Abstract
Focused laser differential interferometry (FLDI) and its relative two-point FLDI (2pFLDI) are used to make density fluctuation and velocity measurements, respectively, in a canonical, round turbulent air jet (\(U_\mathrm{jet}=300\) m/s, \(d=3.2\) mm, \(Re_\mathrm{d}=8.6\times 10^4\)). Both techniques are seedless, non-intrusive, inexpensive (< $5k), and insensitive to vibrations. The FLDI signal is proportional to the phase difference between two closely spaced laser beams passing through the flow. The phase difference is created by index of refraction gradients in the flow, integrated along the beam paths. Transfer functions for interpreting the FLDI signal are proposed as an accurate method for predicting the response in an arbitrary flow. A procedure for applying these transfer functions to a turbulent jet is developed. The procedure is able to model FLDI’s response to fluctuations in the jet with error on the order of 10–50% across a \(\sim \, 100\) kHz band. The transfer functions provide a simple method for estimating the FLDI & 2pFLDI spatial resolution along the optical axis, which is a strong function of disturbance scale, based on three instrument parameters: (1) the laser wavelength, \(\lambda _0\), (2) the beam separation, \(\Delta x_1\), and (3) the beam radius at the focus, \(w_0\). For the 2pFLDI employed in this work (\(\lambda _0=633\) nm, \(\Delta x_1=145\,\mu\)m, \(w_0=3\,\mu\)m), the resolution ranges from 1cm for a 0.9mm disturbance wavelength to 5cm for a 5.5mm disturbance wavelength. The spatiotemporal resolution depends on the convection velocity of the disturbances, as well as the spatiotemporal amplitude variation in the disturbances themselves. We model the velocity and spatial amplitude distribution with Gaussian functions based on historical jet studies and we measure the amplitude variation with frequency directly via FLDI. This leads to 1cm resolution for the smallest timescales measured (100 kHz) up to 5cm resolution for the largest time scales measured (1kHz). 2pFLDI’s relatively large spatial resolution complicates comparisons of velocity measurements to those made using hot-wires. The methods, modeling, and procedures outlined in this work provide a framework for interpreting future FLDI and multi-point FLDI measurements.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2006) Test Uncertainty. Tech. rep, ASME, New York, NY
Anderson JD (2006) Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, 2nd edn. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA
Bathel BF, Weisberger JM, Herring GC, King RA, Jones SB, Kennedy RE, Laurence SJ (2020) Two-point, parallel-beam focused laser differential interferometry with a nomarski prism. Appl Opt 59(2):244. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.59.000244
Bathel BF, Weisberger JM, Herring GC, Jagannathan R, Johansen CT, Jones SB, Cavone AA (2021) Analysis of the Amplitude Response of a Two-Point and a Multi-Point Focused Laser Differential Interferometer. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, January, pp 1–17, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0598
Benitez EK, Jewell JS, Schneider SP (2020) Focused laser differential interferometry for hypersonic flow instability measurements with contoured tunnel windows. AIAA Journal 1 PartF:1–22, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1282
Birch B, Buttsworth D, Zander F (2020) Measurements of freestream density fluctuations in a hypersonic wind tunnel. Exp Fluids 61(7):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02992-w
Bonnet JP, Grésillon D, Taran JP (1998) Nonintrusive measurements for high-speed, supersonic, and hypersonic flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):231–273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.231
Born M, Wolf E (1980) Principles of Optics, 6th edn. Pergamon Press, New York
Boutier A (1992) New Trends in Instrumentation for Hypersonic Research. 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2, arXiv:1011.1669v3
Buxton OR, de Kat R, Ganapathisubramani B (2013) The convection of large and intermediate scale fluctuations in a turbulent mixing layer. Physics of Fluids 25(12), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4837555
Ceruzzi AP, Callis BO, Weber DC (2020) Application of Focused Laser Differential Interferometry ( FLDI ) in a Supersonic Boundary Layer. In: AIAA Scitech Forum, pp 1–6
De Kat R, Ganapathisubramani B (2015) Frequency-wavenumber mapping in turbulent shear flows. J Fluid Mech 783:166–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.558
Favre A, Gaviglio J, Dumas R (1967) Structure of velocity space-time correlations in a boundary layer. Physics of Fluids 10(S138), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762432
Fisher MJ, Davies PO (1964) Correlation measurements in a non-frozen pattern of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 18(1):97–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112064000076
Fulghum MR (2014) Turbulence Measurements in High-Speed Wind Tunnels using Focusing Laser Differential Interferometry. PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University
Gillespie G, Ceruzzi A, Laurence S (2021) Multi-point Focused Laser Differential Interferometry for Noise Measurements in High-Speed Tunnels. In: AIAA Aviation 2021 Forum, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2918
Gragston M, Price T, Davenport K, Zhang Z, Schmisseur JD (2021) Linear array focused-laser differential interferometry for single-shot multi-point flow disturbance measurements. Opt Lett 46(1):154–157
Gragston M, Price TJ, Davenport K, John D (2021b) An \(m \times n\) FLDI Array for Single-Shot , Multipoint Disturbance Measurements in High-Speed Flows. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (January):1–16, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0599
Hameed A, Parziale NJ (2021) Focused Laser Differential Interferometer Response to a Controlled Phase Object. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, January, pp 1–10, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0602
Hinze JO, Van Der Hegge Zijnen BG (1949) Transfer of heart and matter in the turbulent mixing zone of an axially symmetrical jet. Appl Sci Res 1(1):435–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02120346
Houpt A, Leonov S (2021) Cylindrical Focused Laser Differential Interferometer. AIAA Journal pp 1–9, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059750
Jewell JS, Hameed A, Parziale NJ, Gogineni SP (2019) Disturbance Speed Measurements in a Circular Jet via Double Focused Laser Differential Interferometry. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum (January), https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2293, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2019-2293
Kolpin MA (1964) The flow in the mixing region of a jet. J Fluid Mech 18(4):529–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112064000398
Lawson JM (2021) Focused Laser Differential Interferometry. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology
Lawson JM, Neet MC, Grossman IJ, Austin JM (2020) Static and dynamic characterization of a focused laser differential interferometer. Exp Fluid. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2296
Liepmann HW, Roshko A (1957) Elements of Gasdynamics, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York
Lin CC (1953) On taylor’s hypothesis and the acceleration terms in the navier-stokes equations. Q Appl Math 10(4):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814415651_0011
Neet MC, Lawson JM, Austin JM (2021) Design, alignment, and calibration of a focused laser differential interferometer. Appl Opt 60(26):7903. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.435112
Parziale N (2013) Slender-Body Hypervelocity Boundary-Layer Instability. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology
Parziale NJ, Shepherd JE, Hornung HG (2012) Reflected Shock Tunnel Noise Measurement by Focused Differential Interferometry. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (June):1–10
Parziale NJ, Shepherd JE, Hornung HG (2013) Differential interferometric measurement of instability in a hypervelocity boundary layer. AIAA J. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052013
Parziale NJ, Shepherd JE, Hornung HG (2014) Free-stream density perturbations in a reflected-Shock tunnel. Experiments in Fluids 55(2), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1665-0
Pate SR, Schueler CJ (1969) Radiated aerodynamic noise effects on boundary-layer transition in supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels. AIAA J 7(3):450–457
Poon TC, Kim T (2006) Engineering Optics with MATLAB. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore
Reshotko E (2008) Transition issues for atmospheric entry. J Spacecr Rocket doi 10(2514/1):29777
Sanderson SR (2005) Simple, adjustable beam splitting element for differential interferometers based on photoelastic birefringence of a prismatic bar. Rev Sci Instrum 76(11):113703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2132271
Schmidt BE, Shepherd JE (2015) Analysis of focused laser differential interferometry. Appl Opt. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.008459
Schneider SP (2001) Effects of high-speed tunnel noise on laminar-turbulent transition. J Spacecr Rocket 38(3):323–333. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3705
Settles GS, Fulghum MR (2016) The focusing laser differential interferometer, an instrument for localized turbulence measurements in refractive flows. J Fluid Eng doi 10(1115/1):4033960
Shea JF (1988) Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the NATIONAL AEROSPACE PLANE (NASP). Tech. rep, Defense Science Board
Siegman AE (1986) Lasers. University Science Books, Sausalito
Smeets G (1977) Flow Diagnostics by Laser Interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (2)
Smeets G, George A (1971) Gas-dynamic investigations in a shock tube using a highly sensitive interferometer. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 298(0704)
Smeets G, George A (1973) Laser-differential interferometer applications in gas dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 298(0704)
Taylor GI (1938) The spectrum of turbulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society 164(919)
Wallace JM (2014) Space-time correlations in turbulent flow: a review. Theor Appl Mech Lett 4(2):022003. https://doi.org/10.1063/2.1402203
Weisberger JM, Bathel BF, Herring GC, Buck GM, Jones SB, Cavone AA (2020) Multi-point line focused laser differential interferometer for high-speed flow fluctuation measurements. Appl Opt 59(35):11180–11195
Weisberger JM, Bathel BF, Herring GC, Buck GM (2021) Two-line focused laser differential interferometry of a flat plate boundary layer at mach 6. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, January, pp 1–29, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0601
Welch PD (1967) The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time aver. aging Over Short, Modified Periodograms Ik(fn) =-I A h ( % ) [ a k. Tech. Rep. 2
Wills JA (1964) On convection velocities in turbulent shear flows. J Fluid Mech 20(3):417–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211206400132X
Witze PO (1974) Centerline velocity decay of compressible free jets. AIAA J 12(4):417–418. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49262
Wygnanski I, Fiedler H (1969) Some measurements in the self-preserving jet. J Fluid Mech 38(03):577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000358
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mike Smith and AEDC Tunnel 9 staff for guidance and support. Additional thanks to the Air Force Office of Scientific Research support through the University of Maryland Hypersonic Center of Testing Excellence program, and the University of Maryland Clark Doctoral Fellowship Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A derivation of FLDI transfer functions, Eq. 18
A derivation of FLDI transfer functions, Eq. 18
Beginning with the argument of the z-axis integral in Eq. 17, which we will call Z, we have:
Plug in the definition of beam intensity profile \(I_0\) (Eq. 12), the density field model \(\rho (x,y,z,t)\) (Eq. 10) and the definitions of the beam paths \(\mathbf{x} _1\) and \(\mathbf{x} _2\) (Eq. 15 and Eq. 16):
Next, exchange the order of integration and re-arrange some terms:
Re-arrange more terms and convert from Cartesian to polar coordinates using \(x=rcos(\theta )\):
Re-arrange terms and evaluate the integral over \(\theta\):
where \(J_0\) is the Bessel function of the first kind. Next, we evalute the subtraction of the two exponential terms and evaluated the integral over beam radius, r. For more detail on this integral evaluation, see the next subsection, appendix 1.
Finally, re-arrange to get the argument of the z-axis integral in Eq. 18.
1.1 A.1 Evaluation of integral over beam radius, r
Start with the integral over r in Eq. 46, which we will call \(\mathcal {R}\):
Using the definition of the Bessel function of the first kind, \(J_0\):
Expand out the sum:
Re-arrange:
Evaluate the integrals over r:
Finally, we have:
Recognizing the Taylor’s series expansion, we have
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceruzzi, A.P., Cadou, C.P. Interpreting single-point and two-point focused laser differential interferometry in a turbulent jet. Exp Fluids 63, 112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03459-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03459-w