, Jeelani NUO, McLean RJ (2021) Detection of intracranial hypertension in children using optical coherence tomography: a systematic review. BMJ Open 11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046935

  11. Frič R, Langvatn EA, Due-Tønnessen BJ, Eide PK (2021) The role of pulsatile and static intracranial pressure measurements in the management of children with craniosynostosis-an institutional experience from 49 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163:2015–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04680-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bristol RE, Lekovic GP, Rekate HL (2004) The effects of craniosynostosis on the brain with respect to intracranial pressure. Semin Pediatr Neurol 11:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2004.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayward R (2005) Venous hypertension and craniosynostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 21:880–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-1114-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayward R, Gonsalez S (2005) How low can you go? Intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and respiratory obstruction in children with complex craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 102:16–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Goederen R, Cuperus IE, Tasker RC et al (2020) Dural sinus volume in children with syndromic craniosynostosis and intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Pediatr 25:506–513. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.PEDS19562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fearon JA, Barrientos S, Ditthakasem K, Herbert M (2022) Optic nerve atrophy in syndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 150:381e–386e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson AT, den Ottelander BK, de Goederen R et al (2020) Intracranial hypertension and cortical thickness in syndromic craniosynostosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 62:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Proctor MR, Meara JG (2019) Embryology and genetics review A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future JNSPG 75th Anniversary Invited Review Article. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.PEDS18585

  19. Langfitt TW (1969) Increased intracranial Pressure. Clin Neurosurg 16:436–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/16.cn_suppl_1.436. (PMID: 4981573)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubiano AM, Figaji A, Hawryluk GW (2022) Intracranial pressure management: moving beyond guidelines. Curr Opin Crit Care 28:101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller SJ, Henkes E, Gounis MJ et al (2023) (2023) Clinical medicine non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. J Clin Med 12:2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062209

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrade RDAP et al (2021) A nanometer resolution wearable wireless medical device for non invasive intracranial pressure monitoring. IEEE Sens J 21(20):22270–22284. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3090648

  23. Brasil S, Jorge Fontoura Solla D, de Carvalho Nogueira R et al (2021) Personalized medicine A novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121302

  24. April F, Monro A (1783) Observations on the structure and functions of the nervous system, illustrated with tables. Lond Med J 4(2):113–135. PMCID: PMC5545466

  25. Raksin PB, Alperin N, Sivaramakrishnan A et al (2003) Noninvasive intracranial compliance and pressure based on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid flow: review of principles, implementation, and other noninvasive approaches. Neurosurgical focus FOC 14:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2003.14.4.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alperin N (2020) Does the brain have mechanical compliance? Magn Reson Mater Phys, Biol Med 33:753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ueno T, Ballard RE, Shuer LM et al (1998) Noninvasive measurement of pulsatile intracranial pressure using ultrasound. ActaNeurochir 71(Suppl]):66–69

  28. Heifetz MD, Weiss M (1981) Detection of skull expansion with increased intracranial pressure.J Neurosurg 55(5):811–2. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1981.55.5.0811. PMID: 7310503

  29. Miller JD, Stanek AE, Langfitt TW (1973) Cerebral blood flow regulation during experimental brain compression. J Neurosurg 39(2):186–96. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1973.39.2.0186. PMID: 4719697

  30. Nucci CG, De Bonis P, Mangiola A et al (2016) Intracranial pressure wave morphological classification: automated analysis and clinical validation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158:581–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2672-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mataczy C, Kazimierska A, Uryga A et al (2022) End-to-end automatic morphological classification of intracranial pressure pulse waveforms using deep learning index terms-deep neural networks, intracranial pressure, intensive care unit. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 26. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2021.3088629

  32. Cardoso ER, Rowan JO, Galbraith SP (1983) Analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid pulse wave in intracranial pressure.J Neurosurg 59(5):817–21. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0817. PMID: 6619934

  33. Frisien L (1982) Swelling of the optic nerve head: a staging scheme. Neurosurgery, and psychiatry 45:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.45.1.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Renier D, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2006) Functional repercussions of craniosynostosis. Neurochirurgie 52:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3770(06)71220-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ballestero MFM, Frigieri G, Cabella BCT et al (2017) Prediction of intracranial hypertension through noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform analysis in pediatric hydrocephalus. Child’s nervous system 33:1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3475-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brasil S, Solla DJF, Nogueira R de C et al (2021) Intracranial compliance assessed by intracranial pressure pulse waveform. Brain Sci 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080971

  37. de Moraes FM, Rocha E, Barros FCD et al (2022) Waveform morphology as a surrogate for ICP monitoring: a comparison between an invasive and a noninvasive method. Neurocrit Care 37:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01477-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kazimierska A, Kasprowicz M, Czosnyka M et al Compliance of the cerebrospinal space: comparison of three methods. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04834-y/Published

  39. Brasil S, Frigieri G, Silvio Taccone F et al (2022) Noninvasive intracranial pressure waveforms for estimation of intracranial hypertension and outcome prediction in acute brain-injured patients. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1902652/v1

  40. Uryga A, Ziółkowski A, Kazimierska A et al (2022) Analysis of intracranial pressure pulse waveform in traumatic brain injury patients: a CENTER-TBI study. J Neurosurg 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.jns221523

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Michele Brandao is the lead researcher and this study is part of her doctoral degree. She evaluated all patients. Cristiano Tonello is the craniofacial surgeon who operated on the patients. Aldo Igr is the co-advisor of this research. Isabella Parizotto is the ophthalmologist who performed retinography on all patients and provided the optic nerve classification. Luciano Brandao is the anesthesiologist who administered anesthesia to the patients in this study and developed the anesthesia protocol. Nivaldo Alonso is the senior professor, department chair, and the study's advisor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Madeira Brandao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brandao, M.M., Tonello, C., Parizotto, I. et al. Analysis of intracranial pressure waveform using a non-invasive method in individuals with craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 40, 145–152 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06092-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06092-y

Keywords

Navigation