Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does really previous stenting affect graft patency following CABG? A 5-year follow-up

The effect of PCI on graft survival

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the graft patency rates among patients who had a previous history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) with the patients who had experienced CABG surgery alone. The 69 patients who were included in the study had a history of bare metal stent implantation prior to CABG (group 1). The coronary angiography results were compared with 69 patients who had a previous history of CABG (group 2). Graft patency rates of the left anterior descending artery and circumflex anastomoses are statistically significant for both groups, whereas the right coronary artery anastomoses are not statistically significant (p = 0.008; 0.009; 0.2). Graft patency rate of LIMA–LAD anastomoses was 43.9 ± 10.8 % in group 1 and 86.2 ± 6 % in group 2 for means of 60 months (p = 0.0001) and circumflex coronary artery anastomosis is 28.9 ± 0.9 % in group 1, 65.7 ± 10.8 % in group 2 (p = 0.0001) and the right coronary artery anastomosis is 37.2 ± 13.6 % in group 1, 56.4 ± 8.9 % in group 2 (p = 0.0001). The graft patency rates of coronary arteries without previous stent implantation were higher than the patients with previous stent implantation and experienced CABG. The results suggest that prior PCI may induce atherosclerotic events in the vessel that can adversely affect graft patency after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O’Donnell CJ, Roger V, Rumsfeld J, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Hong Y (2007) A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 115:69–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Investigators SoS (2002) Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360:965–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Serruys PW, Ong ATL, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE (2005) Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:575–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez AE, Baldi J, Fernández PC, Jose N, Máximo RA, Alejandro D, Vigo F, Vogel D, O’Neil W, Palacios IF (2005) Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). J Am Coll Cardiol 46:582–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Isom OW, Gold JP, Rose EA (2005) Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 352:2174–2183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cutlip DE, Chhabra AG, Baim DS, Chauhan MS, Marulkar S, Massaro J, Bakhai A, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Ho KK (2004) Beyond restenosis: five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation 110:1226–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keogh B (2003) Fifth National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report: improving outcomes for patients. Dendrite Clinical Systems, Henley-on-Thames, p 352

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalaycioglu S, Sinci V, Oktar L (1998) Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): is PTCA a risk for CABG? Int Surg 83:190–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barakate MS, Hemli JM, Hughes CF, Bannon PG, Horton MD (2003) Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after initially successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a review of 17 years experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Mukai K, Ikeda C, Ueyama K, Watanabe G (2004) Late patency of the left internal thoracic artery graft in patients with and without previous successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Sur 3:110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercado N, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Sigwart U, Flather MD, Stables RH, O’Neill WW, Rodriguez A, Lemos PA, Hueb WA, Gersh BJ, Booth J, Boersma E (2005) One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:512–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massoudy P, Thielmann M, Lehmann N, Marr A, Kleikamp G, Maleszka A, Zittermann A, Körfer R, Radu M, Krian A, Litmathe J, Gams E, Sezer O, Scheld H, Schiller W, Welz A, Dohmen G, Autschbach R, Slottosch I, Wahlers T, Neuhäuser M, Jöckel KH, Jakob H (2009) Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thielmann M, Leyh R, Massoudy P, Neuhäuser M, Aleksic I, Kamler M, Herold U, Piotrorwski J, Jacob H (2006) Prognostic significance of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 114(1 Suppl):1441–1447

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan A, Buth KJ, Baskett RJ, Ali IS, Maitland A, Sullivan JA, Ghali WA, Hirsch GM (2005) The association between prior percutaneous coronary intervention and short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 150:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonaros N, Hennerbichler D, Friedrich G, Kocher A, Pachinger O, Laufer G, Bonatti J (2009) Increased mortality and perioperative complications in patients with previous elective percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:846–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao C, De Lisle R, Chikwe J, Pepper J, Skapinakis P, Aziz O, Darzi A, Athanasiou T (2008) Does previous percutaneous coronary stenting compromise the long-term efficacy of subsequent coronary artery bypass surgery? A microsimulation study. Ann Thorac Surg 85:501–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chocron S, Baillot R, Roucleau JL, Warnica WJ, Block P, Johnstone D, Myers MG, Calciu CD, Nozza A, Martineau P, van Gilst WH (2008) Impact of previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or stenting revascularisation on outcomes after surgical revascularisation: insights from the IMAGINE study. Eur Heart J 29:573–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mack MJ, Osborne JA, Shennib H (1998) Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do really know? Ann Thorac Surg 66:1055–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farb A, Sangiorgi G, Carter A, Walley VM, Edwards W, Schwartz RS, Virmani R (1999) Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 99:44–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jang Y, Lincoff AM, Plow EF, Topol EJ (1994) Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:1591–1601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zotz RB, Klein M, Dauben HP, Moser C, Gams E, Schafrf RE (2000) Prospective analysis after coronary-artery bypass grafting: platelet GP IIIa polymorphism (HPA-1b/PIA2) is a risk factor for bypass occlusion, myocardial infarction, and death. Thromb Haemost 83:404–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Horvath KA, Parker MA, Frederiksen JW, Palmer AS, Fullerton DA (2000) Postoperative troponin I values: insult or injury? Clin Cardiol 32:731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taguchi I, Yoneda S, Abe S, Toyoda S, Nasuno T, Nishino S, Kageyama M, Tokura M, Ogawa M, Node K, Inoue T (2014) The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart Vessels 29:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarkar R, Webb RC (1998) Does nitric oxide regulates smooth muscle cell proliferation? J Vasc Res 35:135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Groves PH, West JL (2000) Nitric oxide generating polymers reduced platelet adhesion and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Biomaterials 21:2273–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen CY, Hanson SR, Keefer LK, Saavedra JE, Davies KM, Hutsell TC, Hughes JD, Ku DN, Lumsden AB (1997) Boundary layer infusion of nitric oxide reduces early smooth muscle cell proliferation in the endarterectomized canine artery. J Surg Res 67:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luscher TF, Diedrich D, Siebenmann R, Lehmann K, Stulz P (1988) Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 319:462–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alagem-Shafir M, Kivovich E, Tzchori I, Lanir N, Falah M, Flugelman MY, Dinnar U, Beyar R, Lotan N, Sivan SS (2014) The formation of an anti-restenotic/anti-thrombotic surface by immobilization of nitric oxide synthase on a metallic carrier. Acta Biomater 10:2304–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tuomainen PO, Ylitalo A, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Pietila M, Sia J, Nyman K, Nammas W, Airaksinen KE, Karjalainen PP (2013) Five-year clinical outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up from the TITAX AMI trial. Int J Cardiol 30(168):1214–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karjalainen PP, Niemelä M, Airaksinen JK, Rivero-Crespo F, Romppanen H, Sia J, Lalmand J, de Bruyne B, Debelder A, Carlier M, Nammas W, Ylitalo A, Hess OM; BACE-ACS study investigators (2012) A prospective randomised comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents with everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: EuroIntervention 8: 306–315

Download references

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital Ankara, Yaşamkent mah.3222/1 sok.Park Armoni sitesi, C blok daire:9 Yenimahalle, Ankara, 06130, Turkey

    Murat Çetin Songur, Sertan Özyalçin, Anıl Özen, Erdal Şimşek, Ümit Kervan, İrfan Taşoğlu, Sadi Kaplan & Ahmet Tulga Ulus

  2. Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

    Kenan Köse

  3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ahmet Tulga Ulus

Authors
  1. Murat Çetin Songur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sertan Özyalçin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anıl Özen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erdal Şimşek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ümit Kervan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. İrfan Taşoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sadi Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kenan Köse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ahmet Tulga Ulus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Çetin Songur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Songur, M.Ç., Özyalçin, S., Özen, A. et al. Does really previous stenting affect graft patency following CABG? A 5-year follow-up. Heart Vessels 31, 457–464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0633-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0633-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation