Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes between on-label and off-label use of rotational atherectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While rotational atherectomy (RA) is used for complex lesions in percutaneous coronary intervention, there are several contraindications such as unprotected left main stenosis or left ventricular dysfunction. We previously reported that the incidence of in-hospital complications was significantly greater in off-label as compared to on-label use RA. However, the mid-term clinical outcomes between off-label and on-label RA have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes between off-label (n = 156) and on-label RA (n = 94). The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-fatal MI, and all-cause death. We also identified 154 patients who underwent RA and follow-up angiography within 1 year, and compared quantitative coronary analysis between the off-label group (n = 96) and on-label group (n = 58). There was no significant difference in late luminal loss between the groups (0.03 ± 0.53 mm in the off-label and −0.05 ± 0.44 mm in the on-label groups, P = 0.57). However, the incidence of MACE was less in the on-label group (3.2 %) as compared to the off-label group (9.0 %) without reaching statistical significance (P = 0.08). In conclusion, mid-term clinical outcomes tended to be worse in the off-label group than in the on-label group. We may have to follow-up the patient who underwent off-label RA more carefully than the patient who underwent on-label RA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavusoglu E, Kini AS, Marmur JD, Sharma SK (2004) Current status of rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:485–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee SW, Hong MK, Lee CW, Kim YH, Song JM, Han KH, Kang DH, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ (2004) Early and late clinical outcomes after rotational atherectomy with stenting versus rotational atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for complex coronary lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 16:406–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boston_Scientific_Corporation (2009) Rotablator, product document

  4. Garcia-Lara J, Pinar E, Valdesuso R, Lacunza J, Gimeno JR, Hurtado JA, Valdes-Chavarri M (2012) Percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy for severely calcified unprotected left main: Immediate and two years follow-up results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakakura K, Ako J, Wada H, Naito R, Funayama H, Arao K, Kubo N, Momomura SI (2012) Comparison of frequency of complications with on-label versus off-label use of rotational atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 110:498–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbato E, Carrie D, Dardas P, Fajadet J, Gaul G, Haude M, Khashaba A, Koch K, Meyer-Gessner M, Palazuelos J, Reczuch K, Ribichini FL, Sharma S, Sipotz J, Sjogren I, Suetsch G, Szabo G, Valdes-Chavarri M, Vaquerizo B, Wijns W, Windecker S, de Belder A, Valgimigli M, Byrne RA, Colombo A, Di Mario C, Latib A, Hamm C (2015) European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention 11:30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tamekiyo H, Hayashi Y, Toyofuku M, Ueda H, Sakuma T, Okimoto T, Otsuka M, Imazu M, Kihara Y (2009) Clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stenting after rotational atherectomy. Circ J 73:2042–2049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathore S, Matsuo H, Terashima M, Kinoshita Y, Kimura M, Tsuchikane E, Nasu K, Ehara M, Asakura Y, Katoh O, Suzuki T (2010) Rotational atherectomy for fibro-calcific coronary artery disease in drug eluting stent era: procedural outcomes and angiographic follow-up results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:919–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakakura K, Ako J, Wada H, Naito R, Arao K, Funayama H, Kubo N, Momomura S (2012) Beta-blocker use is not associated with slow flow during rotational atherectomy. J Invasive Cardiol 24:379–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiono Y, Kubo T, Tanaka A, Ino Y, Yamaguchi T, Tanimoto T, Yamano T, Matsuo Y, Nishiguchi T, Teraguchi I, Ota S, Ozaki Y, Orii M, Shimamura K, Kitabata H, Hirata K, Imanishi T, Akasaka T (2015) Long-term outcome after deferral of revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis and gray-zone fractional flow reserve. Circ J 79:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujimoto S, Kondo T, Yamamoto H, Yokoyama N, Tarutani Y, Takamura K, Urabe Y, Konno K, Nishizaki Y, Shinozaki T, Kihara Y, Daida H, Isshiki T, Takase S (2015) Development of new risk score for pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease based on coronary CT angiography. Heart Vessels 30:563–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norioka N, Iwata S, Yanagi S, Ishii H, Sugioka K, Kamimori K, Ota T, Di Tullio MR, Homma S, Yoshiyama M (2016) Higher visit-to-visit intra-dialytic blood pressure is associated with the progression of aortic valve stenosis in chronic hemodialysis patients. Heart Vessels 31:1491–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Lasala JM, Koglin JJ, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O’Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Stone GW (2005) Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation: analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1193–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Naito R, Sakakura K, Wada H, Funayama H, Sugawara Y, Kubo N, Ako J, Momomura S (2012) Mid-term clinical outcomes of ACS and non-ACS patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents. Int Heart J 53:215–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yabushita H, Takagi K, Tahara S, Fujino Y, Warisawa T, Kawamoto H, Watanabe Y, Mitomo S, Karube K, Matsumoto T, Sato T, Naganuma T, Kobayashi T, Ishiguro H, Fukino K, Kurita N, Nakamura S, Hozawa K, Nakamura S (2014) Impact of rotational atherectomy on heavily calcified, unprotected left main disease. Circ J 78:1867–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sulimov DS, Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Kassner G, Geist V, Richardt G (2015) High-speed rotational atherectomy of the left main coronary artery: a single-center experience in 50 high-risk patients. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 16:284–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Basavarajaiah S, Naganuma T, Latib A, Hasegawa T, Sharp A, Rezq A, Sticchi A, Figini F, Amato A, Colombo A (2014) Extended follow-up following “full-metal jacket” percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84:1042–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neill WW (1992) Mechanical rotational atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 69:12F–18F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto S, Sakakura K, Funayama H, Wada H, Fujita H, Momomura S (2015) Percutaneous coronary artery bypass for type 3 coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1396–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakakura K, Ako J, Momomura S (2011) Successful removal of an entrapped rotablation burr by extracting drive shaft sheath followed by balloon dilatation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78:567–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Totsugawa T, Kuinose M, Yoshitaka H, Katayama K, Tsushima Y, Ishida A, Chikazawa G, Hiraoka A (2012) Surgical treatment for Ellis type 3 coronary perforation during percutaneous catheter intervention. Circ J 76:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Stahle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360:961–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi IJ, Koh YS, Lim S, Choo EH, Kim JJ, Hwang BH, Kim TH, Seo SM, Kim CJ, Park MW, Shin DI, Choi YS, Park HJ, Her SH, Kim DB, Park CS, Lee JM, Moon KW, Chang K, Kim HY, Yoo KD, Jeon DS, Chung WS, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, Seung KB, Kim PJ (2016) Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in non-infarct-related arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction (from the COREA-AMI Registry). Am J Cardiol 117:1039–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace TW, Berger JS, Wang A, Velazquez EJ, Brown DL (2009) Impact of left ventricular dysfunction on hospital mortality among patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 103:355–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all staff in the catheter laboratory in Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center for their technical support in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichi Sakakura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research received no Grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Sakakura received speaking honorarium from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic Cardiovascular, and Terumo; and served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, T., Sakakura, K., Wada, H. et al. Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes between on-label and off-label use of rotational atherectomy. Heart Vessels 32, 514–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0899-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-016-0899-6

Keywords

Navigation