Abstract
Hydrometeor variables (cloud water and cloud ice mixing ratios) are added into the WRF three-dimensional variational assimilation system as additional control variables to directly analyze hydrometeors by assimilating cloud observations. In addition, the background error covariance matrix of hydrometeors is modeled through a control variable transform, and its characteristics discussed in detail. A suite of experiments using four microphysics schemes (LIN, SBU-YLIN, WDM6 and WSM6) are performed with and without assimilating satellite cloud liquid/ice water path. We find analysis of hydrometeors with cloud assimilation to be significantly improved, and the increment and distribution of hydrometeors are consistent with the characteristics of background error covariance. Diagnostic results suggest that the forecast with cloud assimilation represents a significant improvement, especially the ability to forecast precipitation in the first seven hours. It is also found that the largest improvement occurs in the experiment using the WDM6 scheme, since the assimilated cloud information can sustain for longer in this scheme. The least improvement, meanwhile, appears in the experiment using the SBU-YLIN scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albers, S. C., J. A. McGinley, D. L. Birkenheuer, and J. R. Smart, 1997: The local analysis and prediction system (LAPS): Analyses of clouds, precipitation, and temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 273–287.
Auligné, T., A. Lorenc, Y. Michel, T. Montmerle, A. Jones, M. Hu, and J. Dudhia, 2011: Toward a new cloud analysis and prediction system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 207–210.
Barker, D., and Coauthors, 2012: The weather research and forecasting model’s community variational/ensemble data assimilation system: WRFDA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 831–843.
Bauer, P., and Coauthors, 2011: Satellite cloud and precipitation assimilation at operational NWP centres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1934–1951.
Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2004: An hourly assimilationforecast cycle: The RUC. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 495–518.
Bukovsky, M. S., and D. J. Karoly, 2009: Precipitation simulations using WRF as a nested regional climate model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 2152–2159.
Chen, Y. D., S. R. H. Rizvi, X.-Y. Huang, J. Z. Min, and X. Zhang, 2013: Balance characteristics of multivariate background error covariances and their impact on analyses and forecasts in tropical and arctic regions. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 121, 79–98, doi: 10.1007/s00703-013-0251-y.
Chen, Y. D., H. L. Wang, J. Z. Min, X. Y. Huang, P. Minnis, R. Z. Zhang, J. Haggerty, and R. Palikonda, 2015: Variational assimilation of cloud liquid/ice water path and its impact on NWP. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 1809–1825.
Desroziers, G., L. Berre, B. Chapnik, and P. Poli, 2005: Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3385–3396.
Errico, R. M., P. Bauer, and J. F. Mahfouf, 2007: Issues regarding the assimilation of cloud and precipitation data. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3785–3798.
Hong, S.-Y., J.-H. Kim, J.-O. Lim, and J. Dudhia, 2006: The WRF single moment microphysics scheme (WSM). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 2006, 42, 129–151.
Hu, M., M. Xue, and K. Brewster, 2006a: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 675–698.
Hu, M., M. Xue, J. D. Gao, and K. Brewster, 2006b: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699–721.
Jones, T. A., D. J. Stensrud, P. Minnis, and R. Palikonda, 2003: Evaluation of a forward operator to assimilate cloud water path into WRF-DART. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2272–2289.
Lim, K. S. S., and S. Y. Hong, 2010: Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1587–1612.
Lin, Y. L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk Parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092.
Lin, Y. L., and B. A. Colle, 2011: A new bulk microphysical scheme that includes riming intensity and temperaturedependent ice characteristics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1013–1035.
McNally, A. P., 2009: The direct assimilation of cloud-affected satellite infrared radiances in the ECMWF 4D-Var. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1214–1229.
Migliorini, S., 2012: On the equivalence between radiance and retrieval assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 258–265.
Minnis, P., 2007: Cloud retrievals from GOES-R. Proc. OSA Hyperspec. Imaging Sounding of Environ. Topical Mtg., Santa Fe, NM, Feb. 11–15, CD-ROM, HWC3m.
Minnis, P., and Coauthors, 2008: Near-real time cloud retrievals from operational and research meteorological satellites. Proc. SPIE Europe Remote Sens., Cardiff, Wales, UK,15–18 September, 7107, No. 2, 8 pp.
Minnis, P., and Coauthors, 2011: CERES edition-2 cloud property retrievals using TRMM VIRS and terra and aqua MODIS Data—Part I: Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49, 4374–4400.
Minnis, P., and Coauthors, 2012: Simulations of infrared radiances over a deep convective cloud system observed during TC4: Potential for enhancing nocturnal ice cloud retrievals. Remote Sensing, 4, 3022–3054.
Okamoto, K., A. P. McNally, and W. Bell, 2014: Progress towards the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiances: An evaluation of cloud effects. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1603–1614.
Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: The national meteorological center’s spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 1747–1763.
Pincus, R., R. J. Patrick Hofmann, J. L. Anderson, K. Raeder, N. Collins, and J. S. Whitaker, 2011: Can fully accounting for clouds in data assimilation improve short-term forecasts by global models? Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 946–957.
Polkinghorne, R., and T. Vukicevic, 2011: Data assimilation of cloud-affected radiances in a cloud-resolving model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 755–773.
Rama Y. V., H. R. Hatwar, A. Kamal Salah, and Y. Sudhakar, 2007: An experiment using the high resolution eta and WRF models to forecast heavy precipitation over India. Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1593–1615.
Roberts, N. M., and H. W. Lean, 2008: Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 78–97.
Shen, Y., P. Zhao, Y. Pan, and J. J. Yu, 2014: A high spatiotemporal gauge-satellite merged precipitation analysis over China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 119, 3063–3075.
Sun, J. Z., and N. A. Crook, 2010: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642–1661.
Sun, J. Z., and H. L. Wang, 2013: WRF-ARW variational stormscale data assimilation: Current capabilities and future developments. Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 815910.
Wang, H. L., J. Z. Sun, X. Zhang, X.-Y. Huang, and T. Auligné, 2013: Radar data assimilation with WRF 4D-Var. Part I: System development and preliminary testing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2224–2244.
Zhu, T., and D. L. Zhang, 2006: Numerical simulation of hurricane bonnie (1998). Part II: Sensitivity to varying cloud microphysical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 109–126.
Zhu, T., D. L. Zhang and F. Z. Weng, 2004: Numerical simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part I: Eyewall evolution and intensity changes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 225–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Zhang, R., Meng, D. et al. Variational assimilation of satellite cloud water/ice path and microphysics scheme sensitivity to the assimilation of a rainfall case. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1158–1170 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6004-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6004-3