Abstract
The genetic control of the floral transition in winter-flowering chrysanthemum is not well investigated. Here, RNA-seq technology was applied to explore the transcriptome of the variety ‘QD026’ at five developmental time points between the fully vegetative stage and flowering. The number of clean reads obtained per library was around 5 × 107. Under short-day growing conditions, floral induction was accompanied by a substantial number of differentially transcribed genes: these included constans-like and embryonic flower in the photoperiod pathway, and flowering locus c, short vegetative phase, and squamosa promoter-binding protein-like genes in the ambient temperature pathway. A quantitative PCR assay was successfully used to validate the differential transcription of a sample of the genes identified by the RNA-seq analysis as being differentially transcribed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrés F, Coupland G (2012) The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet 13:627–639. doi:10.1038/nrg3291
Andrés F, Porri A, Torti S, Mateos J, Romerabranchat M, Garcíamartínez JL (2014) Short vegetative phase reduces gibberellin biosynthesis at the Arabidopsis shoot apex to regulate the floral transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:2760–2769. doi:10.1073/pnas.1409567111
Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1989) Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37–52. doi:10.1105/tpc.1.1.37
Chao Y, Zhang T, Yang Q, Kang, Sun Y, Gruber MY (2014) Expression of the alfalfa CCCH-type zinc finger protein gene MsZFN, delays flowering time in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci 215C-216C:92–99. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.012
Cheng XF, Wang ZY (2005) Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS-LIKE, gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of CO, and FT, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 43:758–768. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02491.x
Choi K, Kim J, Hwang HJ, Kim S, Park C, Sang YK (2011) The FRIGIDA complex activates transcription of FLC, a strong flowering repressor in Arabidopsis, by recruiting chromatin modification factors. Plant Cell 23:289–303. doi:10.1105/tpc.110.075911
Dan L, Chang L, Shen L, Yang W, Chen H, Robertson M (2008) A repressor complex governs the integration of flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 15:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.002
Fan C, Hu R, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhang Q (2013) Conserved CO-FT regulons contribute to the photoperiod flowering control in soybean. BMC Plant Biol 14:1–14. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-9
Farré EM, Harmer SL, Harmon FG, Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA (2005) Overlapping and distinct roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Curr Biol 15:47–54. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.067
Fornara F, De MA, Coupland G (2010) SnapShot: control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 141:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.024
Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29:644–652. doi:10.1038/nbt.1883
Guo D, Zhang J, Wang X, Han X, Wei B, Wang J (2015) The WRKY transcription factor WRKY71/EXB1 controls shoot branching by transcriptionally regulating RAX genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. doi:10.1105/tpc.15.00829
Hassidim M, Harir Y, Yakir E, Kron I, Green RM (2009) Over-expression of constans-like 5 can induce flowering in short-day grown Arabidopsis. Planta 230:481–491. doi:10.1007/s00425-009-0958-7
Higuchi Y, Hisamatsu T (2015) CsTFL1, a constitutive local repressor of flowering, modulates floral initiation by antagonising florigen complex activity in Chrysanthemum. Plant Sci 237:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.011
Higuchi Y, Narumi T, Oda Y, Nakano A, Sumitomo K, Fukai S (2013) The gated induction system of a systemic floral inhibitor, antiflorigen, determines obligate short-day flowering in Chrysanthemums. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:17137–17142. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307617110
Imaizumi T, Tran HG, Swartz TE, Briggs WR, Kay SA (2003) FKF1 is essential for photoperiodic-specific light signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 426:302–306. doi:10.1038/nature02090
Irish VF (2010) The flowering of Arabidopsis flower development. Plant J 61:1014–1028. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04065.x
Iseli C, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P (1999) ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences. ISMB 99:138–148
Ito S, Song YH, Josephsonday AR, Miller RJ, Breton G, Olmstead RG (2012) FLOWERING BHLH transcriptional activators control expression of the photoperiodic flowering regulator CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:3582–3587. doi:10.1073/pnas.1118876109
Jin J, He K, Tang X, Li Z, Lv L, Zhao Y, Luo Z, Gao G (2015) An transcriptional regulatory map reveals distinct functional and evolutionary features of novel transcription factors. Mol Biol Evol 32(7):1767–1773
Kim J, Lee JS, Ji HA (2005) Constans activates suppressor of overexpression of constans 1 through flowering locus t to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139(2):770–778. doi:10.1104/pp.105.066928
Kim JJ, Lee JH, Kim W, Jung HS, Huijser P, Ahn JH (2012) The miR156-SPL3 module regulates ambient temperature-responsive flowering via ft in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 159:461–478. doi:10.1104/pp.111.192369
Kumar SV, Lucyshyn D, Jaeger KE, Alós E, Alvey E, Harberd NP (2012) Transcription factor PIF4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering. Nature 484:242–245. doi:10.1038/nature10928
Lee JH, Yoo SJ, Park SH, Hwang I, Lee JS, Ahn JH (2007) Role of SVP in the control of flowering time by ambient temperature in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 21:397–402. doi:10.1101/gad.1518407
Li C, He X, Luo X, Xu L, Liu L, Min L (2014) Cotton WRKY1 mediates the plant defense-to-development transition during infection of cotton by Verticillium dahliae by activating JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN1 expression. Plant Physiol 166:2179–2194. doi:10.1104/pp.114.246694
Lin MK, Belanger H, Lee Y, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Taoka K, Miura E (2007) Flowering locus t protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the cucurbits. Plant Cell 19:1488–1506. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.051920
Lin † PC, Marcelo CP, Jikumaru Y, Kang SG, Hah C, Fujioka S (2011) The Arabidopsis tandem zinc finger protein AtTZF1 affects ABA- and GA-mediated growth, stress and gene expression responses. Plant J 65:253–268. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04419.x
Liu H, Sun M, Du D, Pan H, Cheng T, Wang J (2014) Whole-Transcriptome Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in the Vegetative Buds: floral buds and buds of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Plos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128009
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H (2005) Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Reprod Nutr Dev 17:2255–2270. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.033464
Nakamichi N, Kita M, Niinuma K, Ito ST, Mizoguchi T, Mizuno T (2007) Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical constans-dependent photoperiodic pathway. Plant Cell Physiol 48:822–832. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcm056
Oda A, Narumi T, Li T, Kando T, Higuchi Y, Sumitomo K (2012) CsFTL3, a Chrysanthemum flowering locus t-like gene, is a key regulator of photoperiodic flowering in Chrysanthemums. J Exp Bot 63:1461–1477. doi:10.1093/jxb/err387
Pin PA, Nilsson O (2012) The multifaceted roles of FLOWERING LOCUS T in plant development. Plant Cell Environ 35:1742–1755. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02558.x
Ren L, Sun J, Chen S, Gao J, Dong B, Liu Y (2014) A transcriptomic analysis of Chrysanthemum nankingense, provides insights into the basis of low temperature tolerance. BMC Genom 15:1–20. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-844
Rushton PJ, Somssich IE, Ringler P, Qingxi JS (2010) WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 15:247–258. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006
Sawa M, Kay SA (2011) GIGANTEA directly activates flowering locus t in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11698–11703. doi:10.1073/pnas.1106771108
Shannon S, Meekswagner DR (1993) Genetic interactions that regulate inflorescence development in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5:639–655. doi:10.1105/tpc.5.6.639
Shim JS, Imaizumi T (2015) Circadian clock and photoperiodic response in Arabidopsis: from seasonal flowering to redox homeostasis. BioChemistry 54:157–170. doi:10.1021/bi500922q
Song YH, Ito S, Imaizumi T (2013) Flowering time regulation: photoperiod- and temperature-sensing in leaves. Trends Plant Sci 18:575–583. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.003
Srikanth A, Schmid M (2011) Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cellular and Molecular. Life Sci 68:2013–2037. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y
Wang R, Albani MC, Vincent C, Bergonzi S, Luan M, Bai Y (2011) Aa TFL1 confers an age-dependent response to vernalization in perennial Arabis alpina. Plant Cell 23:1307–1321. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083451
Wang Y, Huang H, Ma Y, Fu J, Wang L, Dai S (2013) Construction and de novo characterization of a transcriptome of Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium: analysis of gene expression patterns in floral bud emergence. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 116(3): 297–309. doi:10.1007/s11240-013-0404-1
Yang Y, Gao J (2014) a zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in Chrysanthemum by modu lating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 26:2038–2054. doi:10.1105/tpc.114.124867
Yu Y, Hu R, Wang H, Cao Y, Guo H F, C (2013) MlWRKY12, a novel Miscanthus, transcription factor, participates in pith secondary cell wall formation and promotes flowering. Plant Sci 212C:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.07.010
Zhang L, Liu G, Jia J, Zhao G, Xia C, Zhang L (2016) The wheat MYB-related transcription factor TaMYB72 promotes flowering in rice. J Integr Plant Biol 58:701–704. doi:10.1111/jipb.12461
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31372100), the Jiangsu Province “Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents,” and the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions Priority Academic Program Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
344_2017_9720_MOESM1_ESM.png
Supplementary Figure 1. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation of differentially transcribed genes (DTGs) from RNA-Seq in the ‘QD026’ transcriptome. Correlation of fold change analyzed by RNA-Seq platform (x axis) with data obtained using qRT-PCR (y axis)
344_2017_9720_MOESM2_ESM.xls
Supplementary Table 1. Dates of ‘QD026’ plants to an 8 h photoperiod at constant temperature of 20℃ until the first appearance of visible buds Temperature and photoperiod treatment started on 5.29, visible capitulum of Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘QD026’ was formed on 7.8 ± 2. Data given in the form mean ± SEM
344_2017_9720_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 2. Differentially transcribed genes homologous to those known to act in the photoperiod pathway Hx vs H0 calculated from |log2Ratio|(Hx/H0)|
344_2017_9720_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 3. Differentially transcribed members of the WRKY family in the ‘QD026’ transcriptome Hx vs H0 calculated from |log2Ratio|(Hx/H_0)|
344_2017_9720_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 4. Differentially transcribed members of the CCCH family in the ‘QD026’ transcriptome Hx vs H0 calculated from |log2Ratio|(Hx/H_0)|
344_2017_9720_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 5. Differentially transcribed members of the bHLH family in the ‘QD026’ transcriptome Hx vs H0 calculated from |log2Ratio|(Hx/H_0)|
344_2017_9720_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Table 6. Differentially transcribed members of the MYB family in the ‘QD026’ transcriptome Hx vs H0 calculated from |log2Ratio|(Hx/H_0)|
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, P., Dong, B., Wang, H. et al. A Transcriptomic Analysis Targeting Genes Involved in the Floral Transition of Winter-Flowering Chrysanthemum. J Plant Growth Regul 37, 220–232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9720-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9720-8