Abstract
Introduction
Encephaloceles are rare congenital malformations of the central nervous system in which brain tissue is extruded from a defect in the skull. Hydrocephalus can occur in 60 to 90% of patients with posterior encephaloceles when compared to other types of this malformation. This article aims to present a series of posterior encephaloceles and its association with hydrocephalus as well as promote a review of the pertinent literature.
Material and Methods
A retrospective study of our series based on hospital charts of 50 patients with posterior encephaloceles was performed. Data on sex, location of encephalocele, presence of associated malformations, presence of neural tissue within the malformation, presence of hydrocephalus and microcephaly were recorded.
Results
There were 29 females and 21 males. There were 25 (50%) supratorcular, 8 (16%) torcular, and 17 (34%) infratorcular lesions. Mean age of encephalocele primary repair was 8 days (range 2–120 days). Hydrocephalus was diagnosed in 25 (50%) of the cases. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted in 24 patients. The mean age at VP shunt insertion was 1.3 months (range 0.3–9 months). Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was successfully performed in one patient. Dandy-Walker malformation and ventriculomegaly prior to encephalocele surgical correction were positively associated with hydrocephalus (p values 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). Chiari III malformation was found in 2 cases, both requiring CSF shunt for treatment of hydrocephalus and are stable in follow-up. Microcephaly was present in 9 cases. The known mortality rate was 8%.
Conclusions
Hydrocephalus is common in patients with posterior encephaloceles, being more frequent in the supratorcular type, especially when associated to Dandy-Walker, Chiari III malformation, and pre-existing ventriculomegaly. The severity of giant encephaloceles, when associated to torcular types and microcephaly, is a limiting factor for development of hydrocephalus, due both to the rapid evolution of natural history and the structural changes in microcephaly.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DWM:
-
Dandy-Walker malformation
- CMIII:
-
Chiari III malformation
- CSF:
-
Cerebral spinal fluid
- NTD:
-
Neural tube defect
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
References
Velho V, Naik H, Survashe P et al (2019) Management strategies of cranial encephaloceles: a neurosurgical challenge. Asian J Neurosurg 14:718. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_139_17
Murakami N, Morioka T, Kawamura N et al (2017) Venous anomaly analogous to vertical embryonic positioning of the straight sinus associated with atretic cephalocele at the suboccipital region. Child’s Nerv Syst 33:179–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3134-y
Satyarthee G, Sharma B, Verma S, Singh P (2013) Torcular occipital encephalocele in infant: report of two cases and review of literature. J Pediatr Neurosci 8:207. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.123666
Rolo A, Galea GL, Savery D et al (2019) Novel mouse model of encephalocele: post-neurulation origin and relationship to open neural tube defects. Dis Model Mech 12:dmm040683. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.040683
Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene ND (2013) Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neurol 12:799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70110-8
Rowland CA, Correa A, Cragan JD, Alverson CJ (2006) Are encephaloceles neural tube defects? Pediatrics 118:916–923. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1739
Kabré A, Zabsonre DS, Sanou A, Bako Y (2015) The cephaloceles: a clinical, epidemiological and therapeutic study of 50 cases. Neurochirurgie 61:250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2015.03.011
Markovic I, Bosnjakovic P, Milenkovic Z (2020) Occipital encephalocele: cause, incidence, neuroimaging and surgical management. CPR 16:200–205. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573396315666191018161535
Da Silva SL, Jeelani Y, Dang H et al (2015) Risk factors for hydrocephalus and neurological deficit in children born with an encephalocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15:392–398. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.PEDS14192
Monteagudo A (2020) Posterior encephalocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:B9–B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.177
Alexiev BA, Lin X, Sun C-C, Brenner DS (2006) Meckel-Gruber syndrome: pathologic manifestations, minimal diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1236–1238. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2006)130[1236:MS]2.0.CO;2
Rehman L, Farooq G, Bukhari I (2018) Neurosurgical interventions for occipital encephalocele. Asian J Neurosurg 13:233. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.228549
Kotil K, Kilinc B, Bilge T (2008) Diagnosis and management of large occipitocervical cephaloceles: a 10-year experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 44:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120149
Date I, Yagyu Y, Asari S, Ohmoto T (1993) Long-term outcome in surgically treated encephalocele. Surg Neurol 40:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(93)90122-H
Docherty J, Daly J, Carachi R (1991) Encephaloceles: a review 1971–1990. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1:11–13. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1042528
Martínez-Lage JF, Poza M, Sola J et al (1996) The child with a cephalocele: etiology, neuroimaging, and outcome. Child’s Nerv Syst 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261608
Kıymaz N, Yılmaz N, Demir İ, Keskin S (2010) Prognostic factors in patients with occipital encephalocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000314051
Lo BWY, Kulkarni AV, Rutka JT et al (2008) Clinical predictors of developmental outcome in patients with cephaloceles: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:254–257. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED.2008.2.10.254
Bui CJ, Tubbs RS, Shannon CN et al (2007) Institutional experience with cranial vault encephaloceles. J Neurosurg Pediatr 107:22–25. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED-07/07/022
Alexiou GA, Sfakianos G, Prodromou N (2010) Diagnosis and management of cephaloceles. J Craniofac Surg 21:1581–1582. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181edc3f6
Warf BC, Stagno V, Mugamba J (2011) Encephalocele in Uganda: ethnic distinctions in lesion location, endoscopic management of hydrocephalus, and survival in 110 consecutive children: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:88–93. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.PEDS10326
Bindal AK, Storrs BB, McLone DG (1991) Occipital meningoceles in patients with the Dandy-Walker syndrome: Neurosurgery 844. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199106000-00009
Talamonti G, Picano M, Debernardi A et al (2011) Giant occipital meningocele in an 8-year-old child with Dandy-Walker malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 27:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1154-6
Mankotia D, Satyarthee G, Singh B, Sharma B (2016) A rare case of giant occipital meningocele with Dandy Walker syndrome: Can it grow bigger than this? J Pediatr Neurosci 11:344. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.199471
Shuto T, Sekido K, Ohtsubo Y et al (1999) Dandy-Walker syndrome associated with occipital meningocele and spinal lipoma —case report—. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 39:544–547. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.39.544
Ivashchuk G, Loukas M, Blount JP et al (2015) Chiari III malformation: a comprehensive review of this enigmatic anomaly. Childs Nerv Syst 31:2035–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2853-9
Caldarelli M, Rea G, Cincu R, Di Rocco C (2002) Chiari type III malformation. Child’s Nerv Syst 18:207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-002-0579-y
Young RM, Shafa JS, Myseros JS (2015) The Chiari 3 malformation and a systemic review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg 50:235–242. https://doi.org/10.1159/000438487
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Protzenko, T., dos Santos Gomes Junior, S.C., Bellas, A. et al. Hydrocephalus and occipital encephaloceles: presentation of a series and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 3437–3445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05312-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05312-7