Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural nuclei population dynamics in cavitation tunnels

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nuclei, or microbubble, populations control the inception and dynamics of cavitation. It is, therefore, important to quantify distributions in cavitation test facilities to rigorously model nucleation dynamics. Measurements of natural nuclei population dynamics were made in two test facilities in Australia and Japan via mechanical activation using a Cavitation Susceptibility Meter (CSM). A range of tunnel operating parameters, including pressure, velocity and dissolved oxygen (DO) content, were investigated. The DO saturation condition upstream of the test section is found to provide a threshold as to whether the population is affected by DO in the Australian test facility. Historical trends in the population are quantified, indicating that regular monitoring is required. Variation of the population around the Australian cavitation tunnel circuit was studied by varying the water sampling location. Provided the water remains undersaturated, as defined above, the natural nuclei population in the test section can be measured by sampling from the lower limb resorber. Comparisons are made between test facilities in Australia, Japan and other countries, as well as environmental waters, using different measurement techniques. Optical and acoustic methods show microbubbles in the size range of 10–100 \(\,{\upmu }\hbox {m}\) typical of those used to model cavitation nucleation. CSM measurements show varying distributions of nuclei with equivalent bubble diameters in the range of 0.5–5 \(\,{\upmu }\hbox {m}\) but global trends suggest a universal characteristic.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt R, Keller A (1976) Free gas content effects on cavitation inception and noise in a free shear flow. In: Two phase flow and cavitation in power generation systems. Grenoble, 30 March–2 April 1976

  • Atlar M (2002) The specialist committee on water quality and cavitation-final report. In: Proceedings of 23rd ITTC, 2

  • Billet M (1984) Cavitation nuclei measurements. In: ASME international symposium on cavitation inception, New Orleans, LA

  • Billet ML (1985) Cavitation nuclei measurements-a review. In: Cavitation and multiphase flow forum

  • Brandner P (2018) Microbubbles and cavitation: microscales to macroscales. In: 10th international cavitation symposium on (CAV2018)

  • Brandner P, Lecoffre Y, Walker G (2007) Design considerations in the development of a modern cavitation tunnel. In: 16th Australasian fluid mechanics conference

  • Brandner PA, Venning JA, Pearce BW (2018) Wavelet analysis techniques in cavitating flows. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 376(2126):20170242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitz N, Medwin H (1989) Instrumentation for insitu acoustical measurements of bubble spectra under breaking waves. J Acoust Soc Am 86(2):739–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennen CE (1994) Observations of cavitating flow. In: Proceedings of 20th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, National Academy Press

  • Brennen CE (1995) Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang N, Yakushiji R, Ganesh H, Ceccio S (2009) Mechanism and scalability of tip vortex cavitation suppression by water and polymer injection. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on cavitation

  • d’Agostino L, Acosta A (1991) Separation and surface nuclei effects in a cavitation susceptibility meter. J Fluids Eng 113(4):695–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deane GB, Stokes MD (2002) Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves. Nature 418(6900):839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox FE, Herzfeld KF (1954) Gas bubbles with organic skin as cavitation nuclei. J Acoust Soc Am 26(6):984–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franc JP, Michel JM (2006) Fundamentals of Cavitation, vol 76. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin R (1992) A note on the radius distribution function for microbubbles of gas in water. ASME Cavitat Multiphase Flow Forum 135:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin R (1994) The cavitating submerged jet. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (Tech. rep.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett C, Li M, Farmer D (2000) The connection between bubble size spectra and energy dissipation rates in the upper ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 30(9):2163–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates E, Billet M, Katz J, Ooi K, Holl J (1979) Cavitation inception and nuclei distributions joint ARL/CIT experiments. Pennsylvania Stat Univ University Park Applied Research Lab, Tech. rep

  • Gavrilov L (1969) On the size distribution of gas bubbles in water. Sov Phys Acoust 15(1):22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gindroz B (1995a) Propeller cavitation characteristics: The practical interest of nuclei measurements in test facilities and at sea. In: Proceedings of ASME FED symposium on cavitation

  • Gindroz B, Billard JY, Geistdoerfer P (1995b) Cavitation nuclei measurements at sea. ASME Publications HTD 321:497–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Gindroz B, Bailo G, Matera F, Elefante M (1997) Influence of the cavitation nuclei on the cavitation bucket when predicting the full-scale behavior of a marine propeller. In: Proceedings of 21st symposium on naval hydrodynamics, pp 839–850

  • Gowing S, Shen YT (2001) Nuclei effects on tip vortex cavitation scaling. In: 4th international symposium on cavitation, California

  • Gowing S, Vikram C, Burton S (1988) Comparison of holographic, light scattering and venturi techniques for bubble measurements in a water tunnel. In: ASME cavitation and multiphase flow forum, pp 25–28

  • Harvey EN, Barnes D, McElroy WD, Whiteley A, Pease D, Cooper K (1944) Bubble formation in animals. I. Physical factors. J Cell Physiol 24(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BD, Cooke RC (1981) Generation of stabilized microbubbles in seawater. Science 213(4504):209–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz J (1982) Cavitation inception in separated flows. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology

  • Keller A, Weitendorf E (1976) Influence of undissolved air content on cavitation phenomena at the propeller blades and on induced hull pressure amplitudes. In: Proceedings lAHR symposium on two phase flow and cavitation in power generation system, pp 65–76

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P, Lecoffre Y (2016) Development of a cavitation susceptibility meter for nuclei size distribution measurements. In: 20th Australasian fluid mechanics conference

  • Khoo M, Venning J, Takahashi K, Arai J, Mori T, Pearce B, Brandner P, Ranmuthugala D (2017) Joint research between Australia and Japan on the cavitation inception of marine propellers and control surfaces. MAST Asia 2017:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak HY, Oh SD (2004) Gas-vapor bubble nucleation—a unified approach. J Colloid Interface Sci 278(2):436–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Sato K, Brennen CE (1993) Cavitation nuclei population dynamics in a water tunnel. ASME Am Soc Mech Eng 153:119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori T, Naganuma K, Kimoto R, Yakushiji R, Nagaya S (2007) Hydrodynamic and hydroacoustic characteristics of the Flow Noise Simulator. In: Proceedings of 5th ASME-JSME joint fluids engineering conference, FEDSM2007-37531

  • Nagaya S, Kimoto R, Naganuma K, Mori T (2011) Observation and scaling of tip vortex cavitation on elliptical hydrofoils. In: ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 joint fluids engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 225–230

  • Němec T (2016) Homogeneous bubble nucleation in binary systems of liquid solvent and dissolved gas. J Chem Phys 467:26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris SJ, Brooks I, de Leeuw G, Sirevaag A, Leck C, Brooks B, Birch C, Tjernstrom M (2011) Measurements of bubble size spectra within leads in the arctic summer pack ice. Ocean Sci

  • Pascal RW, Yelland MJ, Srokosz MA, Moat BI, Waugh EM, Comben DH, Cansdale AG, Hartman MC, Coles DG, Chang Hsueh P (2011) A spar buoy for high-frequency wave measurements and detection of wave breaking in the open ocean. J Atmos Ocean Technol 28(4):590–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson F, Danel F, Keller A, Lecoffre Y (1975) Comparative measurements of bubble and particulate spectra by three optical methods. Report of Cavitation Committee, 14th ITTC

  • Pham T, Michel J, Lecoffre Y (1997) Dynamical nuclei measurement: on the development and the performance evaluation of an optimized center-body meter. J Fluids Eng 119(4):744–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph K, Dierssen HM, Twardowski M, Cifuentes-Lorenzen A, Zappa CJ (2014) Optical measurements of small deeply penetrating bubble populations generated by breaking waves in the Southern Ocean. J Geophys Res Oceans 119(2):757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell P, Giosio D, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P, Ceccio S (2018) Microbubble disperse flow about a lifting surface. In: 32nd symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Hamburg

  • Russell P, Venning J, Pearce B, Brandner P (2019) Calibration of Mie Scattering Imaging for microbubble measurement in hydrodynamic test facilities. Manuscript submitted for publication

  • Shen Y, Gowing S, Pierce R (1984) Cavitation susceptibility measurements by a venturi. In: ASME international symposium on cavitation inception, New Orleans, LA

  • Shen YT, Gowing S, Eckstein B (1986) Cavitation susceptibility measurements of ocean lake and laboratory waters. Tech. rep, David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD

  • Stramski D, Boss E, Bogucki D, Voss KJ (2004) The role of seawater constituents in light backscattering in the ocean. Prog Oceanogr 61(1):27–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Arai J, Mori T (2019) Nuclei population dynamics in NSRC/ATLA Flow Noise Simulator. Technical report, Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency, Japan

  • Venning J, Khoo M, Pearce B, Brandner P (2018) Background nuclei measurements and implications for cavitation inception in hydrodynamic test facilities. Exp Fluids 59(4):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward C, Balakrishnan A, Hooper F (1970) On the thermodynamics of nucleation in weak gas–liquid solutions. J Basic Eng 92(4):695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneck P, Williams J (2012) The atmospheric chemist’s companion: numerical data for use in the atmospheric sciences. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Worch E (2015) Hydrochemistry: basic concepts and exercises. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

  • Zhang X (2001) Influence of bubbles on the water-leaving reflectance. PhD thesis, Dalhousie University

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the University of Tasmania, the Defence Science and Technology Group and the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency. The authors thank AMC technical officers, Mr. Robert Wrigley and Mr. Steven Kent, and ATLA technical officer, Mr. Kenji Naganuma, for providing technical assistance with test facility configuration and operation as well as CSM hardware configuration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maritime Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, Australia

    M. T. Khoo

  2. Cavitation Research Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

    M. T. Khoo, J. A. Venning, B. W. Pearce & P. A. Brandner

  3. Naval Systems Research Center, Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency, Tokyo, Japan

    K. Takahashi & T. Mori

Authors
  1. M. T. Khoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. Venning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. W. Pearce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. A. Brandner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Khoo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, M.T., Venning, J.A., Pearce, B.W. et al. Natural nuclei population dynamics in cavitation tunnels. Exp Fluids 61, 34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2843-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2843-x

Search

Navigation