Abstract
There are more uncertainties with ice hydrometeor representations and related processes than liquid hydrometeors within microphysics parameterization (MP) schemes because of their complicated geometries and physical properties. Idealized supercell simulations are produced using the WRF model coupled with “full” Hebrew University spectral bin MP (HU-SBM), and NSSL and Thompson bulk MP (BMP) schemes. HU-SBM downdrafts are typically weaker than those of the NSSL and Thompson simulations, accompanied by less rain evaporation. HU-SBM produces more cloud ice (plates), graupel, and hail than the BMPs, yet precipitates less at the surface. The limiting mass bins (and subsequently, particle size) of rimed ice in HU-SBM and slower rimed ice fall speeds lead to smaller melting-level net rimed ice fluxes than those of the BMPs. Aggregation from plates in HU-SBM, together with snow–graupel collisions, leads to a greater snow contribution to rain than those of the BMPs. Replacing HU-SBM’s fall speeds using the formulations of the BMPs after aggregating the discrete bin values to mass mixing ratios and total number concentrations increases net rain and rimed ice fluxes. Still, they are smaller in magnitude than bulk rain, NSSL hail, and Thompson graupel net fluxes near the surface. Conversely, the melting-layer net rimed ice fluxes are reduced when the fall speeds for the NSSL and Thompson simulations are calculated using HU-SBM fall speed formulations after discretizing the bulk particle size distributions (PSDs) into spectral bins. The results highlight precipitation sensitivity to storm dynamics, fall speed, hydrometeor evolution governed by process rates, and MP PSD design.
摘 要
由于具有复杂的几何和物理性质,微物理参数化(MP)方案中冰相物特征及相关过程比液相物不确定性更大。本文利用将WRF模式与“完整”版本的希伯来大学分档云微物理参数化方案(HU-SBM)、NSSL以及Thompson 体积水云微物理参数化方案(BMP)耦合,对理想超级单体进行模拟。HU-SBM模拟的下沉气流通常弱于NSSL和Thompson模拟的下沉气流,同时伴随着更少的雨水蒸发。HU-SBM比BMPs产生了更多的云冰(圆盘形冰粒)、霰和冰雹,但是在地表的降水较少。相比于BMPs,HU-SBM中冰粒的有限的质量分档(其次,粒径分档)和冰粒较慢的下降速度导致了更小的融化层冰粒净通量。在HU-SBM中,圆盘形冰粒的聚合以及雪-霰的碰并导致了雪对雨水的贡献比BMPs更大。在HU-SBM中,将离散的分档值聚合得到质量混合比和总数量浓度后,使用BMPs的公式来计算下降速度,可增加雨水和冰粒的净通量。尽管如此,总体雨水、NSSL冰雹和Thompson霰在近地面的净通量的量级上,HU-SBM仍较小。相反,将NSSL 和 Thompson中的整体粒径分布(PSDs)离散成谱段,并使用 HU-SBM 的公式计算下降速度时,融化层冰粒净通量减少。研究结果突出了降水对风暴动力条件、下降速度、微物理过程速率控制的水凝物演变,以及MP PSD设计的敏感性。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, M. P., and J. Hallett, 2009: A comprehensive habit diagram for atmospheric ice crystals: Confirmation from the laboratory, AIRS II, and other field studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2888–2899, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2883.1.
Benjamin, S. G., J. M. Brown, and T. G. Smirnova, 2016: Explicit precipitation-type diagnosis from a model using a mixed-phase bulk cloud-precipitation microphysics parameterization. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 609–619, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0136.1.
Chen, S.-H., and W.-Y. Sun, 2002: A one-dimensional time dependent cloud model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 80, 99–118, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.80.99.
Cox, G. P., 1988: Modelling precipitation in frontal rainbands. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711447906.
Dawson, D. T., E. R. Mansell, Y. Jung, L. J. Wicker, M. R. Kumjian, and M. Xue, 2014: Low-level ZDR signatures in supercell forward flanks: The role of size sorting and melting of hail. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 276–299, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0118.1.
Falk, N. M., A. L. Igel, and M. R. Igel, 2019: The relative impact of ice fall speeds and microphysics parameterization complexity on supercell evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 2403–2415, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0417.1.
Fan, J. W., and Coauthors, 2017: Cloud-resolving model intercom-parison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I—Convective updrafts. J. Geophys. Res., 122, 9351–9378, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026622.
Ferrier, B. S., 1994: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 249–280, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<0249:ADMMPF>2.0.CO;2.
Field, P. R., R. J. Hogan, P. R. A. Brown, A. J. Illingworth, T. W. Choularton, and R. J. Cotton, 2005: Parametrization of ice-particle size distributions for mid-latitude stratiform cloud. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1997–2017, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.134.
Geresdi, I., 1998: Idealized simulation of the Colorado hailstorm case: Comparison of bulk and detailed microphysics. Atmos. Res., 45, 237–252, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00079-3.
Hall, W. D., 1980: A detailed microphysical model within a two-dimensional dynamic framework: Model description and preliminary results. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2486–2507, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2486:ADMMWA>2.0.CO;2.
Heikenfeld, M., B. White, L. Labbouz, and P. Stier, 2019: Aerosol effects on deep convection: The propagation of aerosol perturbations through convective cloud microphysics. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2601–2627, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2601-2019.
Heymsfield, A. J., and M. Kajikawa, 1987: An improved approach to calculating terminal velocities of plate-like crystals and graupel. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1088–1099, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1088:AIATCT>2.0.CO;2.
Hong, S.-Y., J. Dudhia, and S.-H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0103:ARATIM>2.0.CO;2.
Jensen, A. A., J. Y. Harrington, H. Morrison, and J. A. Milbrandt, 2017: Predicting ice shape evolution in a bulk microphysics model. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2081–2104, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0350.1.
Johnson, M., Y. Jung, D. T. Dawson II, and M. Xue, 2016: Comparison of simulated polarimetric signatures in idealized supercell storms using two-moment bulk microphysics schemes in WRF. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 971–996, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0233.1.
Johnson, M., Y. Jung, J. A. Milbrandt, H. Morrison, and M. Xue, 2019: Effects of the representation of rimed ice in bulk microphysics schemes on polarimetric signatures. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 3785–3810, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0398.1.
Jung, Y., G. F. Zhang, and M. Xue, 2008: Assimilation of simulated polarimetric radar data for a convective storm using the ensemble Kalman filter. Part I: Observation operators for reflectivity and polarimetric variables. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2228–2245, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2083.1.
Khain, A., and B. Lynn, 2009: Simulation of a supercell storm in clean and dirty atmosphere using weather research and forecast model with spectral bin microphysics. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19209. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011827.
Khain, A., A. Pokrovsky, M. Pinsky, A. Seifert, and V. Phillips, 2004: Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I: Model description and possible applications. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2963–2982, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3350.1.
Khain, A., B. Lynn, and J. Shpund, 2016: High resolution WRF simulations of hurricane irene: Sensitivity to aerosols and choice of microphysical schemes. Atmos. Res., 167, 129–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.07.014.
Khain, A. P., and I. Sednev, 1996: Simulation of precipitation formation in the eastern Mediterranean coastal zone using a spectral microphysics cloud ensemble model. Atmos. Res., 43, 77–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(96)00005-1.
Khain, A. P., and Coauthors, 2015: Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization. Rev. Geophys., 53, 247–322, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468.
Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2008: Polarimetric signatures in supercell thunderstorms. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47, 1940–1961, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1874.1.
Kumjian, M. R., A. P. Khain, N. Benmoshe, E. Ilotoviz, A. V. Ryzhkov, and V. T. J. Phillips, 2014: The anatomy and physics of ZDR columns: Investigating a polarimetric radar signature with a spectral bin microphysical model. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 53, 1820–1843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0354.1.
Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2.
Magono, C. and C. W. Lee, 1966: Meteorological classification of natural snow crystals. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, 2, 321–335.
Mansell, E. R., C. L. Ziegler, and E. C. Bruning, 2010: Simulated electrification of a small thunderstorm with two-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 171–194, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2965.1.
Matrosov, S. Y., R. F. Reinking, R. A. Kropfli, and B. W. Bartram, 1996: Estimation of ice hydrometeor types and shapes from radar polarization measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 85–996, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0085:EOIHTA>2.0.CO;2.
Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005a: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3051–3064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3534.1.
Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005b: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3065–3081, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3535.1.
Milbrandt, J. A., H. Morrison, D. T. Dawson II, and M. Paukert, 2021: A triple-moment representation of ice in the predicted particle properties (P3) microphysics scheme. J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 439–458, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0084.1.
Mitchell, D. L., R. Y. Zhang, and R. L. Pitter, 1990: Mass-dimensional relationships for ice particles and the influence of riming on snowfall rates. J. Appl. Meteorol., 29, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0153:MDR-FIP>2.0.CO;2.
Morrison, H., and J. A. Milbrandt, 2015: Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part I: Scheme description and idealized tests. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 287–311, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1.
Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one-and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1.
Morrison, H., and Coauthors, 2020: Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS001689. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689.
Pruppacher, H. R., and J. D. Klett, 2010: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. 2nd ed., Springer, 954 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48100-0.
Reisin, T., Z. Levin, and S. Tzivion, 1996: Rain production in convective clouds as simulated in an axisymmetric model with detailed microphysics. Part I: Description of the model. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 497–519, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0497:RPICCA>2.0.CO;2.
Ryzhkov, A., M. Pinsky, A. Pokrovsky, and A. Khain, 2011: Polarimetric radar observation operator for a cloud model with spectral microphysics. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 50, 873–894, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2363.1.
Shpund, J., and Coauthors, 2019: Simulating a mesoscale convective system using WRF with a new spectral bin microphysics: 1: Hail vs graupel. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 14 072–14 101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030576.
Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH.
Takahashi, T., 1976: Hail in an axisymmetric cloud model. J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1579–1601, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1579:HIAACM>2.0.CO;2.
Thompson, G., P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen, and W. D. Hall, 2008: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1.
Ulbrich, C. W., 1983: Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 22, 1764–1775, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2.
Van Weverberg, K., and Coauthors, 2013: The role of cloud microphysics parameterization in the simulation of mesoscale convective system clouds and precipitation in the tropical western Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1104–1128, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0104.1.
Vivekanandan, J., W. M. Adams, and V. N. Bringi, 1991: Rigorous approach to polarimetric radar modeling of hydrometeor orientation distributions. J. Appl. Meteorol., 30, 1053–1063, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<1053:RAT-PRM>2.0.CO;2.
Waterman, P. C., 1969: Scattering by dielectric obstacles. Alta Frequncia, 38, 348–352.
Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 504–520, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0504:TDONSC>2.0.CO;2.
Xue, L., and Coauthors, 2017: Idealized simulations of a squall line from the MC3E field campaign applying three bin microphysics schemes: Dynamic and thermodynamic structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 4789–4812, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0385.1.
Young, K. C., 1974: A numerical simulation of wintertime, orographic precipitation: Part I. Description of model microphysics and numerical techniques. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1735–1748, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1735:ANSOWO>2.0.CO;2.
Zrnic, D. S., N. Balakrishnan, C. L. Ziegler, V. N. Bringi, K. Aydin, and T. Matejka, 1993: Polarimetric signatures in the stratiform region of a mesoscale convective system. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 32, 678–693, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<0678:PSITSR>2.0.CO;2.
Acknowledgements
This research was primarily supported by a NOAA Warn-on-Forecast (WoF) grant (Grant No. NA16OAR4320115). We thank the two anonymous reviewers, whose feedback improved the quality of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• HU-SBM “full” version simulates less precipitation than the bulk NSSL and Thompson schemes.
• Rain mass sourced from snow in HU-SBM is larger than those in the BMPs, partly due to large plate production and subsequent aggregation.
• Limiting maximum mass bins and generally slower rimed ice fall speeds than those of the BMPs lower rimed ice flux in HU-SBM.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, M., Xue, M. & Jung, Y. Comparison of a Spectral Bin and Two Multi-Moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes for Supercell Simulation: Investigation into Key Processes Responsible for Hydrometeor Distributions and Precipitation. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 41, 784–800 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3069-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-3069-7
Key words
- precipitation
- spectral bin microphysics
- bulk microphysics parameterization
- microphysics processes
- WRF model
- supercell storm