Skip to main content
Log in

The safety and feasibility of retrograde balloon aortic valvuloplasty using the INOUE-BALLOON with severe aortic stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era, the indications for balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) are increasing. Previously, the INOUE-BALLOON® (IB) was used only for antegrade BAV, but recently, it has also been used for retrograde BAV. However, the safety and feasibility of retrograde BAV using an IB are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the safety and feasibility of retrograde BAV using an IB in elderly Japanese patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We compared 39 cases of retrograde BAV using an IB performed from June 2018 to September 2020 and 34 cases of antegrade BAV using an IB performed from August 2013 to May 2018. The total number of complications was lower in retrograde BAV than in antegrade BAV (p = 0.020). The procedure time was significantly shorter in retrograde BAV than in antegrade BAV (p < 0.001), and the maximum balloon size and number of balloon inflations were smaller in retrograde BAV than in antegrade BAV (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the degree of improvement in the aortic valve area or ejection fraction between retrograde and antegrade BAV. In conclusion, the present study showed the safety and feasibility of retrograde BAV using an IB in elderly Japanese patients with severe AS compared with antegrade BAV using an IB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khawaja MZ, Sohal M, Valli H, Dworakowski R, Pettit SJ, Roy D, Newton J, Schneider H, Manoharan G, Doshi S, Muir D, Roberts D, Nolan J, Gunning M, Densem C, Spence MS, Chowdhary S, Mahadevan VS, Brecker SJ, Maccarthy P, Mullen M, Stables RH, Prendergast BD, de Belder A, Thomas M, Redwood S, Hildick-Smith D (2013) Standalone balloon aortic valvuloplasty: indications and outcomes from the UK in the transcatheter valve era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 81(2):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takafuji H, Hosokawa S, Ogura R, Hiasa Y (2019) Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valvuloplasty prior to non-cardiac surgery in Japanese patients with severe aortic stenosis. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 34(4):352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malkin CJ, Judd J, Chew DP, Sinhal A (2013) Balloon aortic valvuloplasty to bridge and triage patients in the era of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 81(2):358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wacławski J, Wilczek K, Hudzik B, Pres D, Hawranek M, Milewski K, Chodór P, Zembala M, Gąsior M (2019) Aortic balloon valvuloplasty as a bridge-to-decision in patients with aortic stenosis. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej 15(2):195–202

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, Alderman EL, Bashore TM, Block PC, Brinker JA, Diver D, Ferguson J, Holmes DR Jr, Lambrew CT, McKay CR, Palacios IF, Powers ER, Rahimtoola SH, Weiner BH, Davis KB (1994) Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 89(2):642–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C (2021) 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 143(5):e72–e227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38(36):2739–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakata Y, Syed Z, Salinger MH, Feldman T (2005) Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty: antegrade transseptal vs. conventional retrograde transarterial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64(3):314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenhauer AC, Hadjipetrou P, Piemonte TC (2000) Balloon aortic valvuloplasty revisited: the role of the inoue balloon and transseptal antegrade approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 50(4):484–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman T (2000) Transseptal antegrade access for aortic valvuloplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 50(4):492–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Witzke C, Don CW, Cubeddu RJ, Herrero-Garibi J, Pomerantsev E, Caldera A, McCarty D, Inglessis I, Palacios IF (2010) Impact of rapid ventricular pacing during percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with critical aortic stenosis: should we be using it? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75(3):444–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss JN, Qu Z, Chen PS, Lin SF, Karagueuzian HS, Hayashi H, Garfinkel A, Karma A (2005) The dynamics of cardiac fibrillation. Circulation 112(8):1232–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shivaraju A, Thilo C, Sawlani N, Ott I, Schunkert H, von Scheidt W, Kastrati A, Kasel AM (2018) Aortic valve predilatation with a small balloon, without rapid pacing, prior to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Biomed Res Int 2018:1080597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreno PR, Jang IK, Newell JB, Block PC, Palacios IF (1994) The role of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock and critical aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 23(5):1071–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng TO (1989) Multivalve percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 16(2):109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakata Y, Matsubara K, Tamiya S, Hayama Y, Usui K (2015) The efficacy and safety of antegrade inoue-balloon aortic valvuloplasty to treat calcific critical aortic stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 27(8):373–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mizutani K, Hara M, Ishikawa H, Nishimura S, Ito A, Iwata S, Takahashi Y, Sugioka K, Murakami T, Shibata T, Yoshiyama M (2017) Safety and efficacy of simultaneous biplane mode of 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography-guided antegrade multiple-inflation balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circ J 81(5):748–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Brian Quinn (Japan Medical Communication Inc.) for his comments on the language of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Yuzawa-Tsukada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 187 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuzawa-Tsukada, N., Kashiwagi, Y., Nonoue, A. et al. The safety and feasibility of retrograde balloon aortic valvuloplasty using the INOUE-BALLOON with severe aortic stenosis. Heart Vessels 37, 2093–2100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02120-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02120-0

Keywords

Navigation