Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of metabolic syndrome on renal stone progression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Studies on howmetabolic syndrome affects renal stone progression in untreated asymptomatic patients are lacking. Therefore, we investigated the effect of metabolic syndrome on changes in renal stone size.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 820 patients with renal stones incidentally detected on CT during regular health examinations and who underwent follow-up CT evaluations for > 1 year. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of metabolic syndrome. Changes in stone size during the follow-up were assessed, and differences were compared according to various factors. Predictors of stone size change on CT were assessed using linear regression analysis.

Results

Overall, 820 asymptomatic patients without a history of stone treatments and with a mean follow-up of 52.4 months were included. Of these, 104 (12.7%) had metabolic syndrome and 335 (40.9%) showed stone size increase during the follow-up. The stone size at diagnosis was not significantly different between patients with and without metabolic syndrome (225.3 ± 332.6 vs. 183.9 ± 310.2 mm3, p = 0.159); however, a significant difference was observed in the change in stone size at follow-up (148.5 ± 352.0 vs. 81.5 ± 222.4 mm3, p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age (β = − 0.11; − 5.92 to −0.69; p = 0.013), fasting glucose level ≥ 100 mg/dl (β = 0.11; 9.78–99.73; p = 0.017), and metabolic syndrome (β = 0.10; 9.78–99.73; p = 0.017) were factors predictive of stone size changes.

Conclusion

Metabolic syndrome, fasting glucose level ≥ 100 mg/dl and young age are positively related to renal stone size changes. Therefore, periodic follow-up and metabolic syndrome management are required in asymptomatic patients with renal stones, especially in young age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirode G, Wong RJ (2020) Trends in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2011–2016. JAMA 323:2526–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suh S, Lee MK (2014) Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases in Korea. J Atheroscler Thromb 21(Suppl 1):S31-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong Y, Cook P, Roderick P, Somani BK (2016) Metabolic syndrome and kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature. J Endourol 30:246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. West B, Luke A, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Cao G, Shoham D, Kramer H (2008) Metabolic syndrome and self-reported history of kidney stones: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988–1994. Am J Kidney Dis 51:741–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohjimoto Y, Sasaki Y, Iguchi M, Matsumura N, Inagaki T, Hara I (2013) Association of metabolic syndrome traits and severity of kidney stones: results from a nationwide survey on urolithiasis in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 61:923–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, PART I. J Urol 196:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldsmith ZG, Lipkin ME (2012) When (and how) to surgically treat asymptomatic renal stones. Nat Rev Urol 9:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chewcharat A, Curhan G (2021) Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016. Urolithiasis 49:27–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YJ, Ha YS, Jo SW, Yun SJ, Chu IS, Kim WJ, Lee SC (2009) Changes in urinary lithogenic features over time in patients with urolithiasis. Urology 74:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293:455–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ (1998) Body size and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1645–1652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spatola L, Ferraro PM, Gambaro G, Badalamenti S, Dauriz M (2018) Metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: insulin resistance in focus. Metabolism 83:225–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeong IG, Kang T, Bang JK, Park J, Kim W, Hwang SS, Kim HK, Park HK (2011) Association between metabolic syndrome and the presence of kidney stones in a screened population. Am J Kidney Dis 58:383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iba A, Kohjimoto Y, Mori T, Kuramoto T, Nishizawa S, Fujii R, Nanpo Y, Matsumura N, Shintani Y, Inagaki T, Hara I (2010) Insulin resistance increases the risk of urinary stone formation in a rat model of metabolic syndrome. BJU Int 106:1550–1554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Costa F, American Heart A, National Heart L, Blood I (2005) Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 112:2735–2752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cockram CS (2000) Diabetes mellitus: perspective from the Asia-Pacific region. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 50(Suppl 2):S3-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang HS, Yoon HE, Park JH, Chun HJ, Park CW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Choi BS (2011) Noninvasive and direct measures of kidney size in kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis 58:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E, Eren MT, Bakkaloglu M, Ozen H (2007) Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177:2189–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubner W, Porpaczy P (1990) Treatment of caliceal calculi. Br J Urol 66:9–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF, Kane C, Gentle DL, Bruce JE, Leslie SW (2000) Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55:825–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Domingos F, Serra A (2014) Metabolic syndrome: a multifaceted risk factor for kidney stones. Scand J Urol 48:414–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weinberg AE, Patel CJ, Chertow GM, Leppert JT (2014) Diabetic severity and risk of kidney stone disease. Eur Urol 65:242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dwyer ME, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ, Milliner DS, Lieske JC, Rule AD (2012) Temporal trends in incidence of kidney stones among children: a 25-year population based study. J Urol 188:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schaeffer AJ, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Mathews RI, Neu AM, Gearhart JP, Matlaga BR (2011) Medical comorbidities associated with pediatric kidney stone disease. Urology 77:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fang AM, Gibson E, Oster RA, Dangle PP (2021) Effect of age, BMI, and gender on urinary risk factors in pediatric idiopathic stone formers. J Pediatr Urol 17:477.e1-477.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by an Ulsan University Hospital research grant (UUH-2021-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCP: data collection and manuscript writing. JHY: data collection. SP: data collection. SCK: data collection. SP: data collection. KHM: data collection. SHC: data collection. TK: protocol/project development, data analysis, and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taekmin Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Since clinical data, including patient information and laboratory test results, were retrospectively obtained and analyzed, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, M.C., Yoon, J.H., Park, S. et al. Effects of metabolic syndrome on renal stone progression. World J Urol 40, 1845–1851 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04047-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04047-7

Keywords

Navigation