Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urinary and sexual function after treatment with temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in men with LUTS: 6-month interim results of the MT-06-study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the functional outcomes as they relate to the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function after treatment with the temporarily implanted nitinol device (iTind; Medi-Tate Ltd, Israel); a novel minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

Men with symptomatic BPH (IPSS ≥ 10, Qmax < 12 ml/s, and prostate volume (PV) < 120 ml) were invited to participate in this single-arm, prospective multicenter study (MT06). Patients were not washed out of BPH medications before the procedure. The iTind was implanted through a 22F rigid cystoscope under intravenous sedation and was removed 5–7 days later through a 22F Foley catheter under local anesthesia. Post-operative VAS and complications (Clavien Dindo-Grading System) were recorded. Preservation of urinary continence and erectile and ejaculatory function were assessed according to ISI, MSHQ-EjD and SHIM questionnaires. Post-operative IPSS, QoL, Qmax and PVR were also assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively.

Results

This interim report includes data out to 6 months on the first 70 patients enrolled in the study. The median age was 62.31 years, and the mean prostate volume was 37.68 ml (15–80 ml). Baseline and follow-up data are reported in Table 1. No intraoperative complications were observed, the average post-operative VAS score was 3.24 ± 2.56. On average patients returned to daily life after 4.3 days following the retrieval procedure. Sexual function and urinary continence were preserved in all subjects according to the ISI, SHIM and MSHQ-EjD questionnaires and significant improvements (p < 0.0001) from baseline levels were recorded in IPSS, QoL and peak flow.

Conclusion

iTind is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive treatment for BPH-related LUTS which preserves sexual function and urinary continence, offers a rapid recovery and return to daily life, and a significant improvement of symptoms and urinary flow at 6-month follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 67:1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vuichoud C, Loughlin KR (2015) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: epidemiology, economics and evaluation. Can J Urol 22(Suppl 1):1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Gacci M et al (2015) The diagnosis of benign prostatic obstruction: validation of the young academic urologist clinical nomogram. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Amparore D, De Cillis S, Volpi G et al (2019) First- and second-generation temporary implantable nitinol devices as minimally invasive treatments for BPH-related LUTS: systematic review of the literature. Curr Urol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0912-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rieken M, Presicce F, Autorino R, Nunzio DEC (2017) Clinical significance of intravesical prostatic protrusion in the management of benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and critical analysis of current evidence. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:548–555. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02828-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Madersbacher S, Marberger M (1999) Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int 83(3):227–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Nacchia A et al (2018) Young Academic Urologists’ benign prostatic obstruction nomogram predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with transurethral resection of prostate: an Italian cohort study. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70:211–217. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.03008-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Gacci M et al (2017) Metabolic syndrome does not increase the risk of ejaculatory dysfunction in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement: an Italian single-center cohort study. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lombardo R, Andersson KE, Tubaro A, De Nunzio C (2018) Intraprostatic injections for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic enlargement treatment. Minerva Urol e Nefrol 70:570–578

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cacciamani GE, Cuhna F, Tafuri A et al (2019) Anterograde ejaculation preservation after endoscopic treatments in patients with bladder outlet obstruction: systematic review and pooled-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol 71:427–434. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03588-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapisarda S, Russo GI, Osman NI et al (2019) The use of laser as a therapeutic modality as compared to TURP for the small prostate ≤ 40ml: a collaborative review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03350-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Emberton M (2010) Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: physician and patient preferences and satisfaction. Int J Clin Pract 64:1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02463.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sountoulides P, Karatzas A, Gravas S (2019) Current and emerging mechanical minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic obstruction. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219828971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287219828971

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu X, Elliott SP, Wilt TJ, McBean AM (2008) Practice patterns in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical therapy: the dramatic increase in minimally invasive technologies. J Urol 180:241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.039 (discussion 245)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Amparore D et al (2019) Second-generation of temporary implantable nitinol device for the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective, multicentre study at 1 year of follow-up. BJU Int 123:1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith C, Craig P, Taleb S et al (2017) Comparison of traditional and emerging surgical therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms in men: a review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1575-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R et al (2018) 3-Year follow-up of temporary implantable nitinol device implantation for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. BJU Int 122:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertolo R, Fiori C, Amparore D, Porpiglia F (2018) Follow-up of temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND) implantation for the treatment of BPH: a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0793-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Autorino R et al (2013) Contemporary monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: prospective assessment of complications using the Clavien system. Int Urol Nephrol 45:951–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0476-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Presicce F, Denunzio C, Gacci M et al (2017) The influence of the medical treatment of LUTS on benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: Do we operate too late? Minerva Urol e Nefrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02815-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gacci M, Corona G, Sebastianelli A et al (2016) male lower urinary tract symptoms and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Monte C, Carradori S, Granese A et al (2014) Modern extraction techniques and their impact on the pharmacological profile of Serenoa repens extracts for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. BMC Urol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME et al (2008) Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 143:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marcon J, Magistro G, Stief CG, Grimm T (2018) What’s new in TIND? Eur Urol Focus 4:40–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cacciamani GE, Cuhna F, Tafuri A et al (2019) Anterograde ejaculation preservation after endoscopic treatments in patients with bladder outlet obstruction: systematic review and pooled-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03588-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was sponsored by Medi-Tate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CDN: project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. FC: project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. CF: data collection and management and manuscript editing. FC: data collection and management, and manuscript editing. PT: protocol development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. DA: protocol development, data management and manuscript editing. VB: protocol development, data management and manuscript editing. JRE: protocol development, data management, manuscript writing and editing. FGS: protocol development, data management, manuscript writing and editing. FP: protocol development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cosimo De Nunzio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Nunzio, C., Cantiello, F., Fiori, C. et al. Urinary and sexual function after treatment with temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in men with LUTS: 6-month interim results of the MT-06-study. World J Urol 39, 2037–2042 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03418-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03418-2

Keywords

Navigation