Abstract
This study investigated the regime-dependent predictability using convective-scale ensemble forecasts initialized with different initial condition perturbations in the Yangtze and Huai River basin (YHRB) of East China. The scale-dependent error growth (ensemble variability) and associated impact on precipitation forecasts (precipitation uncertainties) were quantitatively explored for 13 warm-season convective events that were categorized in terms of strong forcing and weak forcing. The forecast error growth in the strong-forcing regime shows a stepwise increase with increasing spatial scale, while the error growth shows a larger temporal variability with an afternoon peak appearing at smaller scales under weak forcing. This leads to the dissimilarity of precipitation uncertainty and shows a strong correlation between error growth and precipitation across spatial scales. The lateral boundary condition errors exert a quasi-linear increase on error growth with time at the larger scale, suggesting that the large-scale flow could govern the magnitude of error growth and associated precipitation uncertainties, especially for the strong-forcing regime. Further comparisons between scale-based initial error sensitivity experiments show evident scale interaction including upscale transfer of small-scale errors and downscale cascade of larger-scale errors. Specifically, small-scale errors are found to be more sensitive in the weak-forcing regime than those under strong forcing. Meanwhile, larger-scale initial errors are responsible for the error growth after 4 h and produce the precipitation uncertainties at the meso-β-scale. Consequently, these results can be used to explain under-dispersion issues in convective-scale ensemble forecasts and provide feedback for ensemble design over the YHRB.
摘要
本文基于对流尺度集合模拟系统性地研究了江淮地区不同天气型控制下的强对流天气可预报性的问题. 将 13 个强对流个例分类为强强迫和弱强迫两类, 并就此展开预报误差增长和降水不确定性的机制分析. 结果表明在强强迫类中预报误差呈现“阶梯状”随空间尺度增加而滞后增长的特征, 而弱强迫类中误差展现出午后峰值, 且这一特征主要由小尺度凸显. 两类天气型下误差增长的不同使得降水不确定性在不同尺度上亦呈现出明显差异, 揭示了对流尺度模拟对两类天气型强对流预报技巧的差异. 此外, 对不同来源和不同尺度误差影响的研究发现, 侧边界误差能够通过影响大尺度部分使得误差振幅准线性增长, 表明大尺度强迫能够控制预报误差和降水不确定性的演变, 尤其对强强迫类. 另一方面, 通过对不同尺度初始误差的影响研究发现小尺度误差升尺度增长和较大尺度误差的降尺度传播等尺度相互作用现象均非常明显. 具体来说, 小尺度初始误差对弱强迫类天气型更为敏感, 而较大尺度的初始误差则能够控制 4 小时后的误差增长过程以及降水不确定性发展. 总结来说, 本文的结论可用于解释对流尺度集合预报中常见的“欠发散”问题, 并为集合初始扰动的设计提供科学反馈.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. L., and S. L. Anderson, 1999: A monte carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2741–2758, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<2741:AMCIOT>2.0.CO;2.
Bachmann, K., C. Keil, and M. Weissmann, 2019: Impact of radar data assimilation and orography on predictability of deep convection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 117–130, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3412.
Bachmann, K., C. Keil, G. C. Craig, M. Weissmann, and C. A. Welzbacher, 2020: Predictability of deep convection in idealized and operational forecasts: Effects of radar data assimilation, orography, and synoptic weather regime. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 63–81, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0045.1.
Bei, N. F., and F. Q. Zhang, 2007: Impacts of initial condition errors on mesoscale predictability of heavy precipitation along the Mei-Yu front of China. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 83–99, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.20.
Bei, N. F., and F. Q. Zhang, 2014: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Variable and scale-dependent error growth. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 31, 995–1008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-3191-7.
Bierdel, L., T. Selz, and G. C. Craig, 2017: Theoretical aspects of upscale error growth through the mesoscales: An analytical model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 3048–3059, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3160.
Caron, J.-F., 2013: Mismatching perturbations at the lateral boundaries in limited-area ensemble forecasting: A case study. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 356–374, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00051.1.
Chen, X., H. L. Yuan, and M. Xue, 2018: Spatial spread-skill relationship in terms of agreement scales for precipitation forecasts in a convection-allowing ensemble. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 85–98, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3186.
Chen, Y., Y. Chen, T. Chen, and H. He, 2016: Characteristics analysis of warm sector rainstorms over the middle lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Meteorol. Mon., 12, 724–731, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.06.008. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Chou, M. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1999: A solar radiation parameterization (CLIRAD-SW) for atmospheric studies. NASA Tech. Memo, 10460.
Daniels, M. H., K. A. Lundquist, J. D. Mirocha, D. J. Wiersema, and F. K. Chow, 2016: A new vertical grid nesting capability in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 3725–3747, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0049.1.
Denis, B., J. Côté, and R. Laprise, 2002: Spectral decomposition of two-dimensional atmospheric fields on limited-area domains using the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1812–1829, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1812:SDOTDA>2.0.CO;2.
Ding, Y. H., 1993: Study on the Lasting Heavy Rainfalls over the Yangtze-Huaihe River Basin in 1991. China Meteorological Press. (in Chinese)
Done, J. M., G. C. Craig, S. L. Gray, P. A. Clark, and M. E. B. Gray, 2006: Mesoscale simulations of organized convection: Importance of convective equilibrium. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 737–756, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.84.
Done, J. M., G. C. Craig, S. L. Gray, and P. A. Clark, 2012: Case-to-case variability of predictability of deep convection in a mesoscale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 638–648, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.943.
Durran, D. R., and M. Gingrich, 2014: Atmospheric predictability: Why butterflies are not of practical importance. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2476–2488, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0007.1.
Durran, D. R., and J. A. Weyn, 2016: Thunderstorms do not get butterflies. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 237–243, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00070.1.
Flack, D. L. A., R. S. Plant, S. L. Gray, H. W. Lean, C. Keil, and G. C. Craig, 2016: Characterisation of convective regimes over the British Isles. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 1541–1553, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2758.
Flack, D. L. A., S. L. Gray, R. S. Plant, H. W. Lean, and G. C. Craig, 2018: Convective-scale perturbation growth across the spectrum of convective regimes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 387–405, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0024.1.
Flora, M. L., C. K. Potvin, and L. J. Wicker, 2018: Practical predictability of supercells: Exploring ensemble forecast sensitivity to initial condition spread. Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 2361–2379, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0374.1.
Fu, S. M., F. Yu, D. H. Wang, and R. D. Xia, 2013: A comparison of two kinds of eastward-moving mesoscale vortices during the mei-yu period of 2010. Science China Earth Sciences, 56, 282–300, https://doi.org/10.1077/111300-012-4420-5.
Gasperoni, N. A., M. Xue, R. D. Palmer, and J. D. Gao, 2013: Sensitivity of convective initiation prediction to near-surface moisture when assimilating radar refractivity: Impact tests using OSSEs. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 30, 2281–2302, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00038.1.
Grell, G. A., and D. Dévényi, 2002: A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1693, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311.
Hagedorn, R., T. M. Hamill, and J. S. Whitaker, 2008: Probabilistic forecast calibration using ECMWF and GFS ensemble reforecasts. Part I: Two-meter temperatures. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2608–2619, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2410.1.
Hagedorn, R., R. Buizza, T. M. Hamill, M. Leutbecher, and T. N. Palmer, 2012: Comparing TIGGE multimodel forecasts with reforecast-calibrated ECMWF ensemble forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 1814–1827, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1895.
Hohenegger, C., and C. Schär, 2007: Predictability and error growth dynamics in cloud-resolving models. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 4467–4478, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2143.1.
Hohenegger, C., D. Lüthi, and C. Schär, 2006: Predictability mysteries in cloud-resolving models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2095–2107, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3176.1.
Hong, S.-Y., and J.-O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42, 129–151.
Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1.
Johnson, A., and Coauthors, 2014: Multiscale characteristics and evolution of perturbations for warm season convection-allowing precipitation forecasts: Dependence on background flow and method of perturbation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 1053–1073, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00204.1.
Johnson, A., and X. G. Wang, 2016: A study of multiscale initial condition perturbation methods for convection-permitting ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 2579–2604, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0056.1.
Johnson, A., X. G. Wang, J. R. Carley, L. J. Wicker, and C. Karstens, 2015: A comparison of multiscale GSI-based EnKF and 3DVar data assimilation using radar and conventional observations for midlatitude convective-scale precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 3087–3108, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00345.1.
Judt, F., 2018: Insights into atmospheric predictability through global convection-permitting model simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1477–1497, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0343.1.
Keil, C., and G. C. Craig, 2011: Regime-dependent forecast uncertainty of convective precipitation. Meteorol. Z., 20, 145–151, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0219.
Keil, C., F. Heinlein, and G. C. Craig, 2014: The convective adjustment time-scale as indicator of predictability of convective precipitation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 480–490, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2143.
Keil, C., F. Baur, K. Bachmann, S. Rasp, L. Schneider, and C. Barthlott, 2019: Relative contribution of soil moisture, boundary-layer and microphysical perturbations on convective predictability in different weather regimes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 3102–3115, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3607.
Klasa, C., M. Arpagaus, A. Walser, and H. Wernli, 2019: On the time evolution of limited-area ensemble variance: Case studies with the convection-permitting ensemble COSMO-E. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 11–26, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0013.1.
Kühnlein, C., C. Keil, G. C. Craig, and C. Gebhardt, 2014: The impact of downscaled initial condition perturbations on convective-scale ensemble forecasts of precipitation. Quart. J. Roy.Meteorol.Soc., 140, 1552–1562, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2238.
Lean, H. W., P. A. Clark, M. Dixon, N. M. Roberts, A. Fitch, R. Forbes, and C. Halliwell, 2008: Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the met office unified model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3408–3424, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2332.1.
Liu, J. Y., and Z.-M. Tan, 2009: Mesoscale predictability of meiyu heavy rainfall. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 438–450, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0438-9.
Liu, J. Y., Z. M. Tan, and Y. Zhang, 2012: Study of the three types of torrential rains of different formation mechanism during the Meiyu period. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 70, 452–466, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2012.038.
Lorenz, E. N., 1969: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)26<636:APARBN>2.0.CO;2.
Luo, Y. L., and Y. R. X. Chen, 2015: Investigation of the predictability and physical mechanisms of an extreme-rainfall-producing mesoscale convective system along the Meiyu front in East China: An ensemble approach. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 123, 10593–10618, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015.1D023584.
Luo, Y. L., Y. Gong, and D.-L. Zhang, 2014: Initiation and organizational modes of an extreme-rain-producing mesoscale convective system along a Mei-Yu Front in East China. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 203–221, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00111.1.
Luo, Y. L., W. M. Qian, R. H. Zhang, and D.-L. Zhang, 2013: Gridded hourly precipitation analysis from high-density rain gauge network over the Yangtze-Huai Rivers Basin during the 2007 Mei-Yu season and comparison with CMORPH. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14, 1243–1258, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0133.1.
Madaus, L. E., and G. J. Hakim, 2017: Constraining ensemble forecasts of discrete convective initiation with surface observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 2597–2610, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0395.1.
Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, and B. A. Colle, 2002: Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? The results of two years of real-time numerical weather prediction over the Pacific Northwest Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 13, 407–430, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO;2.
Melhauser, C., and F. Q. Zhang, 2012: Practical and intrinsic predictability of severe and convective weather at the mesoscales. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3350–3371, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0315.1.
Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 102, 16663–16682, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237.
Nielsen, E. R., and R. S. Schumacher, 2016: Using convection-allowing ensembles to understand the predictability of an extreme rainfall event. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 3651–3676, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0083.1.
Nutter, P., D. Stensrud, and M. Xue, 2004: Effects of coarsely resolved and temporally interpolated lateral boundary conditions on the dispersion of limited-area ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2358–2377, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2358:EOCRAT>2.0.CO;2.
Raynaud, L., and F. Bouttier, 2016: Comparison of initial perturbation methods for ensemble prediction at convective scale. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 854–866, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2686.
Selz, T., and G. C. Craig, 2015: Upscale error growth in a high-resolution simulation of a summertime weather event over Europe. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 813–827, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00140.1.
Selz, T., L. Bierdel, and G. C. Craig, 2019: Estimation of the variability of mesoscale energy spectra with three years of COSMO-DE analyses. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 627–637, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0155.1.
Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note-475+ STR.
Snook, N., M. Xue, and Y. Jung, 2015: Multiscale EnKF assimilation of radar and conventional observations and ensemble forecasting for a tornadic mesoscale convective system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 1035–1057, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWRD-13-00262.1.
Sun, J. H., and F. Q. Zhang, 2012: Impacts of mountain-plains solenoid on diurnal variations of rainfalls along the Mei-Yu front over the East China plains. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 379–397, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-0004L1.
Sun, Y. Q., and F. Q. Zhang, 2016: Intrinsic versus Practical limits of atmospheric predictability and the significance of the butterfly effect. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1419–1438, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0142.1.
Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, and M. K. Yau, 2015: A study on the scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation patterns. J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 216–235, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0071.1.
Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, and M. K. Yau, 2016: The case-to-case variability of the predictability of precipitation by a storm-scale ensemble forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 193–212, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0232.1.
Surcel, M., I. Zawadzki, M. K. Yau, M. Xue, and F. Y. Kong, 2017: More on the scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation patterns: Extension to the 2009–13 CAPS spring experiment ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 3625–3646, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0362.1.
Tan, Z.-M., F. Q. Zhang, R. Rotunno, and C. Snyder, 2004: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Experiments with parameterized convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1794–1804, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1794:MPOMBW>2.0.CO;2.
Tennant, W., 2015: Improving initial condition perturbations for MOGREPS-UK. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 2324–2336, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2524.
Tong, M. J., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789–1807, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2898.1.
Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 3297–3319, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<3297:EFANAT>2.0.CO;2.
Vié, B., O. Nuissier, and V. Ducrocq, 2011: Cloud-resolving ensemble simulations of mediterranean heavy precipitating events: Uncertainty on initial conditions and lateral boundary conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 403–423, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3487.1.
Walser, A., D. Lüthi, and C. Schär, 2004: Predictability of precipitation in a cloud-resolving model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 560–577, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0560:POPIAC>2.0.CO;2.
Wang, S. Z., M. Xue, A. D. Schenkman, and J. Z. Min, 2013: An iterative ensemble square root filter and tests with simulated radar data for storm-scale data assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 1888–1903, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2077.
Wang, Y., M. Bellus, J.-F. Geleyn, X. L. Ma, W. H. Tian, and F. Weidle, 2014: A new method for generating initial condition perturbations in a regional ensemble prediction system: Blending. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 2043–2059, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00354.1.
Weyn, J. A., and D. R. Durran, 2017: The dependence of the predictability of mesoscale convective systems on the horizontal scale and amplitude of initial errors in idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2191–2210, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0006.1.
Weyn, J. A., and D. R. Durran, 2019: The scale dependence of initial-condition sensitivities in simulations of convective systems over the southeastern United States. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 57–74, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3367.
Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble Data Assimilation without Perturbed Observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1913–1924, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1913:EDAWPO>2.0.CO;2.
Wu, N. G., X. R. Zhuang, J. Z. Min, and Z. Y. Meng, 2020: Practical and intrinsic predictability of a warm-sector torrential rainfall event in the South China monsoon region. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 125, e2019JD031313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031313.
Yussouf, N., and D. J. Stensrud, 2012: Comparison of single-parameter and multiparameter ensembles for assimilation of radar observations using the ensemble kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 562–586, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05074.1.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and R. Rotunno, 2003: Effects of moist convection on mesoscale predictability. J. Atmos. Sci., 11, 1173–1185, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1173:EOMCOM>2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Z. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1238–1253, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1238:IOIEAO>2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, F. Q., A. M. Odins, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, 2006: Mesoscale predictability of an extreme warm-season precipitation event. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF909.1.
Zhang, F. Q., N. F. Bei, R. Rotunno, C. Snyder, and C. C. Epifanio, 2007: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Convection-permitting experiments and multistage error growth dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3579–3594, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4028.1.
Zhang, L., J. Z. Min, X. R. Zhuang, and R. S. Schumacher, 2019: General features of extreme rainfall events produced by MCSs over East China during 2016–17. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 2693–2714, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0455.1.
Zhang, M., and D.-L. Zhang, 2012: Subkilometer simulation of a torrential-rain-producing mesoscale convective system in East China. Part I: Model verification and convective organization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 184–201, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00029.1.
Zhang, X. B., 2019: Multiscale characteristics of different-source perturbations and their interactions for convection-permitting ensemble forecasting during SCMREX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 291–310, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0218.1.
Zhang, Y. J., F. Q. Zhang, D. J. Stensrud, and Z. Y. Meng, 2016: Intrinsic predictability of the 20 May 2013 Tornadic thunderstorm event in Oklahoma at Storm Scales. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1273–1298, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0105.1.
Zhao, S. X., L. S. Zhang, and J. H. Sun, 2007: Study of heavy rainfall and related mesoscale systems causing severe flood in Huaihe River basin during the summer of 2007. Climatic and Environmental Research, 12, 713–727, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9585.2007.06.002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zheng, Y. G., M. Xue, B. Li, J. Chen, and Z. Y. Tao, 2016: Spatial characteristics of extreme rainfall over China with hourly through 24-hour accumulation periods based on national-level hourly rain gauge data. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1218–1232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6128-5.
Zhu, X. Y., and J. J. Zhu, 2004: New generation weather radar network in China. Meteorological Science and Technology, 32, 255–258, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2004.04.012. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhuang, X. R., H. N. Zhu, J. Z. Min, L. Zhang, N. G. Wu, Z. P. Wu, and S. Q. Wang, 2019: Spatial predictability of heavy rainfall events in East China and the application of spatial-based methods of probabilistic forecasting. Atmosphere, 10, 490, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090490.
Zhuang, X. R., N. G. Wu, J. Z. Min, and Y. Xu, 2020: Understanding the predictability within convection-allowing ensemble forecasts in East China: Meteorological sensitivity, forecast error growth and associated precipitation uncertainties across spatial scales. Atmosphere, 11, 234, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11030234.
Zimmer, M., G. C. Craig, C. Keil, and H. Wernli, 2011: Classification of precipitation events with a convective response timescale and their forecasting characteristics. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046199.
Acknowledgements
The authors would also like to thank Samuel J. CHILDS from Colorado State University for language editing. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC1502103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41430427 and 41705035), the China Scholarship Council, and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYCX17_0876).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The warm-season convective events in the Yangtze and Huai river basin can be categorized into strong-forcing and weak-forcing regimes with respect to different forcing types.
• Error growth dynamics and the associated impact on precipitation are both regime- and scale-dependent, showing different practical predictability across convective regimes.
• The scale interaction in terms of error growth (upscale transfer and downscale cascade) is evident for both convective regimes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuang, X., Min, J., Zhang, L. et al. Insights into Convective-scale Predictability in East China: Error Growth Dynamics and Associated Impact on Precipitation of Warm-Season Convective Events. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 37, 893–911 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9269-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9269-5