Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and validation of a spina bifida-specific pediatric quality of life questionnaire: the Spina Bifida Pediatric Questionnaire, SBPQ

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Based on existing questionnaires and patient interview, a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in spina bifida (SB) children is created and validated, the Spina Bifida Pediatric Questionnaire (SBPQ).

Methods

SB patients from the SB reference centre Ghent University Hospital, Belgium, with mental ability between 6 and 18 years old and their parents were asked to participate in the study, together with a control group.

Results

Thirty-nine patients and parents answered the questionnaire once, 20 patients and their parents the test-retest. Thirty-five controls answered the questionnaire once, 34 controls and their parents the test-retest. The final questionnaire was retained when 3 consecutive patients approved all items. Visual clues were added for children with a mental ability below 10 years of age. The test-retest showed a good to excellent agreement for child self-report in 5 domains (not for social functioning), for parent proxy report in all domains (6), for control self-report in 4 domains (not for domain home) and for control parent proxy report in all domains (5). Internal consistency reliability was good in child self-report and in parent proxy report, except for physical functioning in child self-report. There was parent–child agreement for 4 out of 6 domains. Regarding social and emotional functioning, QoL was rated lower by parents than by children themselves.

Conclusion

A SB HRQoL questionnaire was developed and validated. Because of visual aid, this questionnaire can be used by both young children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vinck A, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Roeleveld NJ, Mullaart RA, Rotteveel JJ, Maassen BA (2010) Motor profile and cognitive functioning in children with spina bifida. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 14(1):86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bomalaski MD, Teague JL, Brooks B (1995) The long-term impact of urological management on the quality of life of children with spina bifida. J Urol 154:778–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman RM, Mc Lone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: a 25 year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34:114–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bol KA, Collins JS, Kirby RS, National Birth Defects Prevention Network (2006) Survival of infants with neural tube defects in the presence of folic acid fortification. Pediatrics 117(3):803–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barf HA, Post MW, Verhoef M, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ (2010) Is cognitive functioning associated with subjective quality of life in Young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus? Rehabil Med 42(1):56–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulkarni AV, Rabin D, Drake JM (2004) An instrument to measure the health status in children with hydrocephalus: the hydrocephalus outcome questionnaire. J Neurosurg 101:134–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nanigian DK, Nguyen T, Tanaka ST, Canbio A, DiGrande A, Kurzrock EA (2008) Development and validation of the Fecal Incontinence and Constipation Quality of life measure in children with spina bifida. J Urol 180:1770–1773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ok JH, Kurzrock EA (2011) Objective measurement of quality of life changes after ACE malone using FICQOL survey. J Pediatr Urol 7(3):389–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rathod KJ, Mahajan JK, Khan RA, Rao KL (2012) Quality of life of very young spina bifida patients after initial surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 28(6):883–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA (1999) The PedsQL: measurement model for the paediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 37(2):126–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Wit M, Winterdijk P, Aanstoot HJ et al (2012) Assessing diabetes-related quality of life in youth with diabetes type 1 in routine clinical care: the Mind Youth Questionnaire (MY-Q). Pediatr Diabetes 13(8):638–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust (2002) Assessing health status and quality of life instruments attributes and review. Qual Life Res 211:193–205

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mc Graw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seid M, Limbers CA, Driscoll KA, Opipari-Arrigan LA, Gelhard LR, Varni JW (2010) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Generic Core Scales and Asthma Symptoms Scale in vulnerable children with asthma. J Asthma 47:170–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM (2007) Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: A comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5(43):1–15

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Varni JW, Limbers CA, Bryant WP, Wilson DP (2009) The PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale in Type 1 diabetes: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Pediatr Diabetes 10:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer SN, Meeske KA, Katz ER, Burwinke TM, Varni JW (2007) The PedsQL™ Brain Tumor Module: Initial reliability and validity. Pediatr Blood Cancer 49:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mc Horney CA, Tarlow AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hetherington R, Dennis M, Barnes M et al (2006) Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 22:117–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Padua L, Rendeli C, Rabini A, Girardi E, Tonali P, Salvaggio E (2002) Health-related quality of life and disability in young patients with spina bifida. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1384–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Minchom PE, Ellis NC, Appleton PL, Lawson V, Böll V, Jones P, Elliott CE (1995) Impact of functional severity on self concept in young people with spina bifida. Arch Dis Child 73:48–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Varni JW, Seid M, Smith Knight T, Burwinkle T, Brown J, Szer I (2002) The PedsQL™ in pediatric rheumatology. Reliability and validity and responsiveness of the Pediatric quality of life inventory ™ generic scores scales and rheumatology modules. Arthritis Rheum 46(3):714–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Laura Mertens, Jozefien Haeve and Laurien De Ruyck are Masters students.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia Vande Velde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velde, S.V., Laridaen, J., Van Hoecke, E. et al. Development and validation of a spina bifida-specific pediatric quality of life questionnaire: the Spina Bifida Pediatric Questionnaire, SBPQ. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 105–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2903-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2903-3

Keywords

Navigation