Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delayed surgical repair of cranial burst fracture without strict dura closure: a prudent choice in selected patients?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Surgical management of cranial burst fracture (CBF) usually involves craniotomy to remove the devitalized brain tissues, followed by watertight repair of dural tears. However, there were times when the dural tear was so extensive that a substantially large bone flap would have to be removed in order to expose the retracted dural margins before it could be repaired. In such cases, strict dural repair would incur a significantly higher risk of damages to the surrounding neural tissues and severe bleeding, especially when the fracture was in the vicinity of eloquent cortical areas and sinus. Basing on our own clinical experiences, we suggest strict dural closure is not mandatory for these selected patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranial surgery for CBF at our hospital was performed. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed to evaluate the extent of dural and brain laceration and the existence of extra-cranial cerebral tissues. Routine craniotomy was delivered to remove the lacerated brain tissues and evacuate the hematoma. The dural defect was only partially fixed with patient’s own tissues or artificial dura patch. Then the fractured bone flaps were restored using titanium micro plates and screws. Data including preoperative neurological status, surgery related complications, postoperative cranial fracture healing, and clinical outcomes were obtained through clinical and radiological examinations.

Results

From October 2004 to March 2013, a total of four patients diagnosed with CBF were treated by this dural closure sparing technique. Their average age was 18.4 months old and the average area of the skull defects was 91 cm2, with an average interval between primary injury and surgery of 13 days. The diagnosis of CBF was confirmed by intraoperative findings like extrusion of cerebral tissues out of the lacerated dura mater and skull defects. The postoperative courses were uneventful and all patients’ neurological functions improved after surgery. Postoperative three dimensional CT reconstruction of the cranial vault showed the skull fractures healed properly in all patients. No patient developed posttraumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak or epilepsy during the on average 24-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

In those selected cases of CBF in whom an extraordinary large craniotomy would be required to expose the entire retracted dura margins, given satisfactory evacuation of devitalized brain tissues and restoration of the bone flaps were achieved, we suggest strict dura closure is not compulsory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciurea AV, Gorgan MR, Tascu A, Sandu AM, Rizea RE (2011) Traumatic brain injury in infants and toddlers, 0-3 years old. J Med Life 4:234–243

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Demellweek C, Baldwin T, Appleton R, Al-Kharusi A (2002) A prospective study and review of pre-morbid characteristics in children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Rehabil 5:81–89. doi:10.1080/136384902320807194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donahue DJ, Sanford RA, Muhlbauer MS, Chadduck WM (1995) Cranial burst fracture in infants: acute recognition and management. Childs Nerv Syst 11:692–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis TS, Vezina LG, Donahue DJ (2000) Acute identification of cranial burst fracture: comparison between CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:795–801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu XS, You C, Lu M, Liu JG (2012) Growing skull fracture stages and treatment strategy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 9:670–675. doi:10.3171/2012.2.PEDS11538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lloyd O, Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ (2015) Awareness deficits in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuura H, Omama S, Yoshida Y, Fujiwara S, Honda T, Akasaka M, Kamei A, Ogasawara K (2012) Use of magnetic resonance imaging to identify the edge of a dural tear in an infant with growing skull fracture: a case study. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1951–1954. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1891-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muhonen MG, Piper JG, Menezes AH (1995) Pathogenesis and treatment of growing skull fractures. Surg Neurol 43:367–372 discussion 372-363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oehmichen M, Meissner C, Saternus KS (2005) Fall or shaken: traumatic brain injury in children caused by falls or abuse at home—a review on biomechanics and diagnosis. Neuropediatrics 36:240–245. doi:10.1055/s-2005-872812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinto PS, Meoded A, Poretti A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications, and their imaging findings—part 2. J Neuroimaging 22:e18–e41. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00690.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinto PS, Poretti A, Meoded A, Tekes A, Huisman TA (2012) The unique features of traumatic brain injury in children. Review of the characteristics of the pediatric skull and brain, mechanisms of trauma, patterns of injury, complications and their imaging findings—part 1. J Neuroimaging 22:e1–e17. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00688.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad GL, Gupta DK, Mahapatra AK, Borkar SA, Sharma BS (2015) Surgical results of growing skull fractures in children: a single centre study of 43 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 31:269–277. doi:10.1007/s00381-014-2529-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy DR (2013) Growing skull fractures: guidelines for early diagnosis and effective operative management. Neurol India 61:455–456. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.121907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanford RA (2010) Prevention of growing skull fractures: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:213–218. doi:10.3171/2009.9.PEDS09180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scarfo GB, Mariottini A, Tomaccini D, Palma L (1989) Growing skull fractures: progressive evolution of brain damage and effectiveness of surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 5:163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Singhal A, Steinbok P (2008) Operative management of growing skull fractures: a technical note. Childs Nerv Syst 24:605–607. doi:10.1007/s00381-007-0552-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thurman DJ (2014) The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in children and youths: a review of research since 1990. J Child Neurol. doi:10.1177/0883073814544363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vignes JR, Jeelani N, Dautheribes M, San-Galli F, Liguoro D (2007) Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 35:185–188. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Li G, Li Q, You C (2013) Early diagnosis and treatment of growing skull fracture. Neurol India 61:497–500. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.121918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winkler R, Taylor NF (2015) Do children and adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms benefit from treatment? A systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang CH, Li Q, Li GP, You C (2009) Internal open brain injury or cranial burst fracture: report of 8 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 45:402–406. doi:10.1159/000260912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Mr. Xiaofeng Ni from Puqi Middle School, Yueqing, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China for his generous helps in preparation of the Fig. 1 artwork in this manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study is funded by Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2015C33144).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mao-de Wang.

Ethics declarations

Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, Hs., Zhang, N., Lin, J. et al. Delayed surgical repair of cranial burst fracture without strict dura closure: a prudent choice in selected patients?. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 1661–1667 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3155-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3155-6

Keywords

Navigation