Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic characteristics of the double-winged otter board in the deep waters of the Mauritanian Sea

  • Aquaculture and Fisheries
  • Published:
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we tested the hydrodynamic characteristics of a new, double-winged otter board that consists of a forewing, a leading edge slat and a trailing edge flap. Flume experiments were conducted in a circulating flume tank by using a model with an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.85 and a horizontal planform area (S) of 0.09 m2. The results indicated that the critical angle (αcr) of the model was 44°, whereas the maximum lift coefficient (CLmax) was up to 1.715, and the door efficiency (K) was 1.122. The attack angle (α) ranged from 30° to 48° and from 10° to 46° when the lift coefficient (CL) and door efficiency (K) were greater than 1.2 and 1.0, respectively. To compare the difference between double-winged otter board and traditional Morgere Polyvalent Ovale, same model of Morgere Polyvalent Ovale was also tested under the same experimental conditions. The critical angle (αcr) and maximum of lift coefficient (CLmax) of the doublewinged otter board were 37.5% and 14.6% larger than those of the Morgere Polyvalent Ovale. Therefore, we concluded that the novel, double-winged otter board was more suitable for bottom trawling fisheries in the deep water of the Mauretania Sea due to its better hydrodynamic characteristics and stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broadhurst M K, Sterling D J, Millar R B. 2015. Modifying otter boards to reduce bottom contact: effects on catches and efficiencies of triple-rigged penaeid trawls. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 22 (5): 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camphuysen C J, van der Meer J. 2005. Wintering seabirds in West Africa: foraging hotspots offWestern Sahara and Mauritania driven by upwelling and fisheries. African Journal of Marine Science, 27 (2): 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigaard O R, Bastardie F, Breen M, Dinesen G E, Hintzen N T, Laffargue P, Mortensen L O, Nielsen J R, Nilsson H C, O’Neill F G, Polet H, Reid D G, Sala A, Sköld M, Smith C, Sørensen T K, Tully O, Zengin M, Rijnsdorp A D. 2016. Estimating seabed pressure from demersal trawls, seines, and dredges based on gear design and dimensions. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73 (S1): i27–i43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda K, Hu F X, Tokai T, Matuda K. 1999. Effects of aspect and camber ratios on hydrodynamic characteristics of biplane-type otter board. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 65 (5): 860–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermannsson E. 2014. Hydrodynamic Shape Optimization of Trawl Doors with Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Models and Local Surrogates. Master’s thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanović A, Neilson R D, Neill F G O. 2011. Modelling the physical impact of trawl components on the seabed and comparison with sea trials. Ocean Engineering, 38 (7): 925–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson E, Hermannsson E, Juliusson M, Leifsson L, Koziel S. 2013. Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis and Shape Optimization of Trawl-Doors. A merican Institute of A eronautics and A stronautics, 114 (1): 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson I M, Leifsson L, Koziel S, Tesfahunegn Y A, Bekasiewicz A. 2015. Shape optimization of trawl-doors using variable-fidelity models and space mapping. Procedia Computer Science, 51: 905–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifsson L, Hermannsson E, Koziel S. 2015. Optimal shape design of multi-element trawl-doors using local surrogate models. Journal of Computational Science, 10: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matuda K, Hu F X, Ishizawa S. 1990. Hydrodynamic characteristics of vertical V type otter board. The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science, 56 (11): 1 815–1 820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissa B, Gascuel D, Rivot E. 2013. Assessing stocks in datapoor African fisheries: a case study on the white grouper Epinephelus aeneus of Mauritania. African Journal of Marine Science, 35 (2): 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellibovsky F, Prat J, Notti E, Sala A. 2015. Testing otter board hydrodynamic performances in wind tunnel facilities. Ocean Engineering, 104: 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C D, Matuda K, Hu F X, Tokai T. 1993. Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Cambered Plates in Free Stream and near the Bottom. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 59 (4): 627–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C D, Matuda K, Tokai T. 1994a. Flow visualization around cambered plates using hydrogen bubbles. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 60 (4): 485–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C D, Matuda K, Tokai T. 1994b. Surface flow visualization of flat plates by tuft method. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 60 (2): 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson R N, Watts K C. 1986. The otter board as a lowaspect-ratio wing at high angles of attack; an experimental study. Fisheries Research, 4 (2): 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prat J, Antonijuan J, Folch A, Sala A, Lucchetti A, Sardà F, Manuel A. 2008. A simplified model of the interaction of the trawl warps, the otterboards and netting drag. Fisheries Research, 94 (1): 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala A, Farran J D P, Antonijuan J, Lucchetti A. 2009. Performance and impact on the seabed of an existing-and an experimental-otterboard: comparison between model testing and full-scale sea trials. Fisheries Research, 100 (2): 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seafish, IFREMER, DIFTA. 1993. Otterboard performance and behaviour. Research project funded by Committee E.C. within the frame of the EEC research programme in the fisheries sector (FAR) Contract TE 1214. https://doi.org/www.seafish.org/media/Publications/Otterboard_Performance_and_Behaviour.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen X L, Hu F X, Kumazawa T, Shiode D, Tokai T. 2015. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a hyper-lift otter board with wing-end plates. Fisheries Science, 81 (3): 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y, Fujimori Y, Hu F X, Shen X L, Kimura N. 2015. Design of trawl otter boards using computational fluid dynamics. Fisheries Research, 161: 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X P, Longva V, Sævik S, Moan T. 2015. A simplified approach to estimate the probability of otter board hooking at pipelines. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 137 (6): 061702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki S, Matsushita Y, Kawashima T, Tomiyama M, Kumazawa T, Hirayama M. 2007. Evaluation of a conventional otter board used in trawl fishery in Ise-wan Bay and proposal of a new design. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 73 (2): 220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhou A Z, Yu Y F. 2011. Current status and development prospects of small pelagic fish resources offsea area of Mauritania. Modern Fisheries Information, 26 (6): 3–5. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunrong Yan  (颜云榕).

Additional information

Supported by the Technological Research on Reforming Otter Boards of Bottom Trawl in Mauretania and Guinea (China National Fisheries Corporation, CNFC), Technological Research on Transformation and Upgrading of Shrimp Trawl in Sierra Leone (CNFC), Far Sea Fisheries Resources Monitoring and Assessment of South China Sea (No. 2013050212)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, X., Lu, H., Feng, B. et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the double-winged otter board in the deep waters of the Mauritanian Sea. J. Ocean. Limnol. 36, 1417–1424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-018-7047-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-018-7047-3

Keyword

Navigation