Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation on the effect of forward-facing steps and gaps combined with wall suction on boundary layer transition

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wall suction is known to be an effective Laminar Flow Control (LFC) technique to delay laminar-turbulent transition, but its commercial implementation is still limited due to design and integration issues. In particular, current design tools that model wall suction do not account for potential surface discontinuities that can arise during installation. However, these defects should be accounted for since they generally move transition further upstream, which could cancel drag reduction benefits from wall suction. Given this context, the present investigation aims at experimentally characterizing the combined effect of wall suction and two types of surface defects that can be found on aerodynamic surfaces, i.e., forward-facing steps (FFS) and gaps. Critical relative dimensions (at which transition occurs at the defect location) were different for each type of defect but remained unchanged regardless of whether wall suction was applied or not. For subcritical defects (defects where transition occurs further downstream of their location), wall suction could still delay transition, with reduced effectiveness. Spectral analysis inside the boundary layer revealed that the transition mechanism, governed by Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities, was unchanged in the presence of either critical or subcritical defects. The resulting increase in amplification of the existing instabilities due to either defect warranted the use of the \(\Delta N\) model to capture this effect. Wall suction is therefore a robust LFC technique that can compete with the destabilizing effects of subcritical defects, albeit less effectively than in a smooth configuration. However, given the chosen suction flow rates, this technique could not delay or prevent the critical dimensions determined for cases without suction

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Maaitah A, Nayfeh A, Ragab S (1989) Effect of suction on the stability of subsonic flows over smooth backward-facing steps. AIAA J 28(11):1916–1924. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-983

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arnal D, Archambaud J (2008) Laminar-turbulent transition control: NLF, LFC, HLFC. Advances in Laminar–Turbulent Transition Modeling, AVT-151 RTO AVT/VKI

  • Béguet S, Perraud J, Forte M et al (2016) Modeling of transverse gaps effects on boundary-layer transition. J Aircr 54(2):794–801. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braslow A (1999) A history of suction-type laminar flow control with emphasis on flight research Monographs Aerospace History 13

  • Bulgubure C, Arnal D (1992) Dassault Falcon 50 laminar flow flight demonstrator In: DGLR/3AF/RAeS First European Forum on Laminar Flow, https://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/126870276.pdf

  • Corelli Grappadelli M, Sattler S, Scholz P, et al (2021) Experimental investigations of boundary layer transition on a flat plate with suction In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, p 1452, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1452

  • Costantini M, Risius S, Klein C (2015) Experimental investigation of the effect of forward-facing steps on boundary layer transition. Procedia IUTAM 14:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2015.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch J, Kosorygin V (2020) Surface step effects on boundary-layer transition dominated by tollmien-schlichting instability. AIAA J 58(7):2943–2950. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch J, Kosorygin V, Ng L (2006) Modeling the effects of steps on boundary-layer transition In: IUTAM Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Springer, pp 37–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4159-4_4

  • Crouch J, Kosorygin V, Sutanto M (2020) Modeling gap effects on transition dominated by tollmien-schlichting instability In: AIAA Aviation 2020, AIAA, pp 1–48, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3075

  • Dovgal A, Kozlov V, Michalke A (1994) Laminar boundary layer separation: instability and associated phenomena. Prog Aerosp Sci 30(1):61–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(94)90003-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann CA, Rist U (2015) Impact of forward-facing steps on laminar-turbulent transition in transonic flows. AIAA J 53(9):2504–2511. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte M, Gentili L, Béguet S, et al (2015) Experimental and numerical study of the effect of gaps on the laminar-turbulent transition for two-dimensional incompressible boundary-layers. In: 50th 3AF International Conference on Applied Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2015.03.073

  • Fransson JH (2004) Leading edge design process using a commercial flow solver. Exp fluids 37(6):929–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0858-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn M, Pfenninger W (1973) Prevention of transition over a backward step by suction. J Aircr 10(10):618–622. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin R (1998) Overview of laminar flow control Tech rep, NASA/TP-1998-208705

  • Klebanoff P, Tidstrom K (1972) Mechanism by which a two-dimensional roughness element induces boundary-layer transition. Phys Fluids 15(7):1173–1188. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1694065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan K, Bertram O, Seibel O (2017) Review of hybrid laminar flow control systems. Prog Aerosp Sci 93:24–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke H, Backhaus K (2018) Direct TS-wave simulation on a laminar wing-profile with forward-facing step In: New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XI Springer, Cham, pp 275–284, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64519-3_25

  • Mack L (1977) Transition and laminar instability. JPL Publication 77-15

  • Maddalon D (1991) Hybrid Laminar Flow Control flight research Research and Technology, NASA, TM 4331:47

  • Methel J, Vermeersch O, Forte M, et al (2018) Experimental characterization of the laminar-turbulent transition of a sucked boundary layer due to surface defects in a two-dimensional incompressible flow 2018 Flow Control Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum AIAA2018-3214 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3214

  • Methel J, Forte M, Vermeersch O et al (2019) An experimental study on the effects of two-dimensional positive surface defects on the laminar-turbulent transition of a sucked boundary layer. Exp Fluids 60(6):94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2741-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morkovin M, Reshotko E, Herbert T (1994) Transition in open flow systems-a reassessment. Bull Am Phys Soc 39:1882

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenni J, Gluyas G (1966) Aerodynamic design and analysis of an LFC surface. Astronautics Aeronaut 4(7):52

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive M, Blanchard A (1982) Etude expérimentale du déclenchement de la transition par des cavités en écoulement incompressible Tech rep, CERT DERAT OA18/5007

  • Perraud J, Séraudie A, Reneaux J, et al (2005) Effect of 2D and 3D imperfections on laminar-turbulent transition In: CEAS Katnet Conference on Key Aerodynamic Technologies

  • Reed H, Saric W, Arnal D (1996) Linear stability theory applied to boundary layers. Annual Rev Fluid Mech 28(1):389–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.002133

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds G, Saric W (1986) Experiments on the stability of the flat-plate boundary layer with suction. AIAA J 24(2):202–207. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rius-Vidales AF, Kotsonis M (2020) Influence of a forward-facing step surface irregularity on swept wing transition. AIAA J 58(12):5243–5253. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzetta D, Visbal M (2014) Numerical simulation of excrescence generated transition. AIAA J 52(2):385–397. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j052530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter J (1964) Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Tech rep, Ministry of Aviation, Royal Aircraft Establishment

  • Rouviere A, Méry F, Methel J et al (2021) Experimental and numerical study on wall impedance effects on Tollmien-Schlichting waves. AIAA J (in press) 10(2514/1):J060536

    Google Scholar 

  • Saric W, Carpenter A, Reed H (2011) Passive control of transition in three-dimensional boundary layers, with emphasis on discrete roughness elements. Philosophical Transactions R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1940):1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0368

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarohia V (1977) Experimental investigation of oscillations in flows over shallow cavities. AIAA J 15(7):984–991. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1976-182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha S, Gupta A, Oberai M (1982) Laminar separating flow over backsteps and cavities ii-cavities AIAA J 20(3):370–375. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7918

  • Smith A, Gamberoni N (1956) Transition, pressure gradient and stability theory Tech rep, Douglas Aircraft Co ES 26388

  • Studer G, Arnal D, Houdeville R et al (2006) Laminar-turbulent transition in oscillating boundary layer: experimental and numerical analysis using continuous wavelet transform. Exp Fluids 41(5):685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0190-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ingen J (1956) A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region Technische Hogeschool Delft, Vliegtuigbouwkunde, Rapport VTH-74

  • Wang Y, Gaster M (2005) Effect of surface steps on boundary layer transition. Exp Fluids 39(4):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-1011-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn J, Rist U (2018) Study about boundary-layer suction at a juncture for sustained laminar flow In: New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XI Springer, p 349–358, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64519-3_32

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ONERA/DMPE, Université de Toulouse, 31055, Toulouse, France

    Jeanne Methel, Maxime Forte & Olivier Vermeersch

  2. ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 31055, Toulouse, France

    Grégoire Casalis

Authors
  1. Jeanne Methel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maxime Forte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olivier Vermeersch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Grégoire Casalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeanne Methel or Maxime Forte.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A All tested FFS and gaps dimensions and positions

Appendix A All tested FFS and gaps dimensions and positions

See Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7

Table 4 Relative heights for FFS at streamwise position \(x_{FFS }\) = 430 mm (\(Re _x\) = 1.12\(\cdot\)106, junction between chambers C5 and C6). (Asterisks correspond to critical FFS )
Full size table
Table 5 Relative heights for FFS at streamwise position \(x_{FFS }\) = 640 mm (\(Re _x\) = 1.66\(\cdot\)106, junction between the end of the suction region and flat plate). (Asterisks correspond to critical FFS)
Full size table
Table 6 All tested gap dimensions for \(x_{GAP }\) = 360 mm. (Asterisks correspond to critical gaps)
Full size table
Table 7 All tested gap dimensions for \(x_{GAP }\) = 640 mm. (Asterisks correspond to critical gaps)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Methel, J., Forte, M., Vermeersch, O. et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of forward-facing steps and gaps combined with wall suction on boundary layer transition. Exp Fluids 63, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03361-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03361-x

Search

Navigation