Abstract
A cloud clustering and classification algorithm is developed for a ground-based Ka-band radar system in the vertically pointing mode. Cloud profiles are grouped based on the combination of a time-height clustering method and the k-means clustering method. The cloud classification algorithm, developed using a fuzzy logic method, uses nine physical parameters to classify clouds into nine types: cirrostratus, cirrocumulus, altocumulus, altostratus, stratus, stratocumulus, nimbostratus, cumulus or cumulonimbus. The performance of the clustering and classification algorithm is presented by comparison with all-sky images taken from January to June 2014. Overall, 92% of the cloud profiles are clustered successfully and the agreement in classification between the radar system and the all-sky imager is 87%. The distribution of cloud types in Beijing from January 2014 to December 2017 is studied based on the clustering and classification algorithm. The statistics show that cirrostratus clouds have the highest occurrence frequency (24%) among the nine cloud types. High-level clouds have the maximum occurrence frequency and low-level clouds the minimum occurrence frequency.
摘 要
云类是开展雷达数据云微物理参数精确反演的前提, 也是研究地区天气或气候分布特征的典型参数之一. 本文基于雷达探测特点, 提出了一种适用于地面Ka波段雷达垂直探测数据的云聚类及云分类算法. 所提的云聚类方法由时间-高度聚类法与k均值聚类法相结合, 实现对雷达廓线的云团检测及聚类; 云分类算法是基于模糊逻辑法, 利用9个云物理参数将云团分为九种类型: 卷层云, 卷积云, 高层云, 高积云, 层积云, 层云, 积云, 雨层云和积雨云. 文章利用2014年1-6月同期观测的全天空图像开展了对比分析, 研究结果表明92%的云廓线被成功聚类, 云分类平均一致性为87%. 基于所提云分类算法和雷达探测数据, 本文研究了北京市2014年1月至2017年12月的云类分布特征, 统计结果表明, 九种云类型中, 卷层云的出现频率最高达24%, 而低层云的出现频率最小.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, R. T., A. J. Heymsfleld, and G. L. Stephens, 2009: Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the Cloud-Sat millimeter-wave radar and temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010049.
Bankert, R. L., 1994: Cloud classification of AVHRR imagery in maritime regions using a probabilistic neural network. J. Appl. Meteor., 33, 909–918, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033>0909:CCOAII<2.0.CO;2.
Baum, B. A., V. Tovinkere, J. Titlow, and R. M. Welch, 1997: Automated cloud classification of global AVHRR data using a fuzzy logic approach. J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 1519–1540, https://doi.Org/l 0.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1519:ACCOGA> 2.0.CO;2.
Chen, C., X. J. Guo, X. B. Qiu, and H. Meng, 2015: Analysis of cloud vertical structure and cloud water content over North China based on satellite remote sensing data. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 31, 159–164, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn,1673-503X.2015.05.023. (in Chinese)
Doviak, R. J., and D. S. Zrnić, 1993: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations. 2nd ed., Academic Press, 562 pp, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-22358-0.
Ebert, E., 1987: A pattern recognition technique for distinguishing surface and cloud types in the polar regions. J. Appl. Meteor., 26, 1412–1427, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1987)026<1412:APRTFD>2.0.CO;2.
Hahn, C. J., W. B. Rossow, and S. G. Warren, 2001: ISCCP cloud properties associated with standard cloud types identified in individual surface observations. J. Climate, 14, 11–28, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0011:ICPAWS>2.0.CO;2.
Hamilton, K., 2006: High resolution global modeling of the atmospheric circulation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 23(6), 842–856, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-006-0842-3.
Heymsfleld, A., D. Winker, M. Avery, M. Vaughan, G. Diskin, M. Deng, V. Mitev, and R. Matthey, 2014: Relationships between ice water content and volume extinction coefficient from in situ observations for temperatures from 0° to -86°C: Implications for spaceborne Lidar retrievals. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 53, 479–505, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1.
Huo, J., 2015: Physical properties of mid-level clouds based on CloudSat/CALIPSO data over land and sea. Climatic and Environmental Research, 20, 30–40, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2014.13188. (in Chinese)
Huo, J., and D. R. Lu, 2009: Cloud determination of all-sky images under low-visibility conditions. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26(10), 2172–2181, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1324.1.
Huo, J., and D. R. Lu, 2014: Physical properties of high-level cloud over land and ocean from CloudSat-CALIPSO data. J. Climate, 27, 8966–8978, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00329.1.
Huschke, R. E., 1959: Glossary of Meteorology. American Meteorological Society, 638 pp.
Kollias, P., I. Jo, P. Borque, A. Tatarevic, and K. Lamer, 2014: Scanning ARM cloud radars. Part II: Data quality control and processing. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 31, 583–598, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00045.1.
Li, Y. Y., L. X. Fang, and X. W. Kou, 2014: Principle and standard of auto-observation cloud classification for satellite, ground measurements and model. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57, 2433–2441, https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20140805. (in Chinese)
Liu, L. P., L. Xie, and Z. H. Cui, 2014: Examination and application of Doppler spectral density data in drop size distribution retrieval in weak precipitation by cloud radar. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 38, 223–236, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.l006-9895.2013.12207. (in Chinese)
Mace, G. G., and K. Sassen, 2000: A constrained algorithm for retrieval of stratocumulus cloud properties using solar radiation, microwave radiometer, and millimeter cloud radar data. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 29 099-29 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900403.
Miller, S. W., and W. J. Emery, 1997: An automated neural network cloud classifier for use over land and ocean surfaces. J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 1346–1362, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1346:AANNCC>2.0.CO;2.
Molinari, J., and M. Dudek, 1992: Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 326–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0326:POCPIM>2.0.CO;2.
Penaloza, M. A., and R. M. Welch, 1996: Feature selection for classification of polar regions using a fuzzy expert system. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00260-X.
Ramanathan, V., R. D. Cess, E. F. Harrison, P. Minnis, B. R. Barkstrom, E. Ahmad, and D. Hartmann, 1989: Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science, 243, 57–63, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4887.57.
Ren, J. Q., W. Yan, H. L. Yang, and J. K. Shi, 2011: Cloud classification algorithm for CloudSat satellite based on fuzzy logic method. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 12, 90–96, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2011.01.017. (in Chinese)
Rodgers, C. D., 1976: Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of thermal radiation. Rev. Geophys., 14, 609–624, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG014i004p00609.
Rodgers, C. D., 1990: Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5587–5595, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD05p05587.
Rodgers, C. D., 2000: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice. World Scientific Publishing, 256 pp.
Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1999: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc, 80, 2261–2288, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<2261: AIUCFI>2.0.CO;2.
Sassen, K., and Z. E. Wang, 2008: Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1-year of results. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L04805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032591.
Sassen, K., Z. E. Wang, and D. Liu, 2008: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and infrared pathfinder satellite observations (CALIPSO) measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009972.
Seguin, W., F. Genene, and R. Perriello, 2012: “Cirrus”. Glossary of Meteorology. 2nd ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc. [Available online from http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Cirrus]
Sekelsky, S.M., W. L. Ecklund, J. M. Firda, K. S. Gage, and R. E. Mcintosh, 1999: Particle size estimation in ice-phase clouds using multifrequency radar reflectivity measurements at 95, 33, and 2.8 GHz. J. Appl. Meteor, 38, 5–28, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0005:PSEIIP>2.0.CO;2.
Tag, P. M., R. L. Bankert, and L. R. Brody, 2000: An AVHRR multiple cloud-type classification package. J. Climate, 39, 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0125:AAMCTC>2.0.CO;2.
Wang, Z. E., and K. Sassen, 2001: Cloud type and macrophysical property retrieval using multiple remote sensors. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 1665–1682, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1665:CTAMPR>2.0.CO;2.
Williams, C. R., W. L. Ecklund, and K. S. Gage, 1995: Classification of precipitating clouds in the tropics using 915-MHz wind profilers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 996–1012, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0996:COPCIT>2.0.CO;2.
World Meteorological Organization, 1956: International Cloud Atlas: Abridged Atlas. WMO, 72 pp.
World Meteorological Organization, 2017: International Cloud Atlas. WMO. [Available from https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/home.html]
Xiao, P., J. Huo, and Y. H. Bi, 2018: Ground-based Ka band cloud radar data quality control. Journal of Chengdu University of Information Technology, 33, 129–136, https://doi.org/10.16836/j.cnki.jcuit.2018.02.005.
Zadeh, L. A., 1968: Fuzzy algorithms. Information and Control, 12, 94–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(68)90211-8.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41775032 and 41275040). We appreciate the valuable suggestions and insightful instructions from the reviewers. We also acknowledge our Ka radar team for their maintenance service in long-term measurement that made our research possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• A systematic cloud clustering and classification algorithm for ground-based Ka-band radar in the vertically pointing mode is developed.
• A comparison experiment shows that 92% of the cloud profiles are clustered successfully and 85% of the cloud clusters are correctly classified.
• In Beijing, the occurrence frequency of cirrostratus clouds is the highest among the nine cloud types, whereas nimbostratus clouds have the lowest occurrence frequency.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huo, J., Bi, Y., Lü, D. et al. Cloud Classification and Distribution of Cloud Types in Beijing Using Ka-Band Radar Data. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 36, 793–803 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8272-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8272-1