Abstract
Most applications related to bubble drag reduction (BDR) occur in contaminated environments where the presence of different surface active agents modify bubble coalescence and hence, affect flow drag. Although there have been studies on bubble drag modifications with salt/surfactant, the effects of systematic variation in salt/surfactant concentration on bubble dynamics and drag remain relatively unexplored. Driven by this motivation, in the present work, we experimentally investigate the effects of salt concentration on the bubble dynamics and drag modification in a fully developed horizontal turbulent channel flow for top wall bubble injection, over a wide range of salt concentrations (\(0<M<0.08\), moles/litre), channel Reynolds number (\(22{,}500<\text{Re}<65{,}000\)), and injected bubble void fraction (\(0<\alpha <0.16\)). The injected bubbles interact with the flow in the turbulent channel and as they move downstream reach an equilibrium state between the bubbly phase and the fully developed carrier phase that persists further downstream. The equilibrium state of the bubble dynamics is captured by high-speed visualizations and the corresponding drag is obtained from stream-wise pressure drop measurements within the channel. Increasing salt concentration levels is seen to lead to reduction in bubble coalescence and consequently in bubble size that modifies bubble deformability, migration, and distribution near the top wall, with the changes being dependent on the Re and \(\alpha\) values. At low \(\text{Re} \approx 22{,}500\), the addition of salt leads to a dramatic reduction in bubble sizes (\(\sim 100\) microns) from the very large coalesced bubbles (\(\sim\) cm) seen in the no-salt cases, with consequent changes in the bubble dynamics and increased drag (up to \(\approx 70\%\)). The reduction in bubble sizes with salt addition leads to an increase in drag with salt concentration, which saturates beyond a critical salt concentration (\(M_\text{Critical}\)). With increasing Re, due to the smaller time available for coalescence, the bubbles are relatively small even in the absence of salt and hence, the bubble dynamics is found to be less susceptible to modifications by the addition of salt, unlike at low Re, and hence, results in a smaller increase in drag and a lower \(M_\text{Critical}\). At the largest Re of about 65,000, both the bubble dynamics and drag are found to be very similar in both the no-salt and salt cases indicating that \(M_\text{Critical}\approx 0\). The present observations suggest that at low Re, the bubble dynamics aspects and flow modifications would be very different between salt water and fresh water conditions, whereas at large Re, the differences would be minimal. The present results can thus help deepen our understanding of bubbly flow applications in contaminated environments, such as those that occur in bubble-induced drag reductions in ships and pipelines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Biswas S (2023) Interaction of bubble(s) and buoyant rigid particles with vortical structures: Towards understanding bubbly turbulent flows. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science
Biswas S, Govardhan RN (2020) Effect of single and multiple bubbles on a thin vortex ring. J Flow Visualiz Image Process. https://doi.org/10.1615/JFlowVisImageProc.2020031014
Biswas S, Govardhan RN (2022) Interaction of a rigid buoyant sphere and a deforming bubble with a vortex ring: the role of deformability. Phys Rev Fluids 7:094302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.094302
Biswas S, Govardhan RN (2023) Vortex ring and bubble interaction: effects of bubble size on vorticity dynamics and bubble dynamics. Phys Fluid. https://doi.org/10.1063/50159766
Blaauw LJ, Lohse D, Huisman SG (2023) Sodium chloride inhibits effective bubbly drag reduction in turbulent bubbly taylor-couette flows. Phil Trans R Soc A 381(2243):20220127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0127
Cannon I, Izbassarov D, Tammisola O, Brandt L, Rosti ME (2021) The effect of droplet coalescence on drag in turbulent channel flows. Phys Fluids 33(8):085112. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0058632
Ceccio SL (2010) Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:183–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145504
Chesters AK (1991) Modelling of coalescence processes in fluid-liquid dispersions: a review of current understanding. Chem Eng Res Des 69(A4):259–270
Christenson HK, Bowen RE, Carlton JA, Denne JRM, Lu Y (2008) Electrolytes that show a transition to bubble coalescence inhibition at high concentrations. J Phys Chem C 112(3):794–796. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp075440s
Coles D (1956) The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 1(2):191–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112056000135
Craig VSJ (2004) Bubble coalescence and specific-ion effects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 9(1–2):178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2004.06.002. (ISSN 13590294)
Dean RB (1978) Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two-dimensional rectangular duct flow. J Fluids Eng 100(2):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3448633
Elbing BR, Winkel ES, Lay KA, Ceccio SL, Dowling DR, Perlin M (2008) Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction. J Fluid Mech 612:201–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008003029
Ervin EA, Tryggvason G (1997) The rise of bubbles in a vertical shear flow. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 119(2):443–449. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2819153
Ferrante A, Elghobashi S (2004) On the physical mechanisms of drag reduction in a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer laden with microbubbles. J Fluid Mech 503:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004007943
Firouzi M, Howes T, Nguyen AV (2015) A quantitative review of the transition salt concentration for inhibiting bubble coalescence. Adv Coll Interface Sci 222:305–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.07.005
Guin MM, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Maeda M, Miyanaga M (1996) Reduction of skin friction by microbubbles and its relation with near-wall bubble concentration in a channel. J Mar Sci Technol 1(5):241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390723. (ISSN 09484280)
Hara K, Suzuki T, Yamamoto F (2011) Image analysis applied to study on frictional-drag reduction by electrolytic microbubbles in a turbulent channel flow. Exp Fluids 50(3):715–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0970-5
Hassan YA, Gutierrez-Torres CC, Jimenez-Bernal JA (2005) Temporal correlation modification by microbubbles injection in a channel flow. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 32(8):1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2005.02.004
ITTC (2008) Recommended procedures and guidelines: Uncertainty analysis particle imaging velocimetry. In: 25th International towing tank conference, 7.5-01-03-03(33):1–12
Jha NK, Govardhan RN (2015) Interaction of a vortex ring with a single bubble: bubble and vorticity dynamics. J Fluid Mech 773:460. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.256
Jha NK, Bhatt A, Govardhan RN (2019) Effect of bubble distribution on wall drag in turbulent channel flow. Exp Fluids 60(8):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2773-7
Jha NK (2017) Interaction of Bubbles with Vortical Structures. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science
Jones G, Ray WA (1942) The surface tension of solutions of electrolytes as a function of the concentration. iv. magnesium sulfate. J Am Chem Soc 64(12):2744–2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01264a006
Kamp AM, Chesters AK, Colin C, Fabre J (2001) Bubble coalescence in turbulent flows: a mechanistic model for turbulence-induced coalescence applied to microgravity bubbly pipe flow. Int J Multiph Flow 27(8):1363–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(01)00010-6
Kang SY, Sangani AS, Tsao HK, Koch DL (1997) Rheology of dense bubble suspensions. Phys Fluids 9(6):1540–1561. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869481
Kato H, Iwashina T, Miyanaga M, Yamaguchi H (1999) Effect of microbubbles on the structure of turbulence in a turbulent boundary layer. J Mar Sci Technol 4(4):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010624
Kawamura T, Moriguchi Y, Kato H, Kakugawa A, Kodama Y (2003) Effect of bubble size on the microbubble drag reduction of a turbulent boundary layer. Fluids Eng Div Summer Meet 36967:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemecjo.2002.7.0_55
Kitagawa A, Hishida K, Kodama Y (2005) Flow structure of microbubble-laden turbulent channel flow measured by piv combined with the shadow image technique. Exp Fluids 38(4):466–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0926-8
Kitagawa A, Kosuge K, Uchida K, Hagiwara Y (2008) Heat transfer enhancement for laminar natural convection along a vertical plate due to sub-millimeter-bubble injection. Exp Fluids 45:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123658
Korosi A, Fabuss BM (1968) Viscosities of binary aqueous solutions of sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium sulfate, and magnesium sulfate at concentrations and temperatures of interest in desalination processes. J Chem Eng Data 13(4):548–552. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60039a031
Legner HH (1984) A simple model for gas bubble drag reduction. Phys Fluids 27(12):2788–2790. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.864592
Jiacai L, Fernández A, Tryggvason G (2005) The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 17(9):095102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2033547
Mäkiharju SA, Elbing BR, Wiggins A, Schinasi S, Vanden-Broeck J-M, Perlin M, Dowling DR, Ceccio SL (2013) On the scaling of air entrainment from a ventilated partial cavity. J Fluid Mech 732:47–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.387
Mäkiharju SA, Gabillet C, Paik B-G, Chang NA, Perlin M, Ceccio SL (2013) Time-resolved two-dimensional x-ray densitometry of a two-phase flow downstream of a ventilated cavity. Exp Fluids 54(7):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1561-z
Masaru H, Niichi N (1963) Skin friction and heat transfer for liquid flow over a porous wall with gas injection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 6(11):941–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(63)90049-8
Meng JCS, Uhlman JS (1989) Microbubble formulation and splitting in a turbulent boundary layer for turbulenee reduction. Adv Fluid Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3684-914
Mercado JM, Gomez DC, Van Gils D, Sun C, Lohse D (2010) On bubble clustering and energy spectra in pseudo-turbulence. J Fluid Mech 650:287–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009993570
Murai Y, Oishi Y, Takeda Y, Yamamoto F (2006) Turbulent shear stress profiles in a bubbly channel flow assessed by particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41(2):343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0142-9
Murai Y (2014) Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection. Exp Fluids 55(7):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1773-x
Murai Y, Oishi Y, Sasaki T, Kodama T, Yamamoto F (2005) Turbulent shear stress profile in horizontal bubbly channel flow. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on smart control of turbulence, Tokyo, pp. 289–295, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0142-9
Murai Y, Fujii H, Tasaka Y, Takeda Y (2006) Turbulent bubbly channel flow investigated by ultrasound velocity profiler. J Fluid Sci Technol 1(1):12–23. https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.1.12
Murai Y, Qu JW, Yamamoto F (2006) Three dimensional interaction of bubbles at intermediate reynolds numbers. Multiph Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1615/MultScienTechn.v18.i2.40
Murai Y, Fukuda H, Oishi Y, Kodama Y, Yamamoto F (2007) Skin friction reduction by large air bubbles in a horizontal channel flow. Int J Multiph Flow 33(2):147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.08.008
Nguyen PT, Hampton MA, Nguyen AV, Birkett GR (2012) The influence of gas velocity, salt type and concentration on transition concentration for bubble coalescence inhibition and gas holdup. Chem Eng Res Des 90(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.08.015
Oishi Y, Murai Y, Tasaka Y, Yasushi T (2009) Frictional drag reduction by wavy advection of deformable bubbles. J Phys: Conf Ser 147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/147/1/012020. (IOP Publishing)
Park HJ, Oishi Y, Tasaka Y, Murai Y, Takeda Y (2009) Turbulent shear control with oscillatory bubble injection. J Phys: Conf Ser 147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/147/1/012037. (IOP Publishing)
Quinn JJ, Sovechles JM, Finch JA, Waters KE (2014) Critical coalescence concentration of inorganic salt solutions. Miner Eng 58:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.12.021
Rust AC, Manga M (2002) Effects of bubble deformation on the viscosity of dilute suspensions. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 104(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00013-7
Shen X, Ceccio SL, Perlin M (2006) Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction. Exp Fluids 41(3):415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0169-y. (ISSN 07234864)
Skudarnov PV, Lin CX (2006) Drag reduction by gas injection into turbulent boundary layer: density ratio effect. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 27(3):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2005.12.002
Slauenwhite DE, Johnson BD (1999) Bubble shattering: differences in bubble formation in fresh water and seawater. J Geophys Res Oceans 104(C2):3265–3275. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JC900064
Sugiyama K, Calzavarini E, Lohse D (2008) Microbubbly drag reduction in taylor-couette flow in the wavy vortex regime. J Fluid Mech 608:21–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008001183
Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2011) Surfactant effects on bubble motion and bubbly flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:615–636. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160756
Tsao HK, Koch DL (1994) Collisions of slightly deformable, high Reynolds number bubbles with short-range repulsive forces. Phys Fluids 6(8):2591–2605. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868149
Tse K, Martin T, Mcfarlane CM, Nienow AW (1998) Visualisation of bubble coalescence in a coalescence cell, a stirred tank and a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci 53(23):4031–4036. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00182-1
Van Gils DPM, NarezoGuzman D, Sun C, Lohse D (2013) The importance of bubble deformability for strong drag reduction in bubbly turbulent taylor-couette flow. J Fluid Mech 722:317–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.96
Verschoof RA, Van Der Veen RCA, Sun C, Lohse D (2016) Bubble drag reduction requires large bubbles. Phys Rev Lett 117(10):104502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.104502
Wei T (1987) Reynolds number effects on the small scale structure of a turbulent channel flow. PhD thesis, University of Michigan
Winkel ES, Ceccio SL, Dowling DR, Perlin M (2004) Bubble-size distributions produced by wall injection of air into flowing freshwater, saltwater and surfactant solutions. Exp Fluids 37(6):802–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0850-y
Wu D,Wang A, Guo L (1992) Seawater: its composition, properties and behaviour seawater. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10208-5
Jin X, Maxey MR, Karniadakis GE (2002) Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. J Fluid Mech 468(2002):271–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002001659
Zanoun E-S, Durst F, Nagib H (2003) Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 15(10):3079–3089. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1608010
Zenit R, Koch DL, Sangani AS (2001) Measurements of the average properties of a suspension of bubbles rising in a vertical channel. J Fluid Mech 429:307–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112000002743
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Manoj Dixit and Chiranjeevi Sadana for all their help with the experiments.
Funding
The support from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB, Reference No. EMR/2017/004154), India, is acknowledged. UKRI Fellowship (No. MR/S015566/1) at the University of Southampton for Subhajit Biswas is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SB contributed to conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation, validation, and writing—original draft. Raghuraman. NG contributed to conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file 1 (mp4 12409 KB)
Supplementary file 2 (mp4 23393 KB)
Supplementary file 3 (mp4 8366 KB)
Supplementary file 4 (mp4 34662 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, S., Govardhan, R.N. Effects of salt concentration on top wall bubble injection in a turbulent channel flow: bubble dynamics and wall drag reduction. Exp Fluids 65, 34 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-024-03770-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-024-03770-8