Abstract
The problems of testing hypotheses on variance components in linear mixed effects models have been addressed by various workers, although existing methodology is still restricted to a narrow range of models. To overcome this difficulty we develop new general p value tests in general settings. The p values are motivated by a useful matrix inequality. It is shown that the proposed test is invariant under the group of location-scale transformations. Numerical results show that the test can control the Type I errors satisfactorily, and it also exhibits good power properties. Most importantly, the new methods are simple and easy to apply.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ananda MMA, Weerahandi S (1997) Two-way ANOVA with unequal cell frequencies and unequal variances. Stat Sin 7:631–646
Arendacká B (2005) Generalized confidence intervals on the variance component in mixed linear models with two variance components. Statistics 39:275–286
Crainiceanu CM, Ruppert D (2004) Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component. J R Stat Soc Ser B 66:165–185
Gamage J, Mathew T, Weerahandi S (2004) Generalized p values and generalized confidence regions for the multivariate Behrens–Fisher problem and MANOVA. J Multivar Anal 88:177–189
Harville DA (1976) Extension of the Gauss–Markov theorem to include the estimation of random effects. Ann Stat 4:384–395
Harville DA (1977) Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc 72:320–340
Khuri AI, Littell RC (1987) Exact tests for the main effects variance components in an unbalanced random two-way model. Biometrics 43:545–560
Khuri AI, Mathew T, Sinha BK (1998) Statistical tests for mixed linear models. Wiely, New York
Krishnamoorthy K, Mathew T (2003) Inferences on the means of lognormal distributions using generalized p values and generalized confidence intervals. J Stat Plan Inference 115:103–121
Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974
Lehmann EL (1986) Testing statistical hypotheses, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Li X, Li G (2005) Confidence intervals on sum of variance components with unbalanced designs. Commun Stat Theory Method 34:833–845
Li X, Li G (2007) Comparison of confidence intervals on the among group variance in the unbalanced variance component model. J Stat Comput Simul 77:477–486
Mathew T, Webb DW (2005) Generalized p values and confidence intervals for variance components: applications to army test and evaluation. Technometrics 47:312–322
Scheffé H (1959) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New York
Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New York
Tsui K, Weerahandi S (1989) Generalized p values in significance testing of hypotheses in the presence of nuisance parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 84:602–607
Wald A (1947) A note on regression analysis. Ann Math Stat 18:586–589
Weerahandi S (1987) Testing regression equality with unequal variances. Econometrica 55:1211–1215
Weerahandi S (1991) Testing variance components in mixed models with generalized p values. J Am Stat Assoc 86:151–153
Weerahandi S (1993) Generalized confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 88:899–905
Weerahandi S (1995a) ANOVA under unequal error variances. Biometrics 51:589–599
Weerahandi S (1995b) Exact statistical methods for data analysis. Springer, New York
Weerahandi S (2004) Generalized inference in repeated measures: exact methods in MANOVA and mixed models. Wiley, New Jersey
Weerahandi S, Johnson RA (1992) Testing reliability in a stress–strength model when \(X\) and \(Y\) are normally distributed. Technometrics 34:83–91
Xu LW, Wang SG (2008) A new generalized p value and its upper bound for ANOVA under unequal error variances. Commun Stat Theory Method 37:1002–1010
Ye RD, Ma TF, Wang SG (2010) Inferences on the common mean of several inverse Gaussian populations. Comput Stat Data Anal 54:906–915
Ye RD, Wang SG (2009) Inferences on the intra class correlation coefficients in the unbalanced two-way random effects model with interaction. J Stat Plan Inference 139:396–410
Zare K, Rasekh A, Rasekhi AA (2012) Estimation of variance components in linear mixed measurement error models. Stat Pap 53:849–863
Zhou L, Mathew T (1994) Some tests for variance components using generalized \(p\) values. Technometrics 36:394–402
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 11171002) and the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (CIT&TCD201404002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix Generalized test variable and generalized p values
Appendix Generalized test variable and generalized p values
Here we introduce the method provided by Tsui and Weerahandi (1989) with their extended definition of p values. Let X be random variable whose distribution depends on the parameters \((\theta ,\eta )\) assuming values in a parameter space H, where \(\theta \) is the parameters of interest and \(\eta \) represents nuisance parameters. Let \(\mathcal {X}\) be the sample space and x be the observed value of X.
Definition A.1
Assume we want to test the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta \leqslant \theta _{0}\) versus the alternative hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta > \theta _{0}\), where \(\theta _{0}\) is a specified value. Define the \(generalized\ test\ variable\) \(T({X}; {x}, \theta , \eta )\), which depends on the sample, the observed value of the sample, and the parameters \((\theta ,\eta )\), and satisfies the following conditions:
-
(1)
The distribution of \(T({X}; {x}, \theta _{0}, \eta )\) is free of the nuisance parameter \(\eta \).
-
(2)
The observed value of \(T({X}; {x}, \theta _{0}, \eta )\), i.e., \(T({x}; {x}, \theta _{0}, \eta )\), is free of \(\eta \).
-
(3)
For fixed x and \(\eta \), and for all t, \(\mathrm {Pr}\{T( {X}; {x}, \theta , \eta )> t\}\) is nondecreasing in \(\theta \), that is, T is stochastically increasing in \(\theta \).
Definition A.2
For a generalized test variable \(T({X}; {x}, \theta , \eta )\) satisfying the conditions given in Definition A.1, the set of possible sample X that are more extreme than or as extreme as the observed sample x in the sense of the test variable is called the generalized extreme region \(C_{{x}}( \theta , \eta )\). More precisely, \( C_{{x}}( \theta , \eta )=\{{X}\ \mid \ T({X}; {x}, \theta , \eta )\geqslant T({x}; {x}, \theta , \eta )\}. \) The generalized p-value is defined by
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, L., Guo, H. & Yu, S. Generalized p value tests for variance components in a class of linear mixed models. Stat Papers 59, 581–604 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0778-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0778-3