Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of optical frequency domain imaging in detecting peripheral artery disease: the result of a multi-center, open-label, single-arm study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) is a high-resolution intracoronary imaging modality with fast automated longitudinal pullback. We aimed to evaluate the ability of performing OFDI from the superficial femoral artery (SFA) to the below-knee (BK) artery. This clinical trial was a multi-center, single-arm, open-label study. The primary endpoint was to obtain a clear image of the intra-vascular lumen from the SFA to the BK artery, specifically  > 270° visualization of the blood vessel lumen with  > 16/21 cross sections. The proportion of the clear image (≥ 85%) was regarded as confirmatory of the ability of OFDI to visualize the vessel lumen. Overall, 20 patients were enrolled. The proportion of the primary endpoint was 90% (18/20), and the pre-specified criterion was successfully attained. The proportion of the clear image assessed by the operator was 100% (20/20), and an additional statistical analysis for the proportion of the visualization,  > 270°, of the blood vessel lumen revealed a significantly higher cut-off value than that for the pre-specified criterion, 85% (p = 0.0315). There were three adverse events not related to OFDI. OFDI achieved acceptable visualization of the vessel lumen without any adverse event related to it. After regulatory approval based on the present study, OFDI will be available as a new option of endovascular imaging for peripheral artery diseases in daily practice

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT 2052190025, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2052190025).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BK:

Below knee

EVT:

Endovascular treatment

GCP:

Good clinical practice

IVUS:

Intra-vascular ultrasonography

jRCT:

Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials

MHLW:

Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

OFDI:

Optical frequency domain imaging

PAD:

Peripheral artery diseases

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PMDA:

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency

SFA:

Superficial femoral artery

References

  1. Rigatelli G, Cardaioli P, Giordan M (2007) Endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal obstructive disease. Minerva Cardioangiol 55:125–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zdanowski Z, Albrechtsson U, Lundin A, Jonung T, Ribbe E, Thorne J, Norgren L (1999) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting for femoropopliteal occlusions? A randomized controlled study. Int Angiol 18:251–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vroegindeweij D, Vos LD, Tielbeek AV, Buthvd Bosch JHC (1997) Balloon angioplasty combined with primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in femoropopliteal obstructions: a comparative randomized study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:420–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becquemin JP, Favre JP, Marzelle J, Nemoz C, Corsin C, Leizorovicz A (2003) Systematic versus selective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 37:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawasaki D, Tsujino T, Fujii K, Masutani M, Ohyanagi M, Masuyama T (2008) Novel use of ultrasound guidance for recanalization of iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:727–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujihara M, Kozuki A, Tsubakimoto Y, Takahara M, Shintani Y, Fukunaga M, Iwasaki Y, Nakama T, Yokoi Y (2019) Lumen gain after endovascular therapy in calcified superficial femoral artery occlusive disease assessed by intravascular ultrasound (CODE study). J Endovasc Ther 26:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shammas NW, Radaideh Q, Shammas WJ, Daher GE, Rachwan RJ, Radaideh Y (2019) The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions. Vasc Health Risk Manag 15:283–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Otsuka K, Shimada K, Ishikawa H, Nakamura H, Katayama H, Takeda H, Fujimoto K, Kasayuki N, Yoshiyama M (2020) Usefulness of pre- and post-stent optical frequency domain imaging findings in the prediction of periprocedural cardiac troponin elevation in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels 35:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amano H, Noike R, Yabe T, Watanabe I, Okubo R, Koizumi M, Toda M, Ikeda T (2020) Frailty and coronary plaque characteristics on optical coherence tomography. Heart Vessels 35:750–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Okamura T, Gonzalo N, Gutierrez-Chico JL, Serruys PW, Bruining N, de Winter S, Dijkstra J, Commossaris KH, van Geuns RJ, van Soest G, Ligthart J, Regar E (2010) Reproducibility of coronary Fourier domain optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of in vivo stented coronary arteries using three different software packages. EuroIntervention 6:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miki K, Fujii K, Fukunaga M, Nishimura M, Horimatsu T, Saita T, Sumiyoshi A, Tamaru H, Imanaka T, Shibuya M, Naito Y, Masuyama T, Ishihara M (2016) Strut coverage after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:753–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, Guagliumi G, Meraj PM, Alfonso F, Samady H, Akasaka T, Carlson EB, Leesar MA, Matsumura M, Ozan MO, Mintz GS, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW, Investigators IIOP (2016) Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:2618–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Fusazaki T, Otake H, Kozuma K, Ioji T, Kaneda H, Serikawa T, Kataoka T, Okada H, Akasaka T (2017) Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J 38:3139–3147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otake H, Kubo T, Takahashi H, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Fusazaki T, Kozuma K, Ioji T, Kaneda H, Akasaka T (2018) Optical frequency domain imaging versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION Trial): results from the OPINION Imaging Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kozuki A, Shinke T, Otake H, Kijima Y, Masano T, Nagoshi R, Imamura K, Fujiwara R, Shibata H, Takeshige R, Tsukiyama Y, Yanaka K, Nakano S, Fukuyama Y, Kawashima S, Hirata K, Shite J (2016) Optical coherence tomography study of chronic-phase vessel healing after implantation of bare metal and paclitaxel-eluting self-expanding nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. J Cardiol 67:424–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miki K, Fujii K, Shibuya M, Fukunaga M, Imanaka T, Tamaru H, Nishimura M, Horimatsu T, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ, Masuyama T, Ishihara M (2016) Comparing the vascular response in implantation of self-expanding, bare metal nitinol stents or paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stents in superficial femoral artery lesions: a serial optical frequency domain imaging study. EuroIntervention 12:1551–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miki K, Fujii K, Shibuya M, Fukunaga M, Imanaka T, Kawai K, Tamaru H, Sumiyoshi A, Nishimura M, Horimatsu T, Saita T, Yoshihara N, Kimura T, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ, Masuyama T, Ishihara M (2017) Impact of stent diameter on vascular response after self-expanding paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery. J Cardiol 70:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawamori H, Konishi A, Otake H, Toba T, Nakano S, Tanimura K, Tsukiyama Y, Namba I, Omori T, Shinke T, Hirata K (2020) Efficacy of optical frequency-domain imaging in detecting peripheral artery disease: a single-center open-label, single-arm study protocol. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 35:385–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalo N, Serruys PW, Okamura T, Shen ZJ, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Sarno G, Schultz C, van Geuns RJ, Ligthart J, Regar E (2009) Optical coherence tomography assessment of the acute effects of stent implantation on the vessel wall: a systematic quantitative approach. Heart 95:1913–1919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Optical coherence tomography catheter review report 2007 (in Japanese). https://www.pmda.go.jp/medical_devices/2007/M200700004/250011000_21900BZX00779000_A100_1.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2020

  21. Meissner OA, Rieber J, Babaryka G, Oswald M, Reim S, Siebert U, Redel T, Reiser M, Mueller-Lisse U (2006) Intravascular optical coherence tomography: comparison with histopathology in atherosclerotic peripheral artery specimens. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eberhardt KM, Treitl M, Boesenecker K, Maxien D, Reiser M, Rieger J (2013) Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography in lower limb arteries compared with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1499–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmagkiolis K, Lendel V, Cawich I, Leesar M, Feldman MD, Cilingiroglu M (2014) Optical coherence tomography to guide below-the-knee endovascular interventions. Int J Cardiol 176:1336–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all of the staff involved in this clinical study.

Funding

This study project was funded by the Terumo Corporation and supported by the Kobe Clinical and Translational Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Hiroyuki Kawamori, Toshiro Shinke, Hirokuni Akahori, Masaharu Ishihara, Hiroaki Tsujita, and Ken-ichi Hirata. Akihide Konishi and Takashi Omori made a great contribution to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript, and all authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihide Konishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Masaharu Ishihara and Ken-ichi Hirata received a research grant from the Terumo Corporation. Toshiro Shinke, Hiromasa Otake, Takashi Kubo, Amane Kozuki, and Junya Shite received lecture fees from the Terumo Corporation. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

This protocol has been approved by the institutional review boards of Kobe University Hospital (protocol identification number: OFDI-01), Showa University, School of Medicine, and Hyogo College of Medicine.

Informed consent

Written informed consent to participate in this study was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawamori, H., Konishi, A., Shinke, T. et al. Efficacy of optical frequency domain imaging in detecting peripheral artery disease: the result of a multi-center, open-label, single-arm study. Heart Vessels 36, 818–826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01758-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01758-y

Keywords

Navigation