Abstract
Purpose
Proximal instrumentation failure is a challenge in posterior spinal fusions (PSFs) crossing the cervicothoracic junction. High rates of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and loss of fixation have been reported. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluate the utility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in addition to traditional PSF crossing the cervicothoracic junction in order to mitigate implant-related complications.
Methods
All patients who underwent PSF across the cervicothoracic junction with ACDF with 2 years of follow-up data were reviewed. We analyzed clinical, surgical, and radiographic measures such as operative details, presence of PJK, complications, instrumentation migration, curve angles, and vertebral translation. Measurements were compared statistically using paired samples t-tests.
Results
Ten patients (6 girls, 4 boys) met inclusion criteria with a mean age at surgery of 12.8 ± 3.3 years and follow-up of 3.38 ± 0.9 years. All patients underwent ACDF (range 1–3 levels), and 8 (80%) underwent traction. The average number of levels fused posteriorly was 16.7 ± 4.7 and anteriorly was 2.4 ± 0.7. The major coronal curve averaged 48.8 ± 34.7° preoperatively and 23.3±13.3° postoperatively (p = 0.028). The average major sagittal curve was 83.5 ± 24.2° preoperatively, resolving to 53.9 ± 25.5° (p=0.001). One patient suffered rod breakage at T7, and another developed symptomatic PJK 19 months postoperatively.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that ACDF procedures added to PSFs crossing the cervicothoracic junction offer promise for reducing risk for instrumentation-related complications. ACDF also significantly helps improve and maintain both coronal and sagittal correction over 2 years.
Level of Evidence: 4
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayoumi AB, Efe IE, Berk S, Kasper EM, Toktas ZO, Konya D (2018) Posterior rigid instrumentation of C7: surgical considerations and biomechanics at the cervicothoracic junction. A review of the literature. World Neurosurg 111:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.026
Godzik J, Dalton JF, Martinez-Del-Campo E, Newcomb A, Dominguez F, Reyes PM, Theodore N, Kelly BP, Crawford NR (2018) Biomechanical evaluation of cervicothoracic junction fusion constructs. World Neurosurg S1878-8750:32863–32868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.040
Goyal A, Akhras A, Wahood W, Alvi MA, Nassr A, Bydon M (2019) Should multilevel posterior cervical fusions involving C7 cross the cervicothoracic junction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 127:588–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.283
Truumees E, Singh D, Geck MJ, Stokes JK (2018) Should long-segment cervical fusions be routinely carried into the thoracic spine? a multicenter analysis. Spine J 18:782–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.09.010
Leven D, Cho SK (2016) Pseudarthrosis of the cervical spine: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J 10:776–786. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.776
Yang JS, Buchowski JM, Verma V (2015) Construct type and risk factors for pseudarthrosis at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E613–E617. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000868
El-Hawary R, Sturm P, Cahill P, Samdani A, Vitale M, Gabos P, Bodin N, d'Amato C, Harris C, Al Khudairy A, Smith JT (2017) What is the risk of developing proximal junctional kyphosis during growth friendly treatments for early-onset scoliosis? J Pediatr Orthop 37:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000599
Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Deviren V, Lafage V, Schwab F, Ames CP, International Spine Study Group (2013) Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 19:141–159. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838
Bible JE, Kang JD (2016) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: surgical indications and outcomes. Semin Spine Surg 28:80–83
Buttermann GR (2018) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes over 10 years: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273
Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB (2000) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200001010-00009
Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR (2005) Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2138–2144. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000180479.63092.17
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e
Mobbs RJ, Prakash R, Chandran NK (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating. J Clin Neurosci (Melbourne Australia) 14:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn2006.04.003
Burkhardt BW, Simgen A, Dehnen M, Wagenpfeil G, Reith W, Oertel JM (2019) Is there an impact of cervical plating on the development of adjacent segment degeneration following Smith-Robinson procedure? a magnetic resonance imaging study of 84 patients with a 24-year follow-up. Spine J 19:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.001
Louie PK, Presciutti SM, Iantorno SE, Bohl DD, Shah K, Shifflett GD, An HS (2017) There is no increased risk of adjacent segment disease at the cervicothoracic junction following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to C7. Spine J 17:1264–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.027
Fayed I, Toscano DT, Triano MJ, Makariou E, Lee C, Spitz SM, Anaizi AN, Nair MN, Sandhu FA, Voyadzis JM (2020) Crossing the cervicothoracic junction during posterior cervical decompression and fusion: is it necessary? Neurosurgery 86:E544–E550. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa078
Battista C, Wild C, Kreul S, Albert M (2018) Prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis & failure using sublaminar bands in a hybrid construct in pediatric kyphosis deformity. Int J Spine Surg 12:644–649. https://doi.org/10.14444/5080
Chen X, Xu L, Qiu Y, Chen ZH, Zhu ZZ, Li S, Sun X (2018) Incidence, risk factors, and evolution of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior hemivertebra resection and short fusion in young children with congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002593
Cho SK, Kim YJ, Lenke LG (2015) Proximal junctional kyphosis following spinal deformity surgery in the pediatric patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:408–414. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00143
Ferrero E, Bocahut N, Lefevre Y, Roussouly P, Pesenti S, Lakhal W, Odent T, Morin C, Clement JL, Compagnon R, de Gauzy JS, Jouve JL, Mazda K, Abelin-Genevois K, Ilharreborde B, Groupe d'Etude sur la Scoliose (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort. Eur Spine J 27:2241-2250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y
Gomez JA, Kubat O, Tovar Castro MA, Hanstein R, Flynn T, Lafage V, Hurry JK, Soroceanu A, Schwab F, Skaggs DL, El-Hawary R, Pediatric Spine Study Group (2020) The effect of spinopelvic parameters on the development of proximal junctional kyphosis in early onset: mean 4.5-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 40:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001516
Homans JF, Kruyt MC, Schlosser TPC, Colo D, Rogers K, Shah SA, Flynn JM, Castelein RM, Pasha S (2020) Changes in the position of the junctional vertebrae after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: implication in risk assessment of proximal junctional kyphosis development. J Pediatr Orthop 40:e84–e90. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001400
Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Kostial P, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Roh J, Lowe R, Asher MA, Marks DS (2005) Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2039–2044
Yadav R, Chavali S, Chaturvedi A, Girija PR (2017) Post-operative complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective review. J Neuroanesthesiol Crit Care 4:170–174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Mr. Toll has nothing to disclose. Dr. Samdani is a paid consultant for DePuy Synthes Spine, Ethicon, Globus Medical, Medical Device Business Systems, Mirus, NuVasive, Orthofix, Stryker, and Zimmer Biomet and receives royalties from NuVasive and Zimmer Biomet. Dr. Pahys is a paid consultant for DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, and Zimmer Biomet. Mr. Amanullah has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hwang is a paid consultant for NuVasive and Zimmer Biomet, is on the speakers bureau for NuVasive and Zimmer Biomet, and owns stocks/options from Auctus.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toll, B.J., Samdani, A.F., Pahys, J.M. et al. Crossing the cervicothoracic junction in complex pediatric deformity using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case series. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 1957–1964 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05109-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05109-8